Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Impact of Court Case Management Systems on Judicial Efficiency Cover

The Impact of Court Case Management Systems on Judicial Efficiency

Open Access
|Feb 2026

References

  1. Ahmed, Rozha K, Khder H Muhammed, Aleksander Reitsakas, Ingrid Pappel, and Dirk Draheim. 2020. “Improving Court Efficiency Through ICT Integration: Identifying Essential Areas of Improvement.” Lecture Notes in Network and Systems 93:44961. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-0630-7_44
  2. Al-Naimat, Osamah, Noor Akiaf, Al-Dabbas Al-Ahliyya, Mohammad Mufdi, and Faleh Maaqqbeh. 2021. “Transition to E-Litigation as a Mechanism to Activate e-Court in Jordan: An Analytical Study.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 24 (1).
  3. Bartolazi, Kamille Gabri, Douglas Souza Guedes, Carla Faria Caetano, and Oswaldo Moreira Ferreira. 2021. “The Implementation of the Electronic Judicial Process: Advances or Setbacks Promoted by the Principle of Celerity.” Revista Científica Interdisciplinar 6 (8): 118216. DOI: 10.51721/2526-4036/v6n1a8
  4. Castelliano, Caio, Peter Grajzl, and Eduardo Watanabe. 2023. “Does Electronic Case-Processing Enhance Court Efficacy? New Quantitative Evidence.” Government Information Quarterly, August, 101861. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101861
  5. Castelliano, Caio, Tomas Aquino, Guimaraes 1 Adalmir, and Oliveira Gomes. 2024. “Fatores Que Aumentam o Tempo Do Processo Judicial No Brasil.” Revista de Administração Pública 2 (58). DOI: 10.1590/0034-761220230175
  6. Castro, Massimo Finocchiaro, and Calogero Guccio. 2014. “Searching for the Source of Technical Inefficiency in Italian Judicial Districts: An Empirical Investigation.” European Journal of Law and Economics 38 (3): 36991. DOI: 10.1007/s10657-012-9329-0
  7. Cerrillo, Agustí Martínez, and Pere Abat Fabra. 2008. E-Justice: Using Information and Communication Technologies in the Court System. Edited by Hershey. New York. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4
  8. Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ). 2013. Resolução n. 184 – Institui o Sistema Processo Judicial Eletrônico.
  9. Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ). 2023. “Relatórios Parciais Do Censo Do Poder Judiciário.” Brasília. www.cnj.jus.br.
  10. Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ). 2024. “Relatório Justiça Em Números 2024.” Brasilia. www.cnj.jus.br.
  11. Dimitrova-Grajzl, Valentina, Peter Grajzl, Janez Sustersic, and Katarina Zajc. 2012. “Court Output, Judicial Staffing, and the Demand for Court Services: Evidence from Slovenian Courts of First Instance.” International Review of Law and Economics 32 (1): 1929. DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2011.12.006
  12. Djamaludin, Muhammad Fahruddin Aziz, Yanuriansyah Ar-Rasyid, and Iskandar Ali As-Sayyis. 2023. “Assessing the Impact of Electronic Court Systems on the Efficiency of Judicial Processes in the Era of Digital Transformation.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 6 (1): 118. DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.8082
  13. European Commission (EC). 2022. “The 2022 EU Justice Scoreboard.” Luxembourg. DOI: 10.2838/52765
  14. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice – CEPEJ. 2016. “Guidelines on How to Drive Change Toward Cyberjustice: Stock-Taking of Tools Deployed and Summary of Good Practices.”
  15. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice – CEPEJ. 2022. “European Judicial Systems CEPEJ Evaluation Report.”
  16. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice. 2024. “European Judicial Systems CEPEJ Evaluation Report.”
  17. Fabri, Marco. 2021. “Will COVID-19 Accelerate Implementation of ICT in Courts?” International Journal for Court Administration 12 (2): 113. DOI: 10.36745/IJCA.384
  18. Fabri, Marco. 2024. “From Court Automation to E-Justice and Beyond in Europe.” International Journal for Court Administration 15 (3): 123. DOI: 10.36745/ijca.640
  19. Fauvrelle, Thiago A, Alessio Tony, and C Almeida. 2016. “Determinants of Judicial Efficiency Change: Evidence from Brazil.” Review of Law and Economics 14 (1): 132. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2745269.
  20. Frade, Catarina, Paula Fernando, and Ana Filipa Conceição. 2020. “The Performance of the Courts in the Digital Era: The Case of Insolvency and Restructuring Proceedings.” International Insolvency Review 29 (3): 34659. DOI: 10.1002/iir.1390
  21. Machado, José A. F., and J. M. C. Santos Silva. 2019. “Quantiles via Moments.” Journal of Econometrics 213 (1): 14573. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.009
  22. Marques Filho, Lourival Barão, and Flávio Garcia Cabral. 2021. “Judiciary Policies and Lack of Accountability: Electronic Procedure x Pending Cases in Labour Courts.” Sequencia 42 (89). DOI: 10.5007/2177-7055.2021.e67814
  23. Melnikova, Anastasia. 2023. “Abuse of Procedural Rights in the Context of Digital Transformation of Justice (the Case of the Russian Federation).” International Journal for Court Administration 14 (3). DOI: 10.36745/IJCA.514
  24. Nissi, Eugenia, Massimiliano Giacalone, and Carlo Cusatelli. 2019. “The Efficiency of the Italian Judicial System: A Two Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Approach.” Social Indicators Research 146 (1–2): 395407. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-018-1892-5
  25. OECD. 2013. “Judicial Performance and Its Determinants: A Cross-Country Perspective.”
  26. Olugasa, Olubukola, and Abimbola Davies. 2022. “Remote Court Proceedings in Nigeria: Justice Online or Justice on the Line.” International Journal for Court Administration 13. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ijca13&id=112&div=12&collection=journals.
  27. Povylius, Kristijonas. 2024. “Virtual Criminal Proceedings: The Lithuanian Experience.” Baltic Journal of Law and Politics 17 (1): 2145. DOI: 10.2478/bjlp-2024-0002
  28. Procopiuck, Mario. 2018. “Information Technology and Time of Judgment in Specialized Courts: What Is the Impact of Changing from Physical to Electronic Processing?” Government Information Quarterly 35 (3): 491501. DOI: 10.1016/J.GIQ.2018.03.005
  29. Reiling, Dory. 2009. Technology for Justice How Information Technology Can Support Judicial Reform. Edited by Jan Michiel Otto and Benjamin van Rooij. Leiden University Press. DOI: 10.5117/9789087280710
  30. Rosa, João, Cláudio Teixeira, and Joaquim Sousa Pinto. 2013. “Risk Factors in E-Justice Information Systems.” Government Information Quarterly 30 (3): 24156. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.02.002
  31. Rosales-López, Virginia. 2008. “Economics of Court Performance: An Empirical Analysis.” European Journal of Law and Economics 25 (3): 23151. DOI: 10.1007/s10657-008-9047-9
  32. Sousa, Marcos, and Tomas Aquino Guimaraes. 2018. “Resources, Innovation and Performance in Labor Courts in Brazil.” Revista de Administracao Publica 52 (3): 486506. DOI: 10.1590/0034-761220170045
  33. Sousa, Marcos, Daniel Kettiger, and Andreas Lienhard. 2022. “E-Justice in Switzerland and Brazil: Paths and Experiences.” International Journal for Court Administration 13 (2). DOI: 10.36745/ijca.368
  34. Sousa, Wesley Gomes, Rafael Antunes Fidelis, Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo, Gersica da Silva Gonçalo, and Bruno de Souza Melo. 2021. “Artificial Intelligence and Speedy Trial in the Judiciary: Myth, Reality or Need? A Case Study in the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF).” Government Information Quarterly 39 (1): 113. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101660
  35. Tavares, Thiago Passos, and Marlton Fontes Mota. 2016. “Processo Judicial Eletrônico: Principais Mudanças Procedimentais Amparadas Pelo Novo Processo Civil Brasileiro.” Interfaces Científicas – Direito 5 (1): 8194. DOI: 10.17564/2316-381x.2016v5n1p81-94
  36. Tenório, Túlio, and Fernando Souza. 2021. “Quais Fatores Influenciam Na Eficiência Judicial? Uma Análise Dos Tribunais de Justiça Estaduais Brasileiros.” In 21o USP International Conference in Accounting, 1. São Paulo. www.congressousp.fipecafi.org.
  37. Velicogna, Marco, Antoine Errera, and Stéphane Derlange. 2011. “E-Justice in France: The e-Barreau Experience.” Utrecht Law Review 3 (E): 2744. http://www.rtsa.ro/en/.
  38. Voigt, Stefan. 2016. “Determinants of Judicial Efficiency: A Survey.” European Journal of Law and Economics 42:183208. DOI: 10.1007/s10657-016-9531-6
  39. Xu, Alison (Lu). 2016. “Chinese Judicial Justice on the Cloud: A Future Call or a Pandora’s Box? An Analysis of the ‘intelligent Court System’ of China.” Communications Technology Law 26 (1): 5971. DOI: 10.1080/13600834.2017.1269873
  40. Yavuz, Nilay, Naci Karkin, and Mete Yildiz. 2022. “E-Justice: A Review and Agenda for Future Research.” In Scientific Foundations of Digital Governance and Transformation. Concepts, Approaches and Challenges, 38:385414. https://link.springer.com/bookseries/10796.
  41. Yeung, Luciana. 2022. “Recent Evolution of the Efficiency of the Brazilian Judiciary (2016-2018).” Revista de Estudos Empíricos Em Direito 10. DOI: 10.19092/reed.v9.579
  42. Yeung, Luciana, Paulo Silva, and Carolina Osse. 2020. “Informatização Judicial e Efeitos Sobre a Eficiência Da Prestação Jurisdicional e o Acesso à Justiça –Projeto de Estudo Desenvolvido Com o Apoio Do Instituto Betty e Jacob Lafer.”
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.637 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 6 - 6
Published on: Feb 5, 2026
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Cinara Rocha, João Martins, João Álvaro Carvalho, Antônio Suxberger, Delfina Soares, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.