References
- 1Aragone, A., Dobre, C. & Faldi, G. (2022, July). Hydrological communities in action. The case of ‘Bruxelles sensible à l’eau’ action research project. Paper presented at the AESOP Annual Congress 2022, Space for Species: Redefining Spatial Justice, Tartu, Estonia.
- 2Aragone, A., Dobre, C. C. & Faldi, G. (2023). Gradients of wetness: Gardens as experiments towards wetness. Roadsides, 10, 9–15.
- 3Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E. & Patton, E. (2011). Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 995–1004.
- 4Ballon, P. & Schuurman, D. (2015). Living labs: Concepts, tools and cases. Info, 17(4). 10.1108/info-04-2015-0024
- 5Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234.
- 6Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Eriksson, C. I., Ståhlbröst, A. & Svensson, J. (2009, December). A milieu for innovation: Defining living labs. Paper presented at the ISPIM Innovation Symposium: Simulating recovery – the Role of innovation management, New York City, USA.
- 7Brandsen, T., Steen, T. & Verschuere, B. (2018).
How to encourage co-creation and co-production. Some recommendations . In T. Brandsen, T. Steen & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services (pp. 299–303). Routledge. - 8Brusseau. (n.d.).
http://brusseau.be/projets/ - 9Bruxelles Environnement. (2016). Etat des lieux et analyse de la situation. In Projet de plan de gestion de l’eau de la Region de Bruxelles-Capitale 2016–2017 (pp. 40–206).
Brussels Capital Region .https://environnement.brussels/sites/default/files/user_files/chapitre2_etatdeslieux.pdf - 10Bulkeley, H., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Hartmann, C., Kronsell, A., Mai, L., Marvin, S., McCormick, K., van Steenbergen, F. & Voytenko Palgan, Y. (2016). Urban living labs: Governing urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, 13–17. 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003
- 11Burns, M. J., Wallis, E. & Matic, V. (2015). Building capacity in low-impact drainage management through research collaboration. Freshwater Science, 34(3), 1176–1185.
- 12Chaffin, B. C., Shuster, W. D., Garmestani, A. S., Furio, B., Albro, S. L., Gardiner, M., Spring, M. & Green, O. O. (2016). A tale of two rain gardens: Barriers and bridges to adaptive management of urban stormwater in Cleveland, Ohio. Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 431–441. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.025
- 13Damay, L. & Schaut, C. (2022). Une recherche-action participative entre cocréation et confrontation des savoirs. Cahiers RAMAU. Revue du Réseau activités et métiers de l’architecture et de l’urbanisme, 11, 149–161.
- 14Davesne, S., De Villers, J. & Squilbin, M. (2017). 12. Maillage Pluie. Bruxelles Environnement.
https://document.environnement.brussels/opac_css/elecfile/Eau_12.PDF?langtype=2060 - 15De Muynck, S. & Nalpas, D. (2021). The renewal of politics through co-creation: The analysis of the case of rainwater and biowaste in Brussels. IJAR – International Journal of Action Research, 17(1), 5–6.
- 16Dobre, C. C., Faldi, G., Nalpas, D., Pinet, J.-F. & Verbeiren, B. (2023). Naar een water gevoelige stad. Ruimte & planning.
http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ - 17Dobre, C. C. & Nalpas, D. (2020). Brusseau—Rapport scientifique III.
- 18Edwards-Schachter, M. E., Matti, C. E. & Alcantara, E. (2012). Fostering quality of life through social innovation: a living lab methodology study case. Review of Policy Research, 29(6), 672–692.
- 19Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W., Ashley, R., Butler, D., Arthur, S., Trowsdale, S., Barraud, S., Semadeni-Davies, A., Bertrand-Krajewski, J.-L., Mikkelsen, P. S., Rivard, G., Uhl, M., Dagenais, D. & Viklander, M. (2014). SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water Journal, 12(7), 1–18. 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
- 20Franz, Y. (2015). Designing social living labs in urban research. Info, 17(4), 53–66.
- 21Greve, K., Leminen, S., De Vita, R. & Westerlund, M. (2020). Unveiling the diversity of scholarly debate on Living labs: A bibliometric approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(8),
2040003 . 10.1142/S1363919620400034 - 22Hermesse, J. & Vankeerberghen, A. (2020). La recherche transdisciplinaire au sein des institutions d’enseignement supérieur et de recherche. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 28(3–4), 270–277. 10.1051/nss/2021006
- 23Herr, K. & Anderson, G. (2015). The action research dissertation. A guide for students and faculty (2nd ed.). SAGE.
- 24Hossain, M., Leminen, S. & Westerlund, M. (2019). A systematic review of living lab literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 976–988.
- 25Jimenez, A., Abbott, P. & Dasuki, S. (2022). In-betweenness in ICT4D research: Critically examining the role of the researcher. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(1), 25–39. 10.1080/0960085X.2021.1978340
- 26Kerstetter, K. (2012). Insider, outsider, or somewhere between: The impact of researchers’ identities on the community-based research process. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 27(2),
7 .https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jrss/vol27/iss2/7 - 27Kohlbrenner, A. (2010).
Le chantier de la place Flagey: Rupture ou continuité? Approche historique des transformations dans la conception de l’espace public bruxellois (1958–2008) (Master’s thesis, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels). - 28Kruijf, J. V., Verbrugge, L., Schröter, B., Den Haan, R., Cortes Arevalo, J., Fliervoet, J., Henze, J. & Albert, C. (2022). Knowledge co-production and researcher roles in transdisciplinary environmental management projects. Sustainable Development, 30(2), 393–405. 10.1002/sd.2281
- 29Leminen, S., Nyström, A.-G., Westerlund, M. & Kortelainen, M. J. (2016). The effect of network structure on radical innovation in living labs. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 31(6), 743–757.
- 30Leminen, S., Westerlund, M. & Nyström, A.-G. (2012). Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 6–11.
- 31Louis, M. R. & Bartunek, J. M. (1992). Insider/outsider research teams: Collaboration across diverse perspectives. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1(2), 101–110.
- 32Nyström, A.-G., Leminen, S., Westerlund, M. & Kortelainen, M. J. (2014). Actor roles and role patterns influencing innovation in living labs. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 483–495.
- 33Petit, S. & Soulard, C.-T. (2015).
Chapitre 10. Rencontres par-delà les frontières: L’analyse du dispositif pour et sur le développement régional . In Les recherches-actions collaboratives (pp. 93–100). Presses de l’EHESP. 10.3917/ehesp.lesch.2015.01.0093 - 34Pohl, C., Rist, S., Zimmermann, A., Fry, P., Gurung, G. S., Schneider, F., Speranza, C. I., Kiteme, B., Boillat, S., Serrano, E., Hadorn, G. H. & Wiesmann, U. (2010). Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Science and Public Policy, 37(4), 267–281.
- 35Qiao, X.-J., Kristoffersson, A. & Randrup, T. B. (2018). Challenges to implementing urban sustainable stormwater management from a governance perspective: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 943–952.
- 36Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (2008).
Introduction . In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 1–13). SAGE. - 37Rickards, L., Wiseman, J., Edwards, T. & Biggs, C. (2014). The problem of fit: Scenario planning and climate change adaptation in the public sector. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(4), 641–662. 10.1068/c12106
- 38Schuttenberg, H. Z. & Guth, H. K. (2015). Seeking our shared wisdom: A framework for understanding knowledge coproduction and coproductive capacities. Ecology and Society, 20(1). 10.5751/ES-07038-200115
- 39Soedirgo, J., & Glas, A. (2020). Toward active reflexivity: positionality and practice in the production of knowledge. American Political Science Association, 53(3), 527–531.
- 40Steen, K. & van Bueren, E. (2017). The defining characteristics of urban living labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(7), 21–33.
- 41Sultana, F. (2007). Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6(3), 374–385.
- 42von Wirth, T., Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N. & Coenen, L. (2019). Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: Mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 229–257. 10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895
- 43Westerlund, M. & Leminen, S. (2011). Managing the challenges of becoming an open innovation company: Experiences from living labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 1(1), 19–25.
- 44Wittmayer, J.-M. & Schäpke, N. (2014). Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. Sustainability Science, 9(4), 483–496.