Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Chemical Composition and Nutritive Value of Protein of the Pea Seeds - Effect of Harvesting Year and Variety Cover

Chemical Composition and Nutritive Value of Protein of the Pea Seeds - Effect of Harvesting Year and Variety

Open Access
|Feb 2012

References

  1. Aczel A. D. 1996. Complete Business Statistics. Columbus, USA: McGraw Hill Companies, 428-436.
  2. Al-Marzooqi W., Wiseman J. 2009. Effect of extrusion under controlled temperature and moisture conditions on ileal apparent amino acid and starch digestibility in peas determined with young broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 153: 113-130.[DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.05.004]10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.05.004
  3. Alonso R., Grant G., Dewey P., Marzo F. 2000. Nutritional Assessment in Vitro and in Vivo of Raw and Extruded Peas (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 48(6): 2286-2290. [DOI: 10.1021/jf000095o]10.1021/jf000095o
  4. AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed., ed. A. O. A. C. Arlington, VA.
  5. Biel W., Bobko K., Maciorowski R. 2009. Chemical composition and nutritive value of husked and naked oats grain. Journal of Cereal Science 49: 413-418. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcs.2009.01.009.]10.1016/j.jcs.2009.01.009
  6. Boisen S., Hvelplund T., Weisbjerg M. R. 2000. Ideal amino acid profiles as a basis for feed protein evaluation. Livestock Production Science 64: 239-251. [DOI: 0301-6226(99)00146-3]10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00146-3
  7. Castell A. G., Guenter W., Igbasan F. A. 1996. Nutritive value of peas for non-ruminant diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 60: 209-227. [DOI:10.1016/0377-8401(96)00979-0]10.1016/0377-8401(96)00979-0
  8. Chrastil J. 1986. Spectrophotometric determination of tryptophan and tyrosine in peptides and proteins based on new color reactions. Analytical Biochemistry 158(2): 443-446. [DOI:10.1016/0003-2697(86)90573-7]10.1016/0003-2697(86)90573-7
  9. COBORU 2008. Wyniki porejestrowych doświadczeń odmianowych (WPDO). [in Polish]
  10. Davies D. R. 1985. Pea (Pisum sativum L.). Grain Legume Crops, (ed. D. R. Davies, et al.) London, UK: Collins., pp. 147-198.
  11. Dobosz M. 2001. Wspomagana komputerowo statystyczna analiza wyników badań. Warsaw: AOW EXIT, 231-232. ISBN 83-87674-29-X.
  12. FAO. 2007. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition. Report of Joint WHO/FAO/UNU Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series, 935. ISSN 0512-3054.
  13. FAO/WHO. 1991. Protein Quality Evaluation. Report of a Joint FAO-WHO Expert Consultation FAO. Food and Nutrition, Rome, 51. ISBN: 9251030979 9789251030974.
  14. Foster-Powell K., Holt S., Brand-Mille J. C. 2002. International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 76: 5-56. ISSN: 00029165.10.1093/ajcn/76.1.512081815
  15. Frias J., Giacomino S., Peñas E., Pellegrino N., Ferreyra V., Apro N., Olivera Carrión M., Vidal-Valverde C. 2011. Assessment of the nutritional quality of raw and extruded Pisum sativum L. var. laguna seeds. LWT - Food Science and Technology 44: 1303-1308. [DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2010.12.025]10.1016/j.lwt.2010.12.025
  16. Han H., Baik B. K. 2008. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of lentils (Lens culinaris), chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.), peas (Pisum sativum L.) and soybeans (Glycine max) and their quantitative changes during processing. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 43: 1971-1978. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2008.01800.x]10.1111/j.1365-2621.2008.01800.x
  17. Jenkins A. L. 2007. The glycemic index: Looking back 25 years. Cereal Foods World 52: 50-53. [DOI: 10.1094/CFW-52-1-0050]10.1094/CFW-52-1-0050
  18. Kraus T. E. C., Dahlgren R.A, Zasoski R. J. 2003. Tannins in nutrient dynamics of forest ecosystems - a review. Plant and Soil 256: 41-66. [DOI: 10.1023/A:1026206511084]10.1023/A:1026206511084
  19. Martínez-Villaluenga C., Gulewicz P., Frias J., Gulewicz K., Vidal-Valverde C. 2008. Assessment of protein fractions of three cultivars of Pisum sativum L.: effect of germination. European Food Research and Technology 226: 1465-1478. [DOI: 10.1007/s00217-007-0678-9]10.1007/s00217-007-0678-9
  20. Martins J. M., Riottot M., de Abreu M. C., Lanca M., Viegas-Crespo A. M., Almeida J. A., Freire J. B., Bento O. P. 2004. Dietary Raw Peas (Pisum sativum L.) Reduce Plasma Total and LDL Cholesterol and Hepatic Esterified Cholesterol in Intact and Ileorectal Anastomosed Pigs Fed Cholesterol-Rich Diets. Journal of Nutrition 134: 3305-3312. ISSN: 00223166.10.1093/jn/134.12.330515570030
  21. Mcdonough F. E., Bodwell C. E., Hitchins A. D., Staples R. S. 1989. Bioavailability of lysine in selected foods by rat growth assay. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 39: 67-75. [DOI: 10.1007/BF01092403]10.1007/BF010924032496403
  22. Millward D. J. 1999. The nutritional value of plant-based diets in relation to human amino acid and protein requirements. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 58: 249-260. [DOI: 10.1017/S0029665199000531]10.1017/S0029665199000531
  23. Nikolopoulou D., Grigorakis K., Stasini M., Alexis M. N., Iliadis K. 2007. Differences in chemical composition of field pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars: Effect of cultivation area and year. Food Chemistry 103: 847-852. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.035]10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.035
  24. Nikolopoulou D., Grigorakis K., Stasini M., Alexis M., Iliadis, K. 2006. Effects of cultivation area and year on proximate composition and antinutrients in three different kabuli-type chickpea (Cicer arientinum) varietes. European Food Research Technology, 23: 737-741. [DOI: 10.1007/s00217-006-0261-9]10.1007/s00217-006-0261-9
  25. NRC. 1989. Recommended Dietary Allowances, 10th ed. Protein and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. ISBN-10: 0-309-04633-5.
  26. NRC. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry 9th rev. ed. National Academy Press. Washington, DC, 19-34. ISBN-10: 0-309-04892-3.
  27. Paczocha S. 2010. Wyniki porejestrowych doświadczeń odmianowych w woj. świętokrzyskim. Świętokrzyski Zespół Porejestrowego Doświadczalnictwa Odmianowego, pp.79-90. [in Polish]
  28. Palander S., Laurinen P., Perttilä S., Valaja J., Partanin K. 2006. Protein and amino acid digestibility and metabolizable energy value of pea (Pisum sativum), faba bean (Vicia faba) and lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) seeds for turkeys of different age. Animal Feed Science and Technology 127: 89-100. [DOI: 10. 1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.07.003]10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.07.003
  29. Rizkalla S. W., Bellisle F., Slama G. 2002. Health benefits of low glycemic index foods, such as pulses, in diabetic patients and health individuals. British Journal of Nutrition 88: 255-262. [DOI: 10.1079/BJN 2002715]
  30. Salgado P., Montagne L., Freire J. P. B., Ferreira R. B., Teixeira A., Bento O., Abreu M. C., Toullec R., Lallès J.-P. 2002. Legume grains enhance ileal losses of specific endogenous serine-protease proteins in weaned pigs. Journal of Nutrition 132(7): 1913-1920. ISSN: 00223166.10.1093/jn/132.7.191312097670
  31. Schumacher H., Paulsen H. M., Gau A. E., Link W., Jürgens H. U., Sass O., Dieterich R. 2011. Seed protein amino acid composition of important local grain legumes Lupinus angustifolius L., Lupinus luteus L., Pisum sativum L. and Vicia faba L. Plant Breeding 130: 156-164. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01832.x]10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01832.x
  32. Stanek M., Zdunczyk Z., Purwin C., Florek S. 2004. Chemical composition and nutritive value of seeds of selected pea varieties. Veterinarija ir Zootechnika 28(50): 71-73. ISSN 1392-2130.
  33. StatSoft, Inc. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 9.0. 2009. www.statsoft.com
  34. Sujak A., Kotlarz A., Strobel W. 2006. Compositional and nutritional evaluation of several lupin seeds. Food Chemistry 98: 711-719. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.06.036]10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.06.036
  35. Szwejkowska B. 2005. [Effect of cultivation intensity on protein content and yields in field pea]. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Agricultura 4(1): 153-161. ISSN:1664-0625. [in Polish with English summary].
  36. Tyczkowska K. 1977. Metoda oznaczania kwasu taninowego w ziarnie sorga. Biuletyn Informacyjny Przemysłu Paszowego 4: 40-45. ISSN: 0137-1568. [in Polish]
  37. Urbano G., López-Jurado M., Frejnagel S., Gómez-Villalva E., Porres J. M., Frías J., Vidal-Valverde C., Aranda, P. 2005. Nutritional assessment of raw and germinated pea (Pisum sativum L.) protein and carbohydrate by in vitro and in vivo techniques. Nutrition 21: 230-239. [DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2004.04.025]10.1016/j.nut.2004.04.02515723753
  38. Valencia D. G., Serrano M. P., Centeno C., Lázaro R., Mateos G. G. 2008. Pea protein as a substitute of soya bean protein in diets for young pigs: Effects on productivity and digestive traits. Livestock Science 118: 1-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.livsci.2008.01.018]10.1016/j.livsci.2008.01.018
  39. Van Soest P. J., Robertson B. J., Lewis B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583. ISSN:00220302.
  40. Wang N., Daun J. K. 2004. Effect of variety and crude protein content on nutrients and certain antinutrients in field peas (Pisum sativum). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 84: 1021-1029. [DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.1742]10.1002/jsfa.1742
  41. Wang N., Hatcher D. W., Gawalko E. J. 2008. Effect of variety and processing on nutrients and certain antinutrients in field peas (Pisum sativum). Food Chemistry 111: 132-138. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.03.047]10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.03.047
  42. Wang N., Hatcher D. W., Warkentin T. D., Toews R. 2010. Effect of cultivar and environment on physicochemical and cooking characteristics of field pea (Pisum sativum). Food Chemistry 118: 109-115. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.082]10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.082
  43. Wang X., Warkentin T. D., Briggs C. J., Oomah B. D., Campbell C. G., Woods S. 1998. Total phenolics and condensed tannins in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Euphytica 101: 97-102. [DOI: 10.1023/A:1018371604056]10.1023/A:1018371604056
  44. Zdunczyk Z., Godycka I., Amarowicz R. 1997. Chemical composition and content of antinutritional factors in Polish cultivars of peas. Plant Food for Human Nutrition 50: 37-45. [DOI: 10.1007/BF02436041]10.1007/BF024360419198113
Language: English
Page range: 57 - 69
Published on: Feb 15, 2012
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2012 Anna Kotlarz, Agnieszka Sujak, Wacław Strobel, Wilhelm Grzesiak, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 75 (2011): Issue 1 (December 2011)