Trends in Argumentation Logic

Almpani, Sofia; Lisanyuk, Elena; Schumann, Andrew

doi:10.2478/sh-2022-0010

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the subject of the special issue Trends in Argumentation Logic. Here we mainly describe two approaches to argumentation logic with explicating monotonic and non-monotonic, or defeasible, reasoning and explain the role of artificial intelligence in applying argumentation logic. Then we give a short overview of the papers contributed to the special issue.

References

1. Alchourrón, C., P. Gärdenfors, D. Makinson, On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions, Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 1985, pp. 510-530.10.2307/2274239
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Almpani, S., Y. Kiouvrekis, P. Stefaneas, P. Frangos, Computational Argumentation for Medical Device Regulatory Classification, International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 31, 2022, DOI: 10.1142/S021821302250005110.1142/S0218213022500051
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Barbashina, E., E. Lisanyuk, Leon Petrażycki on Norms and Their Logical Study, Studia Humana 7: 4, 2018, pp. 30-38.10.2478/sh-2018-0021
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Dung, P.M., On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence 77, 1995, pp. 321-357.10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Eemeren van, F.H., R. Grootendorst, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragmadialectical Approach, Cambridge University Press, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511616389
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Gabbay, D. M., K. Schlechta, A New Perspective on Nonmonotonic Logics, Springer International Publishing AG, 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-46817-4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Kirillova, N., E. Lisanyuk, Truth and legal argumentation in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s, The Karamazov Brothers, Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science 48, 2019, pp. 193-204.10.17223/1998863x/48/19
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Lisanyuk, E., Argumentation, Pavilionis’s meaning continuum and the Kitchen Debate, Problemos 88, 2015, pp. 95-113.10.15388/Problemos.2015.88.8481
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Lisanyuk E. Logical theories of rational behavior, law and argumentation [Логічні теорії раціональної поведінки, право і аргументація], Philosophy of law and contemporary theory of law [Філософія права і загальна теорія права] 1–2, 2014, pp. 148-159, in Ukrainian.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Pollock, J. L., Defeasible Reasoning and Degrees of Justification, Argument and Computation 1 (1), 2010, pp. 7-22.10.1080/19462161003728921
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Prakken, H., Formalising debates about law-making proposals as practical reasoning, [in:] M. Araszkiewicz, K. Pleszka (eds.), Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking. Legisprudence Library Series, Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-3-319-19575-9_11
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Schumann, A. Did the Neo-Babylonians construct a Symbolic Logic for legal proceedings? Journal of Applied Logics – IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications 6: 1, 2019, pp. 31-82.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Schumann, A. Archaeology of Logic, Taylor & Francis Group, 2023.10.1201/9781003316466
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Trends in Argumentation Logic

Abstract

Paradigm

My account