Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Interoperability: An Intertwined Phenomenon Requiring Multidimensional and Multilevel Coordination and Cooperation Cover

Interoperability: An Intertwined Phenomenon Requiring Multidimensional and Multilevel Coordination and Cooperation

By:   
Open Access
|Apr 2026

References

  1. Alam, M. K. (2021). A systematic qualitative case study: Questions, data collection, NVivo analysis and saturation. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 131. 10.1108/QROM-09-2019-1825
  2. Alvesson, M. (2009). At-home ethnography: Struggling with closeness and closure. In S. Ybema, D. Yanow, H. Wels, & F. Kamsteeg (Eds.), Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexities of everyday life (pp. 156174). Sage. 10.4135/9781446278925.n9
  3. Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247271. 10.5465/amr.2009.0188
  4. Ångström, J., & Ljungkvist, K. (2023). Unpacking the varying strategic logics of total defence. Journal of Strategic Studies, 47(4), 498522. 10.1080/01402390.2023.2260958
  5. Annamalah, S. (2024). The value of case study research in practice: A methodological review with practical insights from organizational studies. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 19(4), 485498. 10.57017/jaes.v19.4(86).11
  6. Autesserre, S. (2014). Going micro: Emerging and future peacekeeping research. International Peacekeeping, 21(4), 492500. 10.1080/13533312.2014.950884
  7. Berndtsson, J., Goldenberg, I., & von Hlatky, S. (Eds.) (2023). Total defence forces in the twenty-first century. McGill-Queen’s University Press. 10.1515/9780228019404
  8. Chaturvedi, R., & Nambudiri, R. (2025). Charting new waters: Navigating identity shifts during cross domain transition. Journal of Professions and Organization, 12(3). 10.1093/jpo/joaf006
  9. Civil-Military Cooperation Centre of Excellence (CCOE). (2018). Resilience through civil preparedness. https://www.cimic-coe.org/resources/fact-sheets/resilience-through-civil-preparedness.pdf
  10. Corti, L., & Thompson, P. (2007). Secondary analysis of archived data. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 297313). Sage. 10.4135/9781848608191.d26
  11. Crombe, K., & Nagl, J. A. (2023). A call for action: Lessons from Ukraine for the future force. Parameters, 53(3). 10.55540/0031-1723.3233
  12. Danielsson, A. (2022). Producing the military urban(s): Interoperability, space-making, and epistemic distinctions between military services in urban operations. Political Geography, 97, 102649. 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102649
  13. De Coning, C. (2020). Adaptive peace operations: Navigating the complexity of influencing societal change without causing harm. International Peacekeeping, 27(5), 836858. 10.1080/13533312.2020.1797500
  14. De Coning, C., & Friis, K. (2011). Coherence and coordination: The limits of the comprehensive approach. Journal of International Peacekeeping, 15, 243272. 10.1163/187541110X540553
  15. Derleth, J. (2015). Enhancing interoperability: The foundation for effective NATO operations. NATO Review. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2015/06/12/enhancing-interoperability-the-foundation-for-effective-nato-operations/index.html
  16. Doty, A., Tykkyläinen, S., Pyykönen, J., & Koskimies, T. (2023). Mukautuva ja kokonaisvaltainen kriisinhallinta? Suomen osallistuminen kriisinhallintatoimiin Afganistanissa, 2002–2021 sekä vaikuttavuusarvioinnin kehittäminen [Adaptive and comprehensive crisis management? Finland’s participation in crisis management operations in Afghanistan, 2002–2021 and development of effectiveness assessment] (Publications of the Government’s Analysis, Assessment and Research Activities 2023:46). Finnish Government. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/164991
  17. Drisko, J. W. (2025). Transferability and generalization in qualitative research. Research on Social Work Practice, 35(1), 102110. 10.1177/10497315241256560
  18. Durán, M., & Calatrava, A. (2021). Military interaction with the local actors. In M. Nuciari & E. Olivetti (Eds.), Leaders for tomorrow: Challenges for military leadership in the age of asymmetric warfare (pp. 83100). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-71714-8_5
  19. European Commission. (2025). Joint communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European preparedness union strategy. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_preparedness
  20. Feaver, P. D. (1999). Civil-military relations. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 211241. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.211
  21. Fewell, S., & Clark, T. (2003). Organisational interoperability: Evaluation and further development of the OIM model (DSTO-TR-1533). Defence Science and Technology Organisation. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA421715.pdf
  22. Garbino, H., Robinson, J., & Valdetaro, J. (2024). Civil-military what?! Making sense of conflicting civil-military concepts. Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Studies, Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Brown University. https://watson.brown.edu/chrhs/files/chrhs/imce/research/Civil-Military%20What%20Report.pdf
  23. Giegerich, B., & von Hlatky, S. (2020). Experiences may vary: NATO and cultural interoperability in Afghanistan. Armed Forces & Society, 46(3), 495516. 10.1177/0095327X19875490
  24. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 1531. 10.1177/1094428112452151
  25. Gioia, D. A., Price, K. N., Hamilton, A. L., & Thomas, J. B. (2010). Forging an identity: An insider-outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 146. 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.1
  26. Goldenberg, I., & Dean, W. H. (2017). Enablers and barriers to information sharing in military and security operations: Lessons learned. In I. Goldenberg, J. Soeters, & W. H. Dean (Eds.), Information sharing in military operations (pp. 251267). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-42819-2_16
  27. Guttieri, K., & Franke, V. (2014). Complex operations: Connecting scholarship and practice. In K. Guttieri, V. Franke, & M. A. Civic (Eds.), Understanding complex military operations (pp. 117). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315881577-9
  28. Hackett, M. T., & Nagl, J. A. (2023). A long, hard year: Russia-Ukraine war lessons learned, 2023. Parameters, 54(3). 10.55540/0031-1723.3302
  29. Håkansson, C. (2023). The strengthened role of the European Union in defence: The case of the military mobility project. Defence Studies, 23(3), 436456. 10.1080/14702436.2023.2213647
  30. Hill, R., Hawco, D., Routh, A., Mariani, J., & Keyal, A. (2023). Sum of its parts: Military interoperability and the future of warfare. Deloitte Center for Government Insights. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/public-sector/military-interoperability-future-of-warfare.html
  31. Jenny, J. (2001). Civil-military cooperation in complex emergencies: Finding ways to make it work. European Security, 10(2), 2333. 10.1080/09662830108407492
  32. Kapucu, N., Parkin, A., Lumb, M., & Dippy, R. (2024). Crisis coordination in complex intergovernmental systems: The case of Australia. Public Administration Review, 84(3), 389399. 10.1111/puar.13830
  33. Kinder, T., Stenvall, J., Six, F., & Memon, A. (2021). Relational leadership in collaborative governance ecosystems. Public Management Review, 23(11), 16121639. 10.1080/14719037.2021.1879913
  34. King, A. (2023). Why did Taliban win. Armed Forces & Society, 49(4), 923938. 10.1177/0095327X221096702
  35. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691710. 10.5465/amr.1999.2553248
  36. Leonardsson, H., & Rudd, G. (2015). The local turn in peacebuilding: A literature review of effective and emancipatory local peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 825839. 10.1080/01436597.2015.1029905
  37. Magula, J., Rouland, M., & Zwack, P. (2022). NATO and Russia: Defence and deterrence in a time of conflict. Defence Studies, 22(3), 502509. 10.1080/14702436.2022.2082957
  38. Malkasian, C. (2021). The American war in Afghanistan: A history. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197550779.001.0001
  39. Ministry for Foreign Affairs. (2009). Finland’s comprehensive crisis management strategy. https://um.fi/publications/-/asset_publisher/TVOLgBmLy6YK/content/suomen-kokonaisvaltaisen-kriisinhallinnan-strategia
  40. Ministry for Foreign Affairs. (2022). Suomi osana kansainvälisen yhteisön kriisinhallinta- ja kehitysyhteistyötoimintaa Afganistanissa, 2001–2021 [Finland as part of the international community’s crisis management and development cooperation activities in Afghanistan, 2001–2021]. https://um.fi/julkaisut/-/asset_publisher/TVOLgBmLy6YK/content/suomi-osana-kansainvalisen-yhteison-kriisinhallinta-ja-kehitysyhteistyotoimintaa-afganistanissa-2001-2021
  41. Ministry of Defence. (2022). Puolustusministeriön Afganistan selvitys [Ministry of Defence’s Afghanistan report]. https://www.defmin.fi/ajankohtaista/tiedotteet_ja_uutiset/tiedotearkisto/tiedotteet_2022/puolustusministerion_afganistan-selvitys_on_valmistunut.12836.news
  42. Møller, J. E. (2019). Trilateral defence cooperation in the North: An assessment of interoperability between Norway, Sweden and Finland. Defence Studies, 19(3), 235256. 10.1080/14702436.2019.1634473
  43. Moon, T., Fewell, S., & Reynolds, H. (2008). The what, why, when and how of interoperability. Defence & Security Analysis, 24(1), 517. 10.1080/14751790801903178
  44. Morçöl, G. (2023). Complex governance networks: Foundational concepts and practical implications. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003053392
  45. Morosoff, P., Rudnicki, R., Bryant, J., Farrell, R., & Smith, B. (2015). Joint doctrine ontology: A benchmark for military information systems interoperability. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1325, 29.
  46. Mustasilta, K., Karjalainen, T., Stewart, T. R., & Salo, M. (2022). Finland in Afghanistan, 2001–2021: From stabilization to advancing foreign and security policy relations (FIIA Report 72). Finnish Institute of International Affairs. https://www.fiia.fi/en/publication/finland-in-afghanistan-2001-2021
  47. NATO. (2019). NATO standard AAP-06: NATO glossary of terms and definitions (English and French). https://www.coemed.org/files/stanags/05_AAP/AAP-06_2019_EF.pdf
  48. NATO. (2023a, April 11). Interoperability: Connecting forces. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_84112.htm
  49. NATO. (2023b, July 4). Collective defence and Article 5. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_110496.htm
  50. Newby, V. (2016). The pieces that make the peace: The microprocesses of international security. International Peacekeeping, 23(1), 133157. 10.1080/13533312.2015.1110790
  51. Niinistö, S. (2024). Safer together: Strengthening Europe’s civilian and military preparedness and readiness. European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/8172c9e7-0331-4874-9842-1e968b6d34b4_en
  52. Nisser, J. (2022). Integration is the new black: Thoughts on future warfare in academic and military discourses. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 5(1), 398411. 10.31374/sjms.169
  53. Noordegraaf, M. (2020). Protective or connective professionalism? How connected professionals can (still) act as autonomous and authoritative experts. Journal of Professions and Organization, 7(2), 205223. 10.1093/jpo/joaa011
  54. Paananen, S. (2021). The education and training of military leaders for crisis management environments: Perceptions of its suitability for adaptive expertise. In M. Nuciari & E. Olivetti (Eds.), Leaders for tomorrow: Challenges for military leadership in the age of asymmetric warfare (pp. 6381). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-71714-8_4
  55. Paananen, S., Puustinen, A., Raisio, H., & Jalonen, H. (2022). Embracing dynamic tensions: Peacekeeping as a balancing act of complexity. Public Administration Review, 82(6), 11681178. 10.1111/puar.13535
  56. Paget, S. (2016). Interoperability of the mind: Professional military education and the development of interoperability. The RUSI Journal, 161(4), 4550. 10.1080/03071847.2016.1224496
  57. Qi, H., & Ran, B. (2023). Paradoxes in collaborative governance. Public Management Review, 26(10), 27282753. 10.1080/14719037.2023.2196290
  58. Rinaldo, A., Vogler-Bisig, E., & Tresch, T. S. (2017). How information sharing improves organizational effectiveness in coalition operations. In I. Goldenberg, J. Soeters, & W. H. Dean (Eds.), Information sharing in military operations (pp. 115133). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-42819-2_8
  59. Ryan, A. (2009). The foundation for an adaptive approach: Insights from the science of complex systems. Australian Army Journal, 6(3), 6990.
  60. Sadowski, A., & Maj, J. (2022). Interoperability and complementary of civil defense as crucial problems of regional security: The case of the Suwalki Corridor. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 35(2), 205225. 10.1080/13518046.2022.2139576
  61. Santos, T. P., & Freire, M. E. L. S. (2023). Beyond the buzzwords: Some thoughts on interoperability and military change challenges in Brazil. Defence Studies, 23(3), 497526. 10.1080/14702436.2023.2213635
  62. Sibbald, S. L., Paciocco, S., Fournie, M., Van Asseldonk, R., & Scurr, T. (2021). Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research. Healthcare Management Forum, 34(5), 291296. 10.1177/08404704211028857
  63. Soeters, J. (2017). Information sharing in military and security operations. In I. Goldenberg, J. Soeters, & W. H. Dean (Eds.), Information sharing in military operations (pp. 115). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-42819-2_1
  64. Solli, B. E., & Borrie, A. (2025). Interoperability challenges in NATO’s risk management: Insights from procedural and conceptual analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 8(1), 342362. 10.31374/sjms.328
  65. Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236247). Sage.
  66. Thomas, M. A. (2019). Spaghetti: Systems thinking and the US army. Defence Studies, 19(2), 149169. 10.1080/14702436.2019.1596741
  67. Timulak, L. (2009). Meta-analysis of qualitative studies: A tool for reviewing qualitative research findings in psychotherapies. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4–5), 591600. 10.1080/10503300802477989
  68. Timulak, L., & Creaner, M. (2010). Qualitative meta-analysis of outcomes of person-centred/experiential psychotherapies. In M. Cooper, J. C. Watson, & D. Holldampf (Eds.), Person-centered and experiential psychotherapies work (pp. 6691). PCCS Books.
  69. Van Hulst, M., & Visser, E. L. (2025). Abductive analysis in qualitative research. Public Administration Review, 85, 567580. 10.1111/puar.13856
  70. Wang, H., & Ran, B. (2023). Network governance and collaborative governance: A thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements. Public Management Review, 25(6), 11871211. 10.1080/14719037.2021.2011389
  71. Weston, S. J., Ritchie, S. J., Rohrer, J. M., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). Recommendations for increasing the transparency of analysis of preexisting data sets. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 214227. 10.1177/2515245919848684
  72. Wither, J. K. (2020). Back to the future? Nordic total defence concepts. Defence Studies, 20(1), 6181. 10.1080/14702436.2020.1718498
  73. Yanakiev, Y. (2021). Relationships in multinational missions and operations: Military-to-military dimension. In M. Nuciari & E. Olivetti (Eds.), Leaders for tomorrow: Challenges for military leadership in the age of asymmetric warfare (pp. 101116). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-71714-8_6
  74. Ybema, S., & Kamsteeg, F. (2009). Making the familiar strange: A case for disengaged organizational ethnography. In S. Ybema, D. Yanow, H. Wels, & F. Kamsteeg (Eds.), Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexities of everyday life (pp. 101119). Sage. 10.4135/9781446278925.n6
  75. Yin, K. R. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
  76. Žotkevičiūtė-Banevičienė, A. (2022). The cultural element in NATO military doctrines: Important, but a declarative issue? Politologija, 108(4), 85115. 10.15388/Polit.2022.108.3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.364 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 174 - 190
Submitted on: Nov 22, 2024
Accepted on: Mar 3, 2026
Published on: Apr 1, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Soili Paananen, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.