Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Exploratory Study of Educators’ Perspectives Towards Hospital School Program Support for Children with Special Health Care Needs After Hospitalization Cover

An Exploratory Study of Educators’ Perspectives Towards Hospital School Program Support for Children with Special Health Care Needs After Hospitalization

Open Access
|Mar 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Survey Participant Demographics (N = 40).

DEMOGRAPHIC / CHARACTERISTICCOUNT (%)
Level (select all that apply)
    Preschool5 (12.5%)
    Primary15 (37.5)
    Intermediate13 32.5)
    Middle school/Jr. high16 (40)
    High school20 (50)
School Locale
    Rural7 (17.5)
    Town3 (7.5)
    Suburban12 (30)
    Urban18 (45)
Professional Role
    School counselor15 (37.5)
    Classroom teacher8 (20)
    Administrator7 (17.5)
    Special education5 (12.5)
    Social worker2 (5)
    Health aide/nurse2 (5)
Sex
    Woman32 (80.0)
    Man6 (15.0)
    Non-binary1 (5.0)
    Did not respond1 (5.0)
Race/Ethnicity
    Black (African or African American)2 (5)
    White (Caucasian)37 (92.5)
    Multiple races1 (2.5)
Years Working in Education
    1–32 (5)
    4–62 (5)
    7–106 (15)
    11–159 (22.5)
    16–205 (12.5)
    21+16 (40)
Highest Degree Earned
    Bachelor’s9 (22.5)
    Master’s30 (75.0)
    Did not respond1 (2.5)
Table 2

How Often Was Each of the Following Individuals Involved in Any Process Related to Students Returning to School Following Hospitalization While Working with the [Hospital] School Program?

ROLEALMOST ALWAYS COUNT (%)SOMETIMES COUNT (%)NEVER COUNT (%)
Parents/family28 (90.3%)2 (6.4%)1 (3.2%)
Student23 (79.3)6 (20.7)0 (0)
School counselor21 (77.8)4 (14.8)2 (7.4)
General education teacher17 (54.8)10 (32.2)4 (12.9)
Special education teacher13 (44.8)14 (48.3)2 (6.9)
School nurse12 (44.4)13 (48.1)2 (7.4)
Principal10 (32.2)11 (35.5)10 (32.2)
Vice/assistant principal7 (24.1)18 (62.1)4 (13.8)
School social worker7 (30.4)12 (52.2)4 (17.4)
School psychologist2 (8.3)14 (58.3)8 (33.3)

[i] Note. Frequency count. Response rates varied (N = 23–31).

Table 3

Which of the Following Are Typically Included in Your School’s Re-Entry Plans for Students Returning to School Following Hospitalization?

RE-ENTRY PLAN ELEMENTMANDATORY COUNT (%)OPTIONAL COUNT (%)NOT AVAILABLE COUNT (%)UNSURE/UNKNOWN COUNT (%)
Consideration of hospital evaluations/recommendations23 (63.9%)6 (16.7%)0 (0.0%)7 (19.4%)
Consideration of previous school-based evaluations15 (41.7)10 (27.8)1 (2.8)10 (27.8)
Recommendations provided by outside mental health professionals13 (36.1)14 (38.9)0 (0.0)9 (25.0)
Recommendations provided by parents/other family members12 (33.3)17 (47.2)0 (0.0)7 (19.4)
Recommendations provided by school counselors10 (27.8)17 (47.2)2 (5.6)7 (19.4)
Recommendations provided by school psychologists9 (25.0)17 (47.2)3 (8.3)7 (19.4)
Recommendations provided by school social workers9 (25.0)16 (44.4)4 (11.1)7 (19.4)
Recommendations provided by teachers9 (25.0)20 (55.6)0 (0.0)7 (19.4)
Recommendations provided by student6 (16.7)23 (63.9)0 (0.0)7 (19.4)
Separate school for transition prior to return to classes1 (2.8)13 (36.1)15 (41.7)7 (19.4)
Gradual return to school using transition space outside of school (e.g., separate facility for academic and social-emotional support; home-bound educational services)1 (2.8)20 (55.6)6 (16.7)9 (25.0)
Gradual return to academic classes using transition space within school (e.g., separate area for academic and social-emotional support)1 (2.8)23 (63.9)4 (11.1)8 (22.2)
Recommendations provided by others0 (0.0)21 (58.3)3 (8.3)12 (33.3)
Gradual return to school using another type of service0 (0.0)6 (16.7)4 (11.1)26 (72.2)

[i] Note. Frequency count (N = 36).

Table 4

Which of the Following Services Did the [Hospital] School Program Help Develop for Students Returning to School Following Hospitalization?

SERVICEAVAILABLE COUNT (%)NOT AVAILABLE COUNT (%)
Support with time management/assignment make up17 (51.5%)16 (48.5%)
Student checks in regularly with an adult15 (45.5)18 (54.5)
Transition space within school (e.g., separate area for academic or social-emotional support)13 (39.4)20 (60.6)
Individual counseling13 (39.4)20 (60.6)
Early outreach (e.g., personalized outreach for students with high absence rates)12 (36.4)21 (63.6)
Self-monitoring instruction11 (33.3)22 (66.7)
Tutoring9 (27.3)24 (72.7)
Group counseling9 (27.3)24 (72.7)
Transition space outside of school (e.g., separate facility for academic or social-emotional support)8 (24.2)25 (75.8)
Social skills group8 (24.2)25 (75.8)
Peer mentoring program3 (9.1)30 (90.9)
Adult mentoring program3 (9.1)30 (90.9)

[i] Note. Frequency count (N = 33).

Table 5

Which of the Following Accommodations Did the [Hospital] School Program Help Implement for Students Returning to School Following Hospitalization?

ACCOMMODATIONAVAILABLE COUNT (%)NOT AVAILABLE COUNT (%)
Excused absences following return to school26 (92.8%)2 (7.1%)
Extended deadlines for assignments24 (85.7)4 (14.3)
Missing work forgiveness24 (85.7)4 (14.3)
Reduced assignments/workload23 (82.1)5 (17.8)
Extended time limits for tests21 (75.0)7 (25.0)
Opportunity to take tests in quiet location21 (75.0)7 (25.0)
Breaking long tests into shorter time blocks20 (71.4)8 (28.6)
Alternatives to traditional testing (oral presentation, projects, etc.)19 (67.8)9 (32.1)
Health plan19 (67.8)9 (32.1)
Opportunity to retake tests16 (57.1)12 (42.9)
Pass to attend school late or leave school early16 (57.1)12 (42.9)
Open-book tests13 (46.4)15 (53.6)
Universal pass (to visit school counselor, social worker, etc., at any time)13 (46.4)15 (53.6)
Emergency response/evaluation plan13 (46.4)15 (53.6)
Medication administration12 (42.9)16 (57.1)
Special dietary plan11 (39.3)17 (60.7)
Nurse visits5 (17.8)23 (82.1)

[i] Note. Frequency count (N = 28).

Table 6

Which of the Following Procedures Should the [Hospital] School Program Provide to Schools for Students Returning to School Following Hospitalization?

RE-ENTRY PLAN ELEMENTMANDATORY COUNT (%)OPTIONAL COUNT (%)NOT NEEDED COUNT (%)UNSURE/UNKNOWN COUNT (%)
Meeting with family about re-entry needs24 (70.6%)8 (23.5%)0 (0.0%)2 (5.9%)
Development of an individualized re-entry plan21 (61.8)9 (26.5)0 (0.0)4 (11.8)
Meeting with student about re-entry needs19 (55.9)13 (38.2)0 (0.0)2 (5.9)
Phone communication with hospital staff15 (44.1)16 (47.1)0 (0.0)3 (8.8)
Referral for special education/504 evaluation8 (23.5)23 (67.6)1 (2.9)2 (5.9)
In-person visits by school staff to the hospital0 (0.0)23 (67.6)7 (20.6)4 (11.8)
In-person visits by hospital staff to the school0 (0.0)26 (76.5)5 (14.7)3 (8.8)

[i] Note. Frequency count (N = 34).

Table 7

Educator Perceptions of Interactions with the [Hospital] School Program.

INTERACTION ITEMSTRONGLY AGREE/AGREE COUNT (%)NOT SURE COUNT (%)STRONGLY DISAGREE/DISAGREE COUNT (%)
The [H]SP communicated well with the school regarding the student’s return to school.14 (53.8%)8 (30.8%)4 (15.4%)
The [H]SP communicated well with me regarding the student’s return to school.16 (61.5)5 (19.2)5 (19.2)
The [H]SP provided the school with information related to the student’s academic progress during hospitalization.14 (53.8)7 (26.9)5 (19.2)
The [H]SP helped the student transition back to school following their hospital stay.13 (50.0)9 (34.6)4 (15.4)
The [H]SP helped create an individualized return plan for the student’s return to school.16 (61.5)6 (23.1)4 (15.4)
The individualized return plan considered my/the school’s needs upon return to school.15 (57.7)7 (26.9)4 (15.4)
Overall, I am satisfied with the services the student received from RSP during the inpatient stay15 (57.7)9 (34.6)2 (7.7)
Overall, I am satisfied with the services received from RSP as the student returned to school.16 (61.5)8 (30.8)2 (7.7)

[i] Note. Likert Scale ranged from strongly disagree to strongly agree (N = 26).

cie-5-1-110-g1.png
Figure 1

Average Services, Accommodations, and Satisfaction by School Locale.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cie.110 | Journal eISSN: 2631-9179
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 8, 2023
|
Accepted on: Jan 17, 2024
|
Published on: Mar 15, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Heather E. Ormiston, Polly R. Husmann, Kristin C. Wikel, Chelsey Ruark, Debra L. Reisinger, Michelle J. Curtin, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.