Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Understanding Institutional Compliance in Flood Risk Management: A Network Analysis Approach Highlighting the Significance of Institutional Linkages and Context Cover

Understanding Institutional Compliance in Flood Risk Management: A Network Analysis Approach Highlighting the Significance of Institutional Linkages and Context

Open Access
|Aug 2024

References

  1. 1Abebe, Y. A. (2020). Modelling human-flood interactions: A coupled flood-agent-institution modelling framework for long-term flood risk management. PhD dissertation, TU Delft, the Netherlands. DOI: 10.1201/9781003160045
  2. 2Abebe, Y. A., Ghorbani, A., Nikolic, I., Vojinovic, Z., & Sanchez, A. (2019). Flood risk management in Sint Maarten–A coupled agent-based and flood modelling method. Journal of Environmental Management, 248, 109317. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109317
  3. 3Aznar-Crespo, P., Aledo, A., Malgarejo-Moreno, J., & Vallejos-Romero, A. (2021). Adapting social impact assessment to flood risk management. Sustainability, 13, 3410. DOI: 10.3390/su13063410
  4. 4Basurto, X., Kingsley, G., McQueen, K., Smith, M., & Weible, C. M. (2009). A systematic approach to institutional analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom’s grammar. Political Research Quarterly. DOI: 10.1177/1065912909334430
  5. 5Berkes, F., Feeny, D., McCay, B. J., & Acheson, J. M. (1989). The benefits of the commons. Nature, 340(6229), 9193. DOI: 10.1038/340091a0
  6. 6Boer, J., Botzen, W., & Terpstra, T. (2016). Flood risk and climate change in the Rotterdam area, The Netherlands: Enhancing citizen’s climate risk perceptions and prevention responses despite skepticism. Regional Environmental Change.
  7. 7Cangialosi, J. P., Latto, A. S., & Berg, R. (2018). Hurricane Irma: 30 August-12 September 2017; National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report. NOAA and National Weather Service. Report Number - AL112017.
  8. 8Carter, D. P., & Weible, C. M. (2014). Assessing rule compliance and robustness in recreational resource management. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16(1), 117139. DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2013.821943
  9. 9Cole, D. (2017). Laws, norms, and the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. Journal of Institutional Economics, 13, 829847. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137417000030
  10. 10Crawford, S. E. S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582600. DOI: 10.2307/2082975
  11. 11Department of Statistics. (2015). Sint Maarten Statistics 2015. http://static.bearingpointcaribbean.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/cbs_2016_Statistical_Yearbook_2015_Sint-Maarten.pdf
  12. 12Dewulf, A., & Biesbroeck, R. (2018). Nine lives of uncertainty in decision making: Strategies for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance. Policy and Society, 37(4), 441458. DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2018.1504484
  13. 13Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 19071912. DOI: 10.1126/science.1091015
  14. 14Driessen, P. P. J., Dieperink, C., van Laerhoven, F., Runhaar, H. A. C., & Vermeulen, W. J. V. (2012). Towards a conceptual framework for the study of shifts in modes of environmental governance – Experiences from the Netherlands. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22, 143160. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1580
  15. 15Droege, S., & Johnson, N. B. (2007). Broken rules and constrained confusion: Toward a theory of meso-institutions. Management and Organization Review, 3(1), 81104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00062.x
  16. 16Erdeli, M., Król, M., & Natalizio, E. (2017). Wireless sensor networks and multi-UAV systems for natural disaster management. Computer Networks, 124, 7286. DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2017.05.021
  17. 17Frantz, C. K., & Siddiki, S. (2021). Institutional Grammar 2.0: A specification for encoding and analyzing institutional design. Public Administration, 99(2), 222247. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12719
  18. 18Frantz, C. K., & Siddiki, S. (2022). Institutional Grammar 2.0: Conceptual Foundations and General Syntax. In Institutional Grammar: Foundations and Applications for Institutional Analysis (pp. 75140). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-86372-2
  19. 19Fraser, A., Pelling, M., Scolobig, A., & Mavrogenis, S. (2020). Relating root causes to local risk conditions: A comparative study of the institutional pathways to small-scale disasters in three urban flood contexts. Global Environmental Change, 63, 102102. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102102
  20. 20Garcia, M., Koebele, E., Deslatte, A., Ernst, K., Manago, K. F., & Treuer, G. (2019). Towards urban water sustainability: Analyzing management transitions in Miami, Las Vegas, and Los Angeles. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101967. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101967
  21. 21Greif, A., & Kingston, C. (2011). Institutions: Rules or equilibria? In Political economy of institutions, democracy and voting (pp. 1343). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-19519-8_2
  22. 22Hoang, L., Biesbroek, R., Tri, V., Kummu, M., Vliet, M., Leemans, R., Kabat, P., & Ludwig, F. (2018). Managing flood risks in the Mekong Delta: How to address emerging challenges under climate change and socio-economic developments. Ambio. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-017-1009-4
  23. 23IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
  24. 24ISDR (International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). (2004). Living with risk: A global review of disaster reduction initiatives. United Nations Publications.
  25. 25Janssen, M. A., Bodin, Ö., Anderies, J. M., Elmqvist, T., Ernstson, H., McAllister, R. R., … & Ryan, P. (2006). Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecology and society, 11(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-01462-110115
  26. 26Katsuhama, Y., & Grigg, N. (2010). Capacity building for flood management systems: A conceptual model and case studies. Water International. DOI: 10.1080/02508060.2010.533348
  27. 27Lawrence, M. B., Mayfield, B. M., Avila, L. A., Pasch, R. J., & Rappaport, E. N. (1998). Atlantic hurricane season of 1995. Mon. Weather Rev, 126(5), 11241151. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<;1124:AHSO>2.0.CO;2
  28. 28Levitsky, S., & Murillo, M. V. (2009). Variation in institutional strength. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 115133. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.091106.121756
  29. 29McGinnis, M. D. (2011). Networks of adjacent action situations in polycentric governance. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 5178. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00396.x
  30. 30Mees, H., Crabbe, A., Alexander, M., Kauffman, M., Bruzzone, S., Levy, L., & Lewandowski, J. (2016). Coproducing flood risk management through citizen involvement: Insights from cross-country comparison in Europe. Ecology & Society, 21(3), 7. DOI: 10.5751/ES-08500-210307
  31. 31Mesdaghi, B., Ghorbani, A., & de Bruijne, M. (2022). Institutional dependencies in climate adaptation of transport infrastructures: An institutional network analysis approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 127, 120136. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.010
  32. 32Morgan, J., & Olsen, W. (2011). Conceptual issues in institutional economics: Clarifying the fluidity of rules. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(3), 425454. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137410000299
  33. 33Naess, L., Bang, G., Eriksen, S., & Vevatne, J. (2005). Institutional adaptation to climate change: Flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.10.003
  34. 34Olivier, T. (2018). How do institutions address collective-action problems? Bridging and bonding in institutional design. Political Research Quarterly, 72(1), 162176. DOI: 10.1177/1065912918784199
  35. 35Olivier, T., & Schlager, E. (2021). Rules and the ruled: Understanding joint patterns of institutional design and behavior in complex governing arrangements. Policy Studies Journal. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12429
  36. 36Onuklu, A., Hill, T. T., Darendeli, I. S., & Genc, O. F. (2021). Poison or antidote: How subnational informal institutions exacerbate and ameliorate institutional voids. Journal of International Management, 27(1), 100806. DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2020.100806
  37. 37Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
  38. 38Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  39. 39Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 727. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
  40. 40Pache, A., & Santos, F. (2010). When Worlds Collide: The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands. Academy of Management Review, 35, 455476. DOI: 10.5465/amr.35.3.zok455
  41. 41Samuels, P., Klijn, F., & Dijkman, J. (2006). An analysis of the current practice of policies on river flood risk management in different countries. Irrigation and Drainage, 55, S141S150. DOI: 10.1002/ird.257
  42. 42Siddiki, S. (2014). Assessing policy design and interpretation: An institutions-based analysis in the context of aquaculture in Florida and Virginia, United States. Review of Policy Research, 31(4), 281303. DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12075
  43. 43Siddiki, S., Basurto, X., & Weible, C. M. (2012). Using the institutional grammar tool to understand regulatory compliance: The case of Colorado aquaculture. Regulation & Governance, 6(2), 167188. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01132.x
  44. 44Siddiki, S., Heikkila, T., Weible, C. M., Pacheco-Vega, R., Carter, D., Curley, C., … & Bennett, A. (2022). Institutional analysis with the institutional grammar. Policy Studies Journal, 50(2), 315339. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12361
  45. 45Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sorenson, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199596751.001.0001
  46. 46Vasilescu, L., Khan, A., & Khan, H. (2008). Disaster management cycle–a theoretical approach. Management & Marketing-Craiova, 1, 4350.
  47. 47Vitale, C., Meijerink, S., & Moccia, F. D. (2023). Urban flood resilience, a multi-level institutional analysis of planning practices in the Metropolitan City of Naples. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(4), 813835. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2021.2006156
  48. 48Watkins, C., & Westphal, L. M. (2016). People don’t talk in institutional statements: A methodological case study of the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 125. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12139
  49. 49Witting, A. (2017). Ruling out learning and change? Lessons from urban flood mitigation. Policy and Society, 36(2), 251269. DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2017.1322772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1351 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 18, 2023
Accepted on: Jun 14, 2024
Published on: Aug 6, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Amineh Ghorbani, Saba Siddiki, Batoul Mesdaghi, Maja Bosch, Yared Abayneh Abebe, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.