Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Birds of a Feather Flock Together, but What About Fledglings? Observational Census as a Method to Investigate Spatial, Temporal, Generational, and Gendered Dimensions of Microecological Segregation Cover

Birds of a Feather Flock Together, but What About Fledglings? Observational Census as a Method to Investigate Spatial, Temporal, Generational, and Gendered Dimensions of Microecological Segregation

Open Access
|May 2024

References

  1. Allport, GW. 1954. The nature of prejudice. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  2. Anicich, EM, Jachimowicz, JM, Osborne, MR and Phillips, LT. 2021. Structuring local environments to avoid racial diversity: Anxiety drives Whites’ geographical and institutional self-segregation preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 95: 104117. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104117
  3. APA. n.d. Race and Ethnicity. Available at: https://www.apa.org/topics/race-ethnicity.
  4. Bates, D, Mächler, M, Bolker, B, Walker, S, Christensen, RH, Singmann, H and Dai, B. 2015. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7. 2014.
  5. Beasley, TM and Schumacker, RE. 1995. Multiple regression approach to analyzing contingency tables: Post hoc and planned comparison procedures. The Journal of Experimental Education, 64(1): 7993. DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1995.9943797
  6. Bekhuis, H, Ruiter, S and Coenders, M. 2013. Xenophobia among youngsters: The effect of inter-ethnic contact. European Sociological Review, 29(2): 229242. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcr057
  7. Bettencourt, L, Dixon, J and Castro, P. 2019. Understanding how and why spatial segregation endures: A systematic review of recent research on intergroup relations at a micro-ecological scale. Social Psychological Bulletin, 14: 124. DOI: 10.32872/spb.v14i2.33482
  8. Brown, R and Hewstone, M. 2005. An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Contact. In: Zanna, MP (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 37). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. pp. 255343. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5
  9. City of Helsinki. n.d. Asuinalueet erilaistuvat. (The Residential Areas Are Becoming More Different). Available at: https://julkaisut.hel.fi/fi/julkaisut/asumisen-ja-siihen-liittyvan-maankayton-toteutusohjelma/i-asuntotilanne-ja-3 [Last accessed 4 April 2023].
  10. City of Helsinki. 2019. Population with Foreign Background in Helsinki. Available at: https://ulkomaalaistaustaisethelsingissa.fi/en/content/population-foreign-background-helsinki.
  11. City of Helsinki. 2021. Helsingin väkiluku ylittää 700 000 asukasta vuonna 2028 (The Population of Helsinki Will Exceed 700,000 in 2028). Available at: https://www.hel.fi/fi/uutiset/helsingin-vakiluku-ylittaa-700-000-asukasta-vuonna-2028 [Last accessed 4 April 2023].
  12. Coppock, V and McGovern, M. 2014. ‘Dangerous minds’? Deconstructing counter-terrorism discourse, radicalisation and the ‘psychological vulnerability’ of Muslim children and young people in Britain. Children and Society, 28(3): 242256. DOI: 10.1111/chso.12060
  13. Corry, NH, Williams, CS, Battaglia, M, McMaster, HS and Stander, VA. 2017. Assessing and adjusting for non-response in the Millennium Cohort Family Study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1): 1633. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0294-8
  14. Dixon, J and Durrheim, K. 2010. Contact and the ecology of racial division: Some varieties of informal segregation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42: 123. DOI: 10.1348/014466603763276090
  15. Dixon, J, Sturgeon, B, Huck, J, Hocking, B, Jarman, N, Bryan, D, Whyatt, D, Davies, G and Tredoux, C. 2022. Navigating the divided city: Place identity and the time-geography of segregation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84: 101908. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101908
  16. Dixon, J, Tredoux, C, Davies, G, Huck, J, Hocking, B, Sturgeon, B, Whyatt, D, Jarman, N and Bryan, D. 2020. Parallel lives: Intergroup contact, threat, and the segregation of everyday activity spaces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(3): 457480. DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000191
  17. Dovidio, JF, Gaertner, SL and Kawakami, K. 2003. Intergroup contact: The past, present, and the future. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6(1): 521. DOI: 10.1177/1368430203006001009
  18. Drew, A and Linzer, JBL. 2011. poLCA: An R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(10): 129. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v042.i10
  19. Durrheim, K. 2005. Socio-spatial practice and racial representations in a changing South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 35: 444459. DOI: 10.1177/008124630503500304
  20. Durrheim, K and Dixon, J. 2005. Studying talk and embodied practices: Toward a psychology of materiality of ‘race relations’. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 15: 446460. DOI: 10.1002/casp.839
  21. Durrheim, K and Dixon, J. 2018. Intergroup Contact and the Struggle for Social Justice. In: Hammack, P (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Psychology and Social Justice. New York: Oxford. pp. 367378. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199938735.013.15
  22. ECRI. 2019. ECRI Report on Finland. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-commission-against-racism-and-intolerance/finland.
  23. Evans, J and Jones, P. 2011. The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place, Applied Geography, 31: 849858. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005
  24. Font, J and Méndez, M. (eds.) 2013. Surveying Ethnic Minorities and Immigrant Populations: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9789048519187
  25. FRA. 2018. Being Black in the EU. Available at: https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2018/being-black-eu [Last accessed 4 April 2023].
  26. Harel, A. 2004. Benign segregation? A case study of the practice of gender separation in buses in the ultra-orthodox community in Israel. South African Journal on Human Rights, 20: 6485. DOI: 10.1080/19962126.2004.11864809
  27. Helsingin Sanomat. 2022. Segregaation kiihtyminen täytyy ottaa vakavasti (The Acceleration in Segregation Must Be Taken Seriously), 16 June. Available at: https://www.hs.fi/paakirjoitukset/art-2000008884079.html.
  28. Hirvonen, J and Puustinen, S. 2016. Alueellinen segregaatio ja väestörakenteen muutokset. In: Puustinen, S (ed.), Strateginen eheyttäminen kaupunkiseuduilla. Näkökulmia kestävän maan¬käytön ja julkisen talouden kysymyksiin. Valtioneuvoston selvitys- ja tutkimustoiminnan julkaisusarja, 4/2016. s. 89108.
  29. Hunt, MO, Jackson, PB, Powell, B and Steelman, LC. 2000. Color-blind: The treatment of race and ethnicity in social psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4): 352364. DOI: 10.2307/2695845
  30. Keski-Heikkilä, A. 2023. Perussuomalaiset on ensi kertaa äänestävien selkeä suosikkipuolue (The Finns Party the Clear Favorite Among First Time Voters). Available at: https://www.hs.fi/politiikka/art-2000009382345.html.
  31. Keskinen, S, Tuori, S, Irni, S and Mulinari, D. (eds.) 2016. Complying with Colonialism: Gender, Race and Ethnicity in the Nordic Region. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315573212
  32. Kinder, DR and Sears, DO. 1981. Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3): 414. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.40.3.414
  33. Laurence, J. 2019. Youth engagement, positive interethnic contact, and ‘associational bridges’: A quasi-experimental investigation of a UK National Youth Engagement Scheme. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 48: 12641280. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-019-01042-x
  34. Lenth, RV. 2021. Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means [R Package Emmeans Version 1.6. 0]. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN).
  35. McKeown, S, Cairns, E, Stringer, M and Era, G. 2012. Micro-ecological behavior and intergroup contact. The Journal of Social Psychology, 152: 340358. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2011.614647
  36. Nasar, JL and Fisher, B. 1993. ‘Hot spots’ of fear and crime: A multimethod investigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(3): 187206. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80173-2
  37. Niemi, I, Erjansola, J, Keskinen, V and Saukkonen, P. 2019. Vuoden 2019 eduskuntavaalit Helsingissä. [The 2019 Parliamentary Elections in Helsinki]. Tilastoja, 11: 129. Available at: https://www.hel.fi/hel2/tietokeskus/julkaisut/pdf/19_08_21_Tilastoja_11_Niemi_Erjansola_Keskinen_Saukkonen.pdf [Last accessed 4 April 2023].
  38. O’Donnell, AW, Friehs, MT, Bracegirdle, C, Zúñiga, C, Watt, SE and Barlow, FK. 2021. Technological and analytical advancements in intergroup contact research. Journal of Social Issues, 77(1): 171196. DOI: 10.1111/josi.12424
  39. Paajanen, P, Seppälä, T, Stevenson, C and Finell, E. 2022a. Child’s presence shapes immigrant women’s experiences of everyday intergroup contact. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(2): 430444. DOI: 10.5964/jspp.7477
  40. Paajanen, P, Seppälä, T, Stevenson, C, Riikonen, R and Finell, E. 2022b. Keeping apart on the playground: Construction of informal segregation on public playgrounds in multiethnic neighborhoods. Social Psychology Quarterly, 86(1): 5373. DOI: 10.1177/01902725221116632
  41. Peltola, M, Keskinen, S, Honkasalo, V and Honkatukia, P. 2017. Intergenerational negotiations on (hetero) sexuality and romantic relationships—Views of young people and parents in multi-ethnic contexts. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(5): 533548. DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2016.1241870
  42. Pettersson, K, Liebkind, K and Sakki, I. 2016. You who are an immigrant, why are you in the Sweden Democrats? Discourse & Society, 27(6): 624641. DOI: 10.1177/0957926516664651
  43. Pettigrew, TF and Tropp, LR. 2006. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90: 751783. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
  44. Piekut, A. 2021. Survey nonresponse in attitudes towards immigration in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(5): 11361161. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2019.1661773
  45. Reimer, NK and Sengupta, NK. 2022. Meta-analysis of the ‘ironic’ effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(2): 362380. DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000404
  46. Riikonen, R, Finell, E, Suoninen, E, Paajanen, P and Stevenson, C. 2023. Who is expected to make contact? Interpretative repertoires related to an intergroup encounter between Finnish majority mothers and immigrant mothers. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62: 264280. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12580
  47. Rinken, S, Pasadas-del-Amo, S, Rueda, M and Cobo, B. 2021. No magic bullet: Estimating anti-immigrant sentiment and social desirability bias with the item-count technique. Quality & Quantity, 55(6): 21392159. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021-01098-7
  48. Rye, JF, Andersson, M and O’Reilly, K. 2023. Practises and Processes of Symbolic Reproduction of Racial, Ethnic and National Boundaries in Low-Waged Workplaces. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 13(2): 1. DOI: 10.33134/njmr.677
  49. Swyngedouw, E. 2013. The segregation of social interactions in the red line L-train in Chicago. Symbolic Interaction, 36: 293313. DOI: 10.1002/symb.64
  50. Tredoux, C and Dixon, J. 2009. Mapping the multiple contexts of racial isolation: The case of long street, Cape Town. Urban Studies, 46: 761777. DOI: 10.1177/0042098009102128
  51. Tredoux, C, Dixon, J, Underwood, S, Nunez, D and Finchilescu, G. 2005. Preserving spatial and temporal dimensions in observational data of segregation. South African Journal of Psychology, 35(3): 412432. DOI: 10.1177/008124630503500302
  52. Valentine, G. 1989. The geography of women’s fear. Area, 21: 385390.
  53. Verkuyten, M. 2005. The Social Psychology of Ethnic Identity. New York: Psychology Press. DOI: 10.4324/9780203338704
  54. Vezzali, L and Stathi, S. (eds.) 2017. Intergroup Contact Theory: Recent Developments and Future Directions. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315646510
  55. Weber, M. 1968 [1922]. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  56. Weller, BE, Bowen, NK and Faubert, SJ. 2020. Latent class analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(4): 287311. DOI: 10.1177/0095798420930932
  57. World Economic Forum (WEF). 2022. Global Gender Gap Report. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2022/.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.727 | Journal eISSN: 1799-649X
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 5
Submitted on: Aug 10, 2023
Accepted on: Dec 12, 2023
Published on: May 8, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Katarina Pettersson, Sointu Leikas, Jan-Erik Lönnqvist, Ira Frejborg, Isabella Wahrman, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.