Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effects of the Generic Masculine and Its Alternatives in Germanophone Countries: A Multi-Lab Replication and Extension of Stahlberg, Sczesny, and Braun (2001) Cover

Effects of the Generic Masculine and Its Alternatives in Germanophone Countries: A Multi-Lab Replication and Extension of Stahlberg, Sczesny, and Braun (2001)

International Review of Social Psychology
Volume 37 (2024): Issue 1
By: Hilmar Brohmer,  Gabriela Hofer,  Sebastian A. Bauch,  Julia Beitner,  Jana B. Berkessel,  Katja Corcoran,  David Garcia,  Freya M. Gruber,  Fiorina Giuliani,  Emanuel Jauk,  Georg Krammer,  Smirna Malkoc,  Hannah Metzler,  Hanna M. Mües,  Kathleen Otto,  Rima-Maria Rahal,  Mona Salwender,  Sabine Sczesny,  Dagmar Stahlberg,  Wilken Wehrt and  Ursula Athenstaedt  
Open Access
|Oct 2024

References

  1. 1Aichholzer, J. (2019). Kurzskala Soziale Dominanzorientierung (KSDO-3) [short scale social dominance orientation]. Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). 10.6102/zis269
    Back to article
  2. 2Aisch, G., Pearce, A., & Rousseau, B. (2017). How far is Europe swinging to the right? The New York Times, October 23, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/05/22/world/europe/europe-right-wing-austria-hungary.html
    Back to article
  3. 3Amodio, D. M. (2019). Social cognition 2.0: An interactive memory systems account. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(1), 21–33. 10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.002
    Back to article
  4. 4Athanasopoulos, P., Bylund, E., Montero-Melis, G., Damjanovic, L., Schartner, A., Kibbe, A., Riches, N., & Thierry, G. (2015). Two languages, two minds: Flexible cognitive processing driven by language of operation. Psychological Science, 26(4), 518–526. 10.1177/0956797614567509
    Back to article
  5. 5Bailey, A. H., LaFrance, M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2019). Is man the measure of all things? A social cognitive account of androcentrism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(4), 307–331. 10.1177/1088868318782848
    Back to article
  6. 6Barsalou, L. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(5–6), 513–562. 10.1080/01690960344000026
    Back to article
  7. 7Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    Back to article
  8. 8Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B., Singmann, H., Dai, B., Scheipl, F., Grothendieck, G., Green, P., & Fox, J. (2020). Package ‘lme4’. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf
    Back to article
  9. 9Bayerische Staatsregierung. (2024). Herrmann: Bayern beschließt Verbot der Gendersprache [Interior Minister Herman: Bavaria decides on banning gendered language]. Press release from the Bavarian government retrieved from https://www.bayern.de/herrmann-bayern-beschliesst-verbot-der-gendersprache/
    Back to article
  10. 10Bielby, D. D. (2014). Gender inequality in culture industries. In The Routledge Companion to Media & Gender (pp. 137–146). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203066911-15
    Back to article
  11. 11BMASK. (2015). Leitfaden Geschlechtergerechter Sprachgebrauch im BMASK [Manual for gender-fair language use in BMASK]. Retrieved from https://www.bmgf.gv.at/cms/home/attachments/5/3/2/CH1577/CMS1471603705915/bmask-gendergerechter-sprachgebrauch-leitfaden.pdf
    Back to article
  12. 12Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22. 10.1006/cogp.2001.0748
    Back to article
  13. 13Braun, F., Gottburgsen, A., Sczesny, S., & Stahlberg, D. (1998). Können Geophysiker Frauen sein? Generische Personenbezeichnungen im Deutschen [Can geophysicists be women? Generic person terms in German language]. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 26(3), 265–283. 10.1515/zfgl.1998.26.3.265
    Back to article
  14. 14Braun, F., Oelkers, S., Rogalski, K., Bosak, J., & Sczesny, S. (2007). ‘Aus Gründen der Verständlichkeit…’: Der Einfluss generisch maskuliner und alternativer Personenbezeichnungen auf die kognitive Verarbeitung von Texten. [’For the purpose of comprehensibility…’: The influence of the generic masculine and alternative forms on the cognitive processing of texts]. Psychologische Rundschau, 58(3), 183–189. 10.1026/0033-3042.58.3.183
    Back to article
  15. 15Braun, F., Sczesny, S., & Stahlberg, D. (2005). Cognitive effects of masculine generics in German: An overview of empirical findings. Communications, 30(1), 1–21. 10.1515/comm.2005.30.1.1
    Back to article
  16. 16Bundeskanzlei (2013). Leifaden zum geschlechtergerechten Formulieren [Manual for gender-neutral formulations]. Retrieved from https://www.bk.admin.ch/bk/de/home/dokumentation/sprachen/hilfsmittel-textredaktion/leitfaden-zum-geschlechtergerechten-formulieren.html
    Back to article
  17. 17Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature reviews neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376. 10.1038/nrn3475
    Back to article
  18. 18Cambridge Dictionary (2021). Camel case. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/camel-case
    Back to article
  19. 19Castilla, E. J., & Rho, H. J. (2023). The gendering of job postings in the online recruitment process. Management Science, 69(11), 6912–6939. 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4674
    Back to article
  20. 20Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Back to article
  21. 21Danziger, S., & Ward, R. (2010). Language changes implicit associations between ethnic groups and evaluation in bilinguals. Psychological Science, 21(6), 799–800. 10.1177/0956797610371344
    Back to article
  22. 22Davis, A. C. (2021). Resolving the tension between feminism and evolutionary psychology: An epistemological critique. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 15(4), 368–388. 10.1037/ebs0000193
    Back to article
  23. 23Del Re, A. C. (2020). Package ‘compute.es’. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/compute.es/compute.es.pdf
    Back to article
  24. 24Duden (2020). Geschlechtergerechter Sprachgebrauch [gender-fair language use]. Retrieved from https://www.duden.de/sprachwissen/sprachratgeber/Geschlechtergerechter-Sprachgebrauch
    Back to article
  25. 25Düker, R. (2018). Eins mit Sternchen [Triple-A]. Zeit Online, May 30. Retrieved from https://www.zeit.de/2018/23/gendergerechte-sprache-rechtschreibung-duden-binnen-i-sternchen
    Back to article
  26. 26Fiedler, K., & Hütter, M. (2014). The limits of automaticity. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 497–513). The Guilford Press.
    Back to article
  27. 27Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
    Back to article
  28. 28Flora, D. B. (2020). Your coefficient alpha is probably wrong, but which coefficient omega is right? A tutorial on using R to obtain better reliability estimates. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 484–501. 10.1177/2515245920951747
    Back to article
  29. 29Friedrich, M. C., & Heise, E. (2019). Does the use of gender-fair language influence the comprehensibility of texts? An experiment using an authentic contract manipulating single role nouns and pronouns. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 78(1–2), 51–60. 10.1024/1421-0185/a000223
    Back to article
  30. 30Gabriel, U., & Mellenberger, F. (2004). Exchanging the Generic Masculine for Gender-Balanced Forms—The Impact of Context Valence. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 63(4), 273–278. 10.1024/1421-0185.63.4.273
    Back to article
  31. 31Gastil, J. (1990). Generic pronouns and sexist language: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics. Sex Roles, 23(11–12), 629–643. 10.1007/BF00289252
    Back to article
  32. 32Gygax, P., Gabriel, U., Sarrasin, O., Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (2008). Generically intended, but specifically interpreted: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics are all men. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(3), 464–485. 10.1080/01690960701702035
    Back to article
  33. 33Hanfeld, M. (2022). Ganz schön intensiv [pretty intense]. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, August 2022. Retrieved from https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/gendersprache-im-tv-ganz-schoen-intensiv-18241171.html
    Back to article
  34. 34Harris, T., Hilbe, J. M., & Hardin, J. W. (2014). Modeling count data with generalized distributions. The Stata Journal, 14(3), 562–579. 10.1177/1536867X1401400306
    Back to article
  35. 35Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S. (2016). Reducing women’s lack of fit with leadership positions? Effects of the wording of job advertisements. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(2), 316–328. 10.1080/1359432X.2015.1067611
    Back to article
  36. 36Hülle, S., Liebig, S., & May, M. J. (2017). Measuring attitudes toward distributive justice: The basic social justice orientations scale. Social Indicators Research, 136(2), 663–692. 10.1007/s11205-017-1580-x
    Back to article
  37. 37IJzerman, H., Regenberg, N. F., Saddlemyer, J., & Koole, S. L. (2015). Perceptual effects of linguistic category priming: The Stapel and Semin (2007) paradigm revisited in twelve experiments. Acta Psychologica, 157, 23–29. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.01.008
    Back to article
  38. 38Imran, K., Arifin, W. N., Hanis, T. M., & Mokhtar, T. (2022). Data analysis in medicine and health using R. Bookdown. Retrieved from https://bookdown.org/drki_musa/dataanalysis/poisson-regression.html#poisson-regression-for-rate
    Back to article
  39. 39Infratest Dimap (2020). Vorbehalte gegenüber genderneutraler Sprache [Reservations against gender-neutral language]. Infratest Dimap, May 2020. Representative survey commissioned by Welt am Sonntag. Retrieved from https://www.infratest-dimap.de/umfragen-analysen/bundesweit/umfragen/aktuell/vorbehalte-gegenueber-genderneutraler-sprache/
    Back to article
  40. 40Infratest Dimap (2021). Vorbehalte gegenüber gendergerechter Sprache [Ongoing reservations against gender-fair language]. Infratest Dimap, May 2021. Representative survey commissioned by Welt am Sonntag. Retrieved from https://www.infratest-dimap.de/umfragen-analysen/bundesweit/umfragen/aktuell/weiter-vorbehalte-gegen-gendergerechte-sprache/
    Back to article
  41. 41Keith, N., Hartwig, K., & Richter, T. (2022). Ladies first or ladies last: Do masculine generics evoke a reduced and later retrieval of female exemplars? Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 32964. 10.1525/collabra.32964
    Back to article
  42. 42Kelley, K., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Sample size for multiple regression: obtaining regression coefficients that are accurate, not simply significant. Psychological methods, 8(3), 305–321. 10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.305
    Back to article
  43. 43Knoke, M. (2017). Wie »gender« darf die Sprache werden [How ‘gender’ may the language become]? Spektrum, September 2017. Retrieved from https://www.spektrum.de/news/wie-gender-darf-die-sprache-werden/1492931
    Back to article
  44. 44Lakens, D. (2018). Package ‘TOSTER’. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/TOSTER/TOSTER.pdf
    Back to article
  45. 45Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. 10.1177/2515245918770963
    Back to article
  46. 46Limesurvey GmbH (2021). /LimeSurvey: An Open Source survey tool, version 3. LimeSurvey GmbH, Hamburg, Germany. http://www.limesurvey.org
    Back to article
  47. 47Linden, A. H., & Hönekopp, J. (2021). Heterogeneity of research results: A new perspective from which to assess and promote progress in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(2), 358–376. 10.1177/1745691620964193
    Back to article
  48. 48Lipsitz, K. (2018). Playing with emotions: The effect of moral appeals in elite rhetoric. Political Behavior, 40(1), 57–78. 10.1007/s11109-017-9394-8
    Back to article
  49. 49Lovakov, A., & Agadullina, E. R. (2021). Empirically derived guidelines for effect size interpretation in social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2021, 1–20. 10.1002/ejsp.2752
    Back to article
  50. 50Morey, R. (2020). Jpower. R and Jamovi package. Retrieved from https://github.com/richarddmorey/jpower
    Back to article
  51. 51Moulton, J., Robinson, G. M., & Elias, C. (1978). Sex bias in language use: ‘Neutral’ pronouns that aren’t. American Psychologist, 33(11), 1032–1036. 10.1037/0003-066X.33.11.1032
    Back to article
  52. 52NOE (2023). Niederösterreich legt Gender-Regeln in Kanzleiordnung fest [Lower Austria sets rules for gendered language in the chancellery]. Press release from the state of Lower Austria retrieved from https://www.noe.gv.at/noe/Niederoesterreich_legt_Gender-Regeln_in_Kanzleiordnung_fe.html
    Back to article
  53. 53Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). The best time to argue about what a replication means? Before you do it. Nature, 583(7817), 518–520. 10.1038/d41586-020-02142-6
    Back to article
  54. 54Olsson-Collentine, A., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2020). Heterogeneity in direct replications in psychology and its association with effect size. Psychological Bulletin. Advance online publication. 10.1037/bul0000294
    Back to article
  55. 55Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. 10.1126/science.aac4716
    Back to article
  56. 56Pfadenhauer, K. (2024). Solche Verbote gleichen einer Rolle rückwärts [Such restrictions resemble a backward role]. Report from Tagesschau, https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/genderverbot-bayern-100.html
    Back to article
  57. 57Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. New York, US: Viking.
    Back to article
  58. 58R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org
    Back to article
  59. 59Rat für deutsche Rechtschreibung (2016). Bericht des Rats für deutsche Rechtschreibung über die Wahrnehmung seiner Aufgaben in der Periode 2011 bis 2016 [Report of the council for German orthography on the exercise of its tasks in the period from 2011 to 2016]. Retrieved from http://www.rechtschreibrat.com/DOX/rfdr_Bericht_2011-2016.pdf
    Back to article
  60. 60Rat für deutsche Rechtschreibung. (2021). Geschlechtergerechte Schreibung: Empfehlungen vom 26.03.2021 [Suggestions for gender-fair writing]. Retrieved from https://www.rechtschreibrat.com/DOX/rfdr_PM_2021-03-26_Geschlechtergerechte_Schreibung.pdf
    Back to article
  61. 61Rodrik, D. (2020). Why does globalization fuel populism? Economics, culture, and the rise of rightwing populism. Working Paper of The National Bureau of Economic Research. 10.3386/w27526
    Back to article
  62. 62Rothmund, J., & Scheele, B. (2004). Personenbezeichnungsmodelle auf dem Prüfstand. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 212(1), 40–54. 10.1026/0044-3409.212.1.40
    Back to article
  63. 63Schmitt, D. P. (2015). The evolution of culturally-variable sex differences: Men and women are not always different, but when they are… it appears not to result from patriarchy or sex role socialization. In T. K. Shackelford & R. D. Hansen (Eds.), The evolution of sexuality (pp. 221–256). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-09384-0_11
    Back to article
  64. 64Schmoll, H. (2022). Öffentlich-rechtliche Umerziehung [re-education by the public service]. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, August 2022. Retrieved from https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/gendern-im-rundfunk-und-fernsehen-widerspricht-neutralitaetsgebot-18232949.html
    Back to article
  65. 65Sczesny, S., Formanowicz, M., & Moser, F. (2016). Can gender-neutral language reduce gender stereotyping and discrimination? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 25. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00025
    Back to article
  66. 66Sczesny, S., Moser, F., & Wood, W. (2015): Beyond sexist beliefs: How do people decide to use gender-inclusive language? Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 41(7), 943–954. 10.1177/0146167215585727
    Back to article
  67. 67Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127–190. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127
    Back to article
  68. 68Simonsohn, U. (2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26(5), 559–569. 10.1177/0956797614567341
    Back to article
  69. 69Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534–547. 10.1037/a0033242
    Back to article
  70. 70Sommet, N., Weissman, D. L., Cheutin, N., & Elliot, A. J. (2023). How many participants do I need to test an interaction? Conducting an appropriate power analysis and achieving sufficient power to detect an interaction. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(3), 25152459231178728. 10.1177/25152459231178728
    Back to article
  71. 71Stahlberg, D., Braun, F., Irmen, L., & Sczesny, S. (2007). Representation of the sexes in language. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 163–187). Psychology Press. 10.4324/9780203837702
    Back to article
  72. 72Stahlberg, D., & Sczesny, S. (2001). Sprachformen auf den gedanklichen Einbezug von Frauen. Psychologische Rundschau, 52(3), 131–140. 10.1026//0033-3042.52.3.131
    Back to article
  73. 73Stahlberg, D., Sczesny, S., & Braun, F. (2001). Name your favorite musician: Effects of masculine generics and of their alternatives in German. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20(4), 464–469. 10.1177/0261927X01020004004
    Back to article
  74. 74Stokes, R. (2020). ‘The problem of gendered language is universal’ – how AI reveals media bias. The Guardian, April 2020. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/careers/2020/apr/02/the-problem-of-gendered-language-is-universal-how-ai-reveals-media-bias
    Back to article
  75. 75Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 757–769. 10.1177/0146167211406434
    Back to article
  76. 76Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 859–884. 10.1037/a0017364
    Back to article
  77. 77Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
    Back to article
  78. 78Vainapel, S., Shamir, O. Y., Tenenbaum, Y., & Gilam, G. (2015). The dark side of gendered language: The masculine-generic form as a cause for self-report bias. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1513–1519. 10.1037/pas0000156
    Back to article
  79. 79Vervecken, D., Hannover, B., & Wolter, I. (2013). Changing (S)expectations: How gender fair job descriptions impact children’s perceptions and interest regarding traditionally male occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(3), 208–220. 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.01.008
    Back to article
  80. 80Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v036.i03
    Back to article
  81. 81Viechtbauer, W. (2021). Package ‘metafor’. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/metafor/metafor.pdf
    Back to article
  82. 82von Blazekovic, A. (2021). Kleine Pause [short break]. Sueddeutsche Zeitung. August 2021. Retrieved from https://www.sueddeutsche.de/medien/gendern-oeffentlich-rechtliche-gerster-kleber-gendert-sprechpause-innen-ard-zdf-br-sprache-1.5383641
    Back to article
  83. 83von Humboldt, W. (1843). Über das Entstehen der grammatischen Formen und ihren Einfluß auf die Ideenentwicklung [On the development of grammatical forms and their influence on the development of ideas]. In W. von Humboldt (Ed.), Gesammelte Werke 3 (pp. 269–306). Reimer. 10.1515/9783111471037-008
    Back to article
  84. 84Waldendorf, A. (2024). Words of change: The increase of gender-inclusive language in German media. European Sociological Review, 40(2), 357–374. 10.1093/esr/jcad044
    Back to article
  85. 85Weber, E. U., & Hilton, D. J. (1990). Contextual effects in the interpretations of probability words: Perceived base rate and severity of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(4), 781–789. 10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.781
    Back to article
  86. 86Welzel, C. (2013). Freedom rising. New York, US: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139540919
    Back to article
  87. 87Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. MIT press.
    Back to article
  88. 88Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(19), 7780–7785. 10.1073/pnas.0701644104
    Back to article
  89. 89Wodak, R., & Krzyżanowski, M. (2017). Right-wing populism in Europe & USA: Contesting politics & discourse beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism’. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 471–484. 10.1075/jlp.17042.krz
    Back to article
  90. 90Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 46, pp. 55–123). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7
    Back to article
  91. 91Zeit Online (2021). Kritik an Gendersternchen in staatlichen Stellen. Zeit Online, May 2021. Retrieved from https://www.zeit.de/kultur/2021-05/gender-geschlechtergerechte-sprache-rechtschreibung-regeln-staat
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.522 | Journal eISSN: 2397-8570
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 13, 2024
Accepted on: Aug 28, 2024
Published on: Oct 1, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
gender-inclusive language,
gender-fair language,
generic masculine,
open data,
multi-site study

© 2024 Hilmar Brohmer, Gabriela Hofer, Sebastian A. Bauch, Julia Beitner, Jana B. Berkessel, Katja Corcoran, David Garcia, Freya M. Gruber, Fiorina Giuliani, Emanuel Jauk, Georg Krammer, Smirna Malkoc, Hannah Metzler, Hanna M. Mües, Kathleen Otto, Rima-Maria Rahal, Mona Salwender, Sabine Sczesny, Dagmar Stahlberg, Wilken Wehrt, Ursula Athenstaedt, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 37 (2024): Issue 1Next article