Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Exploring and Promoting Ecological Consciousness in Teacher Education: the Possibilities of Educational Action Research in Education for Sustainable Development Cover

Exploring and Promoting Ecological Consciousness in Teacher Education: the Possibilities of Educational Action Research in Education for Sustainable Development

Open Access
|Jul 2011

References

  1. Aalsburg Wiessner, C., & Mezirow, J. (2000). Theory building and the search for common ground. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.),(pp. 329-358). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  2. Ahteenmaki-Pelkonen, L. (2002). Transformative adult learning: A systematic analysis of Jack Mezirow's conceptions.(3), 2-10.
  3. Birmingham, C. (2004). Phronesis: A model for pedagogical reflection.(4), 313-324. DOI: 10.1177/0022487104266725.
  4. Bradbury, H. (2003). Sustaining inner and outer worlds: A whole-systems approach to developing sustainable business practices in management.(2), 172-187. DOI: 10.1177/1052562903251414.
  5. Bradbury Huang, H. (2010). What is good action research?: Why the resurgent interest?(1), 93-109. DOI: 10.1177/1476750310362435.
  6. Bradbury, H., & Mainemelis, C. (2001). Learning history and organizational praxis.(4), 340-357. DOI: 10.1177/1177/1056492601104008.
  7. Bradbury, H., & Reason, P. (2003). Action research: An opportunity for revitalizing research purpose and practices.(2), 155-175. DOI: 10.1177/1 473325003002002003.
  8. Brereton, D. P. (2009). Why sociocultural anthropology needs John Dewey's evolutionary model of experience.(5), 5-32. DOI: 10.1177/14634996091 03545.
  9. Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research?(1), 9-28. DOI: 10.1177/14767503030011002.
  10. Chandler, D., & Torbert, B. (2003). Transforming inquiry and action: Interweaving 27 flavors of action research.(2), 133-152. DOI: 10.1177/147675030300 12002.
  11. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000).(5th ed.). London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
  12. Cranton, P. (2000). Individual differences and transformative learning. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.),(pp. 181-204). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  13. Fisher, K., & Phelps, R. (2006). Recipe or performing art?: Challenging conventions for writing action research thesis.(2), 143-164. DOI: 10.1177/1476750 306063989.
  14. Flyvbjerg, B. (2004). Phronetic planning research: Theoretical and methodological reflections.(3), 283-306. DOI: 10.1080/1464935042000250 195.
  15. Gedžūne, I., & Gedžūne, G. (2010). Features of inclusion in education: Tendencies in contemporary research and pre-service teachers' views. Dimenzie občianstva a výchova [Dimensions of citizenship and education].(pp. 288-304). Bratislava, Hungary: KEVON.
  16. Geske, A., & Grīnfelds, A. (2006).[Educational research]. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds.
  17. Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research.(4), 597-606. Retrieved June 20, 2010, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-4/golafshani.pdf
  18. Grint, K. (2007). Learning to lead: Can Aristotle help us find the road to wisdom?(2), 231-246. DOI: 10.1177/1742715007076215.
  19. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness., 105-112.
  20. Ilisko, D. (2006). Ecofeminism - a healing perspective for reshaping religious education. In M. De Souza, G. Durka, K. Engebretson, R. Jackson & A. McGrady (Eds.),(pp. 127-140). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
  21. Iliško, D. (2007). Teachers as agents of societal change., 14-26.
  22. Kasper, D. V. S. (2009). Ecological habitus: Toward a better understanding of socioecological relations.(3), 311-326. DOI: 10.1177/10 86026609343098.
  23. Kinsler, K. (2010). The utility of educational action research for emancipatory change.(2), 171-189. DOI: 1.1177/1476750309351357.
  24. Leitch, R., & Day, C. (2000). Action research and reflective practice: Towards a holistic view.(1), 179-193.
  25. Mayring, P. (2000, June). Qualitative content analysis [28 paragraphs].(2). Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2386
  26. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like and adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.),(pp. 3-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  27. Moore, J. (2005). Is higher education ready for transformative learning? A question explored in the study of sustainability.(1), 76-91. DOI: 10.1177/1541344604270862.
  28. Mosquin, T., & Rowe, S. (2004). A manifesto for Earth.(1), 3-9.
  29. Naess, A. (1989).. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  30. O'Sullivan, E. (1999).. London, New York: Zed Books, in association with University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
  31. Pipere, A., & Salite, I. (2006). Educational action research in teacher education: Fostering research skills.. Hong-Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education.
  32. Reason, P. (1999). Integrating action and reflection through co-operative inquiry.(2), 207-226. DOI: 10.1177/1350507699302007.
  33. Reason, P. (2003). Pragmatist philosophy and action research: Readings and conversation with Richard Rorty.(1), 103-123. DOI: 10.1177/147675030300110 07.
  34. Reason, P. (2006). Choice and quality in action research practice.(2), 187-203. DOI: 10.1177/1056492606288074.
  35. Reason, P. (2007). Education for ecology: Science, aesthetics, spirit and ceremony.(1), 27-44. DOI: 10.1177/1350507607073021.
  36. Rolfe, G. (2006). Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: Quality and the idea of qualitative research.(3), 304-310.
  37. Ryland, E. (2000). Gaia rising: A Jungian look at environmental consciousness and sustainable organizations.(4), 381-402. DOI: 10.1177/1086 026600134001.
  38. Salīte, I. (2002). Teachers' views on the aim of education for sustainable development., 68-80.
  39. Salīte, I. (2006). Aim of education in the context of present and future educational issues: Perspective of teachers. In A. Pipere (Ed.)," (Vol. 1, pp. 390-407). Daugavpils: Daugavpils University Publishing House "Saule".
  40. Salīte, I. (2008). Educational action research for sustainability: Constructing a vision for the future in teacher education., 5-16.
  41. Salīte, I., Gedžūne, G., & Gedžūne, I. (2009). Educational action research for sustainability: Seeking wisdom of insight in teacher education.(2), 14-30. DOI: 10.2478/v10099-009-0037-y.
  42. Salīte, I. Mičule, I. Kravale, M. Iliško, Dz. & Stakle, A. (2007). Toward sustainability in teacher education: Promise of action research. In A. Pipere (Ed.)," (Vol. 2, pp. 263-292). Daugavpils: Daugavpils University Academic Press "Saule".
  43. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment,(17). Retrieved September 30, 2011, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.a sp?v=7&n=17
  44. Taylor, K. (2000). Teaching with developmental intention. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.),(pp. 151-180). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  45. Winter, G. (2000, March). A comparative discussion of the notion of ‘validity’ in qualitative and quantitative research [58 paragraphs].[On-line serial], 4(3/4). Retrieved April 4, 2010, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR43/winter.html
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10099-011-0004-2 | Journal eISSN: 1691-5534 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4147
Language: English
Page range: 43 - 61
Published on: Jul 12, 2011
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2011 Inga Gedžūne, Ginta Gedžūne, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.