Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Innovative Leadership-a Missing Puzzle in the Economic Administration of the Judiciary in the Czech Republic Cover

Innovative Leadership-a Missing Puzzle in the Economic Administration of the Judiciary in the Czech Republic

By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 19(3), 235258. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<;235::AID-JOB837>3.0.CO;2-C
  2. Aspen institut Central Europe (2019). Kam kráČíš Česko. Sborník konference 2019. Praha.
  3. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 2, 23846. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  4. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.
  5. Bunjevac, T. (2011). Court Governance in Context: Beyond Independence. International Journal for Court Administration, December, pp. 112. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.68
  6. Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
  7. CEPEJ (2016) https://rm.coe.int/rapport-avec-couv-18-09-2018-en/16808def9c Retrieved 4.3.2020
  8. CEPEJ (2022). https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/cepej-work/evaluation-of-judicial-systems Retrieved 20.october 2022
  9. Černý, P. (2019). Nejvyšší rada soudnictví – palcát nebo štít? https://www.pravniprostor.cz/nazory/ocima-petra-cerneho/nejvyssi-rada-soudnictvi-palcat-nebo-stit-dil-i. Staženo 20.12.2019
  10. Creswell, J. W. & Clarc, L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  11. Currie, G., Grubnic, S. and Hodges, R. (2011). ‘Leadership in Public Services Networks: Antecedents, Process and Outcome’, Public Administration, 89, 2, 24264. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01931.x
  12. Czarniawska, B., & Mazza, C. (2003). Consulting as a liminal space. Human relations, 56(3), 267290. DOI: 10.1177/0018726703056003612
  13. De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and innovation management, 19(1), 2336. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
  14. De Vellis, R.F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  15. Dorsman, S. (2017). Leadership and innovation in the public sector: studying the organizational, team and individual level. Thesis University of Rotterdam NL.
  16. Edel, F. (2007). The civil and criminal proceedings length in the European Court of Human Rights case-law, Strasburg, p.7.
  17. EU Justice scoreboard (2019). https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/upholding-rule-law/eu-justice-scoreboard_en#scoreboards. Retrieved 1.2.2020
  18. European judicial systems-Efficiency and quality of justice-CEPEJ Studies No. 26
  19. Fernandez, S. (2005). Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework of Public Sector Leadership: Evidence from the Public Education Arena‘, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 2, 197217. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mui014
  20. Friesen, E.C. (1971). Constraints and Conflicts in Court Administration. Public Administration Review, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 120124. DOI: 10.2307/974662
  21. Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass.
  22. Hart, P. T. & Tummers, L. (2019). Understanding public leadership. Macmillan International Higher Education.
  23. Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104121. DOI: 10.1177/109442819800100106
  24. Hollanders, H., Arundel, A., Buligescu, B., Peter, V., Roman, L., Simmonds, P., & Es-Sadki, N. (2013). European Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard 2013.
  25. Kearns, K.P. (1996). Managing for Accountability: Preserving the Public Trust in Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers
  26. Kettiger, D., Lienhard, A., Langbroek, P. & Fabri, M. (2019). Court Management: A Young Field of Public Management. In Public Administration in Europe (pp. 309315). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92856-2_28
  27. Legal executive institute (2017). The future of the courts. A white paper. http://www.legalexecutiveinstitute.com/future-of-courts-white-paper/ Downloaded 3.11.2018.
  28. Ministerstvo spravedlnosti, VýroČní zpráva, 2017, 2018, 2019.
  29. Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic, (2017) Veřejná správa v České republice
  30. Murillo, R., & Zuniga, R. (2013). Could Innovation also Emerge from the Public Sector: Creating ISO-like Judiciary Quality Management Standard. International Journal for court administration (Vol. 5, p. 10). DOI: 10.18352/ijca.16
  31. Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  32. Ochrana, F., & PůČek, M. (2011). Efektivní zavádění a řízení změn ve veřejné správě: smart administration. Wolters Kluwer Česká republika.
  33. Pauliat, H. (2007). L’administration de la justice et la qualité des décisions de justice. La qualité des décisions de justice.
  34. Perez Bernardez, C. (2016). The European Union Against the Erosion of the Rule of Law: The Legal.
  35. Peyrache, A. & Zago, A. (2015). Large courts, small justice! Omega. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.11.002
  36. Piana, D. (2012). Assessing and Filling the Gap as a New Mode of Governance, Lessons from Preliminary Study carried out in the Cosenza‘s Public Prosecutors’ Office. International Journal for Court Administration, June, pp. 118. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.78
  37. Piana, D. (2013). Knowledge Transfer as a Leverage of Change: The Case of the Public Prosecutor Office of Naples. International Journal of Court Administration, Vol. 5 No. 2, October pp. 3141. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.14
  38. Schelleová, I. & Schelle, K. (2004). Soudnictví: historie, souČasnost a perspektivy. 2025 Prague: Eurolex Bohemia
  39. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Socialism, capitalism and democracy. Harper and Brothers
  40. Supreme Court (2022). Justice before the collapse: Press conference https://www.nsoud.cz/Judikatura/ns_web.nsf/web/Proverejnostamedia~TiskovezpravyNejvyssihosoudu~Pozvanka_na_tiskovou_konferenci_19__10__2022__Justice_pred_kolapsem_~?open&lng=CZ
  41. ŠpaČek, D. (2016). Public management: v teorii a praxi. CH Beck.
  42. Tummers, L. & Knies, E. (2016). Measuring public leadership: developing scales for four key public leadership roles. Public Administration, 94(2), 433451. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12224
  43. Van der Wal, Z., De Graaf, G., & Lasthuizen, K. (2008). What‘s valued most? Similarities and differences between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public administration, 86(2), 465482. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00719.x
  44. Viapiana, F. (2018). Pressure on Judges: How the Budgeting System Can Impact Judge‘s Autonomy. Laws, 7(4), 38. DOI: 10.3390/laws7040038
  45. Vogel, D., Reuber, A., & Vogel, R. (2020). Developing a short scale to assess public leadership. Public Administration.
  46. Výrost, R., & Slaměník, I. (2008). Sociální psychologie. Grada Praha.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.438 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 3
Published on: Dec 5, 2022
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Martin Viktora, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.