Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Enhancing innovation outcomes among higher education students: A PLS-SEM approach Cover

Enhancing innovation outcomes among higher education students: A PLS-SEM approach

Open Access
|Oct 2026

References

  1. Abdessadak, J., 2025. FabLabs, Makerspaces or Third places: Catalysts for University Students’ Innovation. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(47s), 822-831. DOI: 10.52783/jisem.v10i47s.9345
  2. Ahluwalia, S., Kassicieh, S., 2024. Pathways to Success: The Interplay of Industry and Venture Capital Clusters in Entrepreneurial Company Exits. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(4), 159. DOI: 10.3390/jrfm17040159
  3. Ahmad, H., Halim, H., 2017. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities: The Case of Organizational Research. Selangor Business Review, 20-34.
  4. Ahmetoglu, G., Akhtar, R., Tsivrikos, D., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., 2018. The entrepreneurial organization: The effects of organizational culture on innovation output. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 70(4), 318-338. DOI: 10.1037/cpb0000121
  5. Alberghina, G., 2021. Makerspaces for Innovation in Teaching Practices. In D. Scaradozzi, L. Guasti, M. Di Stasio, B. Miotti, A. Monteriù, & P. Blikstein (Eds), Makers at School, Educational Robotics and Innovative Learning Environments (pp. 107-112). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-77040-2_14
  6. Aljalahma, J., Slof, J., 2022. An Updated Systematic Review of Business Accelerators: Functions, Operation, and Gaps in the Existing Literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 214. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc8040214
  7. Andrews, M.E., Borrego, M., Boklage, A., 2021. Self-efficacy and belonging: The impact of a university makerspace. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 24. DOI: 10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0
  8. Apartis, S., Catalano, G., Consiglio, G., Costas, R., Delugas, E., Rosnay, M.D. de, Grypari, I., Karasz, I., Klebel, T., Kormann, E., Manola, N., Papageorgiou, H., Seminaroti, E., Stavropoulos, P., Stoy, L., Traag, V.A., Leeuwen, T. van, Venturini, T., Vignetti, S., … Willemse, T., 2024. Open Science Impact Indicator Handbook. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14538442
  9. Atrup, A., Diawati, P., Syamsuri, S., Pramono, S.A., Ausat, A.M.A., 2023. The Effect of Entrepreneurship Education and Creativity on Studentsâ€TM Entrepreneurial Intention: The Perspective of Effectuation and Cognitive Flexibility Theory. Jurnal Kependidikan, 9(2), 555-569. DOI: 10.33394/jk.v9i2.7822
  10. Bao, J., 2025. Do makerspaces affect entrepreneurship? If so, who, how, and when? Strategic Management Journal, 46(2), 502-533. DOI: 10.1002/smj.3664
  11. Barbero, J.L., Casillas, J.C., Ramos, A., Guitar, S., 2012. Revisiting incubation performance: How incubator typology affects results. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(5), 888-902. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.12.003
  12. Battaglia, D., Paolucci, E., Ughetto, E., 2021. The role of Proof-of-Concept programs in facilitating the commercialization of research-based inventions. Research Policy, 50. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104268
  13. Beghetto, R., Kaufman, J., 2014. Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25. DOI: 10.1080/13598139.2014.905247
  14. Biggs, J., 1996. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347-364. DOI: 10.1007/BF00138871
  15. Biggs, J., Tang, C., Kennedy, G., 2022. Teaching for Quality Learning at University 5e. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
  16. Bliemel, M.J., Flores, R.G., de Klerk, S., Miles, M.P.P., Costa, B., Monteiro, P., 2016. The Role and Performance of Accelerators in the Australian Startup Ecosystem (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2826317). Social Science Research Network. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2826317
  17. Blouin, R.A., Riffee, W.H., Robinson, E.T., Beck, D.E., Green, C., Joyner, P.U., Persky, A.M., Pollack, G.M., 2009. Roles of Innovation in Education Delivery. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(8), 154. DOI: 10.5688/aj7308154
  18. Bobic, O., Sava, S., Piele, A.N., 2025. Makerspaces as Catalysts for Entrepreneurial Education: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 15(10). DOI: 10.3390/educsci15101295
  19. Bodolica, V., Spraggon, M., 2021. Incubating innovation in university settings: Building entrepreneurial mindsets in the future generation of innovative emerging market leaders. Education + Training, 63(4), 613-631. DOI: 10.1108/ET-06-2020-0145
  20. Bozic, C., Dunlap, D.D., 2013. The Role of Innovation Education in Student Learning, Economic Development, and University Engagement. Journal of Technology Studies, 39(2). DOI: 10.21061/jots.v39i2.a.4
  21. Brantnell, A., Baraldi, E., 2022. Understanding the roles and involvement of technology transfer offices in the commercialization of university research. Technovation, 115, 102525. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102525
  22. Briscoe, S., Nunns, M., Shaw, L., 2020. How do Cochrane authors conduct web searching to identify studies? Findings from a cross-sectional sample of Cochrane Reviews. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 37(4), 293-318. DOI: 10.1111/hir.12313
  23. Brown, P., Von Daniels, C., Bocken, N.M.P., Balkenende, A.R., 2021. A process model for collaboration in circular oriented innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 125499. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125499
  24. Byun, C.-G., Sung, C.S., Park, J.Y., Choi, D.S., 2018. A Study on the Effectiveness of Entrepreneurship Education Programs in Higher Education Institutions: A Case Study of Korean Graduate Programs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(3), 26. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc4030026
  25. Canaria, C.A., Portilla, L., Weingarten, M., 2019. I-Corps at NIH: Entrepreneurial Training Program Creating Successful Small Businesses. Clinical and Translational Science, 12(4), 324-328. DOI: 10.1111/cts.12637
  26. Capdevila, I., 2015. Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in barcelona. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(03), 1540004. DOI: 10.1142/S136391961 5400046
  27. Chen, S.-Y., Lai, C.-F., Lai, Y.-H., Su, Y.-S., 2022. Effect of project-based learning on development of students’ creative thinking. International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 59(3), 232-250. DOI: 10.1177/0020720919846808
  28. Chen, Z., Little, V.J., Thuan, N.H., 2025. The evolving role of technology transfer offices in the entrepreneurial university: Go-betweens or playmakers? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 50(3), 1060-1079. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-024-10123-4
  29. Chin, W., 2010. Handbook of Partial Least Squares (pp. 655-690). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29
  30. Chin, W.W., 1998, January. The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. Advances in Hospitality and Leisure. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311766005_The_Partial_Least_Squares_Approach_to_Structural_Equation_Modeling
  31. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Hove, J.V., 2016. A Look Inside Accelerators in the United Kingdom: Building Technology Businesses. In Technology Entrepreneurship and Business Incubation (pp. 57-86). IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS. DOI: 10.1142/9781783269778_0003
  32. Clusters, Innovation and Entrepreneurship | OECD, n.d.. Retrieved 10 September 2025, from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/clusters-innovation-and-entrepreneur-ship_9789264044326-en.html
  33. Cochran, W.G., 1977. Sampling Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, New York. - References - Scientific Research Publishing. https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?Refer-enceID=1390266
  34. Cohen, S., Fehder, D.C., Hochberg, Y.V., Murray, F., 2019. The design of startup accelerators. Research Policy, 48(7), 1781-1797. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.003
  35. Compagnucci, L., Spigarelli, F., 2024. Improving knowledge transfer and innovation services: A roadmap for Knowledge Transfer Offices. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), 100577. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2024.100577
  36. Credit, K., Kekezi, O., Mellander, C., Florida, R., 2024. Third places, the connective fibre of cities and high-tech entrepreneurship. Regional Studies, 58(12), 2225-2240. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2023.2297083
  37. Cropley, D., 2015. Creativity in Engineering: Novel Solutions to Complex Problems. In Creativity in Engineering: Novel Solutions to Complex Problems. DOI: 10.1016/C2013-0-18511-X
  38. Crossan, M.M., Apaydin, M., 2010. A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-1191. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x
  39. Dana, L.-P., Crocco, E., Culasso, F., Giacosa, E., 2023. Business plan competitions and nascent entrepreneurs: A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 19(2), 863-895. DOI: 10.1007/s11365-023-00838-5
  40. Delgado, M., Porter, M.E., Stern, S., 2014. Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Research Policy, 43(10), 1785-1799. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.007
  41. Didkovskaya, Y.V., Trynov, D.V., 2025. Innovative Attitudes of Students in the Environment of a Modern University. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 28(4). https://ideas.repec.org//a/adf/journl/y2025id1924.html
  42. Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Loyens, S.M.M., Marcq, H., Gijbels, D., 2016. Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: A review of the literature. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(5), 1087-1112. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-015-9645-6
  43. Dziallas, M., Blind, K., 2019. Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis. Technovation, 80-81, 3-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005
  44. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L., 2000. The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  45. Feldman, M.P., Kogler, D.F., 2010. Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1, 381-410.
  46. Ferras-Hernandez, X., Nylund, P., 2018. Clusters as Innovation Engines: The Accelerating Strengths of Proximity. European Management Review, 16. DOI: 10.1111/emre.12330
  47. Fichter, K., Tiemann, I., 2020. Impacts of promoting sustainable entrepreneurship in generic business plan competitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 267, 122076. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122076
  48. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. DOI: 10.2307/3151312
  49. Fredagsvik, M.S., 2023. The Challenge of Supporting Creativity in Problem-Solving Projects in Science: A Study of Teachers’ Conversational Practices with Students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(1), 289-305. DOI: 10.1080/026 35143.2021.1898359
  50. Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., Wenderoth, M.P., 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  51. García-Morales, V.J., Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M.M., Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, L., 2012. Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 1040-1050. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.03.005
  52. García-Ruiz, M.-E., Lena-Acebo, F.-J., Rocha Blanco, R., 2023. Early Stages of the Fablab Movement: A New Path for an Open Innovation Model. Sustainability, 15(11), 8907. DOI: 10.3390/su15118907
  53. Garud, R., Berends, H., Tuertscher, P., 2017. Qualitative Approaches for Studying Innovation as Process (pp. 226-247). DOI: 10.4324/9781315686103-15
  54. Geuna, A., Rossi, F., 2011. Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting. Research Policy, Special Issue: 30 Years After Bayh-Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship, 40(8), 1068-1076. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.008
  55. Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Herrera, F., 2019. Innovation practices in emerging economies: Do university partnerships matter? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 615-646.
  56. Guo, R., Jantharajit, N., Thongpanit, P., 2024. Enhancing Analytical and Critical Thinking Skills through Reflective and Collaborative Learning: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 11(2), 200-223. DOI: 10.22555/joeed.v11i2.1166
  57. Hair, J., Black, W.C, Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., 2010. (Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson, New York. https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1841396
  58. Hair, J., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., 2022. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).
  59. Hall, R., 2021. Students as partners in university innovation and entrepreneurship. Education + Training, 63(7-8), 1114-1137. DOI: 10.1108/ET-01-2021-0003
  60. Hamilton, A.B., Finley, E.P., 2019. Qualitative Methods in Implementation Research: An Introduction. Psychiatry Research, 280, 112516. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516
  61. Han, J., Zhang, Z., Liu, Z., Gao, C., 2023. Towards Sustainability: A Quantitative Inquiry into Chinese University Students’ Perceived Learner Empowerment and Innovative Behaviour. Sustainability, 15(18), 1-14.
  62. Hausberg, J.P., Korreck, S., 2021. Chapter 2: Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/edcoll/9781788974776/9781788974776.00009.xml
  63. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  64. Herth, A., Verburg, R., Blok, K., 2025. How can campus living labs thrive to reach sustainable solutions? Cleaner Production Letters, 8, 100078. DOI: 10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100078
  65. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., 2004. Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. DOI: 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
  66. Hofstede, G., 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. DOI: 10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00184-5
  67. Holgersson, M., Aaboen, L., 2019. A literature review of intellectual property management in technology transfer offices: From appropriation to utilization. Technology in Society, 59, 101132. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.008
  68. Huang, Z., Sindakis, S., Aggarwal, S., Thomas, L., 2022a. The role of leadership in collective creativity and innovation: Examining academic research and development environments. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1060412
  69. Huang, Z., Sindakis, S., Aggarwal, S., Thomas, L., 2022b. The role of leadership in collective creativity and innovation: Examining academic research and development environments. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1060412. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1060412
  70. Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Wright, M., Piva, E., 2014. Technology transfer offices as boundary spanners in the pre-spin-off process: The case of a hybrid model. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 289-307. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-013-9537-1
  71. Jia, X., Chu, W., 2024. The Combination of University Students’ Innovation Ability and Entrepreneurship Education. Journal of Education and Educational Research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378331296_The_Combination_of_University_Students’_Innovation_Ability_and_Entrepreneur-ship_Education
  72. Jordan, P.J., Troth, A.C., 2020. Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations. Australian Journal of Management, 45(1), 3-14. DOI: 10.1177/0312896219871976
  73. Jumini, S., Syam, R.S.E., Suwondo, A., Guspul, A., Hamzah, Mardi-yantoro, N., 2023. The Role Of Higher Education In Fostering The Creativity And Innovation Of Students, College Students, And Business Actors. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 37(1), 77-87. DOI: 10.21009/PIP.371.10
  74. Jurgelevičius, A., Butvilas, T., Kovaitė, K., Šūmakaris, P., 2025. Developing an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Framework for Student-Led Start-Ups in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 15(7), 837. DOI: 10.3390/educsci15070837
  75. Jurgelevičius, A., Pakutinskas, P., Plečkaitis, E., Riškevičienė, V., 2025. Hackathons as a Method for Fostering Corporate Innovation and Competitive Advantage. European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 20(1), 322-330. DOI: 10.34190/ecie.20.1.3823
  76. Kajamaa, A., Kumpulainen, K., 2020. Students’ multimodal knowledge practices in a makerspace learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(4), 411-444. DOI: 10.1007/s11412-020-09337-z
  77. Kaufman, J., Beghetto, R., 2009. Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology - REV GEN PSYCHOL, 13. DOI: 10.1037/a0013688
  78. Kettler, T., Lamb, K.N., Mullet, D.R., 2021. Developing Creativity in the Classroom: Learning and Innovation for 21st-Century Schools. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003234104
  79. Kock, N., 2015. Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration (IJeC), 11(4), 1-10. DOI: 10.4018/ijec.2015100101
  80. Kolympiris, C., Klein, P.G., 2017. The Effects of Academic Incubators on University Innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(2), 145-170. DOI: 10.1002/sej.1242
  81. Kruger, S., Steyn, A.A., 2024. Developing breakthrough innovation capabilities in university ecosystems: A case study from South Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 123002. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123002
  82. Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., Daungtod, S., 2021a. The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7, e07309. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309
  83. Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., Daungtod, S., 2021b. The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309
  84. Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., Dochy, F., 2013. A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002
  85. Lackéus, M., 2020. Comparing the impact of three different experiential approaches to entrepreneurship in education. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(5), 937-971. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-04-2018-0236
  86. Leskinen, J., Kajamaa, A., Kumpulainen, K., 2023. Learning to innovate: Students and teachers constructing collective innovation practices in a primary school’s makerspace. Frontiers in Education, 7. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.936724
  87. Liu, J., Fang, Y., Chi, Y., 2022. Evolution of innovation networks in industrial clusters and multidimensional proximity: A case of Chinese cultural clusters. Heliyon, 8(10), e10805. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10805
  88. Lynch, M.E., Yendol-Hoppey, D., Curcio, R., 2025. A Conceptual Framework for Third Spaces that Disrupt Power Dynamics and Transform Clinically Based Teacher Education. Teachers College Record, 127(2), 3-31. DOI: 10.1177/01614681251331785
  89. Maidin, N.F., Hamzah, M.I.M., 2010. Learning to Develop Creativity and Innovation: A Case Study of Selected Schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, International Conference on Learner Diversity 2010, 7, 24-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.004
  90. Makai, A.L., Dőry, T., 2023. Perceived university support and environment as a factor of entrepreneurial intention: Evidence from Western Transdanubia Region. PLOS ONE, 18(6), e0283850. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283850
  91. Malhotra, N.K., Kim, S.S., Patil, A., 2006. Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865-1883. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0597
  92. Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Alshibani, S.M., Christofi, M., 2025. Born global: Antecedents and consequences of innovation capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 42(2), 1025-1058. DOI: 10.1007/s10490-023-09909-1
  93. Marchant-Pérez, P., Ferreira, J.J., 2024. Integrating historical approaches of university ecosystems: Reviewing the literature streams and future directions. Management Review Quarterly. DOI: 10.1007/s11301-024-00467-4
  94. Markman, G.D., Siegel, D., Wright, M., 2008. Research and Technology Commercialization. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1401-1423. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00803.x
  95. Martín, P., Potočnik, K., Fras, A.B., 2017. Determinants of students’ innovation in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1229-1243. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1087993
  96. Mazzucato, M., 2018. Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803-815. DOI: 10.1093/icc/dty034
  97. Mian, S., Lamine, W., Fayolle, A., 2016a. Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge. Technovation, Technology Business Incubation, 50-51, 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.005
  98. Mian, S., Lamine, W., Fayolle, A., 2016b. Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge. Technovation, Technology Business Incubation, 50-51, 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.005
  99. Midgley, G., Lindhult, E., 2021. A systems perspective on systemic innovation. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 38(5), 635-670. DOI: 10.1002/sres.2819
  100. Miličević, A., Despotović-Zrakić, M., Stojanović, D., Suvajžić, M., Labus, A., 2024. Academic performance indicators for the hackathon learning approach – The case of the blockchain hackathon. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(3), 100501. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2024.100501
  101. Monllor, J., Soto-Simeone, A., 2019. The impact that exposure to digital fabrication technology has on student entrepreneurial intentions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(7), 1505-1523. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-04-2019-0201
  102. Moore, M., 2021. Collaboration in Coworking Spaces: Impact on Firm Innovativeness and Business Models (arXiv:2111.09866). arXiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2111.09866
  103. Mørch, A.I., Flø, E.E., Litherland, K.T., Andersen, R., 2023. Makerspace activities in a school setting: Top-down and bottom-up approaches for teachers to leverage pupils’ making in science education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 39, 100697. DOI: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100697
  104. Munari, F., Toschi, L., 2021. The impact of public funding on science valorisation: An analysis of the ERC Proof-of-Concept Programme. Research Policy, 50(6), 104211. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104211
  105. Murray, K., 2025. The third space professional: Cultivating authentic learning experiences through collaborative practice. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, (33). DOI: 10.47408/jldhe.vi33.1223
  106. Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., Walmsley, A., 2017. The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education in Higher Education: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 277-299. DOI: 10.5465/amle.2015.0026
  107. Nabi, G., Walmsley, A., Liñán, F., Akhtar, I., Neame, C., 2018. Does entrepreneurship education in the first year of higher education develop entrepreneurial intentions? The role of learning and inspiration. Studies in Higher Education, 43, 452-467. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1177716
  108. Neck, H.M., Corbett, A.C., 2018. The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 8-41. DOI: 10.1177/2515127417737286
  109. OECD, 2018. Teaching for the Future: Effective Classroom Practices To Transform Education. DOI: 10.1787/9789264293243-en
  110. Oluwatobi, S., Oshokoya, D., Atayero, A., Oludayo, O., Nsofor, C., Oyebode, A., 2018. Students’ participation in Hult Prize and their decision for entrepreneurship: Data gathered from Hult Prize 2018 regional finals in Nigeria. Data in Brief, 19, 693-699. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.089
  111. Ostendorf, A., Thoma, M., 2022. Demands and design principles of a “heterodox” didactics for promoting critical thinking in higher education. Higher Education, 84(1), 33-50. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-021-00752-1
  112. Oswald, K., Zhao, X., 2021. Collaborative Learning in Makerspaces: A Grounded Theory of the Role of Collaborative Learning in Makerspaces. SAGE Open, 11(2), 21582440211020732. DOI: 10.1177/21582440211020732
  113. Owen, R., Vedanthachari, L.N., Hussain, J., 2024. The role of the university entrepreneurial ecosystem in entrepreneurial finance: Case studies of UK innovation knowledge centres. Venture Capital, 26(3), 351-375. DOI: 10.1080/13691066.2023.2205606
  114. Paasi, J., Wiman, H., Apilo, T., Valkokari, K., 2023. Modeling the dynamics of innovation ecosystems. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 7(2), 142-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijis.2022. 12.002
  115. Panadero, E., 2017. A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
  116. Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Van Hove, J., 2016. Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. TECHNOVATION, 50-51, 13-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003
  117. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., Sobrero, M., 2013. Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
  118. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., Podsakoff, N.P., 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  119. Porter, M.E., 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77-90.
  120. Prince, M., 2004. Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
  121. Quintane, E., Casselman, R., Reiche, B., Nylund, P., 2011. Innovation as a Knowledge-Based Outcome. J. Knowledge Management, 15. DOI: 10.1108/13673271111179299
  122. Rasmussen, E., Wright, M., 2015. How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(5), 782-799. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-014-9386-3
  123. Rayna, T., Striukova, L., 2021a. Assessing the effect of 3D printing technologies on entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120483. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120483
  124. Rayna, T., Striukova, L., 2021b. Fostering skills for the 21st century: The role of Fab labs and makerspaces. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120391. DOI: 10.1016/j.tech-fore.2020.120391
  125. Raytcheva, S., Rouet, G., Côme, T., 2023. Chapter 18 – Third places as catalysts of resilience. In Z. Allam, D. Chabaud, C. Gall, F. Prat-long, & C. Moreno (Eds), Resilient and Sustainable Cities (pp. 323-342). Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-91718-6.00027-X
  126. Richardson, C., Mishra, P., 2018. Learning environments that support student creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 45-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.004
  127. Rispal, M.H., Jouison-Laffitte, E., 2015. La contribution des méthodes qualitatives au développement du champ de l’entrepreneuriat. Revue de l’Entrepreneuriat / Review of Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 15-40. DOI: 10.3917/entre.141.0015
  128. Rocha, A.K.L. da, Moraes, G.H.S.M. de, Fischer, B., 2021. The role of university environment in promoting entrepreneurial behavior: Evidence from heterogeneous regions in Brazil. Innovation & Management Review, 19(1), 39-61. DOI: 10.1108/INMR-08-2020-0112
  129. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  130. Sang, W., Simpson, A., 2019. The Maker Movement: A Global Movement for Educational Change. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17. DOI: 10.1007/s10763-019-09960-9
  131. Schulten, C., Chounta, I.-A., 2024. How do we learn in and from Hackathons? A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 20103-20134. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-024-12668-1
  132. Scott, G., Leritz, L.E., Mumford, M.D., 2004. The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361-388. DOI: 10.1080/10400410409534549
  133. Secundo, G., Mele, G., Sansone, G., Paolucci, E., 2020. Entrepreneur-ship Education Centres in universities: Evidence and insights from Italian “Contamination Lab” cases. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(6), 1311-1333. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-12-2019-0687
  134. Seitz, N., Buratti, M., Lehmann, E.E., Kurrle, J., 2025. A meta-analysis towards the effectiveness of startup accelerators. The Journal of Technology Transfer. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-025-10218-6
  135. Serdyukov, P., 2017. Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4-33. DOI: 10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007
  136. Shoop, B.L., 2013. Developing Critical Thinking, Creativity and Innovation Skills of Undergraduate Students (Invited Paper). ETOP 2013 Proceedings (2013), Paper EThC1, EThC1. https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?uri=ETOP-2013-EThC1
  137. Siegel, D.S., Wright, M., 2015. Academic Entrepreneurship: Time for a Rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582-595. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12116
  138. Sio, U.N., Lortie-Forgues, H., 2024. The impact of creativity training on creative performance: A meta-analytic review and critical evaluation of 5 decades of creativity training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 150(5), 554-585. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000432
  139. Sirwan, K.A., 2024. How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers. Oral Oncology Reports, 12. DOI: 10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662
  140. Smith, A., Hielscher, S., Dickel, S., Soderberg, J., van Oost, E., 2013. Grassroots Digital Fabrication and Makerspaces: Reconfiguring, Relocating and Recalibrating Innovation? (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2731835). Social Science Research Network. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2731835
  141. Soetanto, D., Jack, S., 2016. The impact of university-based incubation support on the innovation strategy of academic spin-offs. Technovation, Technology Business Incubation, 50-51, 25-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.11.001
  142. Soomro, S.A., Casakin, H., Georgiev, G.V., 2022. A Systematic Review on FabLab Environments and Creativity: Implications for Design. Buildings, 12(6), 804. DOI: 10.3390/buildings12060804
  143. Soomro, S.A., Casakin, H., Nanjappan, V., Georgiev, G.V., 2023. Makerspaces Fostering Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(4), 530-548. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-023-10041-4
  144. Soomro, S.A., Nanjappan, V., Casakin, H., Georgiev, G.V., 2025. Fostering technical skills and creativity in the digital fabrication spaces: An open-ended prototyping approach. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 35(3), 1081-1102. DOI: 10.1007/s10798-024-09940-3
  145. Stal, E., Andreassi, T., Fujino, A., 2016. The role of university incubators in stimulating academic entrepreneurship. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13(2), 89-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.rai.2016.01.004
  146. Starko, A.J., 2017. Creativity in the Classroom: Schools of Curious Delight (6th edn). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315391625 Stuckrath, C., Rosales-Carreón, J., Worrell, E., 2025. Conceptualisation of Campus Living Labs for the sustainability transition: An integrative literature review. Environmental Development, 54, 101143. DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101143
  147. Sullivan, F.R., 2017. Creativity, Technology, and Learning: Theory for Classroom Practice. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315765143
  148. Surendran, S., Mack, K., Bingham, N.M., Edwards, N., Frost-Schenk, J., Keshishi, N., Matos, F., Moldoveanu, J., Walsha, R., Bodman-Smith, K., 2023. The use of extracurricular hackathons to promote and enhance students’ academic and employability skills. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100307. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100307
  149. Taalbi, J., 2025. Innovation with and without patents – An information-theoretic approach. Scientometrics. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05406-y
  150. Tani, M., Papaluca, O., Sasso, P., 2018. The System Thinking Perspective in the Open-Innovation Research: A Systematic Review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(3), 38. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc4030038
  151. Taxt, R.E., Robinson, D.K.R., Schoen, A., Fløysand, A., 2022. The embedding of universities in innovation ecosystems: The case of marine research at the University of Bergen. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 76(1), 42-60. DOI: 10.1080/00291951.2022.2041718
  152. Temouri, Y., Luong, H.-P., Pereira, V., Rammal, H., 2024. The role of cluster ecosystems and intellectual capital in achieving high-growth entrepreneurship: Evidence from Germany. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 26. DOI: 10.1108/JIC-01-2024-0017
  153. Thistlethwaite, J.E., Davies, D., Ekeocha, S., Kidd, J.M., MacDougall, C., Matthews, P., Purkis, J., Clay, D., 2012. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23. Medical Teacher, 34(6), e421–e444. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680939
  154. Tilahun, S., Berhan, E., 2022. Innovation value chain: A systematic and narrative review. International Journal of Quality and Innovation, 6(1), 91-114. DOI: 10.1504/IJQI.2022.119296
  155. Tolin, G., Piccaluga, A., 2024. Managing proof-of-concept (PoC) programs in public research organizations: A dynamic capabilities perspective. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(9), 516-541. DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-09-2023-0751
  156. Troxler, P., Wolf, P., 2017. Digital maker-entrepreneurs in open design: What activities make up their business model? Business Horizons, THE GENERATIVE POTENTIAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGY, 60(6), 807-817. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.006
  157. Tsui, 2002. Fostering Critical Thinking through Effective Pedagogy: Evidence from Four Institutional Case Studies. The Journal of Higher Education, 740-763.
  158. Turakhia, D., Ludgin, D., Mueller, S., Desportes, K., 2024. Understanding the educators’ practices in makerspaces for the design of education tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(1), 329-358. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-023-10305-1
  159. Valero, A., Van Reenen, J., 2019. The economic impact of universities: Evidence from across the globe. Economics of Education Review, 68, 53-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.09.001
  160. Van Norman, G.A., Eisenkot, R., 2017. Technology Transfer: From the Research Bench to Commercialization. JACC: Basic to Translational Science, 2(2), 197-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.03.004
  161. Wahl, D., Münch, J., 2022. Turning students into Industry 4.0 entrepreneurs: Design and evaluation of a tailored study program. Entrepreneurship Education, 5(3), 225-259. DOI: 10.1007/s41959-022-00077-9
  162. Walsh, A., Powell, P., 2018. Supporting student innovation through an engagement, employability and employment ecosystem. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 8(1), 15-28. DOI: 10.1108/HESWBL-08-2017-0054
  163. Wang, Z., Zhang, M., Sun, H., Zhu, G., 2016. Effects of standardization and innovation on mass customization: An empirical investigation. Technovation, Innovation and Standardization, 48-49, 79-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2016.01.003
  164. Wannapiroon, N., Pimdee, P., 2022. Thai undergraduate science, technology, engineering, arts, and math (STEAM) creative thinking and innovation skill development: A conceptual model using a digital virtual classroom learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5689-5716. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10849-w
  165. WIPO, 2024. Global Innovation Index 2024. https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/global-innovation-index-2024/index.html
  166. Wright, M., Siegel, D., Mustar, P., 2017a. An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 909-922. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-017-9558-z
  167. Wright, M., Siegel, D.S., Mustar, P., 2017b. An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 909-922.
  168. Zakoth, D., Mauroner, O., Emes, J., 2023. The role of makerspaces in innovation processes: An exploratory study. R&D Management, 54, 398-428. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12594
  169. Zhong, M., 2024. Exploring the Structure of Students’ Innovative Ability in Higher Vocational Colleges – Taking Human Resource Management Major as an Example. SHS Web of Conferences, 183, 01022. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/202418301022
  170. Zimmerman, B.J., 2002. Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
  171. Zimmerman, B.J., Kitsantas, A., 2014. Comparing students’ self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 145-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2026.32.48 | Journal eISSN: 2353-7779 | Journal ISSN: 2353-5156
Language: English
Page range: 596 - 615
Submitted on: Feb 9, 2026
Accepted on: Sep 4, 2026
Published online: Oct 25, 2026
Published in print: Dec 1, 2026
Published by: Quality and Production Managers Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Jihane Abdessadak, Sarah Ferehoun, published by Quality and Production Managers Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.