Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Course Curricular Design and Development of the M.Sc. Programme in the Field of Ict in Education for Sustainable Development Cover

Course Curricular Design and Development of the M.Sc. Programme in the Field of Ict in Education for Sustainable Development

Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability
Volume 14 (2012): Issue 2 (December 2012)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Mar 2013
References

References

  1. Abdullah, M., Parasuraman, B., Muniapan, B., Koren, S., & Jones, M. L. (2008). Motivating factors associated with adult participation in distance learning program.,(4), 104-109.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2005).Retrieved August 5, 2012, from http://www.sloan-c.org/resources/growing_by_degrees.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (2004).(J. A. K. Thomson, trans.). London: Penguin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Austin, A. E. (2002). Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing the new faculty to face changing expectations in a shifting context.,(2), 119-144.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment.,(1), 5-31. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Bush, M. D., & Mott, J. D. (2009). The transformation of learning with technology: Learnercentricity, content and tool malleability, and network effects.(3), 3-20.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, K., Schwier, R. A., & Kenny, R. F. (2005). Agency of the instructional designer: Moral coherence and transformative social practice.(2), 242-262. Retrieved January 30, 2012, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet21/campbell.html
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Cey, T. (2001).Retrieved December 19, 2009, from http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/ceyt/ceyt.htm
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Cranton, P. (1994).. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Daley, D. M. (1991). Great expectations or a tale of two systems: Employee attitudes toward graphic rating scales & MBO-based performance appraisal.(2), 188-209.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Darder, A., Baltodano, M., & Torres, R. D. (2003).. London: Routledge Falmer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005).(6th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. De Haan, G. (2006). ‘The BLK ‘21’ programme in Germany: A ‘Gestaltungskompetenz’ - based model for education for sustainable development’.,(1), 19-32.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992).. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Elliott, J. (2010). Insights to transformative learning through education for sustainable development., 96-113.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Engstrom, M., Santo, S., & Yost, R. (2008). Knowledge building in an online cohort.(2), 151-167.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. European University Association. (2006).Retrieved February 20, 2012, from http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/EMNEM_report.1147364824803.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Fien, J., & Tilbury, D. (1996).. Bangkok: UNESCO.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Freire, P. (1993).New York: Continuum.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Frey, B., & Alman, S. (2003). Applying adult learning theory to the online classroom.(1), 4-12. Retrieved July 10, 2011, from http://education.fiu.edu/newhorizons/journals/volume17n1.pdf
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Galloway, D. (2005). Evaluating distance learning and e-learning: Is Kirkpatrick’s model relevant?(4), 21-27. DOI: 10.1002/pfi.4140440407.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Garvin, D. A. (2000).. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Gikandi, J. (2011). Achieving meaningful online learning through effective formative assessment. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown & B. Cleland (Eds.),(pp. 452-454). Retrieved March 15, 2012, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/procs.Gikandi-poster.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Giroux, H. (n.d.).Retrieved March, 15, 2012, from http://www.afed.itacec.org/document/henry_giroux_2_ok.pdfGiroux, H. (1988).. Boston, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Glasser, H. (2007). Minding the gap: The role of social learning in linking our stated desire for a more sustainable world to our everyday actions and policies. In A. E. J. Wals, (Ed.),(pp. 35-62). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Publishers.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Grundy, S. (1987).. New York: The Falmer Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Habermas, J. (1971).London: Heinemann.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),(pp. 115-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Hasselbring, T. S., & Moore, P. R. (1996). Developing mathematical literacy through the use of contextualized learning environments.(3/4), 199-222.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Huckle, J. (1996). Realising sustainability in changing times. In J. Huckle & S. Sterling (Eds.),(pp. 3-17). London, UK: Earthscan Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Huckle, J. (2008). An analysis of new labour’s policy on education for sustainable development (ESD) with particular reference to socially critical approaches.(1), 65-75.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Huckle, J. (2012). Teacher education for sustainability in network society: Combining digital and sustainability literacies.(2), 130-146.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Hudak, C. (2007). Linking instructional theories and instructional design to leaning objects: A proposed conceptual framework. In A. Koohang & K. Hamman (Eds.),(pp. 1-38). Santa Rosa, California: Informing Science Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivist vs. constructivist: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?,(3), 5-14.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology.,(4), 34-37.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environment. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),(Vol. 2, pp. 215-239). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.),(pp. 693-719). New York: Macmillan.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999).Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. IAU (International Association of Universities). (2006).Retrieved October 14, 2011, from http://www.UNESCO.org/iau/sd/sd_bibliography.html
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1999). Using constructivism in technology-mediated learning: Constructing order out of the chaos in the literature.(1). Retrieved July 5, 2008, from http://www.icaap.org/RadicalPedagogy/content/vol1.1999/issue2/02kanuka1_2.html
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Kenny, R. F., Zhang, Z., Schwier, R. A., & Campbell, K. (2005). A review of what instructional designers do: Questions answered and questions not asked.(1), 9-26.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Kolb, D. A. (1984).Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education.(2), 193-212.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991).. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Lim, G. (2007). Instructional design and pedagogical consideration for the ins-and-outs of learning objects. In A. Koohang & K. Hamman (Eds.),(pp. 89-137). Santa Rosa, California: Informing Science Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Makrakis, V. (2006).. Heraklion: University of Crete.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Makrakis, V. (2008). An instructional design module of ICT that empowers teachers to integrate education for sustainable development across the curriculum. In C. Angeli & N. Valanides (Eds.),(pp. 391-398). Cyprus: University of Cyprus.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Makrakis, V. (2010a). The challenge of WikiQuESD as an environment for constructing knowledge in teaching and learning for sustainable development.(1), 50-57.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Makrakis, V. (2010b). Strategies to reinforce the role of ICT in teaching and learning for sustainability. In M. Witthaus, K. Candless & R. Lambert (Eds.),(pp. 169-171). Leicester: Tudor Rose on behalf of UNESCO.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Makrakis, V. (2010c). ICT-enabled reorienting teacher education to address sustainable development: A case study. In T. Jimogiannis (Ed.),(pp. 1- 8). Korinthos: University of Peloponnese.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Makrakis, V. (2011a). Strategies for change towards sustainability in tertiary education supported by ICT. In(pp. 152-166). Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Makrakis, V. (2011b). ICT-enabled education for sustainable development: Merging theory with praxis. In M. Youssef & S. Aziz Anwar (Eds.),(pp. 410-419). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Makrakis, V. (2012). Critical issues for the course curricular design and development of postgraduate programmes.(pp. 85-107). Saint-Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2005). Techno-sciences and mathematics: Vehicles for a sustainable future and global understanding.(pp. 103-108). Heraklion: University of Crete.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2012a). The challenges of ICTs to online climate change education for sustainable development: The ExConTra learning paradigm. In S.A. Anwar (Ed.),(pp. 594-605). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  57. Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2012b). Online course design for a joint M.Sc. programme on ICT in education for sustainable development. In S. A. Anwar (Ed.),(pp. 627-636). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  58. Makrakis, V., Kostoulas-Makrakis, N., & Kanbar, N. (2012). Developing and validating an ESD student competence framework: A Tempus-RUCAS initiative. In S. A. Anwar (Ed.),(pp. 585-594). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Marsick, V., & Mezirow, J. (2002).Retrieved September 20, 2008, from http://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=10876
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Mayer, R. H. (1999). Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),(Vol. 2, pp. 141-159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. McLaren, P. (1994).New York: Longman.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow (Ed.),(pp. 3-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as a discourse.,(1), 58-63.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  64. Meyers, S. (2008). Using transformative pedagogy when teaching online.(4), 219-224. DOI: 10.3200/CTCH.56.4.219-224.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  65. Nam, C. S., & Smith-Jackson, T. L. (2007). Web-based learning environment: A theory-based design process for developopment and evaluation., 23-43.
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. Novak, J. (1998).. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  67. O’Neill, G. (2010). Initiating curriculum revision: Exploring the practices of educational developers.(1), 61-71. DOI: 10.1080/13601440903529927.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  68. Oppermann, R., & Specht, M. (2006). Situated learning in the process of work. In D. Hung & M. S. Khine (Eds.),(pp. 69-89). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. O’Sullivan, E. (2003). Bringing a perspective of transformative learning to globalized consumption.(4), 326-330. DOI: 10.1046/j.1470-6431.2003.00327.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  70. Paas, L. (2008).. Manitoba Canada: IISD.
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. Pliner, S. M., & Johnson, J. R. (2004). Historical, theoretical, and foundational principles of universal instructional design in higher education.(2), 105-113. DOI: 10.1080/10665680490453913.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  72. Roblyer, M. D. (2003).(3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc./Merrill Prentice Hall.
    Search in Google Scholar
  73. Rychen, S., & Salganick, L. (2003). A holistic model of competence. In S. Rychen & L. Salagnick (Eds.),(pp. 41-62). Gottingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
    Search in Google Scholar
  74. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1996). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.),(pp. 135-148). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  75. Schmidt, A. (2005). Bridging the gap between knowledge management and e-learning with context-aware corporate learning solutions In K. Althoff, A. Dengel, R. Bergmann, M. Nick & T. R. Berghofer (Eds.),(pp. 203-213). WM 2005, Kaiserlautern, Germany: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  76. Schmidt, A. (2008). Enabling learning on demand in semantic work environments: The learning in process approach In J. Rech, B. Decker & E. Ras (Eds.),(pp. 1-21). Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  77. Schmidt, A., & Braun, S. (2006). Context-aware workplace learning support: Concept, experiences, and remaining challenges. In W. Nejdl & K. Tochtermann (Eds.),.(EC-TEL 2006) (pp. 518-524). Crete, Greece: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  78. Scott, S. S., McGuire, J. M., & Shaw, S. F. (2003). Universal design for instruction: A new paradigm for adult instruction in postsecondary education.(6), 369-379.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  79. Seitz, K., & Schreiber, J. R. (2005).A discussion paper of the Association of German development nongovernmental organisations (VENRO) on the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development 2005-2014. VENRO-working paper No. 15.
    Search in Google Scholar
  80. Shurville, S., Browne, T., & Whitaker, M. (2008). Employing educational technologists: A call for evidenced change. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology?Retrieved May 6, 2010, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/shurville.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  81. Smith, M. K. (2000).Retrieved June 4, 2010, from www.infed.org/biblio/b-curric.htm
    Search in Google Scholar
  82. Sorensen, E. K., & Takle, E. S. (2005). Investigating knowledge building dialogues in networked communities of practice. A collaborative learning endeavor across cultures., 50-60.
    Search in Google Scholar
  83. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T. Duffy & D. Jonassen (Eds.),(pp. 57-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
    Search in Google Scholar
  84. Squires, D. (1999). Educational software for constructivist learning environments: Subversive use and volatile design.(3), 48-54.
    Search in Google Scholar
  85. Summers, M., & Kruger, C. (2003). Teaching sustainable development in primary schools: Theory into practice.(2), 157-180. DOI: 10.1080/0958517032000095763.
    Search in Google Scholar
  86. Svanstrom, M., Lozano-Garcia, F. J., & Rowe, D. (2008). Learning outcomes for sustainable development in higher education.,(3), 339-351. DOI: 10.1108/14676370810885925.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  87. Tilbury, D., Podger, D., & Reid, A. (2004).Final report prepared for the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage and Macquarie University, September 2004.
    Search in Google Scholar
  88. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (1996).. Paris: UNESCO.
    Search in Google Scholar
  89. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2003).. Paris: UNESCO.
    Search in Google Scholar
  90. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2005).Technical Paper No. 4. Paris: UNESCO.
    Search in Google Scholar
  91. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2010).No. 2. Paris: UNESCO.
    Search in Google Scholar
  92. Vare, P., & Scott, B. (2007).. Bath: Learning South West.
    Search in Google Scholar
  93. Vrasidas, C. (2001). Constructivism versus objectivism: Implications for interaction, course design, and evaluation in distance education.(4), 339-362.
    Search in Google Scholar
  94. Wade, R. (2012). Pedagogy, places and people.(2), 147-167.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  95. Wals, A. E. J. (2007). Introduction. In A. E. J. Wals (Ed.),(pp. 17-32). Wageningen: Wageningen Publishers.
    Search in Google Scholar
  96. Wals, A. E. J., & Heymann, F. V. (2004). Learning on the edge: Exploring the change potential of conflict in social learning for sustainable living. In A. Wenden (Ed.),(pp. 123-145). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  97. Wals, A. E. J., & Blaze Corcoran, P. (2006). Sustainability as an outcome of transformative learning. In J. Holmberg & B. E. Samuelson (Eds.),(pp. 103-108). Paris: UNESCO.
    Search in Google Scholar
  98. Willis, J. (2000). The maturing of constructivist instructional design: Some basic principles that can guide practice.0(1), 5-16.
    Search in Google Scholar
  99. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987).London: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  100. Wenger, E., & Lave, J. (1991).. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10099-012-0007-7 | Journal eISSN: 1691-5534 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4147
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 40
Published on: Mar 27, 2013
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
curriculum,
information and communication technologies,
online learning,
education for sustainable development,
Masters programme
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Education,
Education, other

© 2013 Vassilios Makrakis, Nelly Kostoulas-Makrakis, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 14 (2012): Issue 2 (December 2012)
Next article