References
- 1Ahvenharju, S. (2020). Potential for a radical policy-shift? The acceptability of strong sustainable consumption governance among elites. Environmental Politics, 29(1), 134–154. 10.1080/09644016.2019.1688532
- 2Ahvenharju, S. (2021). Acceptability of radical consumption policies—Utilising futures consciousness to understand elite preferences. Futures, 128,
102711 . 10.1016/j.futures.2021.102711 - 3Apajalahti, E. L., Lovio, R., & Heiskanen, E. (2015). From demand side management (DSM) to energy efficiency services: A Finnish case study. Energy Policy, 81, 76–85. 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.013
- 4Aro, R. (2016). Normality against sustainability–mobility practices of well-to-do households. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(2), 116–128. 10.1002/eet.1705
- 5Bagheri, M., Roth, L., Siebke, L., Rohde, C., & Linke, H. J. (2024). Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle. Buildings & Cities, 5(1). 10.5334/bc.435
- 6Bertoldi, P. (2022). Policies for energy conservation and sufficiency: Review of existing policies and recommendations for new and effective policies in OECD countries. Energy and Buildings, 264,
112075 . 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112075 - 7Block, S., Emerson, J. W., Esty, D. C., de Sherbinin, A., Wendling, Z. A., et al. (2024). 2024 Environmental Performance Index. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.
epi.yale.edu - 8Cherry, T. L., Kallbekken, S., & Kroll, S. (2012). The acceptability of efficiency-enhancing environmental taxes, subsidies and regulation: An experimental investigation. Environmental Science & Policy, 16, 90–96. 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.11.007
- 9Cohen, M. J. (2021). New conceptions of sufficient home size in high-income countries: Are we approaching a sustainable consumption transition? Housing, Theory and Society, 38(2), 173–203. 10.1080/14036096.2020.1722218
- 10de Groot, J. I. M., & Schuitema, G. (2012). How to make the unpopular popular? Policy characteristics, social norms and the acceptability of environmental policies. Environmental Science & Policy, 19–20, 100–107. 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.004
- 11Defila, R., & Di Giulio, A. (2020). The concept of ‘consumption corridors’ meets society: How an idea for fundamental changes in consumption is received. Journal of Consumer Policy, 43, 315–344. 10.1007/s10603-019-09437-w
- 12Desai, P., & Goncalves, E. (2008). Creating low carbon communities: One planet living solutions. Globalizations, 5(1), 67–71. 10.1080/14747730701587462
- 13Dietz, R., & O’Neill, D. (2013). Enough is enough. Building a sustainable economy in a world of finite resources. Earthscan/Routledge.
- 14Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2016). What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Climate Policy, 16(7), 855–876. 10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240
- 15EEA. (2023a, June 13). Briefing: Conditions and pathways for sustainable and circular consumption in Europe. European Environmental Agency (EEA).
https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/conditions-and-pathways-for-sustainable - 16EEA. (2023b, December 18). Weighted impacts of EU consumption [Dataset]. European Environmental Agency (EEA).
https://sdi.eea.europa.eu/catalogue/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/4c13388f-a801-46d7-b05b-f7a388f18413 - 17Ejelöv, E., Harring, N., Hansla, A., Jagers, S., & Nilsson, A. (2022). Push, pull, or inform—An empirical taxonomy of environmental policy support in Sweden. Journal of Public Policy, 42(3), 529–552. 10.1017/S0143814X21000271
- 18European Union. (2022). Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 April 2022 on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2030.
http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2022/591/oj - 19Fanning, A. L., O’Neill, D. W., Hickel, J., et al. (2022). The social shortfall and ecological overshoot of nations. Nature Sustainability, 5, 26–36. 10.1038/s41893-021-00799-z
- 20Faure, C., Guetlein, M. C., Schleich, J., Tu, G., Whitmarsh, L., & Whittle, C. (2022). Household acceptability of energy efficiency policies in the European Union: Policy characteristics trade-offs and the role of trust in government and environmental identity. Ecological Economics, 192,
107267 . 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2021.107267 - 21Foulds, C., Royston, S., Berker, T., Nakopoulou, E., Bharucha, Z. P., Robison, R., … & Živčič, L. (2022). An agenda for future social sciences and humanities research on energy efficiency: 100 priority research questions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–18. 10.1057/s41599-022-01243-z
- 22Goodin, R. E., & Niemeyer, S. J. (2003). When does deliberation begin? Internal reflection versus public discussion in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 51(4), 627–649. 10.1111/j.0032-3217.2003.00450.x
- 23Grelle, S., & Hofmann, W. (2023). When and why do people accept public-policy interventions? An integrative public-policy-acceptance framework. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 19(1), 258–279. 10.1177/17456916231180580
- 24Heiskanen, E., & Laakso, S. (2019).
Editing out unsustainability from consumption: From information provision to nudging and social practice theory . In O. Mont (Ed.), A research agenda for sustainable consumption governance (pp. 156–171). Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781788117814.00020 - 25Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H., Norton, M., Goff, L., & Wang, S. (2023).
World happiness, trust and social connections in times of crisis . Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J. D., Aknin, L. B., De Neve, J.-E., & Wang, S. (Eds.), World happiness report 2023, 11th ed. (pp. 29–76). Sustainable Development Solutions Network.https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2023/world-happiness-trust-and-social-connections-in-times-of-crisis/ - 26Henry, M. L., Ferraro, P. J., & Kontoleon, A. (2019). The behavioural effect of electronic home energy reports: Evidence from a randomised field trial in the United States. Energy Policy, 132, 1256–1261. 10.17863/CAM.41287
- 27IPCC. (2022).
Summary for policymakers . In P. R. Shukla, J. Skea, A. Reisinger, R. Slade, R. Fradera, M. Pathak, A. Al Khourdajie, M. Belkacemi, R. van Diemen, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, D. McCollum, S. Some, & P. Vyas (Eds.), Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1–48). Cambridge University Press for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 10.1017/9781009157926.001 - 28Jenny, A., Müller, U., Skelton, R., & Mastai, N. (2024). Policies for sufficiency: Factors influencing acceptance in the Swiss population. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 20(1). 10.1080/15487733.2024.2420415
- 29Jungell-Michelsson, J., & Heikkurinen, P. (2022). Sufficiency: A systematic literature review. Ecological Economics, 195,
107380 . 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2022.107380 - 30Kallis, G. (2017). Radical dematerialization and degrowth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2095),
20160383 . 10.1098/rsta.2016.0383 - 31Koch, M., Emilsson, K., Lee, J., & Johansson, H. (2024). Structural barriers to sufficiency: The contribution of research on elites. Buildings & Cities, 5(1), 268–282. 10.5334/bc.439
- 32Kukowski, C., Bernecker, K., & Brandstätter, V. (2021). Self-control and beliefs surrounding others’ cooperation predict own health-protective behaviors and support for COVID-19 government regulations: Evidence from two European countries. Social Psychological Bulletin, 16(1), 1–28. 10.32872/SPB.4391
- 33Kukowski, C. A., Bernecker, K., von der Heyde, L., Boos, M., & Brandstätter, V. (2022). Climate policy support as a tool to control others’ (but not own) environmental behavior? PLoS One, 17(6),
e0269030 . 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0269030 - 34Kuusela, H. (2024). The rise of the owners and the neo-accumulationist imaginary: Changing perceptions of private wealth in Finnish business media, 1981–2021. Economy and Society, 53(4), 651–674. 10.1080/03085147.2024.2406088
- 35Kyrö, R., Heinonen, J., Säynäjoki, A., & Junnila, S. (2011). Occupants have little influence on the overall energy consumption in district heated apartment buildings. Energy and Buildings, 43(12), 3484–3490. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.09.012
- 36Laakso, S., Castellazzi, E., Matschoss, K., & Rinkinen, J. (2024). Agents of change or victims of transition? Media framings on household roles during the energy crisis. Sustainability Science, 19(3), 739–762. 10.1007/s11625-023-01434-w
- 37Lage, J., Thema, J., Zell-Ziegler, C., Best, B., Cordroch, L., & Wiese, F. (2023). Citizens call for sufficiency and regulation—A comparison of European citizen assemblies and national energy and climate plans. Energy Research & Social Science, 104,
103254 . 10.3389/frsus.2022.954660 - 38Lavelle, M. J., & Fahy, F. (2021). Creating context for corridors of consumption: The case of Ireland. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17(1), 62–76. 10.1080/15487733.2020.1864966
- 39Lehner, M., Richter, J. L., Kreinin, H., Mamut, P., Vadovics, E., Henman, J., Henman, J., Mont, O., & Fuchs, D. (2024). Living smaller: acceptance, effects and structural factors in the EU. Buildings & Cities, 5(1). 10.5334/bc.438.s1
- 40Lettenmeier, M., Liedtke, C., & Rohn, H. (2014). Eight tons of material footprint: Suggestion for a resource cap for household consumption in Finland. Resources, 3(3), 488–515. 10.3390/resources3030488
- 41Linnanen, L., Nyfors, T., Heinonen, T., Liimatainen, H., Nissinen, A., Regina, K., Saarinen, M., Seppälä, J., & Viri, R. (2020). The sufficiency perspective in climate policy: How to recompose consumption (Report No. 4/2020). Finnish Climate Change Panel.
https://www.ilmastopaneeli.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Sufficiency-in-climate-policy_2020-09-25.pdf - 42Lorek, S., & Fuchs, D. (2013). Strong sustainable consumption governance—Precondition for a degrowth path? Journal of Cleaner Production, 38, 36–43. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.008
- 43MacKenzie, M. K., & Caluwaerts, D. (2021). Paying for the future: Deliberation and support for climate action policies. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23(3), 317–331. 10.1080/1523908X.2021.1883424
- 44Matschoss, K., Laakso, S., & Heiskanen, E. (2024). What can we say about the longer-term impacts of a living lab experiment to save energy at home? Energy Efficiency, 17(5), 1–13. 10.1007/s12053-024-10231-y
- 45Motiva. (2023). Astetta alemmas -energiansäästökampanjan loppuraportti. Motiva Oy.
https://www.motiva.fi/files/21629/Astetta_alemmas_-energiansaastokampanjan_loppuraportti.pdf - 46Nissinen, A., & Savolainen, H. (2019). Carbon footprint and raw material requirement of public procurement and household consumption in Finland: Results from the ENVIMAT-model (Report No. 15en/2019). Finnish Environment Institute.
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/300737 - 47Numminen, S., de Villafranca, M. S., & Hyysalo, S. (2023). Päälämmityslähteestä monilämmitykseen: suomalaisista pientaloista on tullut toisiaan täydentävien ja vuorottelevien energiajärjestelmien hybrideitä. Alue ja ympäristö, 52(1), 62–76. 10.30663/ay.125979
- 48Nuorivaara, E. (2024). Sufficiency gains limited attention in Finnish climate policy on household consumption. Consumption and Society, 3(3), 337–355. 10.1332/27528499Y2024D000000027
- 49Odyssee-Mure Database. (2024). Finland profile.
https://www.odyssee-mure.eu/publications/efficiency-trends-policies-profiles/finland.html (accessed on 28 February 2024). - 50OSF. (2017). Kotitalouksien määrä, keskikoko, kotitalousväestön koko ja keskimääräiset kulutusyksiköt Suomessa vuosina 1966–2017. Official Statistics of Finland (OSF)/Statistics Finland.
https://www.stat.fi/til/tjt/2017/02/tjt_2017_02_2019-03-08_tau_001_fi.html (accessed on 14 April 2024). - 51OSF. (2022a). Dwellings and housing conditions. Official Statistics of Finland (OSF)/Statistics Finland.
https://stat.fi/en/statistics/asas (accessed on 28 February 2024). - 52OSF. (2022b). Income distribution statistics. Official Statistics of Finland (OSF)/Statistics Finland.
https://www.stat.fi/en/statistics/tjt (accessed on 28 February 2024). - 53Princen, T. (2003). Principles for sustainability: From cooperation and efficiency to sufficiency. Global Environmental Politics, 3(1), 33–50. 10.1162/152638003763336374
- 54Raworth, K. (2012). A safe and just space for humanity—Can we live within the doughnut? (Discussion Paper, February). Oxfam.
http://hdl.handle.net/10546/210490 - 55Ruokamo, E., Kylkilahti, E., Lettenmeier, M. H., & Toppinen, A. (2024). Are people willing to share living space? Household preferences in Finland. Buildings & Cities, 5(1), 601–619. 10.5334/bc.453
- 56Sandberg, M. (2021). Sufficiency transitions: A review of consumption changes for environmental sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293,
126097 . 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126097 - 57Spangenberg, J. H., & Lorek, S. (2019). Sufficiency and consumer behaviour: From theory to policy. Energy Policy, 129, 1070–1079. 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2019.03.013
- 58Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 415–425. 10.1016/J.JENVP.2005.08.003
- 59Thomas, S., Thema, J., Brischke, L. A., Leuser, L., Kopatz, M., & Spitzner, M. (2019). Energy sufficiency policy for residential electricity use and per-capita dwelling size. Energy Efficiency, 12, 1123–1149. 10.1007/s12053-018-9727-4
- 60Zell-Ziegler, C., Thema, J., Best, B., Wiese, F., Lage, J., Schmidt, A., … & Stagl, S. (2021). Enough? The role of sufficiency in European energy and climate plans. Energy Policy, 157,
112483 . 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112483