Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Investigations on Measurement Uncertainty and Stability of Pressure Dial Gauges and Transducers Cover

Investigations on Measurement Uncertainty and Stability of Pressure Dial Gauges and Transducers

Open Access
|Oct 2010

References

  1. International Standards Organization. (1995).. ISO GUM Doc. 1995(E).
  2. European Cooperation for Accreditation of Laboratories. (1997).. EAL-R2/1997, 1-27.
  3. Mohan, P., Sharma, D. R., Gupta, A. C. (1996). Comparison of an ultrasonic interferometer manometer and a static expansion system using a capacitance diaphragm gauge., 33 (2), 165-171.
  4. Yadav, S., Prakash, O., Gupta, V. K., Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2007). The effect of pressure-transmitting fluids in the characterization of a controlled clearance piston gauge up to 1 GPa., 44 (3), 222-233.
  5. Yadav, S. (2007). Characterization of dead weight testers and computation of associated uncertainties: a case study of contemporary techniques., 14 (3), 453-469.
  6. Gupta, A. C., Sharma, D. R., Sharma, J. K. N. (1996). Intercomparison of pressure standards in the barometric region., 11 (1), 3-6.
  7. Bandyopadhyay, A. K., Gupta, A. C. (1999). Establishment of the national pressure standards - a case study for uncertainty statements., 14 (1), 3-14.
  8. Bandyopadhyay, A. K., Gupta, A. C. (1999). Realization of a national practical pressure scale for pressure up to 500 MPa., 36 (6), 681-688.
  9. Yadav, S., Bandyopadhyay, A. K., Dilawar, N., Gupta A. C. (2002). Intercomparison of national hydraulic pressure standards up to 500 MPa.+, 35, 47-51.
  10. Yadav, S., Vijayakumar, A. D., Gupta, A. C. (1997). Computer software for calibration of industrial and master simple / reentrant type piston gauges., 12 (2-4), 101-104.
  11. Heydemann, P. L. M., Welch, W. E. (1975). Piston gauges. In Leneindre, B., Voder, B. (eds.). Butterworths.
  12. Yadav, S., Agarwal, R., Sharma, D. R., Bandyopadhyay, A. K., Gupta, A. C. (2003). Modern instrumentation techniques in pressure metrology under static conditions., 18 (2), 57-82.
  13. Sabuga, W., Bergogilo, M., Rabault, T., Waller, B., Torres, J. C., Olson, D. A., Agarwal, A., Kobata, T., Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2005). Final report on Key comparison CCM.P-K7 in the range 10 MPa to 100 MPa of hydraulic gauge pressure., 42, 07005.
  14. Kobata, T., Bandyopadhyay, A. K., Moore, K., Eltawil, A. A. E., Woo, S.-Y., Chan, T. K., Jian, W., Man, J., Con, N. N., Fatt, C. S., Permana, W., Aldammd, M., Sabuga, W., Changpan, T., Hung, C. C., Pengcheng, Z. (2005). Final report on Key comparison APMP. M.P-K7 in hydraulic gauge pressure from 10 MPa to 100 MPa., 42, 07006.
  15. Driver, R. G., Olson, D. A., Yadav, S., Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2006). Final report on APMP.SIM. M.P-K7: bilateral comparison between NIST (USA) and NPLI (India) in the hydraulic pressure region 40 MPa to 200 MPa., 43, 07003.
  16. Yadav, S., Vijayakumar, D. A., Bandyopadhyay, A. K., Gupta, A. C. (2000). A proposal for the establishment of measurement uncertainty of pressure dial gauges and transducers., 7 (2), 32-43.
  17. Yadav, S., Gupta, V. K., Swarup, S., Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2010). Studies on pressure dial gauges and transducers. In, 30-31 January 2010. Delhi, India: Delhi University, 77-81.
  18. Yadav, S., Gupta, V. K., Prakash, O., Bandyopadhyay A. K. (2005). Proficiency testing through interlaboratory comparison in the pressure range 7-70 MPa using pressure dial gauge as an artifact., 64 (10), 722-740.
  19. Yadav, S., Prakash, O., Gupta, V. K., Kumaraswamy, B. V., Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2008). Evaluation of interlaboratory performance through proficiency testing using pressure dial gauge in the hydraulic pressure measurement up to 70 MPa., 23 (2), 79-99.
  20. Yadav, S., Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2009). Assessment of laboratory performance in external proficiency testing in the pressure range up to 60 MPa., 4 (1), 42-51.
  21. Yadav, S., Gupta, V. K., Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2005). Interlaboratory comparison in the pressure range 7 - 70 MPa using digital pressure calibrator., 20 (4), 297-310.
  22. Yadav, S., Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2009). Evaluation of laboratory performance through interlaboratory comparison., 24 (2), 125-138.
  23. Yadav, S., Gupta, V. K., Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2010). Standardization of pressure calibration (7-70 MPa) using digital pressure calibrator., 69 (1), 27-33.
  24. Yadav, S., Bandyopadhyay, A. K., Gupta, A. C. (2005). Evaluation of associated uncertainties using linear squares best-fit lines for electromechanical transducers., 86, 49-53.
  25. Yadav, S., Kumaraswamy, B. V., Gupta, V. K., Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2010). Least squares best fit line method for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty with electromechanical transducers (EMT) with electrical outputs (EO)., 25 (2), 97-106.
Language: English
Page range: 130 - 135
Published on: Oct 28, 2010
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2010 Sanjay Yadav, V. Gupta, A. Bandyopadhyay, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.