Argumentation: Reasoning Universalis

Antonis Kakas

doi:10.2478/sh-2022-0011

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Argumentation: Reasoning Universalis

Studia Humana

Volume 11 (2022): Issue 3-4 (December 2022)

By: Antonis Kakas

Open Access

|Jan 2023

Abstract

Can argumentation form the basis for any form of reasoning, informal or formal logical reasoning? We examine this question from the particular perspective of the recent developments in logic-based Artificial Intelligence (AI). We propose that argumentation provides the wider framework encompassing uniformly all reasoning, with strict or formal logical reasoning being a special boundary case. We also attempt to link this unifying role of argumentation with Aristotle’s original investigation of methods and forrmalisms for the systematic study of human reasoning.

References

1. Bondarenko, A., Dung, P.M., Kowalski, R.A. and Toni, F. An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artificial. Intelligence 93, 1997, pp. 63–101.10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00015-5
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Diakidoy, I.A., Kakas, A.C., Michael, L. and Miller, R. Story comprehension through argumentation. In Simon Parsons, Nir Oren, Chris Reed, and Federico Cerutti, editors, Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2014, Scottish Highlands, UK, volume 266 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 2014, pp. 31–42, IOS Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Diakidoy I.A., Michael, L. and Kakas, A.C. Knowledge activation in story comprehension. The Journal of Cognitive Science, 18, 2017, pp. 439–471.10.17791/jcs.2017.18.4.439
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Diakidoy I. A., Michael, L., Kakas, A.C. and Miller, R. Story Comprehension through Argumentation. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), 2014, pp. 31–42, IOS Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Novaes, C.T. The Dialogical Roots of Deduction: Historical, Cognitive, and Philosophical Perspectives on Reasoning, 2020, Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. van Eemeren, F.H. and Grootendorst, R. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach, 2003, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616389
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Greco, S. and Rigotti, E. Inference in Argumentation: A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes, 2019, Springer Verlag.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Hadjisoteriou, E. and Kakas, A. C. Reasoning about actions and change in argumentation. Argument Computation, 6 (3), 2015, pp. 265–291.10.1080/19462166.2015.1123774
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Johnson-Laird, P. Mental Models, 1983, Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Kakas, A.C., Mancarella, P. and Toni, F. On argumentation logic and propositional logic. Studia Logica, 106 (2), 2018, pp. 237–279.10.1007/s11225-017-9736-x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Kakas, A.C., Moraitis, P. and Spanoudakis, N.I. GORGIAS: Applying argumentation. Argument & Computation, 10 (1), 2019, pp.55–81.10.3233/AAC-181006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Kakas, A.C., Toni, F. and Mancarella, P. Argumentation logic. In Simon Parsons, Nir Oren, Chris Reed, and Federico Cerutti, editors, Computational Models of Argument - COMMA 2014, volume 266 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 2014, pp. 345–356. IOS Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Kakas, A.C. Informalizing formal logic. Informal Logic, 39 (2), 2019, pp.169–204.10.22329/il.v39i2.5169
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Kakas, A. C. and Mancarella, P. On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation, 23 (5), 2013, pp.991–1015.10.1093/logcom/exs068
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. McCarthy, J. Programs with common sense. In Proc. of Teddington Conf. on Mechanization of Thought Processes, 1959, pp. 75–91.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Mercier, H. and Sperber, D. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34 (2), 2011, pp.57–74.10.1017/S0140525X1000096821447233
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Mercier, H. The argumentative theory: Predictions and empirical evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20 (9), 2016, pp.689 – 700.10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.00127450708
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Michael, L. and Kakas, A.C. Knowledge qualification through argumentation. In Esra Erdem, Fangzhen Lin, and Torsten Schaub, editors, Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, 10th International Conference, LPNMR 2009, Potsdam, Germany. Volume 5753 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2009, pp. 209–222. Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_19
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Moschovakis, J. Intuitionistic Logic. In Edward N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Fall 2021 edition, 2021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Perelman C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation, 1969, Notre Dame/London: University of Notre Dame Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Pollock, J. L. Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11(4), 1987, pp.81–518.10.1207/s15516709cog1104_4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Priest, G., Tanaka K. and Zalta, E.N. Paraconsistent logic. In Edward N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition), 2022.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Dietz, E. and Kakas, A.C. Cognitive argumentation for human syllogistic reasoning. Künstliche Intell., 33(3), 2019, pp.229–242.10.1007/s13218-019-00608-y
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Dietz, E. and Kakas, A.C. Cognitive argumentation and the suppression task. CoRR, abs/2002.10149, 2020.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Dietz, E. and Kakas, A.C. Cognitive argumentation and the selection task. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 43, 2021, pp. 1588-1594, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4n0867c7, 2021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Toumlin, S.E. The Uses of Argument, 1958, Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Walton, D.N. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning, 1995, Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Walton, D.N., Reed C. and Macagno, F. Argumentation Schemes, 2008, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802034
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2022-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2299-0518

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 6 - 17

Published on: Jan 5, 2023

Published by: University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

Keywords:

Reasoning,

argumentation,

Aristotle

Related subjects:

Business and economics,

Political economics,

Political economics, other,

Mathematics,

Logic and set theory,

Philosophy,

Philosophy, other

© 2023 Antonis Kakas, published by University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 11 (2022): Issue 3-4 (December 2022)