Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluating mitigation strategies for building stocks against absolute climate targets Cover

Evaluating mitigation strategies for building stocks against absolute climate targets

Open Access
|Apr 2024

References

  1. 1Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(5), 743758. DOI: 10.1068/b3065
  2. 2Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2012). Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(1), 89103. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00468.x
  3. 3ARUP & UK Green Building Council. (2021). Net zero whole life carbon roadmap: Technical report. https://www.ukgbc.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/UKGBC-Whole-Life-Carbon-Roadmap-Technical-Report.pdf
  4. 4Bahramian, M., & Yetilmezsoy, K. (2020). Life cycle assessment of the building industry: An overview of two decades of research (1995–2018). Energy and Buildings, 219, 109917. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109917
  5. 5Bjørn, A., Chandrakumar, C., Boulay, A-M., Doka, G., Fang, K., Gondran, N., Zwicky Hauschild, M., Kerkhof, A., King, H., Margni, M., McLaren, S., Mueller, C., Owsianiak, M., Peters, G., Roos, S., Sala, S., Sandin, G., Sim, S., Vargas-Gonzalez, M., & Ryberg M. (2020). Review of life-cycle based methods for absolute environmental sustainability assessment and their applications. Environmental Research Letters [Preprint]. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab89d7
  6. 6Bjørn, A., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2015). Introducing carrying capacity-based normalisation in LCA: Framework and development of references at midpoint level. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20, 10051018. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-015-0899-2
  7. 7Brunner, P. H., & Rechberger, H. (2016). Handbook of material flow analysis: For environmental, resource, and waste engineers. CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/9781315313450-4
  8. 8Byers, E., Krey, V., Kriegler, E., Riahi, K., Schaeffer, R., Kikstra, J., Lamboll, R., Nicholls, Z., Sandstad, M., Smith, C., van der Wijst, K., Al -Khourdajie, A., Lecocq, F., Portugal-Pereira, J., Saheb, Y., Stromman, A., Winkler, H., Auer, C., Brutschin, E., … van Vuuren, D. (2022). AR6 Scenarios Database (1.0). Zenodo [Preprint]. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5886912
  9. 9C40 Cities & ARUP. (2016). Deadline 2020: How cities will get the job done. https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/article/Deadline-2020-How-cities-will-get-the-job-done?language=en_US
  10. 10C40 Cities. (2022). 1.5°C climate action plans. https://www.c40.org/what-we-do/raising-climate-ambition/1-5c-climate-action-plans
  11. 11Calwell, C. (2010). Is efficient sufficient? The case for shifting our emphasis in energy specifications to progressive efficiency and sufficiency. ECEEE. https://www.eceee.org/static/media/uploads/site-2/policy-areas/sufficiency/eceee_Progressive_Efficiency.pdf
  12. 12Caney, S. (2009). Justice and the distribution of greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Global Ethics, 5(2), 125146. DOI: 10.1080/17449620903110300
  13. 13City of Copenhagen. (2016). Copenhagen CPH 2025 - Climate Plan. https://kk.sites.itera.dk/apps/kk_pub2/index.asp?mode=detalje&id=1585
  14. 14City of Melbourne. (2018). Climate Change Mitigation Strategy to 2050. https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/sitecollectiondocuments/climate-change-mitigation-strategy-2050.pdf
  15. 15Crawford, R. H., Stephan, A., & Prideaux, F. (2021). The EPiC database: Hybrid embodied environmental flow coefficients for construction materials. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 106058.
  16. 16Danish Center for Energy Savings in Buildings. (2020). Guide om ressourcegenanvendelse på byggepladsen. https://byggeriogenergi.dk/media/3195/ressourceanvendelse-pa-byggepladsen.pdf
  17. 17Dias, A., Lemos, D., Gabarrell, X., & Arroja, L. (2018). Comparison of tools for quantifying the environmental performance of an urban territory. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22(4), 868880. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12614
  18. 18DTU Campus Service. (2018). Strategic Campus Plan. DTU Lyngby Campus.
  19. 19Energistyrelsen. (2022). Global afrapportering. https://ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/Analyser/hovedrapport_-_danmarks_globale_klimapaavirkning_-_global_afrapportering_2023.pdf
  20. 20Giesekam, J., Barrett, J., & Taylor, P. (2018). Scenario analysis of embodied greenhouse gas emissions in UK construction. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability, 171(4), 178190. DOI: 10.1680/jensu.16.00020
  21. 21Greater London Authority. (2018). Zero carbon London: A 1.5C compatible plan. Greater London Authority.
  22. 22Gunder, M., & Hillier, J. (2009). Planning in ten words or less. A Lacanian entanglement with spatial planning. Routledge.
  23. 23Haugbølle, K., Mahdi, V., Morelli, M., & Wahedi, H. (2021). BUILD 2021:32 BUILD levetidstabel. https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/build-levetidstabel-version-2021
  24. 24Horup, L. H., Birgisdottir, H., & Ryberg, M. (2023). Defining dynamic science-based climate change budgets for countries and absolute sustainable building targets. Building and Environment, 230, 109936. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109936
  25. 25Huijbregts, M. A. J., Steinmann, Z. J. N., Elshout, P. M. F., Stam, G., Verones, F., Vieira, M., Zijp, M., Hollander, A., & van Zelm, R. (2017). ReCiPe2016: A harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(2), 138147. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y
  26. 26IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Full_Report.pdf
  27. 27Lenton, T. M. (2011). Early warning of climate tipping points. Nature Climate Change, 1(4), 201209. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1143
  28. 28Lenzen, M. (2000). Errors in conventional and input-output-based life-cycle inventories. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4(4), 127148.
  29. 29Lucas, P. L., Wilting, H. C., Hof, A. F., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2020). Allocating planetary boundaries to large economies: Distributional consequences of alternative perspectives on distributive fairness. Global Environmental Change, 60,102017. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102017
  30. 30Metzger, J., & Lindblad, J. (2020). Dilemmas of sustainable urban development: A view from practice. Routledge.
  31. 31Mi, Z., Zhang, Y., Guan, D., Shan, Y., Liu, Z., Cong, R., Yuan, X.-C., & Wei, Y.-M. (2016). Consumption-based emission accounting for Chinese cities. Applied Energy, 184, 10731081. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.094
  32. 32Neumayer, E. (2000). In defence of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics, 33, 185192. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00135-X
  33. 33Ohms, P. K., Hvid Horup, L., Gummidi, S. R. B., Ryberg, M., Laurent, A., & Liu, G. (2024). Temporally dynamic environmental impact assessment of a building stock: Coupling MFA and LCA. Resources, Conservation and Recycling [Preprint]. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107340
  34. 34Petersen, S., Ryberg, M. W., & Birkved, M. (2022). The safe operating space for greenhouse gas emissions. In press.
  35. 35Rasmussen, M. K., & Johannsen, K. B. (2016) Kvotehuset - Midtvejsevaluering. https://www.realdaniabyogbygklubben.dk/udgivelser/rapporter/kvotehuset-midtvejsevaluering
  36. 36Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2023). CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions
  37. 37Röck, M., Baldereschi, E., Verellen, E., Passer, A., Sala, S., & Allacker, K. (2021). Environmental modelling of building stocks – An integrated review of life cycle-based assessment models to support EU policy making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 151. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111550
  38. 38Ryberg, M. W., Andersen, M. M., Owsianiak, M., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2020). Downscaling the planetary boundaries in absolute environmental sustainability assessments – A review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 276. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123287
  39. 39Salet, W., & Faludi, A. (2000). Three approaches to strategic planning. in The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
  40. 40Statistics Denmark. (2023). Statistics Denmark. https://www.dst.dk/en
  41. 41Stephan, A., Crawford, R. H., Bunster, V., Warren-Myers, G., & Moosavi, S. (2022). Towards a multiscale framework for modeling and improving the life cycle environmental performance of built stocks. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(4), 11951217. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13254
  42. 42Tilsted, J. P., & Bjørn, A. (2023). Green frontrunner or indebted culprit? Assessing Denmark’s climate targets in light of fair contributions under the Paris Agreement. Climatic Change, 176(8), 122. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-023-03583-4
  43. 43Tokyo Metropolitan Government. (2019). Zero Emission Tokyo Strategy. https://www.c40.org/case-studies/zero-emission-tokyo-strategy/
  44. 44Torpman, O. (2022). Consumption-based emissions accounting and historical emissions. Ethics, Policy and Environment, 25(3), 354366. DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2022.2058296
  45. 45UKGBC. (2021). Whole life carbon net zero roadmap. A pathway to net zero for the UK built environment. Draft for Consultation. July 2021. UKGBC.
  46. 46UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2018). World urbanization prospects, Demographic research. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf
  47. 47UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2019). World population prospects 2019. https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/Population (Accessed: 2 February 2022)
  48. 48UNEP. (2022). 2022 global status report for buildings and construction. United Nations Environment Programme.
  49. 49van den Berg, N. J., van Soest, H. L., Hof, A. F., de Elzen, M. G. J., van Vuuren, D. P., Chen, W., Drouet, L., Emmerling, J., Fujimori, S., Höhne, N., Kõberle, A. C., McCollum, D., Schaeffer, R., Shekhar, S., Vishwanathan, S. S., Vrontisi, Z., & Blok, K. (2017). Implications of various effort-sharing approaches for national carbon budgets and emission pathways. Climatic Change, 162(4), 18051822. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-019-02368-y.
  50. 50Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno-Ruiz, E., & Weidema, B. (2016). The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): Overview and methodology. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(9), 12181230. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
  51. 51Wiedmann, T., Chen, G., Owen, A., Lenzen, M., Doust, M., Barrett, J., & Steele, K. (2021). Three-scope carbon emission inventories of global cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(3), 735750. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13063
  52. 52WRI, C40, & ICLEI. (2018). Global protocol for community-scale greenhouse gas inventories. https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.413 | Journal eISSN: 2632-6655
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 8, 2024
Accepted on: Mar 5, 2024
Published on: Apr 8, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Lise Hvid Horup, Pernille K. Ohms, Michael Hauschild, Srinivasa Raghavendra Bhuvan Gummidi, Andreas Qvist Secher, Christian Thuesen, Morten Ryberg, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.