Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Multi-Round Trust Game Quantifies Inter-Individual Differences in Social Exchange from Adolescence to Adulthood Cover

Multi-Round Trust Game Quantifies Inter-Individual Differences in Social Exchange from Adolescence to Adulthood

Computational Psychiatry
Volume 5 (2021): Issue 1
By: Andreas Hula,  Michael Moutoussis,  Geert-Jan Will,  Danae Kokorikou,  Andrea M. Reiter,  Gabriel Ziegler,  NSPN Consortium,  Ed Bullmore,  Peter B. Jones,  Ian Goodyer,  Peter Fonagy,  P. Read Montague and  Raymond J. Dolan  
Open Access
|Oct 2021

References

  1. 1Amir, D., Jordan, M. R., & Rand, D. G. (2018). An uncertainty management perspective on long-run impacts of adversity: The influence of childhood socioeconomic status on risk, time, and social preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 217–226. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.014
    Back to article
  2. 2Bach, D. R., Moutoussis, M., Bowler, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2020). Predictors of risky foraging behaviour in healthy young people. Nature Human Behaviour, 1–12. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0867-0
    Back to article
  3. 3Baker, D. P., Eslinger, P. J., Benavides, M., Peters, E., Dieckmann, N. F., & Leon, J. (2015). The cognitive impact of the education revolution: A possible cause of the Flynn Effect on population IQ. Intelligence, 49, 144–158, ISSN 0160-2896. DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.01.003
    Back to article
  4. 4Belli, S. R., Rogers, R. D., & Lau, J. Y. F. (2012). Adult and adolescent social reciprocity: Experimental data from the Trust Game. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1341–1349. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.05.004
    Back to article
  5. 5Bellucci, G., Hahn, T., Deshpande, G., & Krueger, F. (2018). Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-00654-3
    Back to article
  6. 6Borghans, L., Meijers, H., & Weel, B. T. (2013). The importance of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for measuring IQ. Economics of Education Review, 34, 17–28, ISSN 0272-7757. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.01.008
    Back to article
  7. 7Breuning, S. E., & Zella, W. F. (1978). Effects of individualized incentives on norm-referenced IQ test performance of high school students in special education classes. Journal of School Psychology, 16(3), 220–226, ISSN 0022-4405. DOI: 10.1016/0022-4405(78)90004-3
    Back to article
  8. 8Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
    Back to article
  9. 9Camerer, C. F., Ho, T. H., & Chong, J. S. (2004). A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3), 861–898. DOI: 10.1162/0033553041502225
    Back to article
  10. 10Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong Evidence for Sex Differences in Risk Taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 50–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007
    Back to article
  11. 11Costa-Gomes, M., Crawford, V. P., & Broseta, B. (2001). Cognition and behavior in normal-form games: An experimental study. Econometrica, 69(5), 1193–1235. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00239
    Back to article
  12. 12Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. (2012). Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 636–650. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3313
    Back to article
  13. 13Defoe, I. N., Dubas, J. S., Figner, B., & van Aken, M. A. (2015). A meta-analysis on age differences in risky decision making: Adolescents versus children. Psychological Bulletin, 141(1), 48–84. DOI: 10.1037/a0038088
    Back to article
  14. 14Derks, J., Lee, N. C., & Krabbendam, L. (2014). Adolescent trust and trustworthiness: role of gender and social value orientation. Journal of adolescence, 37(8), 1379–1386. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.09.014
    Back to article
  15. 15Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., Lynam, D. R., Loeber, R., & Loeber, M. S.(2011). Role of test motivation in intelligence testing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(19), 7716–7720. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1018601108
    Back to article
  16. 16Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., Shell, R., McNalley, S., & Shea, C. (1991). Prosocial development in adolescence: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 849–857. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.849
    Back to article
  17. 17Fehr, E., Naef, M., & Schmidt, K. M. (2006). Inequality Aversion, Efficency and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments: Comment. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1912–1917. DOI: 10.1257/aer.96.5.1912
    Back to article
  18. 18Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868. DOI: 10.1162/003355399556151
    Back to article
  19. 19Fett, A. K. J., Shergill, S. S., Gromann, P. M., Dumontheil, I., Blakemore, S. J., Yakub, F., & Krabbendam, L. (2014). Trust and social reciprocity in adolescence–a matter of perspective-taking. Journal of adolescence, 37(2), 175–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.11.011
    Back to article
  20. 20Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2, 156–168. DOI: 10.1177/2515245919847202
    Back to article
  21. 21Gmytrasiewicz, P. J., & Doshi, P. (2005). A framework for sequential planning in multi-agent settings. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 24, 49–79. DOI: 10.1613/jair.1579
    Back to article
  22. 22Gneezy, U., Leonard, K. L., & List, J. A. (2009). Sex Differences in Competition: Evidence from a Matrilineal and a Patriarchal Society. Econometrica, 77(5), 1637–1664. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA6690
    Back to article
  23. 23Hula, A., Montague, P. R., & Dayan, P. (2015). Monte Carlo Planning Method Estimates Planning Horizons during Interactive Social Exchange. PLoS Comput Biol, 11(6), e1004254. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004254
    Back to article
  24. 24Hula, A., Vilares, I., Lohrenz, T., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (2018). A Model of Risk and Mental State Shifts during Social Interaction. PLoS Comput Biol, 14(2), e1005935. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005935
    Back to article
  25. 25Kiddle, B., Inkster, B., Prabhu, G., Moutoussis, M., & Whitaker, K. (2017). NSPN Consortium N, Jones P. The NSPN 2400 Cohort: a developmental sample supporting the Wellcome Trust Neuroscience in Psychiatry Network. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyx117
    Back to article
  26. 26King-Casas, B., Sharp, C., Lomax-Bream, L., Lohrenz, T., Fonagy, P., & Montague, P. R. (2008). The rupture and repair of cooperation in borderline personality disorder. Science, 321(5890), 806–810. DOI: 10.1126/science.1156902
    Back to article
  27. 27King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C. F., Quartz, S. R., & Montague, P. R. (2005). Getting to know you: Reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science, 308(5718), 78–83. DOI: 10.1126/science.1108062
    Back to article
  28. 28Koshelev, M., Lohrenz, T., Vannucci, M. & Montague, P. R. (2010). Biosensor Approach to Psychopathology Classification. Plos Computational Biology, 6(10). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000966
    Back to article
  29. 29Lemmers-Jansen, I. L. J., Krabbendam, L., Veltman, D. J., & Fett, A. K. J. (2017). Boys vs. girls: Gender differences in the neural development of trust and reciprocity depend on social context. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 235–245, ISSN 1878-9293. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.02.001
    Back to article
  30. 30Luo, Y., Hétu, S., Lohrenz, T., Hula, A., Dayan, P., Ramey, S. L., Sonnier-Netto, L., Lisinski, J., LaConte, S., Nolte, T., Fonagy, P., Rahmani, E., & Montague, P. R. (2018). Early childhood investment impacts social decision-making four decades later. Nat Commun, 9, 4705. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07138-5
    Back to article
  31. 31McCabe, K., Rigdon, M. L., & Smith, V. (2003). Positive Reciprocity and Intentions in Trust Games. J Econ Behav Organ, 52(2), 267–275. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2681(03)00003-9
    Back to article
  32. 32Mellick, W., Sharp, C., & Ernst, M. (2019). Depressive Adolescent Girls Exhibit Atypical Social Decision-Making In An Iterative Trust Game. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 224–244. DOI: 10.1521/jscp.2019.38.3.224
    Back to article
  33. 33Morgan, J. K., Olino, T. M., McMakin, D. L., Ryan, N. D., & Forbes, E. E. (2013). Neural response to reward as a predictor of increases in depressive symptoms in adolescence. Neurobiology of Disease, 52, 66–74,ISSN 0969-9961. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.03.039
    Back to article
  34. 34Moutoussis, M., Garzón, B., Neufeld, S., Bach, D. R., Rigoli, F., Goodyer, I., Bullmore, E., Fonagy, P., Jones, P., Hauser, T., Romero-Garcia, R., St Clair, M., Vértes, P., Whitaker, K., Inkster, B., Prabhu, G., Ooi, C., Toseeb, U., Widmer, B., Bhatti, J., Villis, L., Alrumaithi, A., Birt, S., Bowler, A., Cleridou, K., Dadabhoy, H., Davies, E., Firkins, A., Granville, S., Harding, E., Hopkins, A., Isaacs, D., King, J., Kokorikou, D., Maurice, C., McIntosh, C., Memarzia, J., Mills, H., O’Donnell, C., Pantaleone, S., Scott, J., Fearon, P., Suckling, J., van Harmelen, A. L., Kievit, R., Guitart-Masip, M., & Dolan, R. J. (2021) Decision-making ability, psychopathology, and brain connectivity. Neuron, ISSN 0896-6273. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.04.019
    Back to article
  35. 35Navarro-Carrillo, G., Valor-Segura, I., & Moya, M. (2018). Do you Trust Strangers, Close Acquaintances, and Members of Your Ingroup? Differences in Trust Based on Social Class in Spain. Soc Indic Res, 135, 585–597. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-016-1527-7
    Back to article
  36. 36Nelson, E. E., Leibenluft, E., McClure, E. B., & Pine, D. S. (2005). The social re-orientation of adolescence: A neuroscience perspective on the process and its relation to psychopathology. Psychological Medicine, 35, 163–174. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291704003915
    Back to article
  37. 37Proto, E., Rustichini, A., & Sofianos, A. (2017). Intelligence, Personality and Gains from Cooperation in Repeated Interactions. CESifo Working Paper Series, 6121.
    Back to article
  38. 38R Core Team. (2017). R: A Language and Evironment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
    Back to article
  39. 39Ray, D., King-Casas, B., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (2008). Bayesian Model of Behaviour in Economic Games. NIPS, 21, 1345–1353.
    Back to article
  40. 40Reniers, R. L., Murphy, L., Lin, A., Bartolomé, S. P., & Wood, S. J. (2016). Risk perception and risk-taking behaviour during adolescence: the influence of personality and gender. PloS one, 11(4), e0153842. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153842
    Back to article
  41. 41Romer, D., Reyna, V. F., & Satterthwaite, T. D. (2017). Beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental context. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 27, 19–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.07.007
    Back to article
  42. 42Rosati, A. G., Benjamin, N., Pieloch, K., & Warneken, F. (2019). Economic trust in young children. Proc. R. Soc. B, 286. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0822
    Back to article
  43. 43Rutledge, R. B., Smittenaar, P., Zeidman, P., Brown, H. R., Adams, R. A., Lindenberger, U., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2016). Risk Taking for Potential Reward Decreases across the Lifespan. Curr Biol, 26(12), 1634–1639. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.017
    Back to article
  44. 44Stamos, A., Altsitsiadis, E., & Dewitte, S. (2019). Investigating the effect of childhood socioeconomic background on interpersonal trust: Lower childhood socioeconomic status predicts lower levels of trust. Personality and Individual Differences, 145, 19–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.011
    Back to article
  45. 45Steinberg, L. (2004). Risk taking in adolescence: what changes, and why? In Adolescent Brain Development: Vulnerabilities and Opportunities. Sep, 2003, New York, NY, US.
    Back to article
  46. 46Sutter, M., & Kocher, M. G. (2007). Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups. Games and Economic Behavior, 59, 364–382. DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2006.07.006
    Back to article
  47. 47Sutter, M., Zoller, C., & Glätzle-Rützler, D. (2019). Economic behavior of children and adolescents – A first survey of experimental economics results. European Economic Review, 111, 98–121, ISSN 0014-2921. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.09.004
    Back to article
  48. 48Tamnes, C. K., Overbye, K., Ferschmann, L., Fjell, A. M., Walhovd, K. B., Blakemore, S. J., & Dumontheil, I. (2018). Social Perspective Taking Is Associated With Self-Reported Prosocial Behavior and Regional Cortical Thickness Across Adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 54(9), 1745–1757 0012-1649/18/$12.00. DOI: 10.1037/dev0000541
    Back to article
  49. 49van de Groep, S., Meuwese, R., Zanolie, K., Güroglu, B., & Crone, E. A. (2018). Developmental Changes and Individual Differences in Trust and Reciprocity in Adolescence. Journal Of Research On Adolescence, 30(S1), 192–208. DOI: 10.1111/jora.12459
    Back to article
  50. 50van den Akker, O. R., van Assen, M. A. L. M., van Vugt, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2020). Sex Differences in Trust and Trustworthiness: A Meta-Analysis of the Trust Game and the Gift-Exchange Game. psyarxiv. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2020.102329
    Back to article
  51. 51van den Bos, W., van Dijk, E., & Crone, E. A. (2012). Learning whom to trust in repeated social interactions: A developmental perspective. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(2), 243–256. DOI: 10.1177/1368430211418698
    Back to article
  52. 52van den Bos, W., van Dijk, E., Westenberg, M., Rombouts, S. A., & Crone, E. A. (2011). Changing brains, changing perspectives: the neurocognitive development of reciprocity. Psychological Science, 22(1), 60–70. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610391102
    Back to article
  53. 53van den Bos, W., Westenberg, M., van Dijk, E., & Crone, E. A. (2010). Development of trust and reciprocity in adolescence. Cognitive Development, 25(1), 90–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.07.004
    Back to article
  54. 54Van der Graaff, J., Branje, S., De Wied, M., Hawk, S., Van Lier, P., & Meeus, W. (2014). Perspective taking and empathic concern in adolescence: Gender differences in developmental changes. Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 881–888. DOI: 10.1037/a0034325
    Back to article
  55. 55van Duijvenvoorde, A. C., Peters, S., Braams, B. R., & Crone, E. A. (2016). What motivates adolescents? Neural responses to rewards and their influence on adolescents’ risk taking, learning, and cognitive control. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 70, 135–147. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.037
    Back to article
  56. 56Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence: WASI-IV (Fourth). NCS Pearson Inc.
    Back to article
  57. 57Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Coalson, D., & Raiford, S. E. (2010). WASI-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives. Academic Press.
    Back to article
  58. 58Xiang, T., Ray, D., Lohrenz, T., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (2012). Computational phenotyping of two-person interactions reveals differential neural response to depth-of-thought. PLoS Comput Biol, 8(12), e1002841. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002841
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cpsy.65 | Journal eISSN: 2379-6227
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 24, 2021
Accepted on: Aug 16, 2021
Published on: Oct 14, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Development,
Trust,
I-POMDP,
Gender Difference,
IQ Effects,
Model Based,
Age,
Adolescent,
Risk Aversion,
Socio-Economic Status

© 2021 Andreas Hula, Michael Moutoussis, Geert-Jan Will, Danae Kokorikou, Andrea M. Reiter, Gabriel Ziegler, NSPN Consortium, Ed Bullmore, Peter B. Jones, Ian Goodyer, Peter Fonagy, P. Read Montague, Raymond J. Dolan, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 5 (2021): Issue 1