References
- Anscombre, J. C. (2001). Dénomination, sens et référence dans une théorie des stéréotypes nominaux. Cahiers de praxématique, 36, 43–72.
- Anscombre, J. C. (2012). Le problème de l’antonymie dans le champ parémique. In J. C. Anscombre, A. Rodríguez Somolinos, & S. Gómez-Jordana Ferary (Eds.), Voix et marqueurs du discours: des connecteurs à l’argument d’autorité (pp. 121–140). Paris: ENS Editions.
- Anscombre, J. C. (2016). Sur la détermination du sens des proverbes. Etudes et travaux d’Eur’ORBEM, 1, 39–53.
- Anscombre, J. C. (2020). La théorie des stéréotypes: référence, représentation du monde et morphologie lexicale. In E. Hilgert, S. Palma, G. Kleiber, p. Frath, & R. Daval, (Eds.), Lexique et référence (pp. 13–32). Reims: Editions et presses universitaires de Reims.
- Brugman, C., & Lakoff, G. (2006). Cognitive topology and lexical networks. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: basic readings (pp. 109–139). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Chen, L. (2020). Les stéréotypes dans la zoo-anthroponymie française et chinoise. Itinéraires, 2, 1–18.
- Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic leaps. Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Dodge, E., & Lakoff, G. (2005). Image schemas: from linguistic analysis to neural grounding. In B. Hampe, & J. E. Grady (Eds.), From perception to meaning: image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 57–91). Berlin; Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
- Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse, and language (pp. 113–130). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
- Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22, 33–187.
- Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2000). Compression and global insight. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 283–304.
- Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
- Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2003). Polysemy and conceptual blending. In B. Nerlich, V. Herman, Z. Todd, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Polysemy: Patterns of meaning in‘ mind and language (pp. 79–94). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Fradin, B. (1984). Anaphorisation et stéréotypes nominaux. Lingua, 64(4), 325–369.
- Furnham, A. (1987). The proverbial truth: Contextually reconciling and the truthfulness of antonymous Proverbs. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1, 49–55.
- Gibbs, R. W. (2018). Money talks because people move: embodied metaphors in economic action. Society and Economy, 3, 2018, 349–364.
- Gibbs, R. W, Beitel, D., Harrington, M., & Sanders, P. (1994). Taking a stand on the meanings of stand: bodily experience as motivation for polysemy. Journal of Semantics, 11, 231–251.
- Gibbs, R., & Beitel, D. (1995). What proverb understanding reveals about how people think. Psychological Bulletin, 1, 133 –154.
- Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (1995). The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformation. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 347–378.
- Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: the graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 183–206.
- Giora, R. (2002). On our mind: salience, context, and figurative language. New York, Oxford: University Press.
- Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999). Irony: context and salience. Metaphor and Symbol, 14, 241–257.
- Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories – quickly. In R. Gibbs, (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 67–83). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Glucksberg, S. & Haught, C. (2006). Can Florida become like the next Florida? When metaphoric comparisons fail. Psychological Science, 17, 935–938.
- Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97 (1), 3–18.
- Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1993). How metaphors work. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 401–424). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M., & Manfredi, D. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 50–67.
- Glucksberg, S., & McGlone, M. S. (1999). When love is not a journey: what metaphors mean. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1541–1558.
- Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Berkeley.
- Grady, J. E., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs, G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Hampe, B., & Grady, J. E. (2005). From perception to meaning: image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Honeck, R. P. (1997). A proverb in mind: the cognitive science of proverbial wit and wisdom. London: Psychology Press.
- Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- ˙bib Johnson, M. (1991). Knowing through the body. Philosophical Psychology, 4, 3–18.
- Johnson, M. (2017). Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: how our bodies give rise to understanding. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- Kleiber, G. (1999). Problèmes de sémantique. La polysémie en questions. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses du Septentrion.
- Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kövecses, Z. (2011). Recent developments in metaphor theory: are the new views rival ones? Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 11–25.
- Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347.
- Kövecses, Z. (2018). The power (and problem) of money. Society and Economy, 3, 365–376.
- Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Lakoff, G. (1990). The Invariance hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image-schemas? CognitiveLinguistics, 1, 39–74.
- Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Lakoff, G. (2016). Language and emotion. Emotion Review, 3, 269–273.
- Lakoff, G., & Brugman, C. (1986). Argument forms in lexical semantics. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 442–454). Berkeley Linguistics Society.
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
- Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: a field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Langacker, R. W. (1991). Concept, image, and symbol: the cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
- Lemghari, E. (2019). A metaphor-based account of semantic relations among proverbs. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 6(1), 158–184.
- Lemghari, E. (2021a). Metaphorical blending in complex proverbs. A case study. Metaphor and the Social World, 11, 72–98.
- Lemghari, E. (2021b). Constructing a broad model for proverb understanding. Metaphor and Symbol, 36(4), 265–287.
- Lemghari, E. (2022). On the role of source and target words’ meanings in metaphorical conceptualizations. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 67, 73–103.
- Lemghari, E. (2024). Contradiction in proverbs. The role of stereotypical metaphors. In S. Belkhir (Ed.), Proverbs within Cognitive Linguistics. State of the art (pp. 65–85). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
- Lemghari, E., & Lemghari, A. (2024). Stereotype-based metaphors in wealth proverbs. In S. Babič, F., C. Williams, C. Grindl, A. Tóthné Litovkina & W. Mieder (Eds.) Standing on the shoulders of giants: A Festschrift in honour of Wolfgang Mieder on the occasion of his 80th birthday (pp. 181–198). Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Josep Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek.
- Manser, M. (2002). The facts on file dictionary of proverbs: meanings and origins of more than 1,700 popular sayings. New York, NY: Infobase Publishing.
- Mieder, W. (2004). Proverbs: A handbook. Westport & London: Greenwood Press.
- Norvig, P., & Lakoff, G. (1987). Taking: a study in Lexical Network Theory. In A. Jon, B. Natasha, M. Laura, & F. Hana (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society Berkeley (pp. 195–206), BLS.
- Putnam, H. (1975). Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- O’Connor, K. T. (2009). Money and finance as solid, liquid, and gas in Spanish. Metaphor and Symbol, 2, 141–157.
- Oleneva, P. (2023). Conceptualization of money in English and Russian proverbs: a cognitive perspective. Proverbium, 40, 134–160.
- Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. 1–2). Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Teigen, K. (1986). Old truths or fresh insights? A study of students’ evaluations of proverbs. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 43–49.
- Yankah, K. (1984). Do proverbs contradict? Folklore Forum, 17, 2–19.