It Will/Must/May Be a Modal Auxiliary

Gašper Ilc

doi:10.2478/v10319-012-0006-y

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

It Will/Must/May Be a Modal Auxiliary

Romanian Journal of English Studies

Volume 9 (2012): Issue 1 (December 2012)

By: Gašper Ilc

Open Access

|Feb 2013

Abstract

The English modal verb system has proved to be a difficult linguistic concept even for advanced EFL students. Their comprehension/usage problems may be of purely morpho-syntactic and semantic nature or may also involve sociolinguistic dimensions. The paper examines the question of polysemy, sociolinguistic factors and the role of ELT models.

References

Bybee, J. L. and S. Fleischman (eds). 1995. Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 503-517.
Search in Google Scholar
Council of Europe. Common European Framework of Reference. [online] Available: http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf [2011, September 6].
Search in Google Scholar
Croft, W. and D.A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Dik, S. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Search in Google Scholar
Groefsema, M. 1995. ‘Can, may, must and should: a Relevance Theoretic account’ in Journal of Linguistics 31, pp. 53-79.
Search in Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. 1983. The semanitcs of ‘will’ in present-day British English: a unified account. Brussels: Paleis de Academiën.
Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and M.I.M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Search in Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. and G. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Kay, S. and V. Jones. 2009. New Inside Out. Intermediate. Students’s Book. Oxford: Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar
Klinge, A. 1993. ‘The English modal auxiliaries: from lexical semantics to utterance interpretation’ in Journal ofLinguistics 29, pp. 315-357.
Search in Google Scholar
Leech, G. 2004 (1971). Meaning and the English verb. London: Longman.
Search in Google Scholar
Littlewood, W. 1991 (1981). Communicative Language Teaching. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, R. 1994 (1985). English Grammar in Use. A self-study reference and practice book for intermediatestudents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, F. 1991 (1986). Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Papafragau, A. 2000. Modality: the issues in the semantics-pragmatic interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.10.1163/9780585474199
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Richards, J.C. and T.S. Rodgers. 2001 (1986). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Soars L. and J. Soars. 2009. New Headway. Intermediate. Student’s book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Westney, P. 1994. ‘Rules and pedagogical grammar’ in Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar. T. Odlin (ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 72-96.
Search in Google Scholar