Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Acute effects of whole-body vibration training with additional loading on lower limb muscle synergies during running Cover

Acute effects of whole-body vibration training with additional loading on lower limb muscle synergies during running

Open Access
|Sep 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Demographic and anthropometric data of participants

VariableMean value ± standard deviation (SD)
Age (years)19.8 ± 1.8
Height (cm)179.3 ± 5.7
Weight (kg)71.5 ± 8.9
Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m²)22.2 ± 2.3
Running experience (years)3.1 ± 2.0
Weekly running distance (km/week)24.2 ± 12.7
Figure 1

Loaded WBV training setup. Participant performing dynamic squats on a vertical vibration platform (20 Hz, 6 mm) while wearing a weighted vest (20% body mass).

Figure 2

Time activation curves of muscle synergies (SYN1–SYN5). Blue line: pre-intervention mean; red line: post-intervention mean; shaded areas: SD; vertical dashed line: TO; horizontal dashed line: muscle synergy activation threshold (0.3).

Figure 3

Distribution of muscle weightings across identified synergy patterns. *: p < 0.05; Muscle abbreviations: GLU, gluteus maximus; RF, rectus femoris; VM, vastus medialis; VL, vastus lateralis; ST, semitendinosus; BF, biceps femoris; TA, tibialis anterior; PL, peroneus longus; SOL, soleus; GM, gastrocnemius medialis; GL, gastrocnemius lateralis.

Table 2

Temporal parameters of activation curves for all synergy patterns

SynergyParameterPrePost t-value/W-value p-valueEffect size (d/r)
SYN1 T 20.07 ± 0.5721.32 ± 0.40 W = 158 p = 0.028* r = 0.35
T start 9.07 ± 3.214.66 ± 2.05 W = 300.5 p = 0.161 r = 0.22
T stop 29.14 ± 3.0725.98 ± 1.99 W = 380 p = 0.666 r = 0.07
T max 20.64 ± 3.2017.66 ± 2.03 W = 370 p = 0.994 r = 0.01
SYN2 T 32.04 ± 2.2135.46 ± 2.43 t = −1.361 p = 0.182 d = 0.22
T start 47.27 ± 29944.68 ± 3.24 W = 393.5 p = 0.525 r = 0.10
T stop 79.46 ± 2.5580.13 ± 2.95 W = 224 p = 0.454 r = 0.12
T max 64.57 ± 3.4763.22 ± 84 W = 366 p = 0.827 r = 0.04
SYN3 T 16.86 ± 1.0315.73 ± .93 W = 171.5 p = 0.307 r = 0.20
T start 18.03 ± 4.138.59 ± 3.40 W = 131 p = 0.047* r = 0.39
T stop 34.89 ± 4.7524.32 ± 3.53 W = 192 p = 0.033* r = 0.42
T max 26.11 ± 4.3216.55 ± 3.46 W = 221.5 p = 0.041* r = 0.40
SYN4 T 18.89 ± 0.4819.79 ± 0.64 W = 379.5 p = 0.367 r = 0.14
T start 67.29 ± 3.8270.96 ± 2.96 W = 519.5 p = 0.775 r = 0.04
T stop 86.18 ± 3.8690.75 ± 3.04 W = 318 p = 0.613 r = 0.08
T max 78.01 ± 3.8982.09 ± 3.17 W = 451.5 p = 0.795 r = 0.04
SYN5 T 14.07 ± 0.8313.58 ± 0.64 t = 0.546 p = 0.590 d = 0.10
T start 15.45 ± 5.5411.26 ± 5.29 W = 39 p = 0.638 r = 0.07
T stop 29.52 ± 6.0124.84 ± 5.33 W = 169.5 p = 0.850 r = 0.04
T max 21.81 ± 6.0417.62 ± 5.62 W = 167.5 p = 0.893 r = 0.03

Note: Values are presented as mean value ± SD (%). *: p < 0.05. Parameters: T, activation duration; T start, activation onset; T stop, activation offset; T max, time of peak activation.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37190/abb/220282 | Journal eISSN: 2450-6303 | Journal ISSN: 1509-409X
Language: English
Page range: 28 - 40
Submitted on: Dec 22, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2026
Published on: Sep 21, 2026
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Hyeri Nam, Ruipeng Liu, Menghan Xu, Chaoyu Guo, Van Minh Le, Lin Wang, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.