Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Identification with NATO Fosters Collective Defence Efficacy Beliefs and Willingness to Participate in National and Collective Defence Cover

Identification with NATO Fosters Collective Defence Efficacy Beliefs and Willingness to Participate in National and Collective Defence

Open Access
|Aug 2026

References

  1. ABDI. (2021). Finns’ opinions on foreign and security policy, national defence and security (Bulletins and Reports 2021:3). Ministry of Defence. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-663-376-6
  2. ABDI. (2022). Finns’ opinions on foreign and security policy, national defence and security (Bulletins and Reports 2022:3). Ministry of Defence. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-663-463-3
  3. ABDI. (2024). Finns’ opinions on foreign and security policy, national defence and security (Bulletins and Reports 2024:6). Ministry of Defence. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-663-368-1
  4. ABDI. (2025). Finns’ opinions on foreign and security policy, national defence and security (Bulletins and Reports 2025:3). Ministry of Defence. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-663-380-3
  5. Albayrak-Aydemir, N., & Gleibs, I. H. (2024). Whether a religious group membership is shared and salient influences perceived similarity, political support, and helping intention toward refugees, but not charitable donation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 54(3), 175189. 10.1111/jasp.13022
  6. Anderson, C. J., Getmansky, A., & Hirsch-Hoefler, S. (2020). Burden sharing: Income, inequality and willingness to fight. British Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 363379. 10.1017/S0007123417000679
  7. Arter, D. (2022). From Finlandisation and post-Finlandisation to the end of Finlandisation? Finland’s road to a NATO application. European Security, 32(2), 171189. 10.1080/09662839.2022.2113062
  8. Aunesluoma, J. (2024). Gradually, then suddenly: Explaining Sweden and Finland’s path to NATO. In C. F. S. Banke, J. Larsen, & M. R. Olesen (Eds.), Danish foreign policy review: 2024 (pp. 134167). Danish Institute for International Studies.
  9. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191215. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  10. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122147. 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
  11. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
  12. Beaumont, P. D., Wilhelmsen, J., & Lundby Gjerde, K. (2024). Reimagining NATO after Crimea: Defender of the rule-based order and truth? Contemporary Security Policy, 45(3), 396425. 10.1080/13523260.2024.2349393
  13. Berglund, C. (2025). Brothers in arms? Estonia’s Defense Forces and the trojan horse dilemma. Armed Forces & Society. 10.1177/0095327X251339663
  14. Berglund, C., Kasearu, K., & Kivirähk, J. (2022). Fighting for the (step)motherland? Predictors of defense willingness in Estonia’s post-Soviet generation. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 49(2), 146169. 10.5744/jpms.2022.2002
  15. Bērziņa, I., & Zupa, U. (2021). Factors affecting willingness to fight for a country in the Latvian and Russian-speaking communities in Latvia. National Identities, 23(3), 239252. 10.1080/14608944.2020.1851668
  16. Bontenbal, I., Riikonen, R., & Kosonen, J. (2025). A Weberian analysis of the perspectives of individuals with a migrant background regarding joining military service in Finland. Sosiologia, 62(1), 3954.
  17. Çakal, H., Eller, A., Sirlopú, D., & Pérez, A. (2016). Intergroup relations in Latin America: Intergroup contact, common ingroup identity, and activism among indigenous groups in Mexico and Chile. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 355375. 10.1111/josi.12170
  18. Chayinska, M., Minescu, A., & McGarty, C. (2017). Political solidarity through action (and inaction): How international relations changed intracultural perceptions in Ukraine. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(3), 396408. 10.1177/1368430216682354
  19. Conscription Act. (1438/2007). Finlex. https://data.finlex.fi/eli/sd/2007/1438/ajantasa/2026-05-29/fin
  20. Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 872886. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.872
  21. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup validity as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(5), 410436. 10.1006/jesp.1995.1018
  22. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2007). Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 296330. 10.1080/10463280701726132
  23. Drury, J., Carter, H., Cocking, C., Ntontis, E., Guven, S. T., & Amlôt, R. (2019). Facilitating collective psychosocial resilience in the public in emergencies: Twelve recommendations based on the social identity approach. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, Article 141. 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00141
  24. Finnish Defence Forces Statistics. (2024). Annual conscription statistics. National Defence Command.
  25. Flockhart, T. (2024). NATO in the multi-order world. International Affairs, 100(2), 471489. 10.1093/ia/iiae004
  26. Forsberg, T. (2023). Four rounds of the Finnish NATO debate. Nordic Review of International Studies, 1(1), 4150.
  27. FROF. (2024). In English. Finnish Reserve Officers’ Federation. https://www.rul.fi/in-english/
  28. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press. 10.4324/9781315804576
  29. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 126. 10.1080/14792779343000004
  30. Glasford, D. E., & Calcagno, J. (2012). The conflict of harmony: Intergroup contact, commonality and political solidarity between minority groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 323328. 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.001
  31. Hadar, M., & Häkkinen, T. (2020). Conscription and willingness to defend as cornerstones of national defence in Israel and Finland. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 47(2), 188218. 10.5744/jpms/2020/2004
  32. Häkkinen, A., & Salasuo, M. (2026). “Viimeinen niitti”: Suomen Reserviupseeriliiton jäsenten ja reservistä eronneiden kansalaisten näkemyksiä Suomen liittymisestä Pohjois-Atlantin liittoon (NATO) [The last straw: Views of members of the Finnish Reserve Officers’ Federation and citizens who resigned from the reserve on Finland’s NATO membership]. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka, 91(3), 205216.
  33. Häkkinen, T., & Kaarkoski, M. (2024). Willingness to defend and foreign policy in Sweden and Finland from the early Cold War period to the 2010s. Scandinavian Journal of History, 49(2), 266285. 10.1080/03468755.2023.2289664
  34. Hart, L., Kaarkoski, M., & Tallberg, T. (2022). Patriotisms, public opinion and national defense in Estonia, Finland and Sweden. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 49(2), 133145. 10.5744/jpms.2022.2001
  35. Haslam, C., Jetten, J., Cruwys, T., Dingle, A., & Haslam, A. (2018). The new psychology of health: Unlocking the social cure. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315648569
  36. Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. (2006). Stressing the group: Social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 10371052. 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1037
  37. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 155. 10.1080/10705519909540118
  38. Inglehart, R., Puranen, B., & Welzel, C. (2015). Declining willingness to fight for one’s country. Journal of Peace Research, 52(4), 418434. 10.1177/0022343314565756
  39. Jouko, P. (2026). A pragmatic approach: Historical insights into Finnish defence and political turning points. In T. Koivula, M. Puranen, & A. Seppo (Eds.), Finland in NATO: Perspectives on strategy (pp. 1328). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003644569
  40. Jugert, P., Greenaway, K. H., Barth, M., Büchner, R., Eisentraut, S., & Fritsche, I. (2016). Collective efficacy increases pro-environmental intentions through increasing self-efficacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 1223. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.08.003
  41. Kaarkoski, M., & Häkkinen, T. (2022). Legitimacy of conscription in democracy: Connections between conscription politics and public opinion in parliamentary debates in Finland and Sweden in the 2010s. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 49(2), 195218. 10.5744/jpms.2022.2004
  42. Kaarkoski, M., Häkkinen, T., & Kilpeläinen, H. (2024). Suomen Nato-jäsenyyden legitimointi menneisyyttä koskevien käsitysten näkökulmasta [Legitimizing Finland’s NATO membership in light of perceptions of the past]. Kosmopolis, 54(3), 2948. 10.70483/kp.145565
  43. Kaarkoski, M., Tallberg, T., & Villman, E. (2020). Mä niinkun vihaan sitä käsitettä – näkökulmia maanpuolustustahtoon ja sitä mittaaviin kysymyksiin [I kind of hate that concept – Perspectives on willingness to defend the country and its measurement]. In T. Häkkinen, M. Kaarkoski, & J. Tilli (Eds.), Maanpuolustustahto Suomessa [Willingness to defend in Finland] (pp. 173195). Gaudeamus.
  44. Kosonen, J. (2019). Kansalaiset sotilaina ja maan puolustajina: Asevelvollisten sitoutuminen maanpuolustukseen ja sen eri tehtäviin [Citizens as soldiers and defenders of the nation: Conscripts’ commitment to national defense and its various tasks] [Doctoral dissertation, National Defence University]. Doria. https://www.doria.fi/handle/10024/170534
  45. Kosonen, J., Puustinen, A., & Tallberg, T. (2019). Saying no to military service: Obligation, killing and inequality as experienced problems in conscription-based military in Finland. Journal of Military Studies, 8(1), 4657. 10.2478/jms-2019-0005
  46. Kreps, S., & Kriner, D. L. (2024). Treaty obligations and support for collective defence: Evidence from Italy after the invasion of Ukraine. European Journal of Political Research, 63(3), 12271239. 10.1111/1475-6765.12644
  47. Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., Ouwerkerk, J. W., & Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144165. 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
  48. Lemay, E. P., & Ryan, J. E. (2021). Common ingroup identity, perceived similarity, and communal interracial relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(6), 9851003. 10.1177/0146167220953984
  49. Levine, M., Prosser, A., Evans, D., & Reicher, S. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(4), 443453. 10.1177/0146167204271651
  50. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130149. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  51. McNamara, N., Stevenson, C., & Muldoon, O. (2013). Community identity as resource and context: A mixed method investigation of coping and collective action in a disadvantaged community. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(5), 393403. 10.1002/ejsp.1953
  52. Muthén, B. O., Muthén, L. K., & Asparouhov, T. (2017). Regression and mediation analysis using Mplus. Muthén & Muthén.
  53. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
  54. Myyry, L. (2009). Et kai se siit tulee, et se pitää nähdä jotenkin se kohde puolustettavana ja arvokkaana: Käsityksiä maanpuolustustahdosta ja siihen vaikuttavista tekijöistä [I guess it comes from seeing the object as worth defending and valuable: Perceptions of willingness to defend the nation and the factors influencing it]. Ministry of Defence/University of Helsinki.
  55. NATO. (2024). NATO audience research: Pre-summit polling results 2024. Public Diplomacy Division. https://www.nato.int/content/dam/nato/webready/documents/public-opinion/240705-pre-summit-polling-results-en.pdf
  56. Olsson, P. (2024). Nukkuva karhu ja rukouksen voima: Ukrainan sodan herättämät tunteet suomalaisten muisti-ideologiassa [The sleeping bear and the power of prayer: Emotions evoked by the war in Ukraine within Finns’ memory ideology]. Lähihistoria, 3(1), 159187. 10.61559/lh.140943
  57. Persson, T., & Widmalm, S. (2024). Upon entering NATO: Explaining defence willingness among Swedes. European Security, 33(4), 690710. 10.1080/09662839.2023.2294078
  58. Politi, E., Gale, J., Roblain, A., Bobowik, M., & Green, E. G. T. (2023). Who is willing to help Ukrainian refugees and why? The role of individual prosocial dispositions and superordinate European identity. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 33(4), 940953. 10.1002/casp.2689
  59. Puranen, B. (2014). Allegiance eroding: People’s dwindling willingness to fight in wars. In R. J. Dalton & C. Welzel (Eds.), The civic culture transformed: From allegiant to assertive citizens (pp. 261281). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139600002.016
  60. Reicher, S., Cassidy, C., Wolpert, I., Hopkins, S., & Levine, M. (2006). Saving Bulgaria’s Jews: An analysis of social identity and the mobilisation of social solidarity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1), 4972. 10.1002/ejsp.291
  61. Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., Gaertner, S. L., McDonald, S. A., & Lamoreaux, M. J. (2010). Does a common ingroup identity reduce intergroup threat? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(4), 403423. 10.1177/1368430209346701
  62. Riikonen, R., Bontenbal, I., & Kosonen, J. (2025). Boundaries of Finnishness: How military-related encounters with majority Finns shape experiences of belonging to Finland for conscripts with a migrant background. Ethnicities, 25(6), 843864. 10.1177/14687968251322296
  63. Riikonen, R., Finell, E., Seppälä, T., & Stevenson, C. (2024). The more diverse the better: Identifying with a diverse neighbourhood mother community predicts greater intergroup contact. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), Article e2764. 10.1002/casp.2764
  64. Riikonen, R., Tallberg, T., Kosonen, J., & Puustinen, A. (2019). Vapaus, velvollisuus ja vastavuoroisuus – käsityksiä kansalaisen suhteesta valtioon ja maanpuolustukseen [Liberty, duty and reciprocity – Perceptions of relations between citizens, the state and national defence]. Tiede ja Ase, 77, 155186. https://journal.fi/ta/article/view/88685
  65. Rostoks, T., & Mieriņa, I. (2025). NATO’s reassurance and the willingness to defend one’s country: Survey evidence from Latvia. European Security, 34(3), 386406. 10.1080/09662839.2024.2434087
  66. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422445. 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
  67. Sjursen, H. (2004). On the identity of NATO. International Affairs, 80(4), 687703. 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00411.x
  68. Statistics Finland. (2026). Finland’s preliminary population figure was 5,656,779 at the end of February 2026. https://stat.fi/en/publication/cmf0yvhh2ucv408vyqxycf7y4
  69. Stevenson, C., Turner, R., & Costa, S. (2021). ‘Welcome to our neighbourhood’: Collective confidence in contact facilitates successful mixing in residential settings. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(8), 14481466. 10.1177/1368430220961151
  70. Sundberg, R., & Gustavsson, G. (2025). Defending the national identity: Exploring the links between a multidimensional national identity concept and the willingness to defend one’s country. European Security, 35(2), 233253. 10.1080/09662839.2025.2540091
  71. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 3347). Brooks/Cole.
  72. Tallberg, T. (2009). The gendered social organisation of defence: Two ethnographic case studies in the Finnish Defence Forces [Doctoral dissertation, Hanken School of Economics]. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-232-020-9
  73. Thomas, E. F., Mavor, K. I., & McGarty, C. (2011). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 7588. 10.1177/1368430211413619
  74. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Blackwell.
  75. Vargulis, M. (2021). NATO and the role of societal resilience and willingness to defend own country. In M. Andžāns, I. Gajauskaitė, I. Juurvee, A. Palkova, Y.-Y. Yeh, & M. Vargulis (Eds.), Willingness to defend own country in the Baltic States: Implications for national security and NATO’s collective defence (pp. 1828). Rīga Stradiņš University. 10.25143/willingness_to_defend_2021_ISBN_9789934563997_18-28
  76. Wass, H., Aunesluoma, J., Forsberg, T., Hentunen, M., Lavikainen, J., Lehtinen, J., Leonoff, E., Särkkä, I., Tiitinen, A., Tukiainen, J., Valkama, L., Vihriälä, V., Vuorelma, J., & Weckman, A. (2025). Citizens in the turmoil of world politics: Finns’ foreign and security policy expectations two years after joining NATO (NATOpoll Policy Brief 1/2025). University of Helsinki.
  77. Weckman, A. (2025). Wartime solidarity and sense of belonging to Europe: Public support for military aid to NATO allies under attack. European Security, 35(2), 213232. 10.1080/09662839.2025.2560406
  78. YLE. (2023, February 27). Record number switch from reserve to civilian service. https://yle.fi/a/74-20019909
  79. Yu, J., Sim, T., & Qi, W. (2022). Informal social support and disaster preparedness: Mediating roles of perceived collective efficacy and self-efficacy. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 68, Article 102734. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102734
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.536 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 539 - 555
Submitted on: Dec 17, 2025
Accepted on: Jul 2, 2026
Published on: Aug 27, 2026
Published by: Scandinavian Military Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Reetta Riikonen, Miina Kaarkoski, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.