Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Control Types or Complement Types? On the Licensing of Overt Controlees in Mandarin Chinese Cover

Control Types or Complement Types? On the Licensing of Overt Controlees in Mandarin Chinese

By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Bošković, Željko & I-Ta Chris Hsieh. 2013. On word order, binding relations, and plurality in Chinese noun phrases. Studies in Polish Linguistics 8(4). 173–204.
  2. Givón, Talmy. 1980. The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language 4(3). 333–377. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.4.3.03giv.
  3. Grano, Thomas. 2015. Control and restructuring. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703921.
  4. He, Yuyin. 2020. Time in Mandarin: The fingerprints of tense and finiteness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University dissertation.
  5. He, Yuyin. 2024. Finiteness in Mandarin clausal complements: The role of ICH and future modals. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 33(2). 259–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10831-024-09278-w.
  6. Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic inquiry 30(1). 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999553968.
  7. Hu, Jianhua, Haihua Pan & Liejiong Xu. 2001. Is there a finite vs. nonfinite distinction in Chinese? Linguistics 39. 1117–1148. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.043.
  8. Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
  9. Huang, C.-T. James. 1989. Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 185–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_6.
  10. Huang, C.-T. James. 2017. On finiteness and the architecture of complement clauses. Handout for the talk at National Tsinghua University, 27 October.
  11. Huang, C.-T. James. 2022. Finiteness, opacity, and Chinese clausal architecture. In Andrew Simpson (ed.), New explorations in Chinese theoretical syntax: Studies in honor of Yen-hui Audrey Li, 17–76. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.02hua.
  12. Huang, Nick. 2018. Control complements in Mandarin Chinese: Implications for restructuring and the Chinese finiteness debate. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 27(4). 347–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-018-9185-1.
  13. Huang, Nick. 2024. Finiteness in a language without finite morphology: An experimental study of Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 42(2). 533–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-023-09591-4.
  14. Jiang, Li Julie. 2012. Nominal arguments and language variation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University dissertation.
  15. Jiang, Li Julie. 2017. Mandarin associative plural -men and NPs with -men. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 4(2). 191–256. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.16015.jia.
  16. Jiang, Li Julie. 2020. Nominal arguments and language variation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  17. Kratzer, Angelika. 2009. Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40(2). 187–237. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.187.
  18. Kurafuji, Takeo. 2004. Plural morphemes, definiteness, and the notion of semantic parameter. Language and Linguistics 5(1). 211–242.
  19. Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3943-4.
  20. Landau, Idan. 2013. Control in generative grammar: A research companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Landau, Idan. 2015. A two-tiered theory of control. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262028851.
  22. Lee, Kum Young. 2009. Finite control in Korean. Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa dissertation.
  23. Li, Daoxin. 2024. Controlling overt subjects in Mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 33(3). 333–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-024-09280-2.
  24. Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1985. Abstract case in Chinese. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California dissertation.
  25. Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1898-6.
  26. Lin, Jo-Wang. 2006. Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics 23(1). https://doi.org/1–53.10.1093/jos/ffh033.
  27. Lin, Jo-Wang. 2010. A tenseless analysis of Mandarin Chinese revisited: A response to Sybesma 2007. Linguistic Inquiry 41(2). 305–329. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2010.41.2.305.
  28. Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2011. Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese. Syntax 14(1). 48–73. 10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00145.x.
  29. Lin, T-H Jonah. 2012. Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics 48(1). 151–186. https://doi/org/10.1017/S0022226711000272.
  30. Madigan, Sean William. 2008. Control constructions in Korean. Newark, DE: University of Delaware dissertation.
  31. Meng, Fanjun & Jinglian Li. 2019. Hanyu bufen kongzhi de shixian xingshi ji qi jiedu [The instantiations of partial control in Chinese and their interpretations]. Waiyu Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Foreign language teaching and research] 51(5). 653–664, 799.
  32. Park, Yangsook. 2018. Overt subjects in obligatory control constructions in Korean. In Wm. G. Bennett, Lindsay Hracs & Dennis Ryan Storoshenko (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th West coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL), 305–312. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
  33. Pearson, Hazel. 2012. The sense of self: Topics in the semantics of de se expressions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University dissertation.
  34. Pearson, Hazel. 2016. The semantics of partial control. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34. 691–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9313-9.
  35. Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1956. Quantifiers and propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 53. 177–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2022451.
  36. Ramchand, Gillian & Peter Svenonius. 2014. Deriving the functional hierarchy. Language Sciences 46. 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.013.
  37. Szabolcsi, Anna. 2009. Overt nominative subjects in infinitival complements cross-linguistically: Data, diagnostics, and preliminary analyses. In Patricia Irwin & Violeta Vázquez Rojas Maldonado (eds.), NYU working papers in linguistics, vol 2. New York: New York University.
  38. Ussery, Cherlon, Lydia Ding & Yining Rebecca Liu. 2016. The typology of Mandarin infinitives. In Patrick Farrell (ed.), Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, vol. 1, Article 28, 1–15.
  39. Wurmbrand, Susi & Magdalena Lohninger. 2023. An implicational universal in complementation: Theoretical insights and empirical progress. In Jutta Hartmann and Angelika Wöllstein (eds.), Propositional arguments in cross-linguistic research: Theoretical and empirical issues, 183–232. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  40. Yang, Henrietta Shu-fen. 2005. Plurality and modification in Mandarin nominal phrases. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin dissertation.
  41. Zhang, Niina Ning. 2016. Identifying Chinese dependent clauses in the forms of subjects. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25(3). 275–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-016-9146-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/scl-2025-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2470-8275 | Journal ISSN: 1017-1274
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 74
Submitted on: Jun 29, 2025
Accepted on: Feb 25, 2026
Published on: Jun 30, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Hao Pan, Ruiyang Chen, Xiaoshi Hu, published by The Chinese University of Hong Kong, T.T. Ng Chinese Language Research Centre
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.