References
- 1Allf, B.C., Cooper, C.B., Larson, L.R., Dunn, R.R., Futch, S.E., Sharova, M., and Cavalier, D. (2022) Citizen science as an ecosystem of engagement: implications for learning and broadening participation. BioScience, 72(7), pp. 651–663. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biac035
- 2Annoni, J., Balbuena, M., Bonney, R., Bonta, M., Camp, J., Cheatom, M., and Crum, C et al. (2019) Meaningful Collaborations: A workbook for community leaders, educators, and advocates working with scientific organizations. Available at:
https://thechisholmlegacyproject.org/resource-detail/meaningful-collaborations-a-workbook-for-community-leaders-and-avocates-working-with-scientific-insitutions/ . - 3Baptiste, G. (2025) Resisting scientific extractivism: A post-extractivist policy of knowledge production with marginalized communities. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 18(1). DOI: 10.5130/ijcre.v18i1.9326
- 4Blake, C., Rhanor, A. and Pajic, C. (2020) The demographics of citizen science participation and its implications for data quality and environmental justice. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), p. 21. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.320
- 5Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., and Wilderman, C.C. (2009) Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE). Available at:
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519688.pdf . - 6Brouwer, S. and Hessels, L.K. (2019) Increasing research impact with citizen science: The influence of recruitment strategies on sample diversity. Public Understanding of Science, 28(5), pp. 606–621. DOI: 10.1177/0963662519840934
- 7Cameron, J. (2005)
Focussing on the focus group . In Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography. 2nd edn. Melbourne: Oxford University Press. - 8Carver, E. (2024) Birding in the United States: A Demographic and Economic Analysis. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Available at:
https://partnerwithapayer.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Birding-in-the-United-States-A-Demographic-and-Economic-Analysis.pdf . - 9Constant, N.L. and Hughes, J. (2023) Diversifying citizen science through the inclusion of young people. Journal of Science Communication, 22(2), p. A07. DOI: 10.22323/2.22020207
- 10Cooper, C.B., Hawn, C.L., Larson, L.R., Parrish, J.K., Bower, G., Cavalier, D., and Dunn, R.R. et al. (2021) Inclusion in citizen science: The conundrum of rebranding. Science, 372(6549), pp. 1386–1388. DOI: 10.1126/science.abi6487
- 11Cooper, C., Lin Hunter, D., Archer, J., Caballero-Gomez, H., Hawn, C., Johnson, V., and Lee Jenni, G et al. (2024) A Positionality Tool to Support Ethical Research and Inclusion in the Participatory Sciences. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 9(1), p. 28. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.684
- 12Crenshaw, K. (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1). Available at:
http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8 . - 13Davis, L.F., Ramírez-Andreotta, M.D. and Buxner, S.R. (2020) Engaging diverse citizen scientists for environmental health: Recommendations from participants and promotoras. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), p. 7. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.253
- 14Estien, C., Carlen, E. and Schell, C. (2024) Examining the influence of sociodemographics, residential segregation, and historical redlining on eBird and iNaturalist data disparities in three U.S. cities. Ecology and Society, 29(3), p. art16. DOI: 10.5751/ES-15263-290316
- 15Frensley, T., Crall, A., Stern, M., Jordan, R., Gray, S., Prysby, M., and Newman, G. et al. (2017) Bridging the benefits of online and community supported citizen science: A case study on motivation and retention with conservation-oriented volunteers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), p. 4. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.84
- 16Garrison, N.A. (2013) Genomic justice for Native Americans: Impact of the Havasupai case on genetic research. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 38(2). DOI: 10.1177/0162243912470009
- 17Haklay, M., Fraisl, D., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hecker, S., Gold, M., Hager, G., and Ceccaroni, L., et al. (2021). Contours of citizen science: A vignette study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(8), p. 20218. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.202108
- 18Hall, D.M., Avellaneda-Lopez, P.M., Ficklin, D.L., Knouft, J.H., and Lowry, C. (2024) Citizen silence: Missed opportunities in citizen science. BioScience, 74(5), pp. 319–321. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biae020
- 19Hennink, M.M. (2007)
Preparing the discussion guide . In International Focus Group Research : A Handbook for the Health and Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press. - 20Irwin, A. (1995) Citizen Science: A study of people, expertise, and sustainable development. Routledge.
- 21Jennings, K., Dayer, A.A. and Chaves, W.A. (2024) Social support and identity promote diverse participation in wildlife viewing. People and Nature, 6(5), pp. 1865–1876. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10689
- 22Jennings, K., Dayer, A.A., and Chaves, W.A. (2025) Building equitable engagement: Strategies for enhancing diverse engagement in participatory science. Conservation Science and Practice, 7(9),
e70129 . DOI: 10.1111/csp2.70129 - 23Lin Hunter, D., Johnson, V. and Cooper, C. (2023) Diversifying large-scale participatory science: The efficacy of engagement through facilitator organizations. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1), p. 58. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.627
- 24Mahmoudi, D., Hawn, C.L. and Henry, E.H. (2022) Mapping for whom? Communities of color and the citizen science gap. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 21(4), pp. 372–388. DOI: 10.14288/acme.v21i4.2178
- 25Martin, V.Y. and Greig, E.I. (2019) Young adults’ motivations to feed wild birds and influences on their potential participation in citizen science: An exploratory study. Biological Conservation, 235, pp. 295–307. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.009
- 26National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). (2018). Learning Through Citizen Science: Enhancing Opportunities by Design. Washington, DC. DOI: 10.17226/25183
- 27Nielsen, K.E. (2012) A Disability History of the United States. Beacon Press.
- 28Niemiec, R.M. and Tomasulo, D. (2023)
Introduction to disability and strengths-based approaches . In Character Strengths and Abilities Within Disabilities: Advances in Science and Practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 3–22. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-36294-1_1 - 29Pandya, R.E. (2012) A framework for engaging diverse communities in citizen science in the US. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), pp. 314–317. DOI: 10.1890/120007
- 30Pateman, R., Dyke, A. and West, S. (2021) The diversity of participants in environmental citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1), p. 9. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.369
- 31Pearson, A.R., Schuldt, J.P., Romero-Canyas, R., Ballew, M.T., Larson-Konar, D. (2018) Diverse segments of the US public underestimate the environmental concerns of minority and low-income Americans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(49), pp. 12429–12434. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1804698115
- 32Sinkular, E.N., Dayer, A.A., McGregor, F.A., and Karns, M.J. (2025) Accessible birding in the United States: constraints to and facilitators of birding with disabilities. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 30(1), pp. 77–93. DOI: 10.1080/10871209.2024.2325157
- 33Soleri, D., Long, J.W., Ramirez-Andreotta, M.D., Eitemiller, R., and Pandya, R. (2016) Finding pathways to more equitable and meaningful public-scientist partnerships. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1), p. 9. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.46
- 34Sorensen, A.E., Jordan, R.C., LaDeau, S.L., Biehler, D., Wilson, S., Pitas, J.H., and Leisnham, P.T. (2019) Reflecting on efforts to design an inclusive citizen science project in west Baltimore. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), p. 13. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.170
- 35Stapleton, D.C., O’Day, B.L., Livermore, G.A., and Imparato, A.J. (2006) Dismantling the poverty trap: Disability policy for the twenty-first century. The Milbank Quarterly, 84(4), pp. 701–732. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2006.00465.x
- 36Stewart, D., Shamdasani, P. and Rook, D. (2007) Focus Groups. SAGE Publications, Ltd. DOI: 10.4135/9781412991841
- 37Thornberg, R. and Charmaz, K. (2014) Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Analysis. SAGE, pp. 153–169. DOI: 10.4135/9781446282243.n11
- 38U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. (2023) 2022 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Available at:
https://digitalmedia.fws.gov/digital/collection/document/id/2321/rec/1 . - 39Walajahi, H. (2019) Engaging the “Citizen” in citizen science: Who’s actually included?. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8), pp. 31–33. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619868
- 40West, S., Dyke, A. and Pateman, R. (2021) Variations in the motivations of environmental citizen scientists. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1), p. 14. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.370