Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Produktverknüpfung bei Softwareangeboten – ökonomische Einordnung am Beispiel Microsoft Cover

Produktverknüpfung bei Softwareangeboten – ökonomische Einordnung am Beispiel Microsoft

Open Access
|Mar 2023

References

  1. Bakos, Y. und E. Brynjolfsson (2000), Bundling and competition on the Internet, Marketing Science, 19, 63-82.
  2. Carlton, D. W. und M. Waldman (2002), The strategic use of tying to preserve and create market power in evolving industries, Rand Journal of Economics, 33, 194-220.
  3. Choi, J. P. (1996), Preemptive R&D, rent dissipation, and the „leverage theory“, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 1153-1181.
  4. Choi, J. P. (2004), die wir vergessen hatten, ist folgendermaßen: Choi, J. P. (2004), Tying and innovation: A dynamic analysis of tying arrangements, Economic Journal, 114, 83-101.
  5. Choi, J. P. und C. Stefanadis (2001), Tying, investment, and the dynamic leverage theory, Rand Journal of Economics, 32, 52-71.
  6. EU-Kommission (2016), Case M.8124 – Microsoft / LinkedIn, Verfügbar unter https://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m8124_1349_5.pdf (20. April 2022).
  7. EU-Kommission (2018), Case AT.40099 – Google Android, https://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs/40099/40099_9993_3.pdf (25. April 2022).
  8. Farrell, J. und L. M. Katz (2000), Innovation, rent extraction, and integration in systems markets, Journal of Industrial Economics, 48, 413-432.
  9. Jenny, F. (2021), Cloud Infrastructure Services: An analysis of potentially anti-competitive practices, Report, CISPE, https://www.fairsoftwarestudy.com/ (20. April 2022).
  10. Jenkins, M., P. Liu, R. Matzkin und D. McFadden (2021), The browser war — Analysis of Markov Perfect Equilibrium in markets with dynamic demand effects, Journal of Econometrics, 222(1), 244-260.
  11. Metzger, A. (2021), Ausschluss und Beschränkung von Outsourcing in Software-Lizenzverträgen – Eine Grauzone. Grenzen und Vertragsfreiheit nach dem Urheber-, Kartell- und AGB-Recht, CR Computer und Recht – Zeitschrift für die Praxis des Rechts der Informationstechnologie, (9/2021), 573-579.
  12. Microsoft (2021), Annual Report 2021, Redmond, USA.
  13. Nalebuff, B. (2004), Bundling as an entry deterrent, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 159-187.
  14. OECD (2020), Abuse of dominance in digital markets. Verfügbar unter www.oecd.org/daf/competition/abuse-of-dominance-in-digital-markets-2020.pdf (25. April 2022).
  15. Opara-Martins, J., R. Sahandi und F. Tian (2016), Critical analysis of vendor lock-in and its impact on cloud computing migration: a business perspective, Journal of Cloud Computing, 5, Artikelnummer 4. g.
  16. Peitz, M. (2008), Bundling may blockade entry, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26, 41-58.
  17. Reisinger, M., J. Schmidt und N. Sieglitz (2021), How complementors benefit from taking competition to the system level, Management Science, 67, 5106-5123.
  18. Whinston, M. D. (1990), Tying, foreclosure, and exclusion, American Economic Review, 80, 837-59.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/wd-2023-0055 | Journal eISSN: 1613-978X | Journal ISSN: 0043-6275
Language: German
Page range: 211 - 216
Published on: Mar 27, 2023
Published by: ZBW – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 12 issues per year
Keywords:

© 2023 Markus Reisinger, Stefan Wagner, published by ZBW – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.