A Delphi – FMEA Framework for Assessing Information Quality in Engineering R&D
References
- Al-Hakim, L. (Ed.), 2007. Information quality management: Theory and applications. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
- Antony, J., Sony, M., Gutierrez, L., 2022. An empirical study into the limitations and emerging trends of Six Sigma: findings from a global survey. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(5), 2088-2101, DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2020.2995168.
- Antony, J., McDermott, O., Sony, M., Toner, A., Bhat, S., Cudney, E.A. & Doulatabadi, M., 2023. Benefits, challenges, critical success factors and motivations of Quality 4.0 – A qualitative global study, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 34:7-8, 827-846, DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2022.2113737.
- Baiochi, R., Lizot, M., Santos, E. A. P., 2025. A review of quality improvement framework for Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 132, 13–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2025.01.003.
- Batini, C., Scannapieco, M., 2006. Data Quality: Concepts, methodologies and techniques, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Germany. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-33173-5.
- Batini, C., Scannapieco, M., 2016. Data and information quality: Dimensions, principles and techniques. Springer, Cham, Germany. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24106-7.
- Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L. M., Kim, H. H., 2011. Strength in numbers: How does data-driven decisionmaking affect firm performance? SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1819486.
- Černý, M., Gogola, M., Kubaľák, S., Ondruš, J., 2021. Block-chain technology as a new driver in supply chain, Transportation Research Procedia, 55, 299-306, DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.06.034.
- Czajkowska, A., 2026. The evolution of quality management towards Quality 5.0: A maturity model perspective. Production Engineering Archives, 32(2), 220-229, DOI: 10.30657/pea.2026.32.18.
- Davis, C. K., 2014. Beyond data and analysis. Communications of the ACM, 57(6), 39-41, DOI: 10.1145/2602326.
- Declerck, J., Kalra, D., Vander Stichele, R., Coorevits, P., 2024. Frameworks, dimensions, definitions of aspects, and assessment methods for the appraisal of quality of health data for secondary use: Comprehensive Overview of Reviews, JMIR Medical Informatics, 12:e51560, DOI: 10.2196/51560.
- English, L. P., 2009. Information quality applied: Best practices for improving business information, processes and systems, Wiley Publishing, Indianapolis, United States of America.
- Eppler, M. J., 2006. Managing Information Quality: Increasing the Value of Information in Knowledge-intensive Products and Processes. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Germany. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-32225-6.
- Escobar, C., McGovern, M., Morales-Menéndez, R., 2021. Quality 4.0: a review of big data challenges in manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 32(8), 2319-2334, DOI: 10.1007/s10845-021-01765-4.
- Evans, J. R., Lindsay, W. M., 2005. The management and control of quality. 6th ed. Thomson South-Western, Mason, United States of America.
- Gunasekaran, A., Yusuf, Y. Y., Adeleye, E. O., Papadopoulos, T., 2018. Agile manufacturing practices: the role of big data and business analytics with multiple case studies. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 385-397. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1395488.
- Hassenstein, M. J., Vanella, P., 2022. Data quality — concepts and problems, Encyclopedia 2(1):498-510, DOI:10.3390/encyclopedia2010032.
- Haug, A., 2025. Intrinsic data quality dimensions: expanding on Wand and Wang’s data quality model, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 125(1), 238-261, DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-02-2024-0100.
- International Organization for Standardization, 2018. ISO 9004:2018 Quality management — Quality of an organization — Guidance to achieve sustained success. Geneva: ISO.
- Kache, F., Seuring, S., 2017. Challenges and opportunities of digital information at the intersection of Big Data Analytics and supply chain management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(1), 10–36. DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-02-2015-0078.
- Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., Wang, R. Y., 2002. AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment, Information & Management, 40(2), 133-146, DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00043-5.
- Liu, H. C., Liu, R., Gu, X., Yang, M., 2023. From total quality management to Quality 4.0: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10(2), 191–205, DOI: 10.1007/s42524-022-0243-z.
- McAfee, A., Brynjolfsson, E., 2017. Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future. London: W. W. Norton & Company.
- McGilvray, D., 2008. Executing Data Quality Projects: “Ten steps” to Quality Data and Trusted Information. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington, Massachusetts. Pyzdek, T., Keller, P. A., 2014. The Six Sigma Handbook. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN: 978-0071840538.
- Ramos, I. M. J., 2025. Maximizing cleaning efficiency and minimizing rework in a recycling facility using the DMAIC approach. Production Engineering Archives, 31(4), 481-492, DOI: 10.30657/pea.2025.31.45.
- Wang, R. Y., Strong, D. M., 1996. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–33, DOI: 10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099.
- Zonnenshain, A., Kenett, R. S., 2020. Quality 4.0—the challenging future of quality engineering. Quality Engineering, 32(4), 614–626, DOI: 10.1080/08982112.2019.1706744.
- Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., Li, L., 2018. Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends, International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941-2962. DOI: 10.1080/00207543. 2018.1444806.
Language: English
Page range: 525 - 539
Submitted on: May 14, 2026
Accepted on: Sep 16, 2026
Published online: Oct 25, 2026
Published in print: Dec 1, 2026
Published by: Quality and Production Managers Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Eva Nedeliakova, Jana Klimkova, Renata Stasiak-Betlejewska, Pavlina Linhova, published by Quality and Production Managers Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.