Figure 1
Workflow of the framework.
Figure 2
Trapezoidal Membership Function for Chronological Assignment.
Table 1
Metrics applied to both archaeological sites.
| ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE | CDEG (FUNCTIONALITY) | CDEG (CHRONOLOGY) | CDEG(*) | CDEGAVG (FUNCTIONALITY) | CDEGAVG (CHRONOLOGY) | CDEGAVG (*) TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Blas | 1 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.625 | 0.625 | 0.625 |
| Santa María de Hito | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.875 | 0.812 | 0.843 |
| Joint | – | – | – | 0.7500 | 0.7187 | 0.7343 |
Table 2
FEQ Values for Functionality, Chronology, and Combined Variables: Comparison of San Blas and Santa María de Hito.
| FEQ SANTA MARíA DE HITO/SAN BLAS CDEGAVG(FUNCTIONALITY) | FEQ SANTA MARíA DE HITO/SAN BLAS CDEGAVG(CHRONOLOGY) | FEQ SANTA MARíA DE HITO/SAN BLAS CDEGAVG(*) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.35 |
Table 3
CDEG(var), CDEG(), CDEGavg(var), CDEGavg(), and FEQ for Each Site and Combined.
| ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE | CDEG (FUNCTIONALITY) | CDEG(*) | CDEGAVG (FUNCTIONALITY) | CDEGAVG(*) TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Blas | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.625 | 0.625 |
| Santa María de Hito | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.9375 | 0.9375 |
| Joint | – | – | 0.7812 | 0.7812 |