References
- Bearison, D., J. (1986). Transactional cognition in context: New model of social understanding. In D.J. Bearison & H. Zimiles (Eds.), Thought and emotion: Development perspectives (pp. 129-146). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
- Berman, R.A., Katzenberger, I. (2004). Form and function in introducing narrative and expository texts: A developmental perspective. Discourse Processes, 38 (1), 57-94.
- Berman, R.A., Nir-Sagiv, B. (2007). Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes, 43 (2), 79-120.
- Brumark, A. (2008). “Eat your hamburger!” - “No, I don't want to!” Argumentation and argumentative development in the context of dinner conversation in twenty Swedish families. Argumentation, 22, 251-271.
- Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Buchs, C., Butera, F., Mugny, G., Darnon, C. (2004). Conflict elaboration and cognitive outcomes. Theory Into Practice, 45, 23-30.
- Darnon, C., Doll, S., Butera, F. (2007). Dealing with a disagreeing partner: Relational and epistemic conflict elaboration. European Journal Of Psychology of Education, 22, 227-242.
- Doise, W., Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
- van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative disscussion. Dordrecht - Holland: Foris.
- Grzelak, J.L., Nowak, A. (2001). Wplyw spoleczny (Social influence). In J. Strelau (Ed.), Psychologia (Psychology) Vol. 3: Jednostka w spoleczeństwie i elementy psychologii stosowanej (Individual in the society and elements of applied psychology) (pp. 197-204). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
- Kofta, M. (1989). Orientacja podmiotowa: Zarys modelu (Subjective orientation: The outline of a model). In A. Gurycka (Ed.), Podmiotowość w wychowawczych doświadczeniach dzieci i mlodzieży (Subjectivity in educational experiences of children and adolescents), Vol. 1: M. Kofta (Ed.), Wychowanek jako podmiot dzialań (Pupil as agent of actions) (pp. 65-93). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa UW.
- Kurcz, I. (2000/2005). Psychoiogia języka i komunikacji (Psychology of language and communication). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe “Scholar”.
- McCabe, A. (2005). Zdania w polaczeniach - tekst i dyskurs (Sentences in connections - Text and discourse). In J. Berko Gleason & N. Bernstein Ratner (Ed.), Psycholingwistyka (Psycholinguistics) (pp. 299-332). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
- Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6 (4), 359-377.
- Mugny, G., De Paolis, P., Carugati, F. (1984). Social regulations in cognitive development. In W. Doise & A. Palmonari (Eds.), Social interaction in individual development (pp. 127-146). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Rytel, J. (2005). Is disagreement necessary? Argumentation in preschoolers' narrative discourse. In B. Bokus (Ed.), Studies in the psychology of child language. In honor of Grace Wales Shugar (pp. 313-327). Warszawa: Matrix.
- Rytel, J. (2006). Disagreement in preschoolers' narrative discourse. Psychology of Languageand Communication, 10 (1), 21-44.
- Rytel, J. (fothcoming). Monolog, dialog, polifonia - pragmatyka narracji dziecięcej (Monologue, dialog, polyphony - pragmatics of childrens' narration). In: B. Janusz, K. Gdowska & B. de Barbara (Eds.), Narracja: teoria i praktyka (Narration: theory and practice) (pp. 267-286). Kraków: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
- Shugar, G.W. (1989). Male dziecko w sytuacji dwupodmiotowej: Jak powstaje i na czym polega struktura Wspólne Dzialanie? (Young child in a dual-agentive situation. What is the joint action structure and how does it emerge?). In A. Gurycka (Ed.), Podmiotowość w wychowawczych doświadczeniach dzieci i mlodzieży, (Subjectivity in educational experiences of children and adolescents) Vol. 1: M. Kofta (Ed.), Wychowanek jako podmiot dzialań (Pupil as agent of actions) (pp. 65-93). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
- Voss, J.F., Van Dyke, J.A. (2001). Narrative structure, information certainty, emotional content, and gender as factors in a pseudo jury decision-making task. Discourse Processes, 32 (2/3), 215-243.