The eating motivations scale (EATMOT): Development and validation by means of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modelling (SEM)

Guiné Raquel, P. F.; Duarte, João; Ferrão, Ana Cristina; Ferreira, Manuela; Correia, Paula; Cardoso, Ana Paula; Bartkiene, Elena; Szűcs, Viktória; Nemes, Levente; Ljubičić, Marija; Černelič-Bizjak, Maša; Isoldi, Kathy; Kenawy, Ayman El; Ferreira, Vanessa; Straumite, Evita; Korzeniowska, Małgorzata; Vittadini, Elena; Leal, Marcela; Frez-Muñoz, Lucia; Papageorgiou, Maria; Djekić, Ilija

doi:10.2478/sjph-2021-0002

References

Kraus A, Annunziata A, Vecchio R. Sociodemographic factors differentiating the consumer and the motivations for functional food consumption. J Am Coll Nutr. 2017;36:116-26. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2016.1228489.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dikmen D, İnan-Eroğlu E, Göktaş Z, Barut-Uyar B, Karabulut E. Validation of a Turkish version of the food choice questionnaire. Food Qual Prefer. 2016;52:81-6. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.016.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Freedman I. Cultural specificity in food choice – the case of ethnography in Japan. Appetite. 2016;96:138-46. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.006.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Markovina J, Stewart-Knox BJ, Rankin A, Gibney M, de Almeida MDV, Fischer A, et al. Food4Me study: validity and reliability of Food Choice Questionnaire in 9 European countries. Food Qual Prefer. 2015:45:2632. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.05.002.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
De Marchi E, Caputo V, Nayga RM, Banterle A. Time preferences and food choices: evidence from a choice experiment. Food Policy. 2016;62:99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.05.004.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ditlevsen K, Sandøe P, Lassen J. Healthy food is nutritious, but organic food is healthy because it is pure: the negotiation of healthy food choices by Danish consumers of organic food. Food Qual Prefer. 2019;71:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.06.001.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Milošević J, Žeželj I, Gorton M, Barjolle D. Understanding the motives for food choice in Western Balkan countries. Appetite. 2012;58:205-14. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.012.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Steptoe A, Pollard TM, Wardle J. Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: the food choice questionnaire. Appetite. 1995;25:267-84. doi: 10.1006/appe.1995.0061.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lindeman M, Väänänen M. Measurement of ethical food choice motives. Appetite. 2000;34:55-9. doi: 10.1006/appe.1999.0293.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jackson B, Lynne Cooper M, Mintz L, Albino A. Motivations to eat: scale development and validation. J Res Personal. 2003;37:297-318. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00574-3.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van Strien T, Frijters JER, Bergers GPA, Defares PB. The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior. Int J Eat Disord. 1986;5:295-315. doi: 10.1002/1098-108X(198602)5:2<;295::AID-EAT2260050209>3.0.CO;2-T.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roininen K, Lähteenmäki L, Tuorila H. Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods. Appetite. 1999;33:71-88. doi: 10.1006/appe.1999.0232.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ohri-Vachaspati P, Leviton LC. Measuring food environments: a guide to available instruments. Am J Health Promot AJHP. 2010;24:410-26. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.080909-LIT-190.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marôco J. Análise Estatística com o SPSS statistics. 7 Ed. Brazil: Report Number, 2018.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2009.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marôco J. Análise de equações estruturais: fundamentos teóricos, software e aplicações. Lisboa: Report Number, 2014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guiné R, Duarte J, Ferreira M, Correia P, Leal M, Rumbak I, et al. Knowledge about dietary fibres (KADF): development and validation of an evaluation instrument through structural equation modelling (SEM). Public Health. 2016;138:108-18. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.03.031.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sidali KL, Pizzo S, Garrido-Pérez EI, Schamel G. Between food delicacies and food taboos: a structural equation model to assess Western students’ acceptance of Amazonian insect food. Food Res Int. 2019;115:83-9. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.027.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lagerkvist CJ, Amuakwa-Mensah F, Tei Mensah J. How consumer confidence in food safety practices along the food supply chain determines food handling practices: evidence from Ghana. Food Control. 2018;93:265-73. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.06.019.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lim T-P, Chye F-Y, Sulaiman MR, Suki NM, Lee J-S. A structural modeling on food safety knowledge, attitude, and behaviour among Bum Bum Island community of Semporna, Sabah. Food Control. 2016;60:241-6. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.07.042.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ting H, Fam K-S, Jun Hwa JC, Richard JE, Xing N. Ethnic food consumption intention at the touring destination: the national and regional perspectives using multi-group analysis. Tour Manag. 2019;71:518-29. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.11.001.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

The eating motivations scale (EATMOT): Development and validation by means of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modelling (SEM)

References

Paradigm

My account