Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Argumentation: Reasoning Universalis Cover
By: Antonis Kakas  
Open Access
|Jan 2023

References

  1. 1. Bondarenko, A., Dung, P.M., Kowalski, R.A. and Toni, F. An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artificial. Intelligence 93, 1997, pp. 63–101.10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00015-5
  2. 2. Diakidoy, I.A., Kakas, A.C., Michael, L. and Miller, R. Story comprehension through argumentation. In Simon Parsons, Nir Oren, Chris Reed, and Federico Cerutti, editors, Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2014, Scottish Highlands, UK, volume 266 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 2014, pp. 31–42, IOS Press.
  3. 3. Diakidoy I.A., Michael, L. and Kakas, A.C. Knowledge activation in story comprehension. The Journal of Cognitive Science, 18, 2017, pp. 439–471.10.17791/jcs.2017.18.4.439
  4. 4. Diakidoy I. A., Michael, L., Kakas, A.C. and Miller, R. Story Comprehension through Argumentation. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), 2014, pp. 31–42, IOS Press.
  5. 5. Novaes, C.T. The Dialogical Roots of Deduction: Historical, Cognitive, and Philosophical Perspectives on Reasoning, 2020, Cambridge University Press.
  6. 6. van Eemeren, F.H. and Grootendorst, R. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach, 2003, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616389
  7. 7. Greco, S. and Rigotti, E. Inference in Argumentation: A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes, 2019, Springer Verlag.
  8. 8. Hadjisoteriou, E. and Kakas, A. C. Reasoning about actions and change in argumentation. Argument Computation, 6 (3), 2015, pp. 265–291.10.1080/19462166.2015.1123774
  9. 9. Johnson-Laird, P. Mental Models, 1983, Cambridge University Press.
  10. 10. Kakas, A.C., Mancarella, P. and Toni, F. On argumentation logic and propositional logic. Studia Logica, 106 (2), 2018, pp. 237–279.10.1007/s11225-017-9736-x
  11. 11. Kakas, A.C., Moraitis, P. and Spanoudakis, N.I. GORGIAS: Applying argumentation. Argument & Computation, 10 (1), 2019, pp.55–81.10.3233/AAC-181006
  12. 12. Kakas, A.C., Toni, F. and Mancarella, P. Argumentation logic. In Simon Parsons, Nir Oren, Chris Reed, and Federico Cerutti, editors, Computational Models of Argument - COMMA 2014, volume 266 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 2014, pp. 345–356. IOS Press.
  13. 13. Kakas, A.C. Informalizing formal logic. Informal Logic, 39 (2), 2019, pp.169–204.10.22329/il.v39i2.5169
  14. 14. Kakas, A. C. and Mancarella, P. On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation, 23 (5), 2013, pp.991–1015.10.1093/logcom/exs068
  15. 15. McCarthy, J. Programs with common sense. In Proc. of Teddington Conf. on Mechanization of Thought Processes, 1959, pp. 75–91.
  16. 16. Mercier, H. and Sperber, D. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34 (2), 2011, pp.57–74.10.1017/S0140525X1000096821447233
  17. 17. Mercier, H. The argumentative theory: Predictions and empirical evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20 (9), 2016, pp.689 – 700.10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.00127450708
  18. 18. Michael, L. and Kakas, A.C. Knowledge qualification through argumentation. In Esra Erdem, Fangzhen Lin, and Torsten Schaub, editors, Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, 10th International Conference, LPNMR 2009, Potsdam, Germany. Volume 5753 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2009, pp. 209–222. Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_19
  19. 19. Moschovakis, J. Intuitionistic Logic. In Edward N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Fall 2021 edition, 2021.
  20. 20. Perelman C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation, 1969, Notre Dame/London: University of Notre Dame Press.
  21. 21. Pollock, J. L. Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11(4), 1987, pp.81–518.10.1207/s15516709cog1104_4
  22. 22. Priest, G., Tanaka K. and Zalta, E.N. Paraconsistent logic. In Edward N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition), 2022.
  23. 23. Dietz, E. and Kakas, A.C. Cognitive argumentation for human syllogistic reasoning. Künstliche Intell., 33(3), 2019, pp.229–242.10.1007/s13218-019-00608-y
  24. 24. Dietz, E. and Kakas, A.C. Cognitive argumentation and the suppression task. CoRR, abs/2002.10149, 2020.
  25. 25. Dietz, E. and Kakas, A.C. Cognitive argumentation and the selection task. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 43, 2021, pp. 1588-1594, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4n0867c7, 2021.
  26. 26. Toumlin, S.E. The Uses of Argument, 1958, Cambridge University Press.
  27. 27. Walton, D.N. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning, 1995, Routledge.
  28. 28. Walton, D.N., Reed C. and Macagno, F. Argumentation Schemes, 2008, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802034
Language: English
Page range: 6 - 17
Published on: Jan 5, 2023
Published by: University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Antonis Kakas, published by University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.