References
- 1Ajzen, I. (2002) Constructing a TpB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations, 49(4), pp. 1335–1374. Available at: 10.1002/hep.22759
- 2Ajzen, I. (2012) The theory of planned behavior, in P.A.M. Van Lange, E.T. Higgins, and A.W. Kruglanski (eds.) Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, pp. 179–211. Available at: 10.4135/9781446249215.n22
- 3Alender, B. (2016) Understanding volunteer motivations to participate in citizen science projects: A Deeper look at water quality monitoring, Journal of Science Communication, 15(3), pp. 1–19. Available at: 10.22323/2.15030204
- 4Ashepet, M.G., Vranken, L., Michellier, C., Dewitte, O., Mutyebere, R., Kabaseke, C., Twongyirwe, R., et al. (2024) Assessing scale reliability in citizen science motivational research: lessons learned from two case studies in Uganda, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), pp. 1–18. Available at: 10.1057/s41599-024-02873-1
- 5Asingizwe, D., Poortvliet, P.M., Koenraadt, C.J., van Vliet, A.J., Ingabire, C.M., Mutesa, L., and Leeuwis, C. (2020) Why (not) participate in citizen science? Motivational factors and barriers to participate in a citizen science program for malaria control in Rwanda, PLOS ONE, 15(8), p.
e0237396 . Available at: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0237396 - 6Batson, C.D., Ahmad, N. and Tsang, J.-A. (2002) Four Motives for Community Involvement, Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), pp. 429–445. Available at: 10.1111/1540-4560.00269
- 7Benyei, P., Skarlatidou, A., Argyriou, D., Hall, R., Theilade, I., Turreira García, N., Latreche, D., et al. (2023) Challenges, Strategies, and Impacts of Doing Citizen Science with Marginalised and Indigenous Communities: Reflections from Project Coordinators, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1). Available at: 10.5334/CSTP.514
- 8Beza, E., Steinke, J., Van Etten, J., Reidsma, P., Fadda, C., Mittra, S., Mathur, P., et al. (2017) What are the prospects for citizen science in agriculture? Evidence from three continents on motivation and mobile telephone use of resource-poor farmers, PLoS ONE, 12(5), pp. 1–26. Available at: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175700
- 9Bible, J. and Reza, S.C.-D. (2023) Environmental volunteers endorse diverse motivations: Using a mixed-methods study to assess initial and sustained motivation to engage in public participation in science research, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1), p.
52 . Available at: 10.5334/CSTP.506 - 10Boonyaratana, Y., Hansson, E.E., Granbom, M., and Schmidt, S.M. (2021) The psychometric properties of the meaning of home and housing-related control beliefs scales among 67–70 year-olds in Sweden, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, p.
4273 . Available at: 10.3390/ijerph18084273 - 11Brayley, N., Obst, P.L., White, K.M., Lewis, I.M., Warburton, J., and Spencer, N.M. (2015) Examining the predictive value of combining the theory of planned behaviour and the volunteer functions inventory, Australian Journal of Psychology, 67(3), pp. 149–156. Available at: 10.1111/AJPY.12078
- 12Brees, J., Huyse, T., Tumusiime, J., Kagoro-Rugunda, G., Namirembe, D., Mugabi, F., Nyakato, V., et al. (2021) ‘The potential of citizen-driven monitoring of freshwater snails in schistosomiasis research’, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1), pp. 1–13. Available at: 10.5334/cstp.388
- 13Chen, M. (2020) The impacts of perceived moral obligation and sustainability self-identity on sustainability development : A theory of planned behavior purchase intention model of sustainability- labeled coffee and the moderating effect of climate change skepticism, Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), pp. 2404–2417. Available at: 10.1002/bse.2510
- 14Chiaravalloti, R.M., Skarlatidou, A., Hoyte, S., Badia, M. M., Haklay, M., and Lewis, J. (2022) Extreme citizen science: Lessons learned from initiatives around the globe, Conservation Science and Practice, 4(2), p.
e577 . Available at: 10.1111/CSP2.577 - 15Clary, E.G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R., Copeland, J., Stukas, A., Haugen, J., and Miene, P. (1998) Understanding and Assessing the Motivations of Volunteers: A Functional Approach, Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), pp. 1516–1530. Available at: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516
- 16Constant, N.L. and Hughes, J. (2023) Diversifying citizen science through the inclusion of young people, Journal of Science Communication, 22(2), p.
A07 . Available at: 10.22323/2.22020207 - 17Domroese, M.C. and Johnson, E.A. (2017) Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project, Biological Conservation, 208, pp. 40–47. Available at: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.020
- 18Duerinckx, A., Hens, C., Kerckhoffs, S., Laer, J. Van, and Verstraelen, K. (2021) The citizen in Flemish citizen science :Demographics, motives, and experiences Annelies. Leuven. Available at: 10.5281/zenodo.5825419
- 19Elias, P., Shonowo, A., de Sherbinin, A., Hultquist, C., Danielsen, F., Cooper, C., Mondardini, M., et al. (2023) Mapping the landscape of citizen science in Africa: Assessing its potential contributions to Sustainable Development Goals 6 and 11 on access to clean water and sanitation and sustainable cities, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1), pp. 1–13. Available at: 10.5334/CSTP.601
- 20Etter, S., Strobl, B., Seibert, J., van Meerveld, H.J., Niebert, K., and Stepenuck, K.F. (2023) Why do people participate in app-based environment-focused citizen science projects?, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11(February), pp. 1–13. Available at: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1105682
- 21Finkelstien, M.A. (2009) Intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivational orientations and the volunteer process, Personality and Individual Differences, 46(5–6), pp. 653–658. Available at: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.010
- 22Flora, D.B. (2020) Your coefficient alpha is probably wrong, but which coefficient omega is right? A tutorial on using R to obtain better reliability estimates, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), pp. 484–501. Available at: 10.1177/2515245920951747
- 23Glueck, D.H., Mandel, J., Karimpour-Fard, A., Hunter, L., and Muller, K.E. (2008) Exact calculations of average power for the Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure, The International Journal of Biostatistics, 4(1). Available at: 10.2202/1557-4679.1103
- 24Hagger, M.S. and Chatzisarantis, N.L.D. (2006) Self-identity and the theory of planned behaviour: Between- And within-participants analyses, British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(4), pp. 731–757. Available at: 10.1348/014466605X85654
- 25Haklay, M. (2013)
Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information – overview and typology of participation , in D.Z. Sui, S. Elwood, and M.F. Goodchild (eds.) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Springer, pp. 105–122. Available at: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2 - 26Hulbert, J., Turner, S.C. and Scott, S.L. (2019) Challenges and solutions to establishing and sustaining citizen science projects in South Africa, South African Journal of Science, 115(7–8), pp. 8–11. Available at: 10.17159/sajs.2019/5844
- 27Ibrahim, K., Khodursky, S. and Yasseri, T. (2021) Gender Imbalance and Spatiotemporal Patterns of Contributions to Citizen Science Projects: The Case of Zooniverse, Frontiers in Physics, 9, p.
650720 . Available at: 10.3389/fphy.2021.650720 - 28Jacobs, L., Kabaseke, C., Bwambale, B., Katutu, R., Dewitte, O., Mertens, K., Maes, J., and Kervyn, M. (2019) The geo-observer network: A proof of concept on participatory sensing of disasters in a remote setting, Science of the Total Environment, 670, pp. 245–261. Available at: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.177
- 29Jeanmougin, M., Levontin, L. and Schwartz, A. (2016) Motivations for participation to citizen-science program : A meta-analysis Purpose of the STSM. STSM Report. Available at:
https://cs-eu.net/sites/default/files/media/2017/07/Jeanmougin-etal-2017-STSMReport-MotivationParticipation.pdf (Accessed: February 11, 2025). - 30Kanyiginya, V., Twongyirwe, R., Kagoro-Rugunda, G., Mubiru, D., Sekajugo, J., Mutyebere, R., Deijns, A.A.J., et al. (2023) Inventories of natural hazards in under-reported regions: a multi-method insight from a tropical mountainous landscape, African Geographical Review, 00(00), pp. 1–20. Available at: 10.1080/19376812.2023.2280589
- 31Kühne, S. (2018) From strangers to acquaintances? Interviewer continuity and socially desirable responses in panel surveys, Survey Research Methods, 12(2), pp. 121–146. Available at: 10.18148/srm/2018.v12i2.7299
- 32Land-Zandstra, Anne, Agnello, G. and Gültekin, Yasar.S. (2021)
Participants in citizen science , in K. Vohland et al. (eds.) The Science of Citizen Science. Springer International Publishing, pp. 243–259. Available at: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4 - 33Lee, T.K., Crowston, K., Harandi, M., Østerlund, C., and Miller, G. (2018) Appealing to different motivations in a message to recruit citizen scientists: results of a field experiment, Journal of Science Communication, 17(1), p.
A02 . Available at: 10.22323/2.17010202 - 34Levontin, L., Gilad, Z., Shuster, B., Chako, S., Land-Zandstra, A., Lavie-Alon, N., and Shwartz, A. (2022) Standardizing the Assessment of Citizen Scientists’ Motivations: A Motivational Goal-Based Approach, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1), pp. 1–15. Available at: 10.5334/cstp.459
- 35Lubaale, G. (2022) Gender Imbalance in Science Disciplines at Kyambogo University of Uganda and Development Implications, Journal of Science and Sustainable Development, 8(1), pp. 17–31. Available at: 10.4314/jssd.v8i1.2
- 36Martin, V., Smith, L., Bowling, A., Christidis, L., Lloyd, D., and Pecl, G. (2016) Citizens as Scientists: What Influences Public Contributions to Marine Research?, Science Communication, 38(4), pp. 495–522. Available at: 10.1177/1075547016656191
- 37Mati, J.M. (2016) Horizontality: The ignored particularity of African volunteering, in The third sector in transition: Accountability, transparency, and social inclusion. Stockhom: 12th international ISTR conference. Available at:
https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.istr.org/resource/resmgr/WP_Stockholm/Mati_Horizontality.pdf (Accessed: 24 July 2023) - 38Milewski, N. and Otto, D. (2017) The presence of a third person in face-to-face interviews with immigrant descendants: Patterns, determinants, and effects, Life Course Research and Social Policies, 7, pp. 77–96. Available at: 10.1007/978-94-024-1141-6_4
- 39Mukherjee, N., Zabala, A., Huge, J., Nyumba, T. O., Adem Esmail, B., and Sutherland, W.J. (2018) Comparison of techniques for eliciting views and judgements in decision-making, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), pp. 54–63. Available at: 10.1111/2041-210X.12940
- 40Niebuur, J., Liefbroer, A. C., Steverink, N., and Smidt, N. (2019) Translation and Validation of the Volunteer Functions Inventory (VFI) among the General Dutch Older Population. Available at: 10.3390/ijerph16173106
- 41Nov, O., Arazy, O. and Anderson, D. (2011) Technology-Mediated Citizen Science Participation : A Motivational Model, in Proceedings of the AAAI International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2011). Barcelona, pp. 249–256. Available at:
https://cdn.aaai.org/ojs/14113/14113-28-17631-1-2-20201228.pdf (Accessed: 11 February 2023) - 42Nov, O., Arazy, O. and Anderson, D. (2014) What drives the quantity and quality of online citizen science participation?, PLoS ONE, 9(4), pp. 1–11. Available at: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090375
- 43Pateman, R. and West, S. (2023) Citizen science: pathways to impact and why participant diversity matters, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1). Available at: 10.5334/CSTP.569
- 44Schumann, A., Greving, H., Bruckermann, T., Kimmerle, J., Harms, U., and Brandt, M. (2024) We want you! Recruitment strategies for the success of a citizen science project on urban wildlife ecology, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12(March), pp. 1–9. Available at: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1258813
- 45Sekajugo, J., Kagoro-Rugunda, G., Mutyebere, R., Kabaseke, C., Namara, E., Dewitte, O., Kervyn, M., et al. (2022) Can citizen scientists provide a reliable geo-hydrological hazard inventory? An analysis of biases, sensitivity and precision for the Rwenzori Mountains, Uganda, Environmental Research Letters, 17(4), p.
045011 . Available at: 10.1088/1748-9326/AC5BB5 - 46Serdar, C.C., Cihan, M., Yücel, D., and Serdar, A.M. (2020) Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies, Biochemia medica, 31(1), pp. 27–53. Available at: 10.11613/BM.2021.010502
- 47Strachan, D.L., Källander, K., Nakirunda, M., Ndima, S., Muiambo, A., Hill, Z., Meek, S., et al. (2015) Using theory and formative research to design interventions to improve community health worker motivation, retention and performance in Mozambique and Uganda, Human Resources for Health, 13(25), pp. 1–13. Available at: 10.1186/s12960-015-0020-8
- 48Terenzini, J., Safaya, S. and Falkenberg, L.J. (2023) Motivations and barriers to participation in citizen science: The case study of the Hong Kong Jellyfish Project, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1). Available at: 10.5334/CSTP.618
- 49Tumusiime, J., Bhraunxs, N.V., Kagoro-rugunda, G., Namirembe, D., Albrecht, C., Twongyirwe, R., Tolo, C.U., et al. (2024) Citizens can help to map putative transmission sites for snail-borne diseases, PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 18(4), pp. 1–25. Available at: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012062
- 50Varga, D., et al. (2023) How can Inclusive Citizen Science Transform the Sustainable Development Agenda? Recommendations for a Wider and More Meaningful Inclusion in the Design of Citizen Science Initiatives, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1), pp. 1–10. Available at: 10.5334/CSTP.572
- 51Walker, D.W., Smigaj, M. and Tani, M. (2021) The benefits and negative impacts of citizen science applications to water as experienced by participants and communities, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 8(1), p.
e1488 . Available at: 10.1002/WAT2.1488 - 52Walker, D.W. Tani, M., Gyawali, N., Chapagain, P.S., Davids, J.C., Ghimire, A., Maharjan, M., et al. (2021) Citizen science water projects in Nepal: Participant motivations and the impacts of involvement, Water Alternatives, 14(3), pp. 664–689. Available at:
https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol14/v14issue3/639-a14-3-2/file . - 53Weeser, B., Stenfert Kroese, J., Jacobs, S.R., Njue, N., Kemboi, Z., Ran, A., Rufino, M. C., et al. (2018) Citizen science pioneers in Kenya – A crowdsourced approach for hydrological monitoring, Science of the Total Environment, 631–632, pp. 1590–1599. Available at: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.130
- 54Wehn, U. and Almomani, A. (2019) Incentives and barriers for participation in community-based environmental monitoring and information systems: A critical analysis and integration of the literature, Environmental Science and Policy, 101(September), pp. 341–357. Available at: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.09.002
- 55West, S., Dyke, A. and Pateman, R. (2021) Variations in the motivations of environmental citizen scientists, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1), pp. 1–18. Available at: 10.5334/CSTP.370
- 56West, S. and Pateman, R. (2016) Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: What can be learned from the volunteering literature?, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(2), p.
15 . Available at: 10.5334/cstp.8 - 57Wright, D.R., Underhill, L.G., Keene, M., and Knight, A.T. (2015) Understanding the Motivations and Satisfactions of Volunteers to Improve the Effectiveness of Citizen Science Programs, Society and Natural Resources, 28(9), pp. 1013–1029. Available at: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1054976
- 58Young, J.C., Rose, D.C., Mumby, H.S., Benitez-Capistros, F., Derrick, C.J., Finch, T., Garcia, C., et al. (2018) A methodological guide to using and reporting on interviews in conservation science research, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), pp. 10–19. Available at: 10.1111/2041-210X.12828