Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Governing Landscape Simplification in Rapid Commercialization Contexts – the Case of the Dike-Pond System in the Pearl River Delta, China Cover

Governing Landscape Simplification in Rapid Commercialization Contexts – the Case of the Dike-Pond System in the Pearl River Delta, China

Open Access
|Apr 2024

References

  1. 1Abson, D. J., Fraser, E. D., & Benton, T. G. (2013). Landscape diversity and the resilience of agricultural returns: a portfolio analysis of land-use patterns and economic returns from lowland agriculture. Agriculture & Food Security, 2(1), 2. DOI: 10.1186/2048-7010-2-2
  2. 2Aubin, J., Callier, M., Rey-Valette, H., Mathe, S., Wilfart, A., Legendre, M., … & Fontaine, P. (2019). Implementing ecological intensification in fish farming: definition and principles from contrasting experiences. Reviews in Aquaculture, 11(1), 149167. DOI: 10.1111/raq.12231
  3. 3Bekefi, E., & Varadi, L. (2007). Multifunctional pond fish farms in Hungary. Aquaculture international, 15(3), 227233. DOI: 10.1007/s10499-007-9090-5
  4. 4Bieling, C., & Plieninger, T. (Eds.) (2017). The science and practice of landscape stewardship. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316499016
  5. 5Blayac, T., Mathé, S., Rey-Valette, H., & Fontaine, P. (2014). Perceptions of the services provided by pond fish farming in Lorraine (France). Ecological Economics, 108, 115123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.007
  6. 6Botlíková, M. (2021). Potential Pond Farming in the Context of Tourism: Reference: Milena Botlíková. (2021). Potential Pond Farming in the Context of Tourism. Journal of Tourism and Services, 20(11), 4265. Journal of Tourism and Services, 12(22), 42–65. DOI: 10.29036/jots.v12i22.219
  7. 7Brodrechtova, Y., Navrátil, R., Sedmák, R., & Tuček, J. (2018). Using the politicized IAD framework to assess integrated forest management decision-making in Slovakia. Land Use Policy, 79, 10011013. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.015
  8. 8Brossette, F., Bieling, C., & Penker, M. (2022). Adapting Common Resource Management to Under-Use Contexts: The Case of Common Pasture Organizations in the Black Forest Biosphere Reserve. International Journal of the Commons, 16(1), 2946. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1138
  9. 9Bürgi, M., Bieling, C., von Hackwitz, K., Kizos, T., Lieskovský, J., Martín, M. G., … & Printsmann, A. (2017). Processes and driving forces in changing cultural landscapes across Europe. Landscape Ecology, 32, 20972112. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-017-0513-z
  10. 10Chen, G., Noszczyk, T., Nawieśniak-Caesar, M., Pazdan, M., & Hernik, J. (2022). Land use change and landscapes in rural areas in china in forty years of reform and opening up. Cultural heritage—Possibilities for land-centered societal development, 345356. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58092-6_22
  11. 11Chowdhury, K., & Behera, B. (2022). Institutional dynamics and water resource management: the case of traditional water bodies in West Bengal, India. International Journal of water resources development, 38(5), 836860. DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2021.1916448
  12. 12Cole, D., Epstein, G., & McGinnis, M. (2019). The utility of combining the IAD and SES frameworks. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.864
  13. 13Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Tomás, S. V. (2010). A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 38. DOI: 10.5751/ES-03704-150438
  14. 14Dell’Angelo, J., McCord, P. F., Gower, D., Carpenter, S., Caylor, K. K., & Evans, T. P. (2016). Community water governance on Mount Kenya: an assessment based on Ostrom’s design principles of natural resource management. Mountain Research and Development, 36(1), 102115. DOI: 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-15-00040.1
  15. 15Evans, T. P., York, A. M., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Institutional dynamics, spatial organization, and landscape change. In Political economies of landscape change: Places of integrative power (pp. 111129). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5849-3_6
  16. 16Ford, J. D., King, N., Galappaththi, E. K., Pearce, T., McDowell, G., & Harper, S. L. (2020). The resilience of indigenous peoples to environmental change. One Earth, 2(6), 532543. DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.014
  17. 17Francová, K., Šumberová, K., Janauer, G. A., & Adámek, Z. (2019). Effects of fish farming on macrophytes in temperate carp ponds. Aquaculture International, 27(2), 413436. DOI: 10.1007/s10499-018-0331-6
  18. 18Gautam, A. P., & Shivakoti, G. P. (2005). Conditions for successful local collective action in forestry: some evidence from the hills of Nepal. Society and Natural Resources, 18(2), 153171. DOI: 10.1080/08941920590894534
  19. 19Gerber, J. D., & Hess, G. (2017). From landscape resources to landscape commons: focussing on the non-utility values of landscape. International Journal of the Commons, 11(2). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.745
  20. 20Graaf, M., Buck, L. E., Shames, S., & Zagt, R. J. (2017). Assessing Landscape Governance: A Participatory Approach: Manual. Tropenbos International.
  21. 21Green, R. E., Cornell, S. J., Scharlemann, J. P., & Balmford, A. (2005). Farming and the fate of wild nature. science, 307(5709), 550555. DOI: 10.1126/science.1106049
  22. 22Gongfu, Z. (1990). The types, structure and results of the dike-pond system in South China. GeoJournal, 21, 8389. DOI: 10.1007/BF00645312
  23. 23Görg, C. (2007). Landscape governance: The “politics of scale” and the “natural” conditions of places. Geoforum, 38(5), 954966. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.004
  24. 24Joffre, O. M., Klerkx, L., & Khoa, T. N. (2018). Aquaculture innovation system analysis of transition to sustainable intensification in shrimp farming. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 38(3), 34. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-018-0511-9
  25. 25Lai, Z., Chen, M., & Liu, T. (2020). Changes in and prospects for cultivated land use since the reform and opening up in China. Land Use Policy, 97, 104781. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104781
  26. 26Lele, U., & Goswami, S. (2020). Agricultural policy reforms: Roles of markets and states in China and India. Global food security, 26, 100371. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100371
  27. 27Lin, J. Y. (1992). Rural Reforms and Agricultural Growthin China. American Economic Review, 82(1), 3451.
  28. 28Liu, X. (2020). Structural changes and economic growth in China over the past 40 years of reform and opening-up. China Political Economy, 3(1), 1938. DOI: 10.1108/CPE-05-2020-0010
  29. 29Lo, C. P. (1996). Environmental impact on the development of agricultural technology in China: the case of the dike-pond (‘jitang’) system of integrated agriculture-aquaculture in the Zhujiang Delta of China. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 60(2–3), 183195. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(96)01068-7
  30. 30Mastrángelo, M. E., Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Enrico, L., Bennett, E., Lavorel, S., Cumming, G. S., … & Zoeller, K. (2019). Key knowledge gaps to achieve global sustainability goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(12), 11151121. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0412-1
  31. 31Menatti, L. (2017). Landscape: from common good to human right. International Journal of the Commons, 11(2), 641683. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.738
  32. 32Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, PRC. (2019). Announcement of the fifth batch of China’s important agricultural cultural heritage list. Retrieved from http://www.moa.gov.cn/xw/zxfb/201912/t20191231_6334141.htm
  33. 33Morrow, C. E., & Hull, R. W. (1996). Donor-initiated common pool resource institutions: the case of the Yanesha Forestry Cooperative. World Development, 24(10), 16411657. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00064-2
  34. 34Nigussie, Z., Tsunekawa, A., Haregeweyn, N., Adgo, E., Cochrane, L., Floquet, A., & Abele, S. (2018). Applying Ostrom’s institutional analysis and development framework to soil and water conservation activities in north-western Ethiopia. Land use policy, 71, 110. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.039
  35. 35Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  36. 36Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton university press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400831739
  37. 37Ostrom, E. (2007a). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In Theories of the policy process, second edition (pp. 2164). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780367274689-2
  38. 38Ostrom, E. (2007b). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the national Academy of sciences, 104(39), 1518115187. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0702288104
  39. 39Palash, M. S., Rahman, K. T., Salam, S., & Nasrin, M. (2018). Freshwater pond fish farming in Bangladesh: A micro level land use analysis. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, 16(2), 276282. DOI: 10.3329/jbau.v16i2.37983
  40. 40Plieninger, T., Abunnasr, Y., D’Ambrosio, U., Guo, T., Kizos, T., Kmoch, L., … & Varela, E. (2023). Biocultural conservation systems in the Mediterranean region: the role of values, rules, and knowledge. Sustainability Science, 18(2), 823838. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-022-01155-6
  41. 41Polski, M. M., & Ostrom, E. (2017). An institutional framework for policy analysis and design. In: D. H. Cole, D. M. Michael, (Eds.), Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy: a framework for policy analysis. London: Lexington Books, pp 1347.
  42. 42Quinn, C. H., Huby, M., Kiwasila, H., & Lovett, J. C. (2007). Design principles and common pool resource management: An institutional approach to evaluating community management in semi-arid Tanzania. Journal of environmental management, 84(1), 100113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.008
  43. 43Quynh, C. N. T., Schilizzi, S., Hailu, A., & Iftekhar, S. (2020). Vietnam’s Territorial Use Rights for Fisheries: How do they perform against Ostrom’s institutional design principles? World Development Perspectives, 17, 100171. DOI: 10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100171
  44. 44Riechers, M., Balázsi, Á., Betz, L., Jiren, T. S., & Fischer, J. (2020). The erosion of relational values resulting from landscape simplification. Landscape Ecology, 35(11), 26012612. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-020-01012-w
  45. 45Riechers, M., Martín-López, B., & Fischer, J. (2021). Human–nature connectedness and other relational values are negatively affected by landscape simplification: insights from Lower Saxony, Germany. Sustainability Science, 17(3), 865877. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-021-00928-9
  46. 46Rusch, A., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Gardiner, M. M., Hawro, V., Holland, J., Landis, D., … & Bommarco, R. (2016). Agricultural landscape simplification reduces natural pest control: A quantitative synthesis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 221, 198204. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.039
  47. 47Sarker, A., & Itoh, T. (2001). Design principles in long-enduring institutions of Japanese irrigation common-pool resources. Agricultural Water Management, 48(2), 89102. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00125-6
  48. 48Sarrazin, B., Wezel, A., Guerin, M., & Robin, J. (2022). Pesticide contamination of fish ponds in relation to crop area in a mixed farmland-pond landscape (Dombes area, France). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(44), 6685866873. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-20492-8
  49. 49Tscharntke, T., Klein, A. M., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., & Thies, C. (2005). Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity–ecosystem service management. Ecology letters, 8(8), 857874. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x
  50. 50Vialatte, A., Barnaud, C., Blanco, J., Ouin, A., Choisis, J. P., Andrieu, E., … & Sirami, C. (2019). A conceptual framework for the governance of multiple ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 34, 16531673. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-019-00829-4
  51. 51Wong, M. H., Cheung, K. C., Yediler, A., & Wong, C. K. C. (2004). The dyke-pond systems in South China: Past, present and future. In Wetlands Ecosystems in Asia (pp. 4766). Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-044451691-6/50007-7
  52. 52Zhong, G. F. (1987). Study on the dike-pond system in the Pearl River Delta. Science Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1300 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 6, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 9, 2024
Published on: Apr 9, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Wenxiu Chi, Tobias Plieninger, Guangsi Lin, Koushik Chowdhury, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.