Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
VESA: A Visualization-Enabled Search Application for Exploratory Dataset Discovery Cover

VESA: A Visualization-Enabled Search Application for Exploratory Dataset Discovery

Open Access
|Aug 2026

References

  1. Angelini, M., Ferro, N., Santucci, G., Silvello, G. et al. (2017) ‘Visual Analytics for Information Retrieval Evaluation Campaigns’, EuroVA@ EuroVis, pp. 2529. Available at: 10.2312/eurova.20171115
  2. Auer, T., Barker, S., Barry, J., Charnoky, M., Curtis, J., Davies, I., Davis, C., Downie, I., Fink, D., Fredericks, T., Ganger, J., Gerbracht, J., Hanks, C., Hochachka, W., Iliff, M., Imani, J., Jordan, A., Levatich, T., Ligocki, S., Long, M.T., Morris, W., Morrow, S., Oldham, L., Padilla Obregon, F., Robinson, O., Rodewald, A., Ruiz-Gutierrez, V., Schloss, M., Smith, A., Smith, J., Stillman, A., Strimas-Mackey, M., Sullivan, B., Weber, D., Wolf, H. and Wood, C. (2024) ‘EOD – eBird Observation Dataset’, Occurrence dataset, Available at: 10.15468/aomfnb, accessed via GBIF.org on 2025-08-20.
  3. Beilschmidt, C., Drönner, J., Mattig, M. and Seeger, B. (2017) ‘VAT: A System for Data-Driven Biodiversity Research’, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT), Demonstration Track. OpenProceedings.org, pp. 546549. Available at: 10.5441/002/edbt.2017.66
  4. Blazevic, M., Sina, L.B., Burkhardt, D., Siegel, M. and Nazemi, K. (2021) ‘Visual analytics and similarity search-interest-based similarity search in scientific data’, 2021 25th international conference information visualisation (IV). IEEE, pp. 211217. Available at: 10.1109/IV53921.2021.00041
  5. Borst, T. and Limani, F. (2020) ‘Patterns for searching data on the web across different research communities’, LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 30(1), pp. 121. Available at: 10.18352/lq.10317
  6. Ceneda, D., Collins, C., El-Assady, M., Miksch, S., Tominski, C. and Arleo, A. (2024) ‘A Heuristic Approach for Dual Expert/End-User Evaluation of Guidance in Visual Analytics’, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30(1), pp. 9971007. Available at: 10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327152
  7. Dörk, M., Carpendale, S., Collins, C. and Williamson, C. (2008) ‘VisGets: Coordinated visualizations for web-based information exploration and discovery’, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14(6), pp. 12051212. Available at: 10.1109/TVCG.2008.175
  8. Felden, J., Möller, L., Schindler, U., Huber, R., Schumacher, S., Koppe, R., Diepenbroek, M. and Glöckner, F.O. (2023) ‘PANGAEA – Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science’, Scientific Data, 10(1), p. 347. Available at: 10.1038/s41597-023-02269-x
  9. Fox, E.A., Hix, D., Nowell, L.T., Brueni, D.J., Wake, W.C., Heath, L.S. and Rao, D. (1993) ‘Users, user interfaces, and objects: Envision, a digital library’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(8), pp. 480491. Available at: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199309)44:8<;480::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO;2-B
  10. Heer, J. and Shneiderman, B. (2012) ‘Interactive dynamics for visual analysis: A taxonomy of tools that support the fluent and flexible use of visualizations’, Queue, 10(2), pp. 3055. Available at: 10.1145/2133416.2146416
  11. Holzner, A., Igo-Kemenes, P. and Mele, S. (2009) ‘First results from the PARSE. Insight project: HEP survey on data preservation, re-use and (open) access’, arXiv preprint arXiv:09060485. Available at: 10.48550/arXiv.0906.0485
  12. Isenberg, T., Isenberg, P., Chen, J., Sedlmair, M. and Möller, T. (2013) ‘A systematic review on the practice of evaluating visualization’, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), pp. 28182827. Available at: 10.1109/TVCG.2013.126
  13. Jänicke, S., Kaur, P., Kuzmicki, P. and Schmidt, J. (2020) ‘Participatory Visualization Design as an Approach to Minimize the Gap between Research and Application’, VisGap@ Eurographics/EuroVis, pp. 3542. Available at: 10.2312/visgap.20201108
  14. Jeong, H. (2011) ‘An investigation of user perceptions and behavioral intentions towards the e-library’, Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 35(2–3), pp. 4560. Available at: 10.1080/14649055.2011.10766298
  15. Kaur, P., Klan, F. and König-Ries, B. (2018) ‘Issues and Suggestions for the Development of a Biodiversity Data Visualization Support Tool’, Proceedings of the EG/VGTC Conference on Visualization (Short Papers) (EuroVis ‘18), pp. 7377, Available at: 10.2312/eurovisshort.20181081
  16. Kaur, P. and König-Ries, B. (2017) ‘Visualization Taxonomy based on the Specification of User’s Goal and Data Dimensions’, EuroVis 2017 - Posters. The Eurographics Association. Available at: 10.2312/eurp.20171161
  17. Kern, D. and Mathiak, B. (2015) ‘Are there any differences in data set retrieval compared to well-known literature retrieval?’ Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries: 19th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, TPDL 2015, Poznań, Poland, September 14–18, 2015, Proceedings 19, Springer, pp. 197208. Available at: 10.1007/978-3-319-24592-8_15
  18. Khalsa, S., Cotroneo, P. and Wu, M. (2018) ‘A survey of current practices in data search services’, Research Data Alliance Data (RDA) Discovery Paradigms Interest Group. Available at: 10.17632/7j43z6n22z.1
  19. Koesten, L., Gregory, K., Groth, P. and Simperl, E. (2021) ‘Talking datasets–understanding data sensemaking behaviours’, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146, p. 102562. Available at: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102562
  20. Krämer, T., Papenmeier, A., Carevic, Z., Kern, D. and Mathiak, B. (2021) ‘Data-seeking behaviour in the social sciences’, International Journal on Digital Libraries, 22, pp. 175195. Available at: 10.1007/s00799-021-00303-0
  21. Madin, J.S., Bowers, S., Schildhauer, M.P. and Jones, M.B. (2008) ‘Advancing ecological research with ontologies’, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23(3), pp. 159168. Available at: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.007
  22. Malikathazham, H.M. and Betz, P.K. (2026) ‘DLR-SC/VESA2: A Backend Agnostic Visualisation Enabled Search Application (VESA) (v1.0.1)’, Zenodo. Available at: 10.5281/zenodo.19843966
  23. Nowell, L.T., France, R.K. and Hix, D. (1997) ‘Exploring search results with Envision’, CHI’97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1415. Available at: 10.1145/1120212.1120223
  24. Otegui, J. and Ariño, A.H. (2012) ‘BIDDSAT: visualizing the content of biodiversity data publishers in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility network’, Bioinformatics, 28(16), pp. 22072208. Available at: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts359
  25. Pérez-Montoro, M. and Nualart, J. (2015) ‘Visual articulation of navigation and search systems for digital libraries’, International Journal of Information Management, 35(5), pp. 572579. Available at: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.06.005
  26. Purchase, H.C. (2012) Experimental human-computer interaction: a practical guide with visual examples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: 10.1017/CBO9780511844522
  27. Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD) (2017) ‘Forschungsethische Grundsätze und Prüfverfahren in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften’, Tech. Rep., 9(5), Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD), Berlin. Available at: 10.17620/02671.1
  28. Saraiya, P., North, C. and Duca, K. (2005) ‘An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualizations’, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 11(4), pp. 443456. Available at: 10.1109/TVCG.2005.53
  29. Seebacher, D., Häußler, J., Stein, M., Janetzko, H., Schreck, T. and Keim, D.A. (2017) ‘Visual analytics and similarity search: concepts and challenges for effective retrieval considering users, tasks, and data’, Similarity Search and Applications: 10th International Conference, SISAP 2017, Munich, Germany, October 4–6, 2017, Proceedings 10, Springer, pp. 324332. Available at: 10.1007/978-3-319-68474-1
  30. Shneiderman, B. (2003) ‘The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations’, in B.B. Bederson and B. Shneiderman (eds.) The craft of information visualization. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 364371. Available at: 10.1109/VL.1996.545307
  31. Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A.U., Wu, L., Read, E., Manoff, M. and Frame, M. (2011) ‘Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions’, PloS One, 6(6), p. e21101. Available at: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
  32. Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S. and Young, T. (2018) ‘Characterising and Justifying Sample Size Sufficiency in Interview-Based Studies: Systematic Analysis of Qualitative Health Research over a 15-Year Period’, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), p. 148. Available at: 10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7
  33. Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I.J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.W., da Silva Santos, L.B., Bourne, P.E. et al. (2016) ‘The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship’, Scientific Data, 3(1), pp. 19. Available at: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
  34. Wu, M., Psomopoulos, F., Khalsa, S.J. and Waard, A.d. (2019) ‘Data discovery paradigms: User requirements and recommendations for data repositories’, Data Science Journal, 18(1), pp. 113. Available at: 10.5334/dsj-2019-003
Language: English
Page range: 34 - 34
Submitted on: Aug 21, 2025
Accepted on: Jul 31, 2026
Published on: Aug 26, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Pawandeep Kaur Betz, Tobias Hecking, Hudaif Mohammad Malikathazham, Andreas Gerndt, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.