Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Investigating Service Quality Issues in Higher Educational Context Cover

Investigating Service Quality Issues in Higher Educational Context

Open Access
|Feb 2020

References

  1. Ansary, A., Jayashree, S. & Malarvizhi, C. A. N. (2014). The effect of gender and nationality on service quality in Malaysian higher education. The Journal of Developing Areas. 48(4), 97-118. DOI: 10.1353/jda.2014.007610.1353/jda.2014.0076
  2. Bennett, R. & Ali-Choudhury, R. (2009). Prospective students’ perceptions of university brands: an empirical study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education., 19(1), 85–107. DOI: 10.1080/0884124090290544510.1080/08841240902905445
  3. Bernhard, A. (2012). Quality Assurance in an International Higher Education Area: A summary of a case-study approach and comparative analysis. Tertiary Education and Management. 18(2), 153-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2012.65450410.1080/13583883.2012.654504
  4. Bhuian, S. N. (2016). Sustainability of Western branch campuses in the Gulf Region: Students’ perspectives of service quality. International Journal of Educational Development. 49, 314-323. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.05.00110.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.05.001
  5. Black, T. R. (1999). Doing quantitative research in social sciences: An integrated approach to research design, measurement and statistics. Sage: London.
  6. Butt, B. Z. & Rehman, K. (2010). A study examining the students’ satisfaction in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2(2), 5446-5450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.88810.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.888
  7. Chung, E. & McLarney, C. (2000). The Classroom as a Service Encounter: Suggestions for Value Creation. Journal of Management Education. 24(4), 484-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629000240040710.1177/105256290002400407
  8. Cameron, K. S. & Whetten, D. A. (1996). Organizational Effectiveness and Quality: The Second Generation. In Smart, J.C. (ed.). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. XI. New York: Agathon Press, 265-306.
  9. Clayson, D. E. & Haley, D. A. (2005). Marketing Models in Education: Students as Customers, Products, or Partners. Marketing Education Review. 15(1), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2005.1148888410.1080/10528008.2005.11488884
  10. Depken, C., Chiseni, C. & Ita, E. (2019). Returns to Education in South Africa: Evidence from the National Income Dynamics Study. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business. 22(1), 1-12. DOI: 10.2478/zireb-2019-000910.2478/zireb-2019-0009
  11. Douglas, J., McClelland, R. & Davies, J. (2008). The development of a conceptual model of student satisfaction with their experience in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education. 16(1), 19-35. DOI: 10.1108/0968488081084839610.1108/09684880810848396
  12. Engellant, K. A., Holland, D. D. & Piper, R. T. (2016). Assessing Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Motivation Construct for the Technology Integration Education (TIE) Model. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice. 16(1), 37-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v16i1.1935
  13. Fassin, Y. (2009). The Stakeholder Model Refined. Journal of Business Ethics. 84, 113-135. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9677-4.10.1007/s10551-008-9677-4
  14. Fosu, F. F. & Owusu, B. K. (2015). Understanding Ghanaian students’ perception of service quality in higher education. European Journal of Business Management. 7(9), 96–105.
  15. Guilbault, M. (2016). Students as customers in higher education: reframing the debate. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 26(2), 132-142. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2016.124523410.1080/08841241.2016.1245234
  16. Guolla, M. (1999). Assessing the Teaching Quality to Student Satisfaction Relationship: Applied Customer Satisfaction Research in the Classroom. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 7(3), 87–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.1999.1150184310.1080/10696679.1999.11501843
  17. Gupta, P. & Kaushik, N. (2018). Dimensions of service quality in higher education – critical review (students’ perspective). International Journal of Educational Management. 32(4), 580-605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2017-005610.1108/IJEM-03-2017-0056
  18. Harvey, L. (2003). Student Feedback. Quality in Higher Education. 9(1), 3-20. DOI: 10.1080/1353832030816410.1080/13538320308164
  19. Hofmeister-Tóth, Á. & Simon, J. (2006). A Q-módszer elmélete és alkalmazása a marketingkutatásban. Vezetéstudomány. 27(9), 18-28. [In Hungarian]10.14267/VEZTUD.2006.09.02
  20. Ibrahim, M. Z., Rahman, M. N. A. & Yasin, R. M. (2012). Assessing students’ perceptions of service quality in technical Educational and Vocational Training (TEVT) Institution in Malaysia. In International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education in conjunction with Regional Conference on Engineering Education and Research in Higher Education, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 272-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.65510.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.655
  21. Jain, R., Sinha, G., & Sahney, S. (2011). Conceptualizing service quality in higher education. Asian Journal on Quality. 12(3), 296–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/1598268111118712810.1108/15982681111187128
  22. Kara, A. & DeShields, O. W. (2004). Business Student Satisfaction, Intentions and Retention in Higher Education: An Empirical Investigation, Pennsylvania State University-York Campus, 3.
  23. Kincsesné, V. B., Farkas, G. & Málovics, É. (2015). Student evaluations of training and lecture courses: development of the COURSEQUAL method. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing. 12, 79-88. DOI: 10.1007/s12208-015-0127-610.1007/s12208-015-0127-6
  24. Krueger, R. A. (2002). Designing and conducting focus group interviews. Retrieved at 26.11.2019 from https://www.eiu.edu/ihec/Krueger-FocusGroupInterviews.pdf
  25. Krueger, R. A. & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage10.3138/cjpe.024.007
  26. Labanauskis, R. & Ginevicius, R. (2017). Role of stakeholders leading to development of higher education services. Engineering Management in Production and Services. 9(3), 63-75. DOI: 10.1515/emj-2017-002610.1515/emj-2017-0026
  27. Mainardes, E. W., Alves, H. & Raposo, M. (2012). A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships. Management Decision. 50(10), 1861-1879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/0025174121127964810.1108/00251741211279648
  28. Mark, E. (2013). Student satisfaction and the customer focus in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management. 35(1), 2–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.72770310.1080/1360080X.2012.727703
  29. Mattah, P. A. D., Kwarteng, A. J. & Mensah, J. (2018). Indicators of service quality and satisfaction among graduating students of a higher education institution (HEI) in Ghana. Higher Education Evaluation and Development. 12(1), 36-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-10-2017-000610.1108/HEED-10-2017-0006
  30. Mizikaci F. (2006). A systems approach to program evaluation model for quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education. 14(1), 37-53. DOI: 10.1108/0968488061064360110.1108/09684880610643601
  31. Nasim, K., Sikander, A. & Tian, X. (2019). Twenty years of research on total quality management in Higher Education: A systematic literature review. Higher Education Quarterly. 00, 1-23. DOI: 10.1111/hequ.1222710.1111/hequ.12227
  32. Navarro, M. M., Iglesias, M. P. & Torres, P. R. (2005). A new management element for universities: satisfaction with the offered courses. International Journal of Educational Management. 19(6), 505-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/0951354051061745410.1108/09513540510617454
  33. Nell, C. E. & Cant, M. C. (2014). Determining student perceptions regarding the most impoartant service features and overall satisfaction with the service quality of a higher education institution. Management. 19(2), 63-87.
  34. Oldfield, B. & Baron, S. (2000). Student perceptions of service quality in a UK university business and management faculty. Quality Assurance in Education. 8(2), 85-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/0968488001032560010.1108/09684880010325600
  35. Owlia, M. S. & Aspinwall, E. M. (1996). A framework for the dimensions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education. 4(2), 12–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/0968488961011601210.1108/09684889610116012
  36. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. & Berry, L.L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multi-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing. 64(1), 12-40.
  37. Pereira, M. A. C. & Da Silva, M. T. (2003). A key question for higher education: who are the customers? In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Production and Operations Management Society, POM, Atlanta, GA, 2003. Retrieved at 26.11.2019 from https://pomsmeetings.org/ConfProceedings/001/Papers/SOM-19.3.pdf
  38. Ruben, B. D. (2018). Quality in higher education, New York, NY: Routledge, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/978135129356310.4324/9781351293563
  39. Seesy, N. A. E. E, Hussein, R. G. & Alzahrani, A. E. (2018). Undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions of educational service quality at Alexandria University, Egypt. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 8(1), 37-45. DOI: 10.5430/jnep.v8n1p3710.5430/jnep.v8n1p37
  40. Stensaker, B. (2007). Quality as Fashion: Exploring the Translation of a Management Idea into Higher Education. Quality Assurance in Higher Education. 99-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6012-0_410.1007/978-1-4020-6012-0_4
  41. Stewart, J. D. & Walsh, K. (1989). In Search of Quality. Local Government Training Board, Luton, In: Abdullah, F. (2006) The development of HEdPERF: a new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 569-581.10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x
  42. Surman, V. & Tóth, Zs. E. (2019a). Developing a Service Quality Framework for a Special Type of Course. Periodica Polytechnica – Social and Management Sciences. 27(1), 66-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.1220110.3311/PPso.12201
  43. Surman, V. & Tóth, Zs. E. (2019b). Listening to the voice of primary stakeholders – Differences of measuring quality among the operation levels of higher education institutions. In The 20th AGTEDU Conference, 2019.11.13., John von Neumann University Kecskemét, Hungary.
  44. Teeroovengadum, V., Kamalanabhan, T. J. & Seebaluck, A. K. (2016). Measuring service quality in higher education: Development of a hierarchical model (HESQUAL). Quality Assurance in Education. 24((2), 244-258. DOI: 10.1108/QAE-06-2014-002810.1108/QAE-06-2014-0028
  45. Tóth Zs. E, Surman V. & Árva G. (2017). Challenges in course evaluations at Budapest University of Technology and Economics. In The 8th International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology, London, The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, Future Academy, 629-641.10.15405/epsbs.2017.10.60
  46. Veršić, I. I. (2018). Organizational Decision-Making and Academic Institutions. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business. 21(1), 37-46. DOI: 10.2478/zireb-2018-000310.2478/zireb-2018-0003
  47. Williamson, K. (2018). Questionnaire, individual interview and focus group interviews. In Williamson, K. & Johanson, G., Research Methods, Information, Systems, and Contexts (2nd Ed.), Chandos Publishing, 379-403.10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00016-9
  48. Yousapronpaiboon, K. (2014). SERVQUAL: Measuring higher education service quality in Thailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 116, 1088-1095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.35010.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.350
  49. Zell, D. (2001). The Market-Driven Business School. Has the Pendulum Swung Too Far? Journal of Management Inquiry. 10(4), 324-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/105649260110400610.1177/1056492601104006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2019-0025 | Journal eISSN: 1849-1162 | Journal ISSN: 1331-5609
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 37
Published on: Feb 17, 2020
Published by: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics & Business
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Vivien Surman, Zsuzsanna Eszter Tóth, published by University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics & Business
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.