Assurance–Traceability–Risk Modeling for Verification-Ready Design of a Multi-Fuel Aircraft Reciprocating Engine Test Cell
References
- Li S. Design and development of aviation aircraft maintenance training platform based on VR technology. Procedia Comput Sci. 2023;228:898–906.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.11.118 - Ulansky V, Raza A. A historical survey of condition-based maintenance models with imperfect inspections: Cases of constant and non-constant probabilities of inspection outcomes. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2025;254:110544.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110544 - Shao L, Zhou Y, Geng T, Zhao S, Zhu K, Zhong Z, et al. Advanced combustion in heavy fuel aircraft piston engines: A comprehensive review and future directions. Fuel. 2024;370:131771.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131771 - Liao B, Zhang F, Chen Z, Qin T, Lin X, Guo Y. Effect of injection strategy on an air-assisted direct injection aviation kerosene two-stroke engine. Appl Therm Eng. 2023;233:121193.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121193 - Mobin M, Li Z, Cheraghi SH, Wu G. An approach for design verification and validation planning and optimization for new product reliability improvement. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2019;190:106518.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106518 - Nešić D, Nyberg M, Gallina B. Product-line assurance cases from contract-based design. J Syst Softw. 2021;176:110922.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.110922 - Abdel-Aty TA, Negri E. Conceptualizing the digital thread for smart manufacturing: A systematic literature review. J Intell Manuf. 2024;35(8):3629–3653.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-024-02407-1 - Wu S, Wang G, Lu J, Hu Z, Yan Y, Kiritsis D. Design ontology for cognitive thread supporting traceability management in model-based systems engineering. J Ind Inf Integr. 2024;40:100619.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2024.100619 - Dong M, Wang G, Lu J, Wu S, Ma J. Ontology formalism and semantic rules supporting traceability management in model-based systems engineering. J Eng Des. 2025.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2025.2532291 - Yuan S, Reniers G, Yang M. Dynamic and integrated safety and security barrier management: A new framework to manage major event risks in chemical plants. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2025;96:105632.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105632 - Güneş T. Aircraft maintenance technician perceptions and evaluations about the safety culture and responsibility related competencies. J Aerosp Technol Manag. 2025;17:e0725.
https://doi.org/10.1590/jatm.v17.1367 - Martins LEG, Gorschek T. Requirements engineering for safety-critical systems: Overview and challenges. IEEE Softw. 2017;34(4):49–57.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2017.94 - Paz A, Boussaidi GE, Mili H. Checsdm: A method for ensuring consistency in heterogeneous safety-critical system design. IEEE Trans Softw Eng. 2021;47(12):2713–2739.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.2966994 - Mucha J, Kaufmann A, Riehle D. A systematic literature review of pre-requirements specification traceability. Requir Eng. 2024;29:119–141.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-023-00412-z - Parizi RM, Lee SP, Dabbagh M. Achievements and challenges in state-of-the-art software traceability between test and code artifacts. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2014;63(4):913–926.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2014.2338254 - Schmitt U. Projectability and heritage management of design knowledge: A grass-roots artefact perspective of a longitudinal research project for knowledge management system innovation. Sustainability. 2021;13(23):13033.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313033 - Dincelli E, Chengalur-Smith I. Choose your own training adventure: Designing a gamified SETA artefact for improving information security and privacy through interactive storytelling. Eur J Inf Syst. 2020;29(6):669–687.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1797546 - Scales J. A design science research approach to closing the gap between the research and practice of project scheduling. Syst Res Behav Sci. 2020;37(5):804–812.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2743 - Ling GHT, Leng PC, Rusli N, Ho WS. A DSR methodology for conceptual solution development of public open space governance. J Reg City Plan. 2021;32(1):15–35.
https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2021.32.1.2 - Brooks SP, Alba C, Montesanti S, et al. Leveraging intermediaries’ skillsets to build implementation research and practice infrastructure: A qualitative case study. Implement Sci Commun. 2025;6:80.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00765-2 - Busse M, Zscheischler J, Zoll F, Rogga S, Siebert R. Co-design approaches in land use related sustainability science: A systematic review. Land Use Policy. 2023;129:106623.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106623 - Mdletshe S, Motshweneng OS, Oliveira M, Twala B. Design science research application in medical radiation science education: A case study on the evaluation of a developed artifact. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2023;54(1):206–214.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2022.11.007 - Ismael M, McCall R, McGee F, Belkacem I, Stefas M, Baixauli J, et al. Acceptance of augmented reality for laboratory safety training: Methodology and an evaluation study. Front Virtual Real. 2024;5:1322543.
https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2024.1322543 - Johnston J, Perry D, JET Contributors. An overview of the preparation and implementation of the safety case in support of the 2nd JET deuterium–tritium experiment. Plasma Phys Control Fusion. 2024;66(7):075023.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ad4d1b - Pasman HJ, Rogers WJ. How can we improve HAZOP, our old workhorse, and do more with its results? An overview of recent developments. Chem Eng Trans. 2016;48:829–834.
https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1648139 - Cheong SK, Kim J. SU-G-TeP4-05: An evaluation of a low dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy procedure using a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). Med Phys. 2016;43(6Part15):3685–3686.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4957130 - Nealon KA, Douglas RJ, Han EY, Kry SF, Reed VK, Simiele SJ, et al. Hazard testing to reduce risk in the development of automated planning tools. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023;24(8):e13995.
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13995 - Baker KE, Pulisci RM, Hendry MT, Lefsrud LM. Combining safety approaches to bring hazards into focus: An oil sands tailings case study. Can J Chem Eng. 2020;98(11):2330–2341.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.23813 - Ma Y, Sun C, Chen J, Cao D, Xiong L. Verification and validation methods for decision-making and planning of automated vehicles: A review. IEEE Trans Intell Veh. 2022;7(3):480–498.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2022.3196396 - Cederbladh J, Cicchetti A, Suryadevara J. Early validation and verification of system behaviour in model-based systems engineering: A systematic literature review. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol. 2024;33(3).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3631976 - Olechowski AL, Eppinger SD, Joglekar N, Tomaschek K. Technology readiness levels: Shortcomings and improvement opportunities. Syst Eng. 2020;23(4):395–408.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21533 - Trstenjak M, Opetuk T. Industry 4.0 readiness factor calculation and process planning: State-of-the-art review. Trans FAMENA. 2020;44(3):1–22.
https://doi.org/10.21278/TOF.44301 - Shenoy D, Mahanty B. Measuring the readiness of a megaproject. Int J Manag Proj Bus. 2021;14(4):999–1022.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-05-2020-0154 - Zamora Iribarren M, Garay-Rondero CL, Lemus-Aguilar I, Peimbert-García RE. A review of Industry 4.0 assessment instruments for digital transformation. Appl Sci. 2024;14(5):1693.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14051693 - Szymański GM, Waligórski M, Misztal W. Assessment of the effectiveness of mounting the aircraft piston combustion engine on a test stand. Combust Engines. 2024;198(3):82–92.
https://doi.org/10.19206/CE-186702 - Tărăbîc CM, Cican G, Dediu G, Catană RM. Updating a didactical piston engine test bench, from analogue instrumentation to digital. Tech Vjesn. 2024;31(4):1087–1094.
https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20230315000440 - Mazuro P, Kozak D. Experimental investigation on the performance of the prototype of aircraft opposed-piston engine with various values of intake pressure. Energy Convers Manag. 2022;269:116075.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116075 - Ebrahimi K, Gordon D, Canteenwalla P, Koch CR. Evaluation of ASTM D6424 standard for knock analysis using unleaded fuel candidates on a six cylinder aircraft engine. Int J Engine Res. 2022;23(7):1208–1221.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874211008703 - United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Uniform provisions concerning the approval of internal combustion engines to be installed in agricultural and forestry tractors and in non-road mobile machinery, with regard to the measurement of the net power, net torque and specific fuel consumption: Regulation No. 120. Geneva: UNECE; 2021. Available from:
https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/R120r2e.docx - Wan H, He X, Deng Y, Wang B. A systematic mapping study of information retrieval-based requirements traceability methods. Inf Process Manag. 2025;62(6):104287.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104287 - Yuan S, Reniers G, Yang M. Dynamic-risk-informed safety barrier management: An application to cost-effective barrier optimization based on data from multiple sources. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2023;83:105034.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2023.105034 - Heffner RA, Miller ME. Building credibility for human systems integration in model-based systems engineering. Syst Eng. 2025;28(2):284–293.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21790 - Henderson K, Salado A. Value and benefits of model-based systems engineering (MBSE): Evidence from the literature. Syst Eng. 2021;24(1):51–66.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21566 - Gu P, Zhang Y, Chen Z, Zhao C, Xie K, Wu Z, et al. X-RMTV: An integrated approach for requirement modeling, traceability management, and verification in MBSE. Systems. 2024;12(10):443.
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100443 - Zhang Q, Liu J, Chen X. A literature review of the digital thread: Definition, key technologies, and applications. Systems. 2024;12(3):70.
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12030070 - Jones D, Snider C, Nassehi A, Yon J, Hicks B. Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. 2020;29:36–52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002 - Anwer N, Stark R, Tao F, Erkoyuncu JA. Developing and leveraging digital twins in engineering design. CIRP Ann. 2025;74(2):843–868.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2025.05.002 - Muram FU, Javed MA. ATTEST: Automating the review and update of assurance case arguments. J Syst Archit. 2023;134:102781.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2022.102781 - Gregor S, Zwikael O. Design science research and the co-creation of project management knowledge. Int J Proj Manag. 2024;42(3):102584.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102584 - Fàbregues S, Escalante-Barrios EL, Toraman Turk S, Guetterman TC, Fetters MD. Assessing quality in mixed methods research: Concepts, frameworks, and criteria. In: Cameron R, Golenko X, editors. Handbook of mixed methods research in business and management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2023. p. 76–93.
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800887954.00013 - Guetterman TC, Fàbregues S, Sakakibara R. Visuals in joint displays to represent integration in mixed methods research: A methodological review. Methods Psychol. 2021;5:100080.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100080 - Holopainen J, Mattila O, Pöyry E, Parvinen P. Applying design science research methodology in the development of virtual reality forest management services. For Policy Econ. 2020;116:102190.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102190 - Bano M, Zowghi D, Ferrari A, Spoletini P, Donati B. Teaching requirements elicitation interviews: An empirical study of learning from mistakes. Requir Eng. 2019;24:259–289.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-019-00313-0 - Mohedas I, Daly SR, Loweth RP, Huynh L, Cravens GL, Sienko KH. The use of recommended interviewing practices by novice engineering designers to elicit information during requirements development. Des Sci. 2022;8:e16.
https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2022.4 - Ahmad M, Wilkins S. Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Qual Quant. 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5 - Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med. 2022;292:114523.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523 - Döringer S. The problem-centred expert interview: Combining qualitative interviewing approaches for investigating implicit expert knowledge. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2021;24(3):265–278.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1766777 - Fetters MD, Tajima C. Joint displays of integrated data collection in mixed methods research. Int J Qual Methods. 2022;21.
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221104564 - Zeng T, Chen G, Reniers G, Men J. Developing a barrier management framework for dealing with Natech domino effects and increasing chemical cluster resilience. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2022;168:778–791.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.10.024 - Ayre J, McCaffery KJ. Research note: Thematic analysis in qualitative research. J Physiother. 2022;68(1):76–79.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2021.11.002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/tar-2026-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2545-2835
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 40
Submitted on: May 9, 2026
Accepted on: Jul 22, 2026
Published on: Sep 28, 2026
Published by: ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Arthur Dela Peña, Robert Corpuz, Eric Tiansay, Terence Jason Mallari, Jefferson Clariza, Harold Tiglao, Sheena Mae Serrano, Henry Paul Tagle, Michael Laurenz Escalante, Maria Theresa Vinoya, Raymond Niño Miranda, published by ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.