NATO’s Nuclear Types: Vulnerability, Defense Investment, and Alliance Strategy Preferences
By: Stephen Herzog, J. Luis Rodriguez and Lauren Sukin
References
- Alberque, W., & Schreer, B. (2022). Finland, Sweden and NATO membership. Survival, 64(3), 67–72. 10.1080/00396338.2022.2078046
- Allison, D. M., Herzog, S., & Ko, J. (2022). Under the umbrella: Nuclear crises, extended deterrence, and public opinion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 66(10), 1766–1796. 10.1177/00220027221100254
- Bell, M. S. (2021). Nuclear reactions: How nuclear-armed states behave. Cornell University Press. 10.1515/9781501754173
- Bell, M. S., & Hoffmann, F. R. (2025, March 31). Europe’s nuclear trilemma: The difficult and dangerous options for post-American deterrence. Foreign Affairs.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/europe/europes-nuclear-trilemma - Béraud-Sudreau, L., & Giegerich, B. (2018). NATO defence spending and European threat perceptions. Survival, 60(4), 53–74. 10.1080/00396338.2018.1495429
- Blankenship, B., & Lin-Greenberg, E. (2022). Trivial tripwires? Military capabilities and alliance reassurance. Security Studies, 31(1), 92–117. 10.1080/09636412.2022.2038662
- Bollfrass, A. K., & Herzog, S. (2022). The war in Ukraine and global nuclear order. Survival, 64(4), 7–32. 10.1080/00396338.2022.2103255
- Braut-Hegghammer, M., & Bowers, I. (2026). Small States and the Third Nuclear Age: An Introduction. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 9(1).
- Braut-Hegghammer, M., & Hagstrom, L. E. (2026). Hawks in the High North: The Rise of a Nordic Deterrence Cluster. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 9(1).
- Cameron, J. (2025, March 31). Eurodeterrent: A vision for an Anglo-French nuclear force. War on the Rocks.
https://warontherocks.com/2025/03/eurodeterrent-a-vision-for-an-anglo-french-nuclear-force - Cebul, M., Dafoe, A., & Monteiro, N. P. (2021). Coercion and the credibility of assurances. Journal of Politics, 83(3), 975–991. 10.1086/711132
- Chu, J., & Recchia, S. (2022). Does public opinion affect the preferences of foreign policy leaders? Experimental evidence from the UK Parliament. Journal of Politics, 84(3), 1874–1877. 10.1086/719007
- Coppock, A., & McClellan, O. A. (2019). Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. Research & Politics, 6(1). 10.1177/2053168018822174
- Crescenzi, M. (2018). Of friends and foes: Reputation and learning in international politics. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190609528.001.0001
- Erästö, T., & Wan, W. (2026). Security Beyond Nuclear Deterrence: Towards Risk Reduction in Northern Europe. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 9(1).
- Eriksson, J. (2015). Small-state mediation in international conflicts. I.B. Tauris. 10.5040/9780755618910
- Fearon, J. D. (1997). Signaling foreign policy interests: Tying hands versus sinking costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(1), 68–90. 10.1177/0022002797041001004
- Fox, A. B. (1959). The power of small states: Diplomacy in World War II. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226834863.001.0001
- Freedman, L. (2025). Europe’s nuclear deterrent: The here and now. Survival, 67(3), 7–24. 10.1080/00396338.2025.2508078
- Friedhoff, K. (2020, August). Withdrawal likely to undermine South Korean public support for alliance with United States. Chicago Council on Global Affairs.
https://globalaffairs.org/research/public-opinion-survey/troop-withdrawal-likely-undermine-south-korean-public-support - Gates, W., & Terasawa, K. (1992). Commitment, threat perceptions, and expenditures in a defense alliance. International Studies Quarterly, 36(1), 101–118. 10.2307/2600918
- George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
- Handel, M. I. (1981). Weak states in the international system. Frank Cass.
- Harvey, F., & Mitton, J. (2016). Fighting for credibility: US reputation and international politics. University of Toronto Press. 10.3138/9781487511753
- Henry, I. (2020). What allies want: Reconsidering loyalty, reliability, and alliance interdependence. International Security, 44(4), 45–83. 10.1162/isec_a_00375
- Herzog, S. (2021).
Backchannel non-proliferation: Militarily non-aligned states and nuclear diplomacy . In J. L. Black-Branch & D. Fleck (Eds.), Nuclear non-proliferation in international law—Volume VI: Nuclear disarmament and security at risk: Legal challenges in a shifting nuclear world (pp. 281–303). Springer. 10.1007/978-94-6265-463-1_11 - Herzog, S., & Kunertova, D. (2024). NATO and emerging technologies—The alliance’s shifting approach to military innovation. Naval War College Review, 77(2), 47–69.
- Hoffmann, F. (2026). Small State Conventional Long-Range Strike Arsenals and Strategic Stability in Europe. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 9(1).
- Huth, P. (1988). Extended deterrence and the outbreak of war. American Political Science Review, 82(2), 423–443. 10.2307/1957394
- Jackson, V. (2016). Rival reputations: Coercion and credibility in US–North Korea relations. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316459669
- Jentleson, B. W. (1992). The pretty prudent public: Post post-Vietnam American opinion on the use of military force. International Studies Quarterly, 36(1), 49–74. 10.2307/2600916
- Jesse, N. G., & Dreyer, J. R. (2016). Small states in the international system: At peace and at war. Lexington Books. 10.5040/9781978731783
- Katzenstein, P. J., & Keohane, R. O. (2007).
The political consequences of anti-Americanism . In P. J. Katzenstein & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Anti-Americanisms in world politics (pp. 273–305). Cornell University Press. - Kertzer, J. (2016). Resolve in international politics. Princeton University Press. 10.23943/princeton/9780691171609.003.0001
- Kertzer, J. (2017). Microfoundations in international relations. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 34(1), 81–97. 10.1177/0738894216665488
- Kertzer, J. (2022). Re-assessing elite-public gaps in political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 66(3), 539–553. 10.1111/ajps.12583
- Kertzer, J. (2023).
Public opinion about foreign policy . In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, J. S. Levy, & J. Jerit (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (3rd ed., pp. 447–485). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197541302.013.12 - Ko, J. (2019). Alliance and public preference for nuclear forbearance: Evidence from South Korea. Foreign Policy Analysis, 15(4), 509–529. 10.1093/fpa/ory014
- Krebs, R., & Spindel, J. (2018). Divided priorities: Why and when allies differ over military intervention. Security Studies, 27(4), 575–606. 10.1080/09636412.2018.1483609
- Kreps, S. (2010). Elite consensus as a determinant of alliance cohesion: Why public opinion hardly matters for NATO-led operations in Afghanistan. Foreign Policy Analysis, 6(3), 191–215. 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00108.x
- Kristensen, H. M., & Korda, M. (2023). United States nuclear weapons, 2023. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 79(1), 28–52. 10.1080/00963402.2022.2156686
- Kühn, U. (2025).
Choosing U.S. nuclear protection: The growing costs of German status quo policies . In S. Herzog, G. D. Arceneaux, & A. F. W. Petrovics (Eds.), Atomic backfires: When nuclear policies fail (pp. 345–379). MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/16163.003.0022 - Kunertova, D., & Schmitt, O. (2025). Assessing NATO’s cohesion: Methods and implications. International Politics, 62(5), 1097–1110. 10.1057/s41311-024-00641-1
- Kydd, A. (2000). Trust, reassurance, and cooperation. International Organization, 54(2), 325–357. 10.1162/002081800551190
- Lanoszka, A., Leuprecht, C., & Moens, A. (2020). Lessons from the Enhanced Forward Presence, 2017–2020. NATO Defense College.
- Larsen, H. (2022). Adapting NATO to great-power competition. Washington Quarterly, 45(4), 7–26. 10.1080/0163660X.2022.2148507
- Lee, J. (1977). Rallying around the flag: Foreign policy events and presidential popularity. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 7(4), 252–256.
- LeVeck, B., & Narang, N. (2017). How international reputation matters: Revisiting alliance violations in context. International Interactions, 43(5), 797–821. 10.1080/03050629.2017.1237818
- Lin-Greenberg, E. (2021). Soldiers, pollsters, and international crises: Public opinion and the military’s advice on the use of force. Foreign Policy Analysis, 17(3),
orab009 . 10.1093/fpa/orab009 - Liyanage, H. R. (2026). Allied with Constraints: How the United States Integrates Nuclear-Constrained Allies. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 9(1).
- Lohr, S. L. (2021). Sampling: Design and analysis (2nd ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC. 10.1201/9780429298899
- Long, T. (2022). A small state’s guide to influence in world politics. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190926205.001.0001
- Lupton, D. (2018a). Reexamining reputation for resolve: Leaders, states, and the onset of international crises. Journal of Global Security Studies, 3(2), 198–216. 10.1093/jogss/ogy004
- Lupton, D. (2018b). Signaling resolve: Leaders, reputations, and the importance of early interactions. International Interactions, 44(1), 59–87. 10.1080/03050629.2017.1316268
- Lupton, D. (2020). Reputation for resolve: How leaders signal determination in international politics. Cornell University Press. 10.7591/cornell/9781501747717.001.0001
- Maas, M. (2017). Small states in world politics: The story of small state survival, 1648–2016. Manchester University Press. 10.7228/manchester/9780719082733.001.0001
- Markovits, A. (2007). Uncouth nation: Why Europe dislikes America. Princeton University Press.
- Mattes, M. (2012). Reputation, symmetry, and alliance design. International Organization, 66(4), 679–707. 10.1017/S002081831200029X
- Mercer, J. (1996). Reputation and international politics. Cornell University Press.
- Morrow, J. D. (1991). Alliances and asymmetry: An alternative to the capability aggregation model of alliances. American Journal of Political Science, 35(4), 904–933. 10.2307/2111499
- Murdoch, J., & Sandler, T. (1984). Complementarity, free riding, and the military expenditures of NATO allies. Journal of Public Economics, 25(1–2), 83–101. 10.1016/0047-2727(84)90045-8
- Narang, V. (2014). Nuclear strategy in the modern era: Regional powers and international conflict. Princeton University Press. 10.23943/princeton/9780691159829.001.0001
- Narang, V. (2022). Seeking the bomb: Strategies of nuclear proliferation. Princeton University Press. 10.23943/princeton/9780691172613.001.0001
- Palmer, G. (1990). Corralling the free rider: Deterrence and the Western Alliance. International Studies Quarterly, 34(2), 147–164. 10.2307/2600706
- Pesu, M. (2026). NATO’s Spearhead in the European Arctic: The Rise of a Nordic Deterrence Cluster. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 9(1).
- Peyton, K., Huber, G. A., & Coppock, A. (2022). The generalizability of online experiments conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 9(3), 379–394. 10.1017/XPS.2021.17
- Plümper, T., & Neumayer, E. (2015). Free-riding in alliances: Testing an old theory with a new method. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 32(3), 247–268. 10.1177/0738894214522916
- Press, D. G. (2005). Calculating credibility: How leaders assess military threats. Cornell University Press.
- Rickli, J.-M. (2008). European small states’ military policies after the Cold War: From territorial to niche strategies. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21(3), 307–325. 10.1080/09557570802253435
- Risse-Kappen, T. (1991). Public opinion, domestic structure, and foreign policy in liberal democracies. World Politics, 43(4), 479–512. 10.2307/2010534
- Rothstein, R. L. (1968). Alliances and small powers. Columbia University Press.
- Sanders, D., Clarke, H. D., Stewart, M. C., & Whiteley, P. (2007). Does mode matter for modeling political choice? Evidence from the 2005 British Election Study. Political Analysis, 15(3), 257–285. 10.1093/pan/mpl010
- Sharman, J. C. (2015). War, selection, and micro-states: Economic and sociological perspectives on the international system. European Journal of International Relations, 21(1), 194–214. 10.1177/1354066114523658
- Simón, L. (2022, May 12). Bridging US-led alliances in the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific. Center for Strategic and International Studies.
https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/220512_Simon_Inter-theater_Perspective.pdf - Smetana, M., Sukin, L., Herzog, S., & Vranka, M. (2025). Atomic responsiveness: How public opinion shapes elite beliefs and preferences on nuclear weapon use. European Journal of International Security. Advance online publication. 10.1017/eis.2025.10031
- Snyder, G. (1984). The security dilemma in alliance politics. World Politics, 36(4), 461–495. 10.2307/2010183
- Sorg, A. (2025, March 24). Force de l’Europe: How realistic is a French nuclear umbrella? War on the Rocks.
https://warontherocks.com/2025/03/force-de-leurope-how-realistic-is-a-french-nuclear-umbrella - Sorg, A., & Horovitz, L. (2026). Nuclear Matryoshka: Russia’s Deployment to Belarus. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 9(1).
- Sprinz, D., & Vaahtoranta, T. (1994). The interest-based explanation of international environmental policy. International Organization, 48(1), 77–105. 10.1017/S0020818300000825
- Staniland, P. (2012). States, insurgents, and wartime political orders. Perspectives on Politics, 10(2), 243–264. 10.1017/S1537592712000655
- Steele, B. (2019). Restraint in international politics. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108644082
- Sukin, L. (2020). Credible nuclear security commitments can backfire: Explaining domestic support for nuclear weapons acquisition in South Korea. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(6), 1011–1042. 10.1177/0022002719888689
- Sukin, L., Herzog, S., & Lanoszka, A. (2026a). Winning hearts and minds? How the United States reassured during the Russo-Ukrainian War. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 70(4), 639–665. 10.1177/00220027251363229
- Sukin, L., & Lanoszka, A. (2024). Credibility in crises: How patrons reassure their allies. International Studies Quarterly, 68(2),
sqae062 . 10.1093/isq/sqae062 - Sukin, L., Rodriguez, J. L., & Herzog, S. (2026b). Rethinking the deterrence–disarmament dichotomy: The complex landscape of global nuclear weapons preferences. Perspectives on Politics. Advance online publication. 10.1017/S1537592725103666
- Thomson, C., Mader, M., Münchow, F., Reifler, J., & Schoen, H. (2023). European public opinion: United in supporting Ukraine, divided on the future of NATO. International Affairs, 99(6), 2485–2500. 10.1093/ia/iiad241
- Tingley, D., & Walter, B. (2011). The effect of repeated play on reputation building: An experimental approach. International Organization, 65(2), 343–365. 10.1017/S0020818311000026
- Tomz, M. (2007). Domestic audience costs in international relations: An experimental approach. International Organization, 61(4), 821–840. 10.1017/S0020818307070282
- Tomz, M., Weeks, J., & Yarhi-Milo, K. (2020). Public opinion and decisions about military force in democracies. International Organization, 74(1), 119–143. 10.1017/S0020818319000341
- Walt, S. (1987). The origins of alliances. Cornell University Press.
- Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.
- Weeks, J. (2008). Autocratic audience costs: Regime type and signaling resolve. International Organization, 62(1), 35–64. 10.1017/S0020818308080028
- Weisiger, A., & Yarhi-Milo, K. (2015). Revisiting reputation: How past actions matter in international politics. International Organization, 69(2), 473–495. 10.1017/S0020818314000393
- Weitsman, P. (2014). Waging war: Alliances, coalitions, and institutions of interstate violence. Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9780804788946
- Williams, K. P., Lobell, S. E., Jesse, N. G., & Dreyer, J. R. (2012). Beyond great powers and hegemons: Why secondary states support, follow or challenge. Stanford University Press.
- Withorne, J. (2026). Situational Awareness in the Third Nuclear Age. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 9(1).
- Yarhi-Milo, K., Kertzer, J., & Renshon, J. (2018). Tying hands, sinking costs, and leader attributes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(10), 2150–2179. 10.1177/0022002718785693
- Yeager, D. S., Krosnick, J. A., Chang, L., Javitz, H. S., Levendusky, M. S., Simper, A., & Wang, R. (2011). Comparing the accuracy of RDD telephone surveys and internet surveys conducted with probability and non-probability samples. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(4), 709–747. 10.1093/poq/nfr020
- Yeo, A. (2020). Asia’s regional architecture: Alliances and institutions in the Pacific century. Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9781503608801
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.509 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 453 - 472
Submitted on: Nov 3, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 9, 2026
Published on: Jul 15, 2026
Published by: Scandinavian Military Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2026 Stephen Herzog, J. Luis Rodriguez, Lauren Sukin, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.