Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Design and analysis of rehabilitation training mechanism based on upper limb rehabilitation movements Cover

Design and analysis of rehabilitation training mechanism based on upper limb rehabilitation movements

By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Oct 2026

Abstract

Purpose

To conduct a comparative analysis of the trajectory and joint torque differences between exoskeleton type and end–effector type upper limb rehabilitation training mechanisms during rehabilitation movements, and to identify the more suitable mechanism type for passive upper limb rehabilitation training.

Methods

Based on the Brunnstrom rehabilitation approach, upper limb rehabilitation movements for the passive training phase were selected. Muscle force simulations were conducted using OpenSim software to identify movements with high muscular engagement. The structures of the two mechanisms were designed through degree–of–freedom analysis, and motion trajectory simulations were completed in Automatic Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems (ADAMS). In MATLAB, discrete Fréchet distance is used to evaluate trajectory similarity. The error of comparing simultaneously the trajectories of two mechanisms with the trajectory of the human body model using R 2 was calculated. In ADAMS, the rotational torque changes of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints between two mechanisms were compared.

Results

The movement trajectory of the exoskeleton mechanism closely matched the natural motion of the human upper limb, with error ≤2 mm and trajectory R 2 ≥ 0.9975. Its joint torque distribution was balanced, with a maximum torque ≤40 Nm. The trajectory error of the end–effector mechanism was ≤5 mm and trajectory R 2 ≥ 0.9910 and torques were concentrated at the wrist and elbow joints, some values being ≥40 Nm.

Conclusion

The exoskeleton–type upper limb rehabilitation training mechanism demonstrates superior performance in terms of movement trajectory adaptability and joint protection compared to the end–effector–type mechanism, making it more suitable for passive movement assistance and joint range of motion recovery training.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37190/abb/220943 | Journal eISSN: 2450-6303 | Journal ISSN: 1509-409X
Language: English
Page range: 136 - 151
Submitted on: Mar 10, 2026
Accepted on: Apr 21, 2026
Published on: Oct 28, 2026
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Haoyu Han, Qinghui Zhu, Li Feng, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.