Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Arguing to Persuade and Arguing to Explore in Preschoolers' Narrative Discourse Cover

Arguing to Persuade and Arguing to Explore in Preschoolers' Narrative Discourse

By:   
Open Access
|Jun 2009

References

  1. Bearison, D., J. (1986). Transactional cognition in context: New model of social understanding. In D.J. Bearison & H. Zimiles (Eds.),(pp. 129-146). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
  2. Berman, R.A., Katzenberger, I. (2004). Form and function in introducing narrative and expository texts: A developmental perspective., 38 (1), 57-94.
  3. Berman, R.A., Nir-Sagiv, B. (2007). Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox., 43 (2), 79-120.
  4. Brumark, A. (2008). “Eat your hamburger!” - “No, I don't want to!” Argumentation and argumentative development in the context of dinner conversation in twenty Swedish families., 22, 251-271.
  5. Bruner, J. (1986).Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  6. Buchs, C., Butera, F., Mugny, G., Darnon, C. (2004). Conflict elaboration and cognitive outcomes., 45, 23-30.
  7. Darnon, C., Doll, S., Butera, F. (2007). Dealing with a disagreeing partner: Relational and epistemic conflict elaboration., 22, 227-242.
  8. Doise, W., Mugny, G. (1984).Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  9. van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R. (1984).Dordrecht - Holland: Foris.
  10. Grzelak, J.L., Nowak, A. (2001). Wplyw spoleczny (Social influence). In J. Strelau (Ed.),(Psychology) Vol. 3:(Individual in the society and elements of applied psychology) (pp. 197-204). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
  11. Kofta, M. (1989). Orientacja podmiotowa: Zarys modelu (Subjective orientation: The outline of a model). In A. Gurycka (Ed.),(Subjectivity in educational experiences of children and adolescents), Vol. 1: M. Kofta (Ed.),(Pupil as agent of actions) (pp. 65-93). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa UW.
  12. Kurcz, I. (2000/2005).(Psychology of language and communication). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe “Scholar”.
  13. McCabe, A. (2005). Zdania w polaczeniach - tekst i dyskurs (Sentences in connections - Text and discourse). In J. Berko Gleason & N. Bernstein Ratner (Ed.),(Psycholinguistics) (pp. 299-332). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
  14. Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom., 6 (4), 359-377.
  15. Mugny, G., De Paolis, P., Carugati, F. (1984). Social regulations in cognitive development. In W. Doise & A. Palmonari (Eds.),(pp. 127-146). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Rytel, J. (2005). Is disagreement necessary? Argumentation in preschoolers' narrative discourse. In B. Bokus (Ed.),(pp. 313-327). Warszawa: Matrix.
  17. Rytel, J. (2006). Disagreement in preschoolers' narrative discourse., 10 (1), 21-44.
  18. Rytel, J. (fothcoming). Monolog, dialog, polifonia - pragmatyka narracji dziecięcej (Monologue, dialog, polyphony - pragmatics of childrens' narration). In: B. Janusz, K. Gdowska & B. de Barbara (Eds.),(Narration: theory and practice) (pp. 267-286). Kraków: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  19. Shugar, G.W. (1989). Male dziecko w sytuacji dwupodmiotowej: Jak powstaje i na czym polega struktura Wspólne Dzialanie? (Young child in a dual-agentive situation. What is the joint action structure and how does it emerge?). In A. Gurycka (Ed.),, (Subjectivity in educational experiences of children and adolescents) Vol. 1: M. Kofta (Ed.),(Pupil as agent of actions) (pp. 65-93). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
  20. Voss, J.F., Van Dyke, J.A. (2001). Narrative structure, information certainty, emotional content, and gender as factors in a pseudo jury decision-making task., 32 (2/3), 215-243.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-009-0002-9 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 (formerly 1234-2238) | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 21 - 38
Published on: Jun 15, 2009
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2009 Jolanta Rytel, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.