Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Understanding Institutional Compliance in Flood Risk Management: A Network Analysis Approach Highlighting the Significance of Institutional Linkages and Context Cover

Understanding Institutional Compliance in Flood Risk Management: A Network Analysis Approach Highlighting the Significance of Institutional Linkages and Context

Open Access
|Aug 2024

Figures & Tables

ijc-18-1-1351-g1.png
Figure 1

Map of Sint Maarten. The red rectangle in the inset map shows the position of Sint Maarten in the Caribbean. (Map source: Google Maps).

Table 1

Overview of key documents on FRM in Sint Maarten.

FRM PHASESOURCES
PreparationVROMI policy documents
ResponseNational Disaster Plan
RecoveryVROMI policy documents, yearly reports, and plans
MitigationVROMI policy documents, yearly reports, and Ministry plans
ijc-18-1-1351-g2.png
Figure 2

An institutional statement represented in network format.

ijc-18-1-1351-g3.png
Figure 3

Different types of connections between institutional statements a) actor-driven marked in purple, b) outcome-driven marked in green, c) sanction-driven marked in red.

ijc-18-1-1351-g4.png
Figure 4

A network diagram illustrating the institutional environment of the response phase in FRM for cleaning up after a flood. The dotted arrow shows how filling a structural hole in the network can make the institutional environment more fluent in case of a disaster situation. The green and orange node colors indicate formal rules (FR) and informal rules (IR), respectively.

ijc-18-1-1351-g5.png
Figure 5

A network diagram of the private property development and permit situation reflecting a weak institutional environment.

ijc-18-1-1351-g6.png
Figure 6

A network diagram of the inspection action situation, reflecting a very weak institutional environment.

ijc-18-1-1351-g7.png
Figure 7

Statement level diagrams showing the inspection situation of the mitigation phase. The end goal of this action situation is permit revocation (FR22) or demolishing/fining (FR25) in case of violation. a) the whole institutional landscape, b) the institutional landscape when FR21 or F23 are not followed, and c) the institutional landscape when FR22 or FR24 are not followed. The grey nodes reflect the parts of the institutional landscape that became void as a result of non-compliance to a certain formal institution. Note: the discrepancies between statements are represented as red links with diamond-shaped arrows on both sides.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1351 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 18, 2023
Accepted on: Jun 14, 2024
Published on: Aug 6, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Amineh Ghorbani, Saba Siddiki, Batoul Mesdaghi, Maja Bosch, Yared Abayneh Abebe, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.