Stereotypical Metaphor: A Missing Piece in Conceptual Metaphor Theory

Lemghari, El Mustapha

doi:10.2478/slgr-2025-0018

Abstract

The paper argues for a new kind of metaphors referred to as stereotypical metaphors. They are assumed to be stereotype-based metaphors, in that they arise from stereotypical thoughts speakers within a speech community attach to concepts. They are shown to be instrumental in motivating metaphorical extension of a variety of lexical items. Two case studies are conducted to adduce evidence in support of their descriptive adequacy.

References

Anscombre, J. C. (2001). Dénomination, sens et référence dans une théorie des stéréotypes nominaux. Cahiers de praxématique, 36, 43–72.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anscombre, J. C. (2012). Le problème de l’antonymie dans le champ parémique. In J. C. Anscombre, A. Rodríguez Somolinos, & S. Gómez-Jordana Ferary (Eds.), Voix et marqueurs du discours: des connecteurs à l’argument d’autorité (pp. 121–140). Paris: ENS Editions.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anscombre, J. C. (2016). Sur la détermination du sens des proverbes. Etudes et travaux d’Eur’ORBEM, 1, 39–53.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anscombre, J. C. (2020). La théorie des stéréotypes: référence, représentation du monde et morphologie lexicale. In E. Hilgert, S. Palma, G. Kleiber, p. Frath, & R. Daval, (Eds.), Lexique et référence (pp. 13–32). Reims: Editions et presses universitaires de Reims.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brugman, C., & Lakoff, G. (2006). Cognitive topology and lexical networks. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: basic readings (pp. 109–139). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen, L. (2020). Les stéréotypes dans la zoo-anthroponymie française et chinoise. Itinéraires, 2, 1–18.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic leaps. Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dodge, E., & Lakoff, G. (2005). Image schemas: from linguistic analysis to neural grounding. In B. Hampe, & J. E. Grady (Eds.), From perception to meaning: image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 57–91). Berlin; Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse, and language (pp. 113–130). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22, 33–187.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2000). Compression and global insight. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 283–304.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2003). Polysemy and conceptual blending. In B. Nerlich, V. Herman, Z. Todd, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Polysemy: Patterns of meaning in‘ mind and language (pp. 79–94). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fradin, B. (1984). Anaphorisation et stéréotypes nominaux. Lingua, 64(4), 325–369.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Furnham, A. (1987). The proverbial truth: Contextually reconciling and the truthfulness of antonymous Proverbs. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1, 49–55.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gibbs, R. W. (2018). Money talks because people move: embodied metaphors in economic action. Society and Economy, 3, 2018, 349–364.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gibbs, R. W, Beitel, D., Harrington, M., & Sanders, P. (1994). Taking a stand on the meanings of stand: bodily experience as motivation for polysemy. Journal of Semantics, 11, 231–251.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gibbs, R., & Beitel, D. (1995). What proverb understanding reveals about how people think. Psychological Bulletin, 1, 133 –154.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (1995). The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformation. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 347–378.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: the graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 183–206.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Giora, R. (2002). On our mind: salience, context, and figurative language. New York, Oxford: University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999). Irony: context and salience. Metaphor and Symbol, 14, 241–257.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories – quickly. In R. Gibbs, (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 67–83). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glucksberg, S. & Haught, C. (2006). Can Florida become like the next Florida? When metaphoric comparisons fail. Psychological Science, 17, 935–938.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97 (1), 3–18.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1993). How metaphors work. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 401–424). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M., & Manfredi, D. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 50–67.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glucksberg, S., & McGlone, M. S. (1999). When love is not a journey: what metaphors mean. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1541–1558.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Berkeley.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grady, J. E., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs, G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hampe, B., & Grady, J. E. (2005). From perception to meaning: image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Honeck, R. P. (1997). A proverb in mind: the cognitive science of proverbial wit and wisdom. London: Psychology Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
˙bib Johnson, M. (1991). Knowing through the body. Philosophical Psychology, 4, 3–18.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Johnson, M. (2017). Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: how our bodies give rise to understanding. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kleiber, G. (1999). Problèmes de sémantique. La polysémie en questions. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses du Septentrion.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kövecses, Z. (2011). Recent developments in metaphor theory: are the new views rival ones? Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 11–25.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kövecses, Z. (2018). The power (and problem) of money. Society and Economy, 3, 365–376.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lakoff, G. (1990). The Invariance hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image-schemas? CognitiveLinguistics, 1, 39–74.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lakoff, G. (2016). Language and emotion. Emotion Review, 3, 269–273.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lakoff, G., & Brugman, C. (1986). Argument forms in lexical semantics. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 442–454). Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: a field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Langacker, R. W. (1991). Concept, image, and symbol: the cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lemghari, E. (2019). A metaphor-based account of semantic relations among proverbs. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 6(1), 158–184.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lemghari, E. (2021a). Metaphorical blending in complex proverbs. A case study. Metaphor and the Social World, 11, 72–98.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lemghari, E. (2021b). Constructing a broad model for proverb understanding. Metaphor and Symbol, 36(4), 265–287.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lemghari, E. (2022). On the role of source and target words’ meanings in metaphorical conceptualizations. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 67, 73–103.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lemghari, E. (2024). Contradiction in proverbs. The role of stereotypical metaphors. In S. Belkhir (Ed.), Proverbs within Cognitive Linguistics. State of the art (pp. 65–85). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lemghari, E., & Lemghari, A. (2024). Stereotype-based metaphors in wealth proverbs. In S. Babič, F., C. Williams, C. Grindl, A. Tóthné Litovkina & W. Mieder (Eds.) Standing on the shoulders of giants: A Festschrift in honour of Wolfgang Mieder on the occasion of his 80th birthday (pp. 181–198). Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Josep Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Manser, M. (2002). The facts on file dictionary of proverbs: meanings and origins of more than 1,700 popular sayings. New York, NY: Infobase Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mieder, W. (2004). Proverbs: A handbook. Westport & London: Greenwood Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Norvig, P., & Lakoff, G. (1987). Taking: a study in Lexical Network Theory. In A. Jon, B. Natasha, M. Laura, & F. Hana (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society Berkeley (pp. 195–206), BLS.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Putnam, H. (1975). Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O’Connor, K. T. (2009). Money and finance as solid, liquid, and gas in Spanish. Metaphor and Symbol, 2, 141–157.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oleneva, P. (2023). Conceptualization of money in English and Russian proverbs: a cognitive perspective. Proverbium, 40, 134–160.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. 1–2). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Teigen, K. (1986). Old truths or fresh insights? A study of students’ evaluations of proverbs. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 43–49.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yankah, K. (1984). Do proverbs contradict? Folklore Forum, 17, 2–19.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Stereotypical Metaphor: A Missing Piece in Conceptual Metaphor Theory

Abstract

Paradigm

My account