Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Uncommonness of Urban Commons in Central and Eastern European Countries Cover

The Uncommonness of Urban Commons in Central and Eastern European Countries

Open Access
|May 2023

References

  1. 1Activatica. (2020). Na kruglom stole nazvali stoimost’ moskovskoy zemli – ona fantasticheski dorogaya. Retrieved from https://activatica.org/blogs/view/id/9182/title/na-kruglom-stole-nazvali-stoimost-moskovskoy-zemli-ona-fantasticheski-dorogaya
  2. 2Analiza zmian w zagospodarowaniu przestrzennym Gdańska w latach 2010–2013. (2014). Gdańsk: Biuro Rozwoju Gdańska.
  3. 3Arvanitidis, P. A., & Papagiannitsis, G. (2020). Urban open spaces as a commons: The credibility thesis and common property in a self-governed park of Athens, Greece. Cities, 97, pp. 113. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102480
  4. 4Augustyn, M., Górz, A., Łepkowski, M., Matejko, W., Śmiechowski, D., Wilczyńska, A., & Zielińska, E. (eds.) (2017). Otwarty Jazdów. Współzarządzanie przestrzenią miejską. Warszawa: Otwarty Jazdów, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nsH4ZNh7BOxQI7kYaZyB3z0lQOlS5iPT/view
  5. 5Bauwens and Niaros. (2017). Changing Societies through Urban Commons Transitions. Heinrich Böll Stiftung.
  6. 6Blomley, N. (2020). Urban Commoning and the Right not to be Excluded. In Ökzan, Dand Büyüksaraç, G. B., (eds.) Commoning the City – Empirical Perspectives on Urban Ecology, Economics and Ethics, pp. 89103. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429021886-8
  7. 7Borčić, L. S., Cvitanovic, M., & Lukić, A. (2016). Cultivating alternative spaces – Zagreb’s community gardens in transition: from socialist to post-socialist perspective. Geoforum, 77, pp. 5160. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.010
  8. 8Chan, J. K. H. (2019). Urban Ethics in the Anthropocene. The Moral Dimensions of Six Emerging Conditions in Contemporary Urbanism. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0308-1
  9. 9Chernysheva, L., & Sezneva, O. (2020). Commoning beyond ‘commons’: The case of the Russian ‘obshcheye’. The Sociological Review, 68(2), pp. 322340. DOI: 10.1177/0038026120905474
  10. 10Colding, J., Barthel, S., Bendt, P., Snep, R., der Knaap, W., & Ernstson, H. (2013). Urban green commons: Insights on urban common property systems. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), pp. 10391051. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.006
  11. 11Čukić, I., & Timotijević, J. (2020a). Theoretical framework. In I. Čukić and J. Timotijević (eds.) Spaces of Commoning. Urban Commons in the Ex-Yu Region. Belgrade: Ministry of Space/Institute for Urban Politics.
  12. 12Čukić, I., & Timotijević, J. (eds.) (2020b). Spaces of Commoning. Urban Commons in the Ex-Yu Region. Belgrade: Ministry of Space/Institute for Urban Politics.
  13. 13Czapiński, J., & Panek, T. (eds.) (2015). Social Diagnosis 2015: Objective and subjective quality of life in Poland. Contemporary Economics, 9(4), http://www.diagnoza.com/pliki/raporty/Diagnoza_raport_2015.pdf (02.06.2021).
  14. 14Davy, B. (2014). Polyrational Property: rules for the many uses of land. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 472492. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.455
  15. 15Dellenbaugh-Losse, M., Zimmermann, N., & De Vries, N. 2020. The Urban Commons Cookbook: Strategies and Insights for Creating and Maintaining Urban Commons. DOI: 10.4324/9780429352485-8
  16. 16Dragović, S. (2021). The Volatile Policy Framework of Spatial Planning in Montenegro: Will the Centre Hold? In E. Berisha et al. (eds.), Springer Nature. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-72124-4_7
  17. 17Dymnicka, M. (2013). Przestrzeń publiczna a przemiany miasta. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  18. 18Feinberg, A., Ghorbani, A., & Herder, P. (2021). Diversity and Challenges of the Urban Commons: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of the Commons, 15(1), pp. 120. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1033
  19. 19Ferguson, F. (2014). Make Shift-City: The Renegotiation of Urban Commons. In F. Ferguson (ed.), Make_Shift City: Renegotiating the Urban Commons, Jovis Verlag: Berlin, 256 pp. ISBN: 978-3-86859-223-8, pp. 14.
  20. 20Foster, S. R., & Iaione, C. (2016). The City as a Commons. Yale Law and Policy Review, 34(2), pp. 280349.
  21. 21Gärtner, P. (2017). European Capital Greenness Evaluation, [Online] available at https://philippgaertner.github.io/2017/10/european-capital-greenness-evaluation/#
  22. 22Gerwin, M. (2012). Biorą dzielnicę we własne ręce. Przekrój, 16(3485), pp. 1213.
  23. 23Golubchikov, O., Badyina, A., & Makhrova, A. (2014). The hybrid spatialities of transition: Capitalism, legacy and uneven urban economic restructuring. Urban Studies, 51(4), pp. 617633. DOI: 10.1177/0042098013493022
  24. 24Grabkowska, M. (2018). Urban space as a commons in print media discourse in Poland after 1989. Cities, 72, pp. 122129. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.013
  25. 25Haase, D., Dushkova, D., Haase, A., & Kronenberg, J. (2019). Green infrastructure in post- socialist cities. Evidence and experiences from Eastern Germany, Poland and Russia. In T. Tuvikene, W. Sgibnev and C. S. Neugebauer (eds.) Post Socialist Urban Infrastructures. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 105124. DOI: 10.4324/9781351190350-7
  26. 26Harvey, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  27. 27Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, pp. 2340.
  28. 28Harvey, D. (2011). The Future of the Commons. Radical History Review, 109, pp. 101107. DOI: 10.1215/01636545-2010-017
  29. 29Harvey, D. (2018). David Harvey with Laura Flanders. Readings and Conversations Events, 24 October 2018. Lannan Foundation. [Online] available at: https://lannan.org/events/david-harvey-with-laura-flanders. [Accessed: 21 January 2021].
  30. 30Helfrich, S. (2012). We have to reformulate the role of the state as enabler of the commons. Interview by Rob Hopkins. Transition Culture, October, 2012: www.transitionculture.org/2012/10/02/an-interview-withsilke-helfrich-we-have-to-reformulate-the-role-of-the-state-as-enablerof-the-commons.
  31. 31Hess, C. (2008). Mapping the New Commons. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1356835
  32. 32Hirt, S. A. (2012). Iron curtains: Gates, suburbs and privatization of space in the post-socialist city. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781118295922
  33. 33Humphrey, C. (2005). Ideology in infrastructure: architecture and Soviet imagination. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 11(1), pp. 3958. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2005.00225.x
  34. 34Humphrey, C., & Verdery, K., (eds.). (2020). Property in Question: Value Transformation in the Global Economy. Routledge.
  35. 35Huron, A. (2017). Theorising the urban commons: New thoughts, tensions and paths forward. Urban Studies, pp. 18. DOI: 10.1177/0042098016685528
  36. 36Iaione, C. (2015). Governing the Urban Commons. Italian Journal of Public Law, 7(1), 170221.
  37. 37Iaione, C. (2016). The CO-City: Sharing, Collaborating, Cooperating, and Commoning in the City. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 75(2), pp. 415455. DOI: 10.1111/ajes.12145
  38. 38Inizan, G., & Volkova, D. (in press). Land plots in soviet housing estates as interstices: juridic appropriation as a contesting strategy.
  39. 39Jerram, L. (2015). The false promise of the commons: historical fantasies, sexuality and the ‘really-existing’ urban common of modernity In C. Borch and M. Kornberger (eds.) Urban Commons – Rethinking the City. London: Taylor & Francis Online, pp. 4767.
  40. 40Kalyukin, A., Borén, T., & Byerley, A. (2015). The second generation of post-socialist change: Gorky Park and public space in Moscow. Urban Geography, 36(5), pp. 674695. DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2015.1020658
  41. 41Kip, M., Bieniok, M., Dellenbaugh, M., Müller, A. K., & Schwegmann, M. (2015). Seizing the (Every)Day: Welcome to the Urban Commons. In M. Dellenbaugh, M. Kip, M. Bieniok, A. K. Müller, M. Schwegmann (eds.) Urban Commons. Moving Beyond State and Market. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, pp. 925. DOI: 10.1515/9783038214953-001
  42. 42Kommersant. (2014). Otreznoy palisad, 10 March. Retrieved from https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2411765
  43. 43Kozlov, A. (2020). roblemy s oformleniyem moskvichami zemli mogut byt’ ne sluchaynoy yuridicheskoy kolliziyey, a produmannoy politikoy Pravitel’stva Moskvy, Federal City, 29 January. Retrieved from https://federalcity.ru/index.php?newsid=7454&fbclid=IwAR3qoDJ3TlqUkZBOzFBu1asImUluHyZVGThdC9gmObefgHqcz8ccpVRBM0c
  44. 44KPRF. (2014). “Problemy narusheniya prav moskvichey na zemlyu”. Kruglyy stol fraktsii KPRF v Moskovskoy gorodskoy Dume, 20 December. Retrieved from https://kprf.ru/dep/reg/137551.html
  45. 45Kubicki, P. (2020). Miasto jako dobro wspólne czy suma prywatnych własności? O polskiej kwestii miejskiej w kontekście działalności ruchów miejskich. Przegląd Kulturoznawczy, 4(46), pp. 477492. DOI: 10.4467/20843860PK.20.041.12845
  46. 46Łapniewska, Z. (2017). (Re)Claiming Space by Urban Commons. Review of Radical Political Economics, 49(1), pp. 5466. DOI: 10.1177/0486613415616217
  47. 47Lefebvre, H. (1967). Le Droit à la Ville. L’Homme et la societé, 6, pp. 2935. DOI: 10.3406/homso.1967.1063
  48. 48Lefebvre, H. (1972). Entretien avec Henri Lefèbvre. From the series URBANOSE, chapter 15. L’Office National du Film du Canada. Space Frames, 2012. [Online] available at: http://space-frames.blogspot.com/2012/07/. [Accessed on 27 January 2021].
  49. 49Marella, M. R. (2017). The Commons as a Legal concept. Law Crititique, 28, pp. 6186. DOI: 10.1007/s10978-016-9193-0
  50. 50Matysek-Imielińska, M. (2020). Warsaw Housing Cooperative: City in Action. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23077-7
  51. 51Moss, T. (2014). Spatiality of the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), pp. 457471. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.556
  52. 52Müller, M. (2019). Goodbye, Postsocialism! Europe-Asia Studies, 71(4), pp. 533550. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2019.1578337
  53. 53Nafziger, S. (2016). Communal property rights and land redistributions in Late Tsarist Russia. The Economic History Review, 69(3), pp. 773800. DOI: 10.1111/ehr.12167
  54. 54Narodnaya. (2020). Itogi kruglogo stola v Mosgordume po teme “Zemel’nyy vopros v Moskve: prava grazhdan i defekty imushchestvennogo ucheta”, 25 February. Retrieved from http://narodnaya.org/2020/02/25/1-78/
  55. 55Needham, B. (2006). Planning, Law and Economics. The Rules we Make for Using Land. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  56. 56Noterman, E. (2022). Adverse Commoning. Tracing contested legal geographies of the urban commons. EPD: Society and Space, 40(1), pp. 99117. DOI: 10.1177/02637758211053339
  57. 57O’Brien, D. T. (2012). Managing the urban commons: the relative influence of individual and social incentives on the treatment of public space. Human Nature, 23(4), pp. 467489. DOI: 10.1007/s12110-012-9156-6
  58. 58Ondrejicka, V., Finka, M., Husar, M., & Jemecny, L. (2017). Urban space as the commons – new modes for urban space management. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 95, 052004. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/95/5/052004
  59. 59Ostrom, E. (1990a). Design Principles of Robust Property Rights Institutions: What Have We Learned? Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2551.
  60. 60Ostrom, E. (1990b). Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  61. 61Ostrom, E. (2003). How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action. Journal of Theoretical Policies, 15(3), pp. 239270. DOI: 10.1177/0951692803015003002
  62. 62Pancewicz, Ł. (2013). Miasto jako dobro wspólne. Od “użytkowników” miasta do obywateli. In: Ł. Pancewicz, P. Zbieranek (eds.), Pomorskie miasta – jak je kształtować dla dobra wspólnego? Gdańsk: Instytut Badań nad Gospodarką Rynkową, pp. 1217.
  63. 63Peck, J., Kirk, C. P., Luangrath, A. W., & Shu, S. B. (2021). Caring for the commons: using psychological ownership to enhance stewardship behavior for public goods. Journal of Marketing, 86(2), 3349. DOI: 10.1177/0022242920952084
  64. 64Peisert, A. (2019). Obywatelskość jako kompetencja cywilizacyjna. Dyskurs & Dialog, 1, 2130. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3538322
  65. 65Pemán, M. L., & De Moor, T. (2013). A tale of two commons. Some Preliminary Hypotheses on the long-term development of the commons in Western and Eastern Europe, 11–19th Centuries. International Journal of the Commons, 7(1), pp. 733. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.355
  66. 66Perrings, C. (2006). Resilience and Sustainable Development. Environment and Development Economics, 11, pp. 41727. DOI: 10.1017/S1355770X06003020
  67. 67Plasari, A. (2018). Historiku i përmbledhur i teatrit kombëtar (The summary of the national theatre history). Radi and Radi. [Online] available at: http://www.radiandradi.com/historiku-i-permbledhur-i-teatrit-kombetar-nga-aurel-plasari-korrik-2018/. [Accessed: 12 July 2021].
  68. 68Podleśna Polana – Qlala z mieszkańcami (2013–10–18). Last accessed on 21st March from: https://www.portalpomorza.pl/wiadomosci/44467,podlesna-polana-qlala-z-mieszkancami
  69. 69Poklembová, V., Kluvánková-Oravská, T., & Finka, M. (2012). Sustainable management of urban public spaces: Lessons from commons governance. Terra Spectra STU, Planning Studies. Central European Journal of Spatial and Landscape Planning, 4(2).
  70. 70Purcell, M. (2013). Possible Worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), pp. 141154. DOI: 10.1111/juaf.12034
  71. 71Püttner, E. (2015). Jaśkowa Dolina i Góra Jana nieopodal Gdańska. Malbork: Oficyna Pomuchel.
  72. 72Rozmarynowska, K. (2011). Park miejski w Jaśkowej Dolinie. In: K. Szczepańska, J. Szczepański (eds.), Wędrówki po Wrzeszczu. Gdańsk: wydawnictwo słowo/obraz terytoria, pp. 84109.
  73. 73Sassen, S. (2015). Who owns our cities – and why this urban takeover should concern us all. The Guardian. [Online] available at: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/nov/24/who-owns-our-cities-and-why-this-urban-takeover-should-concern-us-all. [Accessed: 22 January 2021].
  74. 74Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis. Land Economics, 68(3), pp. 249262. DOI: 10.2307/3146375
  75. 75Sevilla-Buitrago, A. (2015). Capitalist formations of enclosure: Space and the extinction of the commons. Antipode, 47(4), pp. 9991020. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12143
  76. 76Shanin, T. (1971). Peasants and peasant societies. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
  77. 77Smirnova, V. (2019). Territory, enclosure, and state territorial mode of production in the Russian imperial periphery. Geographica Helvetica, 74(1), pp. 1325. DOI: 10.5194/gh-74-13-2019
  78. 78Smirnova, V., & Adrianova, E. (2022). From Systemic Underdevelopment to Basic Urban Maintenance: National Priority Projects in the Russian Periphery. Changing Societies & Personalities, 6(2), pp. 433454. DOI: 10.15826/csp.2022.6.2.183
  79. 79Sowa, J. (2015). Inna Rzeczpospolita jest możliwa! Widma przeszłości, wizje przyszłości. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo W.A.B.
  80. 80Staniszkis, M. (2012). Continuity of change vs. change of continuity: A diagnosis and evaluation of Warsaw’s urban transformation. In: M. Grubbauer, J. Kusiak (eds.), Chasing Warsaw: Socio-material dynamics of urban change since 1990. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, pp. 81108.
  81. 81Stenning, A., Smith, A., Rochovská, A., & Światek, D. (2010). Domesticating Neo-Liberalism. Spaces of Economic Practice and Social Reproduction in Post-Socialist Cities. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781444325409
  82. 82Stoppani, T. (2014). Relational Architecture: Dense Voids and Violent Laughter. Field: Urban Blind Spots, 6(1), 97111.
  83. 83Sudakova, Y. (2018). Pravo sobstvennosti na zhil’ye dayet treshchinu?, CIAN, 5 December. Retrieved from https://www.cian.ru/stati-pravo-sobstvennosti-na-zhile-daet-treschinu-287366/
  84. 84Svirin, I. (2020). V Mosgordume rasskazali, kak u moskvichey ukrali 16 trillionov rubley, Regnum, 17 February. Retrieved from https://regnum.ru/news/society/2860810.html
  85. 85Theesfeld, I. (2019). The role of pseudo-commons in post-socialist countries. In B. Hudson, J. Rosenbloom and D. Cole (eds.) Routledge Handbook of the Study of the Commons. London: Routledge, pp. 345359. DOI: 10.4324/9781315162782-26
  86. 86Tomašević, T., Horvat, V., Midžić, A., Dragšić, I., & Dakić, M. (2018). Commons in South East Europe, Case of Croatia, Bosnia & Herzegovina and Macedonia. Zagreb: Institute for Political Ecology.
  87. 87Torocheshnikova, M. (2020). Snesti mogut kazhdogo, Radio Svoboda, 24 December. Retrieved from https://www.svoboda.org/a/31017353.html
  88. 88Toto, R., Ćaćić, M., Ivanova, Z., Nientied, P., & Stachowiak-Bongwa, K. (2021). Urban Commons in Emerging Economies. In M. P. Van Dijk, J. Fransen and J. Edelenbos (eds.) Urban Governance in Emerging Economies. New Paradigms and Practices. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 117141. DOI: 10.4337/9781800883840.00013
  89. 89Tuvikene, T., Sgibnev, W., & Neugebauer, C. S. (2019). Introduction. Linking post-socialist and urban infrastructures. In T. Tuvikene, W. Sgibnev and C. S. Neugebauer (eds.) Post Socialist Urban Infrastructures. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 120. DOI: 10.4324/9781351190350-1
  90. 90Voronov, A., & Zanina, A. (2020). Renovatsii ochertili mezhu [The renovation has drawn the boundary]. Kommersant, 139, 1. Retrieved from https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4443137.
  91. 91Williams, M. J. (2018). Urban commons are more than property. Geographical Research, 56(1), pp. 1625. DOI: 10.1111/1745-5871.12262
  92. 92Zhelnina, A. (2013). Learning to use ‘public space’: urban space in post-Soviet St. Petersburg. The Open Urban Studies Journal, 6(1). DOI: 10.2174/1874942901306010057
  93. 93Zielińska, E. (2015). O Koszmarze partycypacji Markusa Miessena/Polyphonic Spatial Practice. On Markus Miessen’s Nightmare of Participation. Societas/Communitas, 20, 1–2, pp. 321334.
  94. 94Zupan, D., & Büdenbender, M. (2019). Moscow urban development. Neoliberal urbanism and green infrastructures. In T. Tuvikene, W. Sgibnev and C. S. Neugebauer (eds.) Post Socialist Urban Infrastructures. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 125141. DOI: 10.4324/9781351190350-8
  95. 95Zupan, D., Smirnova, V., & Zadorian, A. (2021). Governing through stolichnaya praktika: Housing renovation from Moscow to the regions. Geoforum, 120, pp. 155164. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1189 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 4, 2022
Accepted on: Apr 3, 2023
Published on: May 5, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Rudina Toto, Maja Grabkowska, Peter Nientied, Vera Smirnova, Sonja Dragović, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.