Abstract
Introduction
Malignancy-related hypercalcemia is commonly observed in patients with advanced stages of cancer. It is intricately linked with an unfavorable prognosis among oncology patients. This study aimed to evaluate survival outcomes among individuals diagnosed with hypercalcemia associated with malignancy.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective analysis of 173 cancer patients with hypercalcemia who sought treatment at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan, between July 2019 and June 2020. This cohort of patients underwent a longitudinal follow-up for 2.5 years. To assess survival outcomes, the Kaplan-Meier tool was used to construct survival curves and estimate the survival probability over time. The significance of potential survival factors was evaluated using the log-rank test.
Results
All patients exhibited elevated levels of calcium. At admission, the cohort demonstrated varying degrees of hypercalcemia severity attributable to malignancy: Mild hypercalcemia was observed in approximately 61.3% of patients, moderate hypercalcemia in 23.7%, and severe hypercalcemia in 15% of cases. Among the total sample, most patients were female (54.9%), with a median age of 54. The primary tumor site most frequently observed was in cases of breast cancer (35.3%), wherein the prevalent histological subtype was lobular/ductal invasive carcinoma (34.1%). Most of the patients (93.6%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (ECOG) >1. In addition, the median overall survival for patients diagnosed with hypercalcemia was 51 days. Notably, there was a significant association between survival factors, including the primary site of malignancy (P = 0.001), bone metastasis (P = 0.04), severity and symptoms of hypercalcemia (P = 0.001), altered mental state (P = 0.001), albumin levels (P = 0.001), and ECOG (P = 0.001).
Conclusion
Malignancy-related hypercalcemia in patients with cancer is a significant predictor of an unfavorable prognosis. The aforementioned survival factors may have the potential to influence patient survival outcomes. Further studies on larger cohorts are warranted.