Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Geofoam-enhanced soft embankments with a load distribution slab for improved pavement performance: A 3D numerical analysis Cover

Geofoam-enhanced soft embankments with a load distribution slab for improved pavement performance: A 3D numerical analysis

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Diop, S., Stapelberg, F., Tegegn, K., Ngubelanga, S., & Heath, L. (2011). A review on problem soils in South Africa. Council for Geoscience Report (2011–0062).
  2. Aneke, F. I., Mostafa, M. H., & Moubarak, A. (2021). Resilient modulus and microstructure of unsaturated expansive subgrade stabilised with activated fly ash. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 15, 915–938. doi: 10.1080/19386362.2019.1656919.
  3. Aneke, F. I., Mohamed, M. H., & Azza, M. (2021) Swelling stress effects on shear strength resistance of subgrades, International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 15(8), 939–949, doi: 10.1080/19386362.2019.1656445.
  4. Aneke, F. I., Hanandeh, S., & Kalumba, D. (2023). Evaluation of factors affecting the performance of fiber-reinforced subgrade soil characteristics under cyclic loading. Civil Engineering Journal, 9, 2046–2061.
  5. Underwood, B. S., Guido, Z., Gudipudi, P., & Feinberg, Y. (2017). Increased costs to US pavement infrastructure from future temperature rise. Nature Climate Change, 7(10), 704–707.
  6. King, D. J., Gniel, J., King, L., & Bouazza, A. (2020). Geosynthetic reinforced column supported embankments – designing for serviceability. Australian Geomechanics Journal, 55(1), 27–40.
  7. Wang, Z. J., Jacobs, F., & Ziegler, M. (2017). Influence of geogrid transverse members on strength and deformation behavior of reinforced granular soil. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 38(8), 1–7. (in Chinese).
  8. Ali, K., Shahu, J. T., & Sharma, K. G. (2012). Model tests on geosynthetic reinforced stone columns: a comparative study. Geosynthetics International, 19(4), 292–305.
  9. El Kamash, W., Han, J., & ASCE, F. (2014). Displacements of column-supported embankments over soft clay after widening considering soil consolidation and column layout: Numerical analysis. Soils and Foundations, 54(6), 1054–1069.
  10. Aneke, F. I., & Mostafa, M. H. (2020). Performance assessment of pavement structure using dynamics cone penetrometer (DCP). International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 13, 466–476. doi: 10.1007/s42947-020-0249-z.
  11. Yogendra, T., Mohsin, J., Chandresh, S., Atul, D., & Jignesh, P. (2017) Performance of small group of geosynthetic-reinforced granular piles. Marine Georesources Geotechnology, 35(4), 504–511. doi: 10.1080/1064119X.2016.1213336.
  12. Ng, K. S., & Tan, S. A. (2015) Stress transfer mechanism in 2D and 3D unit cell models for stone column improved ground. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 1, 1–9.
  13. Wijerathna, M., & Liyanapathirana, D. S. (2020) Load transfer mechanism in geosynthetic reinforced column-supported embankments 2020. Geosynthetics International, 27(3), 236–248. doi: 10.1680/jgein.19.00022.
  14. Rojimol, J., & Umashankar B. (2022). Three-dimensional analysis of geogrid reinforced flexible pavement using finite difference program FLAC3D. GEOMATE Journal, 22(92), 41–47. https://geomatejournal.com/geomate/article/view/1720.
  15. Biot, M. A. (1956). General solutions of the equations of elasticity and consolidation for a porous material. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 78, 91–96.
  16. Itasca. (2002). Fluid-mechanical interaction. User’s manual. (p. 161). Itasca Consulting Group.
  17. Yu Z., Jianhui Z., Xu Z., Xiaodong P., Hongwei L., & Hao C. (2017) Finite element analysis of embankment with soft foundation reinforced by geogrids. Modern Civil and Structural Engineering, 1(1), 78–83.
  18. Yu, C., Liu, S. Y., & Ji, T. Y. (2006). Study on the performance of the reinforced piled embankment. In ASCE geotechnical special publication, (Vol. 151, pp. 247–254). American Society of Civil Engineers.
  19. Anjana, B., & Rajagopal, K. (2015). Numerical study of basal reinforced embankments supported on floating/end bearing piles considering pile–soil interaction. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 43(6), 524–536. doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.05.003. ISSN 0266-1144.
  20. Han, J., Huang, J., & Porbaha, A. (2005). 2D numerical modelling of a constructed geosynthetic-reinforced embankment over deep mixed columns. ASCE geotechnical special publication (GSP) No. 131: Contemporary issues in foundation engineering (pp. 24–26). ASCE GeoFrontiers.
  21. Forsman, J. (2001). Geovahvistetutkimus, Koerakenteiden loppuraportti 1996–2001 (Georeinforcement project, final report of test structures 1996–2001). (p. 122). Tiehallinto.
  22. Abdelrahman, G. E., & El Kamash, W. H. (2014). Behaviour improvement of raft foundation on port-said soft clay utilising geofoam. In Ground improvement and geosynthetics: Geo‑Congress 2014. (pp. 557–566). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA, USA.
  23. Yapage, N., Liyanapathirana, S., Kelly, R. B., Poulos, H. G., & Leo, C. J. (2014). Numerical modeling of an embankment over soft ground improved with deep cement mixed columns: Case history. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 140(11), 04014062. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001165.
  24. Itasca. (2005). Manual, F. U. S. Itasca Consulting Group.
  25. Bruce, D. A. (2001). An introduction to the deep mixing methods as used in geotechnical applications, Vol. III: The verification and properties of treated ground. (Report No. FHWA‑RD‑99‑167). Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, USA, 455 pp.
  26. Hong, Y. S., Wu, C. S., & Yu. Y.-S. (2016). Model tests on geotextile-encased granular columns under 1-g and undrained conditions. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 44:13–27. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.006.
  27. Ali-Mohammadi, H., Schaefer, V. R., Zheng, J., & Li, H. (2021). Performance evaluation of geosynthetic reinforced flexible pavement: A review of full-scale field studies. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 14(1), 30–42.
  28. Zadeh-Mohamad, M., Luo, N., Abu-Farsakh, M., & Voyiadjis, G. (2022). Evaluating long-term benefits of geosynthetics in flexible pavements built over weak subgrades by finite element and mechanistic-empirical analyses. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 50(3), 455–469.
  29. Ali-Mohammadi, H., Zheng, J., Schaefer, V. R., Siekmeier, J., & Velasquez, R. (2021). Evaluation of geogrid reinforcement of flexible pavement performance: A review of large-scale laboratory studies. Transportation Geotechnics, 27, 100471.
  30. Pedroso, G. O. M., Ramos, G., & Da Silva, J. L. (2022). Evaluating geosynthetic base stabilisation on lateritic gravel and granular material under cyclic moving wheel loads. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, e00880.
  31. Chen, J. F., Xue, J. F., & Feng, S. Z. (2015). Failure mechanism of geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft soils under embankment. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 43(5), 424–431. doi: 10.1016/j geotexmem.2015.04.016.
  32. Sarker, D., & Wang, J. X. (2022). Characterisation of soil-geosynthetic interaction to evaluate reinforcement location in pavement over expansive soils. In Proceedings of Geo-congress 2022. (pp. 367–379). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA, USA.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2026-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 62
Submitted on: May 1, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 11, 2026
Published on: May 7, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Aneke I. Frank, Walid El Kamash, Mohamed M. H. Mostafa, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.