Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Pile–Soil Interaction during Static Load Test Cover
Open Access
|Jun 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Graphical description of the loads acting on a pile in the presented approach. D – Pile diameter [m]; h – Pile length [m]; N2 – Load acting on the head of the pile [N]; N1 – Soil reaction at the toe [N]; T – Pile skin resistance [N]; s2,1 – Settlement value of the head and base of the pile [mm]; σ1 – Stress under the base of the pile [Pa]; τ – Stress acting on the skin of the pile, representing the skin resistance [Pa]; l – Arm of the soil deformation according to Kirchhoff's principle [m].

Figure 2:

Location of a static load test project in Northern Poland, Szczecin, Leona Heyki 3 street.

Figure 3:

Pile designed for testing with visible extensometers attached to the reinforcing steel while casting (image captured by the author).

Figure 4:

Part of the site prepared for static load testing (image captured by the author).

Figure 5:

Distribution of the axial force along the pile shaft and deformation of the pile shaft measured during the static load test with extensometers [36].

Figure 6:

Completed static load test site ready for testing (image obtained from authors' library).

Figure 7:

CPTu investigation results for Pile 1 [27].

Figure 8:

CPTu investigation results for Pile 2 [27].

Figure 9:

Example of the M–K curve graph [20].

Figure 10:

Least-squares graphs of the results obtained for the analyzed piles.

Figure 11:

Relationship between the load acting on the head of the pile and the shear stress at the head level (τ2) and base level (τ1) for the pile taken from Heyki 1 [by author].

Figure 12:

Relationship between the load acting on the head of the pile and the shear stress at the head level (τ2) and base level (τ1) for the pile taken from Heyki 2 [by author].

Figure 13:

Soil under and around the pile base forming a sphere, where the parameters vary significantly [22, 28].

Figure 14:

M–K curve and static load test results compared for Pile 1 (left) and Pile 2 (right).

Load–settlement values obtained from the static load test; Pile Heyki 1_

N [kN]01452894325767208631007115012951438158117261890
s [mm]0,000,571,141,862,643,694,826,548,3810,8313,3816,4120,2826,08

Load–settlement values obtained from static load test for Pile Heyki 2_

N [kN]01452934315757208641006115112941438158217261896201321562300
s [mm]0,000,711,271,882,573,494,486,047,7710,2413,2416,1319,5923,2027,1431,7336,42

Geotechnical parameters of the soil profile [27]_

qcsvoIDIcqnβqNmΦ′C′Su(Cu)M0

[m][-][-][MPa][KPa][%][-][MPa][-][-][°][kPa][kPa][MPa]
0,0
1,8Mg(hgrcFSa)nN(Pd+H+c+ż)2,203520-2,190,02-29° 30′--9,5
2,3Mg(grchclSa)nN(Pg+H+c+ż)1,3042-0,541,270,0111,122° 10′6989,2
2,5Mg(grchFSa)nN(Pd+H+c+ż)2,205715-2,140,00-29°--9,4
3,8Or(Nm)Nm 0,4592-0,500,380,043,713° 10′3201,1
6,6Or(Nm)Nm 0,65117-0,600,580,125,115° 50′4312,5
7,0Or(Nmp)/HFSa Nmp/PdH1,10133-0,441,000,016,818° 50′5717,9
8,2FSa Pd 3,3014920-3,180,00-29° 20′--14,2
8,6FSa Pd/Ps 6,4017740-6,250,00-32° 10′--28,4
11,1FSa Pd 13,2020865-13,030,00-35° 10′--64,9
11,8FSa Pd 7,3022040-7,120,00-32° 20′--32,4
12,4saSi Πp 2,60236-0,742,400,0011,122° 10′717121,8
13,3FSa Pd 7,0025035-6,800,00-31° 50′--31,1
13,8FSa Pd 11,1026855-10,880,00-33° 50′--54,6
15,2saSi/siSa Πp/Pπ3,40292-0,823,170,0012,222° 50′722628,5
16,2FSa/MSa Pd/Ps 14,0032060-13,740,00-34° 30′--70,3
18,0FSa Pd 7,0034230-6,730,00-31°--31,2
18,4FSa Pd 10,5035345-10,220,00-33°--51,8
19,1FSa/MSa Pd/Ps 15,4040060-15,080,00-34° 30′--75,9

Equation (42) results, left side and right side_

side EQ. (42)Right side Eq.(42)
Pile 10,830,803
Pile 20,850,84
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2024-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 164 - 175
Published on: Jun 22, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Paweł Siemaszko, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.