References
- 1Agrawal, A. (2001). Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Development, 29(10), 1649–1672. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00063-8
- 2Baggio, J. A., Barnett, A. J., Perez-Ibarra, I., Brady, U., Ratajczyk, E., Rollins, N., Rubiños, C., Shin, H. C., Yu, D. J., Aggarwal, R., Anderies, J. M., & Janssen, M. A. (2016). Explaining success and failure in the commons: The configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2), 417–439. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.634
- 3Baland, J.-M., & Platteau, J.-P. (1996). Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities? Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0198290616.001.0001
- 4Barnes, C. (2017). Approaching facilitated self-governance of the forest commons: On the roles of external actors in community forest management in India. (ISBN
978-94-6233-692-6 ) [Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University]. Utrecht University Repository. - 5Barnes, C., Claus, R., Driessen, P., Ferreira Dos Santos, M. J., George, M. A., & Van Laerhoven, F. (2017). Uniting forest and livelihood outcomes? Analyzing external actor interventions in sustainable livelihoods in a community forest management context. International Journal of the Commons, 11(1), 532–571. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.750
- 6Barnes, C., & van Laerhoven, F. (2015). Making it last? Analysing the role of NGO interventions in the development of institutions for durable collective action in Indian community forestry. Environmental Science & Policy, 53, 192–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.06.008
- 7Bawa, K. S., Joseph, G., & Setty, S. (2007). Poverty, biodiversity and institutions in forest-agriculture ecotones in the Western Ghats and Eastern Himalaya ranges of India. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 121(3), 287–295. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.023
- 8Baynes, J., Herbohn, J., Smith, C., Fisher, R., & Bray, D. (2015). Key factors which influence the success of community forestry in developing countries. Global Environmental Change, 35, 226–238. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.011
- 9Brass, J. N., Longhofer, W., Robinson, R. S., & Schnable, A. (2018). NGOs and international development: A review of thirty-five years of scholarship. World Development, 112, 136–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.07.016
- 10Brockerhoff, E. G., Barbaro, L., Castagneyrol, B., Forrester, D. I., Gardiner, B., González-Olabarria, J. R., Lyver, P. O., Meurisse, N., Oxbrough, A., Taki, H., Thompson, I. D., van der Plas, F., & Jactel, H. (2017). Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(13), 3005–3035. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2
- 11Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Villamayor Tomás, S. (2010). A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 15(4). DOI: 10.5751/ES-03704-150438
- 12Gadgil, M., Krishnan, B. J., Ganeshaiah, K. N., Vijayan, V. S., Renee, B., Sukumar, R., Noronha, L., Nayak, V. S., Subramaniam, D. K., Varma, R. V., Gautam, S. P., Navalgund, R. R., & Subrahmanyam, G. V. (2011). Report of the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel Part I. Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel.
https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/library/resource/report-of-the-western-ghats-ecology-expert-panel/ - 13Gebreegziabher, Z., Mekonnen, A., Gebremedhin, B., & Beyene, A. D. (2021). Determinants of success of community forestry: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia. World Development, 138,
105206 . DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105206 - 14Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? The American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/4145316 . DOI: 10.1017/S0003055404001182 - 15Gupta, D., & Koontz, T. M. (2019). Working together? Synergies in government and NGO roles for community forestry in the Indian Himalayas. World Development, 114, 326–340. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.016
- 16Gupta, D., Lele, S., & Sahu, G. (2020). Promoting a responsive state: The role of NGOs in decentralized forest governance in India. Forest Policy and Economics, 111,
102066 . DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102066 - 17Hasan, M. B., Driessen, P., Zoomers, A., & Van Laerhoven, F. (2020). How can NGOs support collective action among the users of rural drinking water systems? A case study of Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) systems in Bangladesh. World Development, 126,
104710 . DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104710 - 18Jamila Haider, L., Neusel, B., Peterson, G. D., & Schlüter, M. (2019). Past management affects success of current joint forestry management institutions in Tajikistan. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21(5), 2183–2224. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-018-0132-0
- 19Kasturirangan, K., Babu, C. R., Mauskar, J. M., Chopra, K., Kishwan, J., Shankar, D., Narain, S., Roy, P. S., Tyagi, A., & Chandrasekharan, I. (2013). Report of the High Level Working Group on the Western Ghats. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.
https://ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/usys/ites/ecosystem-management-dam/documents/EducationDOC/EM_DOC/Recommended%20readingDOC/HLWG2.pdf - 20KimDung, N., Bush, S. R., & Mol, A. P. J. (2016). NGOs as bridging organizations in managing nature protection in Vietnam. The Journal of Environment & Development, 25(2), 191–218. DOI: 10.1177/1070496516642499
- 21Mayne, J. (2017). Theory of Change analysis: Building robust theories of change. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 32(2), 155–173. DOI: 10.3138/cjpe.31122
- 22Meinzen-Dick, R., Chaturvedi, R., Kandikuppa, S., Rao, K., Rao, J. P., Bruns, B., & ElDidi, H. (2021). Securing the commons in India: Mapping polycentric governance. International Journal of the Commons, 15(1), 218–235. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1082
- 23Neris, R. R., Papathanassoglou, E., Leite, A. C. A. B., Garcia-Vivar, C., DeMontigny, F., & Nascimento, L. C. (2023). Five tips for conducting remote qualitative data collection in COVID times: Theoretical and pragmatic considerations. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem Da USP, 57,
e20220277 . DOI: 10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2022-0277en - 24Nunan, F. (Ed.) (2020). Governing renewable natural resources: Theories and frameworks. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. DOI: 10.4324/9780429053009
- 25Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316423936
- 26Ostrom, E., & Cox, M. (2010). Moving beyond panaceas: A multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis. Environmental Conservation, 37(4), 451–463. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892910000834
- 27Partelow, S., Winkler, K. J., & Thaler, G. M. (2020). Environmental non-governmental organizations and global environmental discourse. PLOS ONE, 15(5),
e0232945 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232945 - 28Persson, J., & Prowse, M. (2017). Collective action on forest governance: An institutional analysis of the Cambodian community forest system. Forest Policy and Economics, 83, 70–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.06.008
- 29Pratap, D. (2010). Community participation and forest policies in India: An overview. Social Change, 40(3), 235–256. DOI: 10.1177/004908571004000301
- 30Roy, S., Islam, K., & Wadud, M. (2018). Role of NGOs on livelihood improvement and forest resource conservation: Experiences from Bangladesh. Journal of Agroforestry and Environment, 12(1), 35–42.
https://jagroforenviron.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/6.-Role-of-NGOs-on-livelihood-improvement-and-forest-resource-conservation-Experiences-from-Bangladesh-S.-Roy.pdf - 31United Nations. (n.d.). The UN and Civil Society. United Nations; United Nations. Retrieved February 17, 2022, from
https://www.un.org/en/get-involved/un-and-civil-society - 32Vakil, A. C. (2018).
A return to the classification problem: Revising a framework for studying NGOs . In A. Kellow & H. Murphy-Gregory (Eds.), Handbook of Research on NGOs (pp. 95–113). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781785361685.00011 - 33Wade, R. (1989). Village republics: Economic conditions for collective action in South India. Orient Longman.
- 34Wright, G., & Andersson, K. (2013). Non-Governmental organizations, rural communities and forests: A comparative analysis of community-NGO interactions. Small-Scale Forestry, 12(1), 33–50. DOI: 10.1007/s11842-012-9206-2