Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ambiguity in Argumentation: The Impact of Contextual Factors on Semantic Interpretation Cover

Ambiguity in Argumentation: The Impact of Contextual Factors on Semantic Interpretation

Open Access
|Jan 2023

References

  1. 1. Aristotle. Topics. In the complete works of Aristotle, vol. I, ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.
  2. 2. Atlas, J. Philosophy Without Ambiguity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
  3. 3. Chang, C.-H., & Krulee, G. Resolution of ambiguity in Chinese and its application to machine translation. Machine Translation, 6(4), 1991, pp. 279–315.10.1007/BF00417653
  4. 4. Chapman, S., & Routledge, C. (Eds.). Key Ideas in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language. Edinburgh University Press, 2009.10.1515/9780748631421
  5. 5. Crivelli, P. Aristotle on Truth, Cambridge, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511482496
  6. 6. Degano, C. Corpus linguistics and argumentation: Retrieving argumentative patterns in UK prime ministerial debates. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5(2), 2016, pp.113-138.10.1075/jaic.5.2.01deg
  7. 7. Golitsis, P. “Aristotle on Ambiguity”. Strategies of Ambiguity in Ancient Literature, edited by Martin Vöhler, Therese Fuhrer and Stavros Frangoulidis, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2021, pp. 11-28.10.1515/9783110715811-002
  8. 8. Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan. Language, context and text: a social semiotic perspective. Deakin University Press, 1985.
  9. 9. Halliday, M.A.K. An introduction to functional grammar.2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold, 1994.
  10. 10. Halliday, M. A. K. The notion of context in language education. Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), Language and education. Volume 7 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, 250–264. London & New York: Continuum, 2007.
  11. 11. Hamblin, C. L. Fallacies. London: Methuen, 1970.
  12. 12. Hinton, M. Corpus Linguistics Methods in the Study of (Meta)Argumentation. Argumentation 35, 2021, pp. 435–455.10.1007/s10503-020-09533-z
  13. 13. Horn, L.R.A pragmatic approach to certain ambiguities. Linguist Philos 4, 1981, pp. 321–358.10.1007/BF00304400
  14. 14. Hutchby, I. Oh’, Irony and Sequential Ambiguity in Arguments. Discourse & Society 12 (2), 2001, pp. 123–41.10.1177/0957926501012002001
  15. 15. Jackson, S. Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng (ed.). Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics: John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Volume 12 of the Argumentation in Context Series. Argumentation 32 (2), 2017, pp. 293-299.10.1007/s10503-018-9459-9
  16. 16. Jaszczolt, K. Discourse, beliefs and intentions. Oxford: Elsevier, 1999.
  17. 17. Koniak, P. and Cwalina, W. Does it pay to avoid speaking straight about controversial issues? Impact of argumentative ambiguity on the perception of the speaker, Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 26 No. 1, 2022, pp. 84-9710.1108/JCOM-11-2020-0154
  18. 18. Larina, T., Ozyumenko V. and Ponton D. Persuasion strategies in media discourse about Russia: Linguistic ambiguity and uncertainty. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics Levinson, S. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized Conversational 22 implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2019.10.1515/lpp-2019-0002
  19. 19. Levinson, S. C. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. The MIT Press, 2000.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
  20. 20. Malinowski, B. The problem of meaning in primitive languages. Charles K. Ogden & Ian A. Richards (eds.), The meaning of meaning, London: Routledge, 1935, pp. 146–152.
  21. 21. Postal, P. On Certain Ambiguities. In Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 3, 1974.
  22. 22. Schiaparelli, A. Aristotle on the fallacies of combination and division in Sophistici Elenchi 4. History and Philosophy of Logic, 2003.10.1080/0144534031000096145
  23. 23. Smith, L. W. John-Steiner, V., Panofsky, C. P., Smith, L. W (eds.). “Context.” Sociocultural Approaches to Language and Literacy: An Interactionist Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 1994.10.1017/CBO9780511897047
  24. 24. van Eemeren, F. H. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma- dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2010.10.1075/aic.2
  25. 25. van Eemeren, F. H. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1), 2013, pp. 10-31.10.1075/jaic.2.1.01eem
  26. 26. Walton, D. N. Informal logic: A pragmatic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  27. 27. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/american_english/seal_2
  28. 28. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/make_1?q=make
Language: English
Page range: 18 - 24
Published on: Jan 5, 2023
Published by: University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Dimitra Serakioti, Petros Stefaneas, published by University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.