First Steps in the Use of a Game Engine for Historical Roads and Paths Research

Willem Vletter

doi:10.5334/jcaa.18

Abstract

Game engines are developing fast and are used in several scientific disciplines. In the domain of cultural heritage, they have been applied mostly for dynamic visualization. On the other hand, GISs are employed to address research questions with a spatial component. In an ideal situation, the visualization power and analytical strength of the two technologies should be combined in one system. With this in mind, the analytical
potential of a game engine was investigated based on a comparison with GIS analysis of historical routes. The outcome demonstrates the suitability of the game engine in offering extra analytical possibilities. This analytical capacity encourages further script developments in building more historically accurate models.

References

1Anderson, EF, McLoughlin, L, Liarokapis, F, Peters, Petridis, P and de Freitas, S. 2010. Developing serious games for cultural heritage: A state-of-the-art review. Virtual Reality, 14: 255–275. DOI: 10.1007/s10055-010-0177-3
Back to article
2Buro, M. 2004. Call for AI research in RTS games. In: Ferguson, G and McGuinness, D (eds.), The AAAI-04 Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, 139–142. Menlo Park: The AAAI Pres.
Back to article
3Casimir, M and Rao, A. (eds.) 1992. Mobility and Territoriality. Social and Spatial Boundaries among Foragers, Fishers, Pastoralists and Peripatetics. Oxford: Berg.
Back to article
4Caspersen, CJ, Powell, KE and Christenson, GM. 1985. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: Definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Reports, 100(2): 126–131.
Back to article
5Ch’ng, E. 2007. Using Games Engines for Archaeological Visualization: Recreating Lost Worlds. In: Mehdi, Q, Estraillier, P and Eboueya, M (eds.), AI, Animation, Mobile, Educational and Serious Games. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Games, 26–30. Wolverhampton: The university of Wolverhampton School of Computing and information technology.
Back to article
6Ch’ng, E. 2009. Experiential archaeology: Is virtual time travel possible? Journal of Cultural Heritage, 10: 458–470. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2009.02.001
Back to article
7Citter, C. 2012. Modelli predittivi e archeologia postclassica: Vecchi strumenti e nuove prospettive. In: Redi, F and Forgione, A (eds.), Atti del VI convegno nazionale della SAMI, L’Aquila, 2012, 3–6. Modelli predittivi e archeologia postclassica: Vecchi strumenti e nuove prospettive, 12–15. Firenze: Edizioni All’Insegna del Giglio.
Back to article
8Crutchley, S. 2010. The Light Fantastic, using airborne lidar in archaeological survey. Swindon: English Heritage.
Back to article
9Denecke, D. 1969. Methodische Untersuchungen zur historisch-geographischen Wegeforschung im Raum zwischen Solling und Harz. Ein Beitr. zur Rekonstruktion d. mittelalterl. Kulturlandschaft. Göttingen: Goltze.
Back to article
10Doneus, M. 2013. Die hinterlassene Landschaft Prospektion und Interpretation. Die Landschaftsarchäologie in Mitteilungen der Prähistorischen Kommission, 78. Vienna: OAW. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1vw0qcb
Back to article
11Doneus, M and Briese, C. 2011. Airborne Laser Scanning in Forested Areas – Potential and Limitations of an Archaeological Prospection Technique. In: Cowley, D (ed.), Remote Sensing for Archaeological Heritage Management. Proceedings EAC, 53–76. Budapest: Archaeolingua.
Back to article
12Fovet, E and Zaksek, K. 2014. Path network modelling and network of aggregated settlements: A case study in Languedoc (Southeastern France). In: Polla, S and Verhagen, Ph (eds.), Computational approaches to the study of movement in archaeology. Theory, practice and interpretation of factors and effects of long term landscape formation and transformation, 43–72. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Back to article
13Gietl, R, Doneus, M and Fera, M. 2008. Cost Distance Analysis in an Alpine Environment: Comparison of Different Cost Surface Modules. In: Posluschny, A, Lambers, K and Herzog, I (eds.), Layers of Perception. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Berlin, Germany, April 2–6, 2007 (Kolloquien zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte), 10: 336–341. Bonn: Dr Rudolf Habelt GmbH.
Back to article
14Granberg, A. 2018. A*Pathfinding Project. Available at: https://arongranberg.com/astar/ [Last accessed 31 December 2018].
Back to article
15Hagelbäck, J and Johansson, SJ. 2008. The rise of potential fields in real time strategy bots. In: Darken, C and Mateas, M (eds.), AIIDE 08: The Fourth Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference, 42–47. Menlo Park: The AAAI Pres.
Back to article
16Herzog, I. 2013. Theory and practice of cost functions. In: Contreras, MF and Melero, FJ (eds.), Fusion of culture. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain, April 2010, 375–382. Oxford: Archaeopress.
Back to article
17Herzog, I. 2014. Least-cost Paths. Some Methodological Issues. Internet Archaeology, 36. [Last accessed 28 May 2014]. DOI: 10.11141/ia.36.5
Back to article
18Herzog, I and Posluschny, A. 2011. Tilt – Slope-Dependent Least Cost Path Calculations Revisited. In: Jerem, EE, Redő, F and Szeverényi, V (eds.), On the Road to Reconstructing the Past. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA). Proceedings of the 36th International Conference. Budapest, April 2–6, 2008, 212–218. Budapest: Archeaeolingua.
Back to article
19Howey, MCL. 2011. Multiple pathways across past landscapes: Circuit theory as a complementary geospatial method to least cost path for modeling past movement. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38: 2523–2535. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.03.024
Back to article
20Jurney, C. 2008. Company of Heroes Squad Formations Explained. AI game programming wisdom. Cengage Learning PTR, 4: 61–69.
Back to article
21Krizsanits, B and Horvath, M. 2012. Das Leithagebirge. Grenze und Verbindung. Weitra: Bibliothek der Provinz.
Back to article
22Matthews, J. 2002. Basic A* Pathfinding Made Simple. AI Game Programming Wisdom, 1: 105–113.
Back to article
23Nareyek, A. 2004. Smarter games are making for a better user experience. What does the future hold? Ai in computer games. ACM Queue, 1(10): 58–65. DOI: 10.1145/971564.971593
Back to article
24Olsson, P. 2008. Practical Pathfinding in Dynamic Environments. AI game programming wisdom. Cengage Learning PTR, 4: 179–191.
Back to article
25Opitz, RS and Cowley, DC. (eds.) 2012. Interpreting archaeological topography: Lasers, 3D data, observation, visualisation and applications. Oxford: Oxbow.
Back to article
26Orkin, J. 2002. Tips from the trenches. AI Game Programming Wisdom, 1: 105–113.
Back to article
27Orkin, J. 2004. Symbolic Representation of Game World State: Toward Real-Time Planning in Games. The proceedings of the AAAI-04 Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, 26–30. Menlo Park: The AAAI Pres.
Back to article
28Paanakker, F. 2008. Risk-Adverse Pathfinding Using Influence Maps. AI game programming wisdom. Cengage Learning PTR, 4: 173–178.
Back to article
29Soule, RG and Goldman, S. 1972. Terrain Coefficients for Energy Cost Reduction. Journal of Applied Physiology, 32(5): 706–708. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1972.32.5.706
Back to article
30Stout, B. 2000. The Basics of A* for Path Planning. Game Programming Gems, 1: 254–263.
Back to article
31Tarr, L. 1978. Karren, Kutsche, Karosse: Eine Geschichte des Wagens. Berlin: Henschel.
Back to article
32Van Lanen, RJ, Kosian, MC, Groenewoudt, BJ and Jansma, E. 2015. Finding a way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands. Geoarchaeology: An international Journal, 30: 200–222. DOI: 10.1002/gea.21510
Back to article
33Verhagen, JWHP. 2013 On the Road to Nowhere? Least Cost Paths, Accessibility and the Predictive Modelling Perspective. In: Contreras, F, Farjas, M and Melero, FJ (eds.), Fusion of culture. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain, April 2010 (BAR International Series 2494), 383–390. Oxford: Archaeopress.
Back to article
34Vletter, WF. 2014. (Semi) automatic extraction from Airborne Laser Scan data of roads and paths in forested areas. In: Hadjimitsis, DG, et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment, SPIE 9229, 11. Bellingham: SPIE. DOI: 10.1117/12.2069709
Back to article

First Steps in the Use of a Game Engine for Historical Roads and Paths Research

Abstract

Paradigm

My account