Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
China-Schock 2.0 trifft Deutschland: Was kann der Industrial Accelerator Act leisten? Cover

China-Schock 2.0 trifft Deutschland: Was kann der Industrial Accelerator Act leisten?

By:  and    
Open Access
|Oct 2026
Read online

References

  1. Bickenbach, F., Dohse, D., Langhammer, R. J. & Liu, W.-H. (2024). Foul-spiel? Zu Höhe und Umfang der Industriesubventionen in China. Kiel Policy Brief, Nr. 173. Kiel Institut für Weltwirtschaft.
  2. Binder, J., Dohse, D., Görg, H., Liu, W.-H., Schöl, B. & Semrau, F. O. (2026). The EU Industrial Accelerator Act: Strategic Ambitions and Design Challenges. Intereconomics, 61(4), 240–248.
  3. Binder, J. & Semrau, F. O. (2026). Der IAA: Ein Schritt in die richtige Rich-tung – aber nur ein Schritt. China.Table.
  4. BMWE – Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie. (2026, 16. April). Industriestrompreis wird eingeführt – Europäische Kommission genehmigt das Entlastungsinstrument für die energieintensive Industrie [Pressemitteilung].
  5. Cammeraat, E., Dechezleprêtre, A. & Lalanne, G. (2022). Innovation and industrial policies for green hydrogen. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, Nr. 125.
  6. Chowdhry, S., Erhardt, K. & Hinz, J. (2026). Competing with China in third markets. Kiel Policy Brief, Nr. 213. Kiel Institut für Weltwirtschaft.
  7. Czock, B., Dressler, M., Keutz, J., Restel, L., Ruhnau, O. & Schnaars, P. (2025). Optimierte Netzanschlüsse von Wind und PV: Wie sich durch Überbauung Netzausbaukosten einsparen lassen [Kurzstudie]. Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universität zu Köln.
  8. Emelianova, P., Hoffmann-Willers, P. & Ruhnau, O. (2025). Redistribution through cross-border electricity trade: How to achieve Pareto improvement? EWI Working Paper, Nr. 25/11. Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universität zu Köln.
  9. European Commission. (2026). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework of measures for the acceleration of industrial capacity and decarbonisation in strategic sectors and amending Regulations (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2024/1735 and (EU) 2024/3110. COM(2026) 100 final.
  10. Fang, H., Li, M. & Lu, G. (2025). Decoding China‘s industrial policies. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, Nr. 33814.
  11. Fischer, C. & Newell, R. G. (2008). Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55(2), 142–162.
  12. Hottenrott, H., Inderst, R., Janeba, E., Schmidt, K., Wambach, A. & Zulehner, C. (2025). Industriepolitik in Europa. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 26(3), 272–289.
  13. IEA – International Energy Agency. (2024). Batteries and Secure Energy Transitions.
  14. IEA – International Energy Agency. (2025). Energy Technology Patents Data Explorer.
  15. IEA – International Energy Agency. (2026a, 29. Juli). Inverter supply chains and cybersecurity.
  16. IEA – International Energy Agency. (2026b). Global Hydrogen Review 2026.
  17. IMF – International Monetary Fund. (2026). People’s Republic of China: 2025 Article IV Consultation – Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for the People’s Republic of China. IMF Country Report, Nr. 26/44.
  18. Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G. & Stavins, R. N. (2005). A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy. Ecological Economics, 54(2–3), 164–174.
  19. Jäger, P. & Redeker, N. (2026). Paradigm Shift in Principle, Paper Tiger in Practice? How to Make the Industrial Accelerator Act Count. Hertie School Jacques Delors Centre.
  20. Meissner, L. P., Peterson, S. & Semrau, F. O. (2026). It’s not a sprint, it’s a marathon: reviewing governmental R&D support for environmental innovation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 69(1), 1–27.
  21. Peterson, S. & Semrau, F. O. (2024). Innovationspolitik für die Transformation zur Klimaneutralität. Wirtschaftsdienst, 104(5), 301–305.
  22. Revoltella, D. & Kalantzis, F. (2026). The EU emissions trading system works but most industrial decarbonisation is still to come. Bruegel Analysis, 22/2026.
  23. State Council of China. (2026). The Draft Outline of the 15th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China (中华人民共和 国国民经济和社会发展第十五个五年 规划 纲要(草案)).
  24. Tordoir, S. & Setser, B. (2026). China Shock 2.0: The Cost of Germany’s Complacency. Centre for European Reform.
  25. U.S. Geological Survey. (2026, Mai). Mineral commodity summaries 2026. U.S. Geological Survey.
  26. Zachmann, G., Batlle, C., Beaude, F., Maurer, C., Morawiecka, M. & Roques, F. (2024). Unity in power, power in unity: Why the EU needs more integrated electricity markets. Bruegel Policy Brief, 2024/03.
  27. Zenglein, M. J. & Holzmann, A. (2019). Evolving Made in China 2025 - China’s industrial policy in the quest for global tech leadership. Merics Papers on China, Nr. 8. Mercator Institute for China Studies.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/wd-2026-0161 | Journal eISSN: 1613-978X | Journal ISSN: 0043-6275
Language: German, English
Page range: 648 - 655
Published online: Oct 11, 2026
Published in print: Sep 1, 2026
Published by: ZBW – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 12 issues per year
JEL:

© 2026 Benno Schöl, Finn Ole Semrau, published by ZBW – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.