Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Living labs: a systematic review of success parameters and outcomes Cover

Living labs: a systematic review of success parameters and outcomes

Open Access
|Jan 2026

References

  1. Alexandrakis, J., Hein, J., & Kratzer, J. (2022). Living labs and small and medium-sized enterprises: A symbioses propelling sustainable innovation. Sustainability, 14(19), 12729. 10.3390/su141912729
  2. Archibald, M. M., Wittmeier, K., Gale, M., Ricci, F., Russell, K., & Woodgate, R. L. (2021). Living labs for patient engagement and knowledge exchange: An exploratory sequential mixed methods study to develop a living lab in paediatric rehabilitation. BMJ Open, 11(5), e041530. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041530
  3. Ballon, P., & Schuurman, D. (2015). Living labs: Concepts, tools and cases. Info, 17(4). 10.2139/ssrn.2642754
  4. Ballon, P., Van Hoed, M., & Schuurman, D. (2018). The effectiveness of involving users in digital innovation: Measuring the impact of living labs. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 12011214. 10.1016/j.tele.2018.02.003
  5. Banerjee, S. (2022). Living innovation lab: A human centric computing toward healthy living (Version 1). arXiv. 10.48550/arXiv.2205.03324
  6. Berniak-Woźny, J., & Szelągowski, M. (2023). Living labs as an engaging approach to developing process thinking competency—Case study and instructional strategy. Communications of International Proceedings. https://ibimapublishing.com/p-articles/42EDU/2023/4223623/
  7. Bouwma, I., Wigboldus, S., Potters, J., Selnes, T., Van Rooij, S., & Westerink, J. (2022). Sustainability transitions and the contribution of living labs: A framework to assess collective capabilities and contextual performance. Sustainability, 14(23), 15628. 10.3390/su142315628
  8. Bronson, K., Devkota, R., & Nguyen, V. (2021). Moving toward generalizability? A scoping review on measuring the impact of living labs. Sustainability, 13(2), 502. 10.3390/su13020502
  9. Bulkeley, H., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Hartmann, C., Kronsell, A., Mai, L., Marvin, S., McCormick, K., Van Steenbergen, F., & Voytenko Palgan, Y. (2016). Urban living labs: Governing urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, 1317. 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003
  10. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 4169. 10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
  11. Ceseracciu, C., Branca, G., Deriu, R., & Roggero, P. P. (2023). Using the right words or using the words right? Re-conceptualising living labs for systemic innovation in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Rural Studies, 104, 103154. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103154
  12. Chen, K. B., Tsui, H.-L., Yang, C.-T., Ting, L. H., & Houng, H. (2010). A living lab model for user driven innovation in urban communities. In 2010 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE) (pp. 17). 10.1109/ICE.2010.7476984
  13. Cigir, K. (2018). Creating a living lab model for tourism and hospitality businesses to stimulate CSR and sustainability innovations. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 217, 569583. 10.2495/SDP180491
  14. Ciliberti, S., Bartolini, F., Brunori, A., Mariano, E., Metta, M., Brunori, G., & Frascarelli, A. (2022). EUTR implementation in the Italian wood-energy sector: Role and impact of (ongoing) digitalisation. Forest Policy and Economics, 141, 102758. 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102758
  15. De Vita, K., & De Vita, R. (2021). Expect the unexpected: Investigating co-creation projects in a living lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9–10), 620. 10.22215/timreview/1461
  16. Del Vecchio, P., Elia, G., Ndou, V., Secundo, G., & Specchia, F. (2017). Living lab as an approach to activate dynamic innovation ecosystems and networks: An empirical study. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14, 1750024. 10.1142/S0219877017500249
  17. Dell’Era, C., & Landoni, P. (2014). Living lab: A methodology between user-centred design and participatory design. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(2), 137154. 10.1111/caim.12061
  18. Du, D. (2020). Urban living lab: What is it, and what is the matter? plaNext–Next Generation Planning, 10, 2237. 10.24306/plnxt/65
  19. Emblen-Perry, K. (2019). Can sustainability audits provide effective, hands-on business sustainability learning, teaching and assessment for business management undergraduates? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(7), 11911219. 10.1108/IJSHE-10-2018-0181
  20. Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V. P., & Kulkki, S. (2005). State-of-the-art in utilizing living labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation—A European approach. Center for Distance-Spanning Technology, Lulea University of Technology. stateoftheart_livinglabs_eriksson2005-libre.pdf
  21. Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V.-P., Kulkki, S., & Hribernik, K. A. (2006). Living labs as a multi-contextual R&D methodology. In 2006 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE) (pp. 18). 10.1109/ICE.2006.7477082
  22. Fauth, J., De Moortel, K., & Schuurman, D. (2024). Living labs as orchestrators in the regional innovation ecosystem: A conceptual framework. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 11(1), 2414505. 10.1080/23299460.2024.2414505
  23. Fuglsang, L., Hansen, A. V., Mergel, I., & Røhnebæk, M. T. (2021). Living labs for public sector innovation: An integrative literature review. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 58. 10.3390/admsci11020058
  24. Galbraith, B., Mulvenna, M., Martin, S., & McGloin, E. (2008). Living labs: Helping to meet the needs of ageing people? In Assistive technology research series (pp. 105118). IOS Press. 10.3233/978-1-58603-902-8-105
  25. Greve, K., Vita, R. D., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2021). Living labs: From niche to mainstream innovation management. Sustainability, 13(2), 791. 10.3390/su13020791
  26. Grüneis, H., Egartner, S., Niedermayr, J., Heinschink, K., & Wagner, K. (2020). Living labs—Innovate business models for rural regions. Rural Development 2019, 2019(1), 388392. 10.15544/RD.2019.068
  27. Gualandi, E., & Romme, A. G. (2019). How to make living labs more financially sustainable? Case studies in Italy and the Netherlands. Engineering Management Research, 8(1), 11. 10.5539/emr.v8n1p11
  28. Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11, 181217. 10.1002/jrsm.1378
  29. Guzmán, J. G., Del Carpio, A. F., Colomo-Palacios, R., & De Diego, M. V. (2013). Living labs for user-driven innovation: A process reference model. Research-Technology Management, 56(3), 2939. 10.5437/08956308X5603087
  30. Hossain, M., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2019). A systematic review of living lab literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 976988. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.257
  31. Huang, J. H., Iakovleva, T. A., & Bessant, J. (2024). Fostering user involvement in collaborative innovation spaces: Insights from living labs. International Journal of Innovation Management, 28(7–8), 2450032. 10.1142/S1363919624500324
  32. Jernsand, E. M. (2019). Student living labs as innovation arenas for sustainable tourism. Tourism Recreation Research, 44(3), 337347. 10.1080/02508281.2019.1613299
  33. Jiang, C., Xiao, Y., & Cao, H. (2020). Co-creating for locality and sustainability: Design-driven community regeneration strategy in Shanghai’s old residential context. Sustainability, 12(7), 2997. 10.3390/su12072997
  34. Kalinauskaite, I., Brankaert, R., Lu, Y., Bekker, T., Brombacher, A., & Vos, S. (2021). Facing societal challenges in living labs: Towards a conceptual framework to facilitate transdisciplinary collaborations. Sustainability, 13(2), 614. 10.3390/su13020614
  35. Kemeç, A. (2023). Living labs experiences in Turkey: Examples of Başakşehir and Bodrum. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(27), 320341. 10.36543/kauiibfd.2023.013
  36. Konstantinidis, E. I., Petsani, D., & Bamidis, P. D. (2021). Teaching university students co-creation and living lab methodologies through experiential learning activities and preparing them for RRI. Health Informatics Journal, 27(1). 10.1177/1460458221991204
  37. LabCampus GmbH. (2025). The innovation center of tomorrow I: LabCampus. https://www.labcampus.de/en
  38. Leminen, S. (2015). Q&A. What are living labs? Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(9), 2935. 10.22215/timreview/928
  39. Leminen, S., Nyström, A.-G., Westerlund, M., & Kortelainen, M. J. (2016). The effect of network structure on radical innovation in living labs. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(6), 743757. 10.1108/JBIM-10-2012-0179
  40. Leminen, S., Rajahonka, M., & Westerlund, M. (2023). Innovation in living labs: A quantum approach. Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 122. 10.24840/2183-0606_011.004_0001
  41. Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2008). Living labs fostering innovations in the retail industry: A network perspective. In Proceedings of the 24th IMP 2008 Conference, Uppsala, Sweden, 4–6 September 2008. https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/living-labs-fostering-innovations-in-the-retail-industry-a-networ/
  42. Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2012). Towards innovation in living labs networks. International Journal of Product Development, 17(1–2), 4359. 10.1504/IJPD.2012.051161
  43. Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2016). A framework for understanding the different research avenues of living labs. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(4), 399. 10.1504/IJTMKT.2016.079731
  44. Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2019). Living labs: From scattered initiatives to a global movement. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(2), 250264. 10.1111/caim.12310
  45. Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström, A.-G. (2012). Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 611. 10.22215/timreview/602
  46. Lin, C.-K., Wang, T.-H., & Yang, J.-F. (2013). Developed smart nutrient services with living lab methodology. In 2013 1st International Conference on Orange Technologies (ICOT) (pp. 260263). 10.1109/ICOT.2013.6521207
  47. Logghe, S., & Schuurman, D. (2017). Action research as a framework to evaluate the operations of a living lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2), 3541. 10.22215/timreview/1056
  48. Mäkäräinen-Suni, I. (2008). Best practices, innovation and development: Experiences from five living lab innovation environments. In 2008 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE) (pp. 18). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7462121
  49. Mastelic, J., Sahakian, M., & Bonazzi, R. (2015). How to keep a living lab alive? Info, 17(4), 1225. 10.1108/info-01-2015-0012
  50. Merino-Barbancho, B., Abril Jiménez, P., Mallo, I., Lombroni, I., Cea, G., López Nebreda, C., Cabrera, M. F., Fico, G., & Arredondo, M. T. (2023). Innovation through the quintuple helix in living labs: Lessons learned for a transformation from lab to ecosystem. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1176598. 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1176598
  51. Molnar, A., Lepenies, R., Borda, A., & Pedell, S. (2023). Grand challenges and living labs: Toward achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1242138. 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1242138
  52. Mulder, I., & Stappers, P. J. (2009). Co-creating in practice: Results and challenges. In 2009 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE) (pp. 18). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7461369
  53. Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (2005). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(12), 12281263. 10.1108/01443570510633639
  54. Nguyen, H. T., Nguyen, H., & Marquès, P. (2021). The promise of living labs to the quadruple helix stakeholders: Exploring the sources of (dis)satisfaction. European Planning Studies, 30(6), 11241143. 10.1080/09654313.2021.1968798
  55. Notz, G. (2006). Theoretische Zugänge und empirische Beispiele zu kommunitären Lebens- und Arbeitsformen. Soziale Ungleichheit, kulturelle Unterschiede: Verhandlungen des 32. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in München. Teilbd. 1 und 2 (pp. 41034113). https://d-nb.info/1191910628
  56. Nyborg, S., Horst, M., O’Donovan, C., Bombaerts, G., Hansen, M., Takahashi, M., Viscusi, G., & Ryszawska, B. (2024). University campus living labs: Unpacking multiple dimensions of an emerging phenomenon. Science & Technology Studies, 37(1), 6081. 10.23987/sts.120246
  57. Nyström, A.-G., Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Kortelainen, M. (2014). Actor roles and role patterns influencing innovation in living labs. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 483495. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.016
  58. Paranunzio, R., Anton, I., Adirosi, E., Ahmed, T., Baldini, L., Brandini, C., Giannetti, F., Meulenberg, C., Ortolani, A., Pilla, F., Iglesias, G., & Gharbia, S. (2023). A new approach towards a user-driven coastal climate service to enhance climate resilience in European cities. Sustainability, 16(1), 335. 10.3390/su16010335
  59. Pascu, C., & van Lieshout, M. (2009). User-led, citizen innovation at the interface of services. Info, 11(6), 8296. 10.1108/14636690910996731
  60. Paskaleva, K., & Cooper, I. (2021). Are living labs effective? Exploring the evidence. Technovation, 106, 102311. 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102311
  61. Purcell, W. M., Henriksen, H., & Spengler, J. D. (2019). Universities as the engine of transformational sustainability toward delivering the sustainable development goals: ‘Living labs’ for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(8), 13431357. 10.1108/IJSHE-02-2019-0103
  62. Quadros Aniche, L., Edelenbos, J., Gianoli, A., Caruso, R., DeLosRíos-White, M. I., Pyl Wissink-Nercua, C., Undabeitia, A., Enseñado, E. M., & Gharbia, S. (2024). Contextualizing and generalizing drivers and barriers of urban living labs for climate resilience. Environmental Policy and Governance, 34(5), 490523. 10.1002/eet.2097
  63. Rogers, S., Jeffery, A., Pringle, J., Law, A., Nobajas, A., Szkornik, K., Turner, A., Moolna, A., Davenward, B., & Hobson, L. (2023). Experiential and authentic learning in a living lab: The role of a campus-based living lab as a teaching and learning environment. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 28. 10.47408/jldhe.vi28.1020
  64. Rosa, N., Leite, S., Alves, J., Carvalho, A., Oliveira, D., Santos, F., Macedo, B., & Prazeres, H. (2024). Knowledge innovation ecosystem for the promotion of user-centre health innovations: Living lab methodology and lessons learned through the proposal of standard good practices. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2024.01.17.573578
  65. Rossi, P., Freeman, H., & Rosenbaum, S. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Sage.
  66. Saleme, P., Dietrich, T., Pang, B., & Parkinson, J. (2023). Co-creating and evaluating social marketing programs: A living lab approach. Journal of Social Marketing, 13(3), 399418. 10.1108/JSOCM-06-2022-0124
  67. Santally, M. I., Cooshna-Naik, D., & Conruyt, N. (2014). A model for the transformation of the Mauritian classroom based on the living lab concept. In 2014 IST-Africa Conference Proceedings (pp. 110). 10.1109/ISTAFRICA.2014.6880603
  68. Santonen, T., Petsani, D., Julin, M., Garschall, M., Kropf, J., Van der Auwera, V., Bernaerts, S., Losada, R., Almeida, R., Garatea, J., Muñoz, I., Nagy, E., Kehayia, E., De Guise, E., Nadeau, S., Azevedo, N., Segkouli, S., Lazarou, I., Petronikolou, V., … Konstantinidis, E. (2022). Cocreating a harmonized living lab for big data–driven hybrid persona development: Protocol for cocreating, testing, and seeking consensus. JMIR Research Protocols, 11(1), e34567. 10.2196/preprints.34567
  69. Satria, A., Slamet, A. S., Kosasih, A., Purwito, A., Siregar, I. Z., & Putra, H. (2023). Campus setting as living labs: Lessons from IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia. Journal of Sustainability Perspectives, 3(3), 257262. 10.14710/jsp.2023.20712
  70. Schafer, L. J., Anthouli, A., Schmidt, A., Beblek, A., Fruehbeisser, A., Walthall, B., Mingolla, C., Rogozan, C., Petruzzella, D., Wascher, D., Volpe, F., Ruggeri, G., Arciniegas, G., Vicente-Vicente, J. L., Riviou, K., Valta, K., Marijke Wenzel, L., Labellarte, L., Crivits, M., … (2024). Transforming European food systems with multi-actor networks and living labs through the FoodSHIFT approach. Open Research Europe, 4, 151. 10.12688/openreseurope.17982.2
  71. Scholl, C., & Kraker, J. D. (2021). The practice of urban experimentation in Dutch city labs. Urban Planning, 6(1), 161170. 10.17645/up.v6i1.3626
  72. Schrevel, S., Slager, M., & De Vlugt, E. (2020). ‘I stood by and watched’: An autoethnography of stakeholder participation in a living lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(11), 19–30. 10.22215/timreview/1400
  73. Schuurman, D., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. (2013). Open innovation processes in living lab innovation systems: Insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11), 2836. 10.22215/timreview/743
  74. Schuurman, D., Herregodts, A.-L., Georges, A., & Rits, O. (2019). Innovation management in living lab projects: The Innovatrix Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3). https://www.timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Schuurman_et_al_TIMReview_March2019.pdf
  75. Schuurman, D., Marez, L. D., & Ballon, P. (2016). The impact of living lab methodology on open innovation contributions and outcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1). 10.22215/timreview/956
  76. Sharp, D., & Salter, R. (2017). Direct impacts of an urban living lab from the participants’ perspective: Livewell Yarra. Sustainability, 9(10), 115. 10.3390/su9101699
  77. Shenhar, A., Dvir, D., Levy, O., & Maltz, A. (2001). Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning, 34, 699725. 10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00097-8
  78. Smith, G., Dixon, C., Neiva Ganga, R., & Greenop, D. (2022). How do we know co-created solutions work effectively within the real world of people living with dementia? Learning methodological lessons from a co-creation-to-evaluation case study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14317. 10.3390/ijerph192114317
  79. Srinivasan, R. (2023). JOSEPHS®: Die Service-Manufaktur. In Plattform-Geschäftsmodelle (pp. 369388). Springer Nature. 10.1007/978-981-19-9448-7_22
  80. Ståhlbröst, A. (2012). A set of key principles to assess the impact of living labs. International Journal of Product Development, 17(1–2), 60. 10.1504/IJPD.2012.051154
  81. Ståhlbröst, A., & Holst, M. (2017). Reflecting on actions in living lab research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2). 10.22215/timreview/1055
  82. Steen, K., & Van Bueren, E. (2017). The defining characteristics of urban living labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(7), 2133. 10.22215/timreview/1088
  83. Svensson, J., Ihlstrom Eriksson, C., & Ebbesson, E. (2010). User contribution in innovation processes—Reflections from a living lab perspective. In 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 110). 10.1109/HICSS.2010.424
  84. Toffolini, Q., Capitaine, M., Hannachi, M., & Cerf, M. (2021). Implementing agricultural living labs that renew actors’ roles within existing innovation systems: A case study in France. Journal of Rural Studies, 88, 157168. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.10.015
  85. Van Geenhuizen, M. (2018). A framework for the evaluation of living labs as boundary spanners in innovation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(7), 12801298. 10.1177/2399654417753623
  86. Van Geenhuizen, M. (2019). Applying an RRI filter in key learning on urban living labs’ performance. Sustainability, 11(14), 3833. 10.3390/su11143833
  87. Veeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2013). Linking living lab characteristics and their outcomes: Towards a conceptual framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12), 615. 10.22215/timreview/748
  88. Veeckman, C., & Temmerman, L. (2021). Urban living labs and citizen science: From innovation and science towards policy impacts. Sustainability, 13(2), 526. 10.3390/su13020526
  89. Vermeylen, S., Vandenhoudt, H., Helsen, K., & De Witte, N. A. J. (2023). How can a local government boost prevention and inclusive primary care for its citizens? International Journal of Integrated Care, 23(S1), 270. 10.5334/ijic.ICIC23105
  90. Von Wirth, T., Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N., & Coenen, L. (2019). Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: Mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 229257. 10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895
  91. Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., Evans, J., & Schliwa, G. (2016). Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 4554. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053
  92. White, H. (2009). Theory-based impact evaluation: Principles and practice. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 1, 271284. 10.1080/19439340903114628
  93. Yilmaz, O. C., & Ertekin, O. (2023). Urban living labs as a tool to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 16: A case study of Istanbul, Turkiye. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 18(3), 88118. https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/terumm/v18y2023i3p88-118.html
  94. Yilmaz, O. C., & Ertekin, O. (2024). Towards setting a standard for evaluating living labs with case studies in Turkiye. Technology in Society, 77, 102574. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102574
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.624 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 14, 2025
|
Accepted on: Dec 17, 2025
|
Published on: Jan 29, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Jan Moritz Müller, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.