Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Building component reuse as sociomaterial interaction: lessons from precast concrete Cover

Building component reuse as sociomaterial interaction: lessons from precast concrete

Open Access
|Oct 2026

References

  1. Adams, K. T., Osmani, M., Thorpe, T., & Thornback, J. (2017). Circular economy in construction: Current awareness, challenges and enablers. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Waste and Resource Management, 170(1), 15–24. 10.1680/jwarm.16.00011
  2. Addis, B. (2012). Building with reclaimed components and materials: A design handbook for reuse and recycling. Routledge. 10.4324/9781849770637
  3. Addis, M., Boyd, D., & Raidén, A. (2016). Theorizing expertise in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 34(7–8), 433–438. 10.1080/01446193.2016.1204801
  4. Alkki, L., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Jaakkola, E., & Pohls, E. L. (2025). How do business-to-business actors experience circular solutions? Uncovering the interplay between experience, interaction, and adaptation in the case of concrete element reuse. Industrial Marketing Management, 131, 181–195. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.10.012
  5. Alkki, L., Jonker-Hoffrén, P., & Sairanen, M. (2026). The feasibility of building component reuse in the construction sector—An empirical multiple-case study of precast concrete element reuse. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 6(2), art. 24. 10.1007/s43615-026-00781-x
  6. Alkki, L., Uusikartano, J., Pohls, E. L., Rusthollkarhu, S., & Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2024). Unfolding the human–material interaction of material flows in societies: DNA as a conceptual metaphor. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 28(2), 339–354. 10.1111/jiec.13473
  7. Al-Najjar, A., Malmqvist, T., Stenberg, E., & Höjer, M. (2025). Stock, flow and reuse potential of precast concrete in Swedish residential buildings: Embodied carbon assessment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 218, 108229. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108229
  8. Bajwa, A. U. R., Siriwardana, C., Shahzad, W., & Naeem, M. A. (2025). Material selection in the construction industry: A systematic literature review on multi-criteria decision making. Environment Systems and Decisions, 45, art. 8. 10.1007/s10669-025-10001-w
  9. Bastien-Masse, M., Lambec, B., Arceo, A., & Fivet, C. (2025). An extensive database of Swiss building structures to predict the availability of materials and components. In Rinke, M., & Hvejsel, M. F. (Eds.), Structures and architecture (pp. 34–41). CRC Press. 10.1201/9781003658641-5
  10. Benachio, G. L. F., Freitas, M. do C. D., & Tavares, S. F. (2020). Circular economy in the construction industry: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121046. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121046
  11. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
  12. Berki, M. (2022). The ‘social’ within our walls: Stamped bricks as hidden socio-material entanglements. Cultural Geographies, 30(3). 10.1177/14744740211068100
  13. Blomsma, F., & Tennant, M. (2020). Circular economy: Preserving materials or products? Introducing the Resource States framework. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 156, 104698. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104698
  14. Boxenbaum, E., Jones, C., Meyer, R. E., & Svejenova, S. (2018). Towards an articulation of the material and visual turn in organization studies. Organization Studies, 39(5–6), 597–616. 10.1177/0170840618772611
  15. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  16. Brinkman, L., & Miller, S. A. (2021). Environmental impacts and environmental justice implications of supplementary cementitious materials for use in concrete. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, 1(2), 025003. 10.1088/2634-4505/ac0e86
  17. Bullinger, K. (2025). An institutional theory perspective on social innovations for a circular built environment. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 13(1). 10.1080/21650020.2025.2534351
  18. Cai, G., & Waldmann, D. (2019). A material and component bank to facilitate material recycling and component reuse for a sustainable construction: Concept and preliminary study. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21, 2015–2032. 10.1007/s10098-019-01758-1
  19. Carlile, P. R., Nicolini, D., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (Eds.). (2013). How matter matters: Objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies. Oxford University Press.
  20. Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R., & Hosseini, M. R. (2016). Drivers for adopting reverse logistics in the construction industry: A qualitative study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 23(2), 134–157. 10.1108/ECAM-06-2014-0087
  21. Choi, S., & O’Brien, W. J. (2025). Material suppliers’ perspective on collaboration in industrial construction projects. Frontiers in Built Environment, 11, 1567594. 10.3389/fbuil.2025.1567594
  22. Çimen, Ö. (2021). Construction and built environment in circular economy: A comprehensive literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 305, 127180. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127180
  23. Condotta, M., & Zatta, E. (2021). Reuse of building elements in the architectural practice and the European regulatory context: Inconsistencies and possible improvements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128413. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128413
  24. da Rocha, C. G., & Sattler, M. A. (2009). A discussion on the reuse of building components in Brazil: An analysis of major social, economical and legal factors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(2), 104–112. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.07.004
  25. De Wolf, C., Hoxha, E., & Fivet, C. (2020). Comparison of environmental assessment methods when reusing building components: A case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61, 102322. 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102322
  26. DeLyser, D., & Greenstein, P. (2017). The devotions of restoration: Materiality, enthusiasm, and making three ‘Indian Motocycles’ like new. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107(6), 1461–1478. 10.1080/24694452.2017.1310020
  27. den Hollander, M. C., Bakker, C. A., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). Product design in a circular economy: Development of a typology of key concepts and terms. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21, 517–525. 10.1111/jiec.12610
  28. Devènes, J., Bastien-Masse, M., Küpfer, C., & Fivet, C. (2023). Reusability assessment of obsolete reinforced concrete structural components. In Ilki, A., Çavunt, D., & Çavunt, Y. S. (Eds.), Building for the future: Durable, sustainable, resilient (pp. 440–449). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-031-32519-9_42
  29. Donyavi, S., Flanagan, R., Assadi-Langroudi, A., & Parisi, L. (2024). Understanding the complexity of materials procurement in construction projects to build a conceptual framework influencing supply chain management of MSMEs. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(2), 177–186. 10.1080/15623599.2023.2267862
  30. Droege, H., Kirchherr, J., Raggi, A., & Ramos, T. B. (2023). Towards a circular disruption: On the pivotal role of circular economy policy entrepreneurs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(3), 1142–1158. 10.1002/bse.3098
  31. Elhacham, E., Ben-Uri, L., Grozovski, J., Bar-On, Y. M., & Milo, R. (2020). Global human-made mass exceeds all living biomass. Nature (London), 588(7838), 442–444. 10.1038/s41586-020-3010-5
  32. Engelsen, C. J., Mehus, J., Pade, C., & Sæther, D. H. (2005). Carbon dioxide uptake in demolished and crushed concrete: CO2 uptake during the concrete life cycle (Project Report No. 395-2005). Norwegian Building Research Institute.
  33. Fatimah, Y. A., & Arora, S. (2016). Nonhumans in the practice of development: Material agency and friction in a small-scale energy program in Indonesia. Geoforum, 70, 25–34. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.01.009
  34. Flick, U. (2004). Triangulation in qualitative research. In A companion to qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 178–183). Sage.
  35. Håkansson, H., & Ingemansson, M. (2013). Industrial renewal within the construction network. Construction Management and Economics, 31(1), 40–61. 10.1080/01446193.2012.737470
  36. Harala, L., Alkki, L., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Al-Najjar, A., & Malmqvist, T. (2023). Industrial ecosystem renewal towards circularity to achieve the benefits of reuse—Learning from circular construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 389, 135885. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135885
  37. Higuchi, T., Morioka, M., Yoshioka, I., & Yokozeki, K. (2014). Development of a new ecological concrete with CO2 emissions below zero. Construction and Building Materials, 67, 338–343. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.029
  38. Hopkinson, P., Chen, H.-M., Zhou, K., Wang, Y., & Lam, D. (2019). Recovery and reuse of structural products from end-of-life buildings. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Engineering Sustainability, 172(3), 119–128. 10.1680/jensu.18.00007
  39. Huuhka, S., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Lahdensivu, J., Jonker-Hoffrén, P., Arnold, V., Stenberg, E., Blok, R., Gudmundsson, K., Teuffel, P., & Mettke, A. (2023). Recreating the construction sector for circularity: Catalysing the reuse of prefabricated concrete elements. In The Routledge handbook of catalysts for a sustainable circular economy (pp. 42–66). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003267492-4
  40. Ingstrup, M. B., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Adlin, N. (2021). When institutional logics meet: Alignment and misalignment in collaboration between academia and practitioners. Industrial Marketing Management, 92, 267–276. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.01.004
  41. Jemal, K. M., Aibinu, A., & Oraee, M. (2026). State of circular business models and product service system in construction research: A bibliometric-qualitative review. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 1–25. 10.1108/SASBE-07-2025-0431
  42. Jones, M. (1999). Information systems and the double mangle: Steering the course between the Scylla of embedded structure and the Charybdis of strong symmetry. In Larsen, T. J., Levine, L., & DeGross, J. I. (Eds.), Information systems: Current issues and future changes. Proceedings of the IFIPWG 8.2 & 8.6 Joint Working Conference on Information Systems 1998, Helsinki (pp. 287–302).
  43. Jonker-Hoffrén, P. (2023). Policy tensions in demolition: Dutch social housing and circularity. Buildings & Cities, 4, 405–421. 10.5334/bc.305
  44. Khouja, A., Lehoux, N., Cimon, Y., & Cloutier, C. (2021). Collaborative interorganizational relationships in a project-based industry. Buildings, 11(11), 502. 10.3390/buildings11110502
  45. Klitgaard, A., & Gottlieb, S. C. (2019). Strategizing and project management in construction projects: An exploratory literature review. In 10th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization. Emerald. 10.1108/S2516-285320190000002040
  46. Knappett, C., & Malafouris, L. (2008). Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach. Springer. 10.1007/978-0-387-74711-8
  47. Kokkonen, A., & Alin, P. (2015). Practice-based learning in construction projects: A literature review. Construction Management and Economics, 33(7), 513–530. 10.1080/01446193.2015.1062903
  48. Lambec, B., Bastien-Masse, M., & Fivet, C. (2025). Analysis and synthesis of existing procedures used to determine the reuse potential of building elements. Frontiers in Built Environment, 11, art. 1511109. 10.3389/fbuil.2025.1511109
  49. Latour, B. (1988). Mixing humans and nonhumans together: The sociology of a door-closer. Social Problems, 35(3), 298–310. 10.4324/9781315775357
  50. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor–network-theory. Oxford University Press.
  51. Leonardi, P. M. (2013a). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them? In Leonardi, P. M., Nardi, B. A., & Kallinikos, J. (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 25–48). Oxford University Press.
  52. Leonardi, P. M. (2013b). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23, 59–76. 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002
  53. Lizarralde, G., de Blois, M., & Latunova, I. (2011). Structuring of temporary multi-organizations: Contingency theory in the building sector. Project Management Journal, 42(4), 19–36. 10.1002/pmj.20249
  54. London, K., & Pablo, Z. (2017). An actor–network theory approach to developing an expanded conceptualization of collaboration in industrialized building housing construction. Construction Management and Economics, 35(8–9), 553–577. 10.1080/01446193.2017.1339361
  55. Martini, A., Massa, S., & Testa, S. (2013). The firm, the platform and the customer: A ‘double mangle’ interpretation of social media for innovation. Information and Organization, 23(3), 198–213. 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.07.001
  56. McDowall, W., Geng, Y., Huang, B., Barteková, E., Bleischwitz, R., Türkeli, S., Kemp, R., & Doménech, T. (2017). Circular economy policies in China and Europe. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 651–661. 10.1111/jiec.12597
  57. Mehta, L., Huff, A., & Allouche, J. (2019). The new politics and geographies of scarcity. Geoforum, 101, 222–230. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.10.027
  58. Orlikowski, W. J. (2005). Material works: Exploring the situated entanglement of technological performativity and human agency. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 6. https://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol17/iss1/6
  59. Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. 10.1177/0170840607081138
  60. Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474. 10.1080/19416520802211644
  61. Padilla Gil, H. M., Moore, T., Willand, N., & Horne, R. (2025). Beyond the walls: How materiality shapes social processes of housing insulation retrofit. Energy Research & Social Science, 127, art. 104233. 10.1016/j.erss.2025.104233
  62. Pickering, A. (1993). The mangle of practice: Agency and emergence in the sociology of science. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 559–589. 10.1086/230316
  63. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. University of Chicago Press.
  64. Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017). Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 710–718. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055
  65. Rakhshan, K., Morel, J. C., Alaka, H., & Charef, R. (2020). Components reuse in the building sector—A systematic review. Waste Management & Research, 38(4), 347–370. 10.1177/0734242X20910463
  66. Riuttala, M., Harala, L., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Huuhka, S. (2024). How building component reuse creates economic value—Identifying value capture determinants from a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 443, 141112. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141112
  67. Rokio, M., Ahola, T., Alkki, L., & Ståhle, M. (2024). Projects as drivers of sustainability: How the adoption of the reuse principle affects the front-end of a construction project. International Journal of Project Management, 42(7), 102647. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102647
  68. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. SAGE.
  69. Shooshtarian, S., Wong, P. S., Caldera, S., Jayarathna, C., Ryley, T., Maqsood, T., Zaman, A., & Ruiz, A. M. C. (2025). Circular economy policies and the use of recycled materials in the Australian built environment. Journal of Environmental Management, 389, 126108. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126108
  70. Styre, A. (2017). Thinking about materiality: The value of a construction management and engineering view. Construction Management and Economics, 35(1–2), 35–44. 10.1080/01446193.2016.1272760
  71. Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. University of Chicago Press.
  72. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001
  73. Uusikartano, J. (2025). Metatheoretical exploration of resource management concept in industrial ecology. Tampere University. https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/230863
  74. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. In Applied social research methods (4th ed.). Sage.
  75. Zhao, Y., Wang, T., & Yi, W. (2023). Emergy-accounting-based comparison of carbon emissions of solid waste recycled concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 387, 131674. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131674
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.840 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Page range: 1103 - 1118
Submitted on: Apr 23, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 26, 2026
Published on: Oct 9, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Jarmo Uusikartano, Lauri Alkki, Vittorio Capitani, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.