References
- Radner S. Thoracal aortography by catheterization from the radial artery. Acta radiol. 1948 Jan 1;29(2):178–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016924809132437
- Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989 Jan 1;16(1):3–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810160103
- Kawamura Y, Yoshimachi F, Nakamura N, Yamamoto Y, Kudo T, Ikari Y. Impact of dedicated hemostasis device for distal radial arterial access with an adequate hemostasis protocol on radial arterial observation by ultrasound. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jan 1;36(1):104–10. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7829236/
- Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, Barbato E, Berry C, Chieffo A, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes: Developed by the task force on the management of acute coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 7;44(38):3720–826. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191
- Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, Rossello X, Adamo M, Ainslie J, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes: Developed by the task force for the management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Endorsed by the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2024 Aug 30;45(36): 3415–3537. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177
- Elmahdy MF, ElMaghawry M, Hassan M, Kassem HH, Said K, Elfaramawy AAA. Comparison of safety and effectiveness between right versus left radial arterial access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Jan 1;26(1):35–40. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27374862/
- Burzotta F, Trani C, De Vita M, Crea F. A new operative classification of both anatomic vascular variants and physiopathologic conditions affecting transradial cardiovascular procedures. Int J Cardiol. 2010 Nov 5;145(1):120–2. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19616324/
- Klimek K, Światek M, Klocek K, Tworek M, Zwolski M, Milewski K, et al. Comparison of safety and efficiency between Tiger-2 catheter with right radial artery access and Judkins catheter with left radial artery access. J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 1;10(17): 4020. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34501468/
- Lee OH, Roh JW, Im E, Cho DK, Jeong MH, Choi D, et al. Feasibility and safety of the left distal radial approach in percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesions. J Clin Med. 2021 May 2;10(10): 2204. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34069701/
- Sciahbasi A, Romagnoli E, Burzotta F, Trani C, Sarandrea A, Summaria F, et al. Transradial approach (left vs right) and procedural times during percutaneous coronary procedures: TALENT study. Am Heart J. 2011;161(1):172–9. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870310009026
- Pelliccia F, Trani C, Biondi-Zoccai GGL, Nazzaro M, Berni A, Patti G, et al. Comparison of the feasibility and effectiveness of transradial coronary angiography via right versus left radial artery approaches (from the PREVAIL study). Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(6):771–5. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914912013343
- Daralammouri Y, Nazzal Z, Mosleh YS, Abdulhaq HK, Khayyat ZY, Hamshary Y El, et al. Distal radial artery access in comparison to forearm radial artery access for cardiac catheterization: a randomized controlled trial (DARFORA trial). J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Jan 1;2022(1):7698583. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7698583
- Tokarek T, Dziewierz A, Plens K, Rakowski T, Januszek R, Zabojszcz M, et al. Comparison of safety and effectiveness between the right and left radial artery approach in percutaneous coronary intervention. Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition). 2022 Feb;75(2):119–28. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33221180/
- Taylor M, Capers IV Q, Patel D, Mehta NK. Rebirth of left radial artery access: could this be the ‘right’ radial artery? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2015 Jun 3;13(6):637–41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1586/14779072.2015.1043271
- Rigatelli G, Zuin M, Daggubati R, Vassilev D, Zuliani G, Nguyen T, et al. Distal snuffbox versus conventional radial artery access: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Access. 2021 Mar 31;23(4):653–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298211005256
- Ploumen EH, Halfwerk FR, van der Kolk R, Grandjean JG, von Birgelen C, van Til JA. Use of the left radial artery as vascular access for coronary angiography and as a bypass conduit: A clinical dilemma? Cardiovascular Revasc Med. 2022;34:134–9. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553838921000427
- Roczniak J, Tarnawski A, Dziewierz A, Glanowski S, Pawlik A, Sabatowski K, et al. Radial artery spasms - angiographic morphology, risk factors and management. Postepy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2024;20(1):53–61. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38616935/
- Youn YJ, Choi DH, Park YJ, Son JW, Lee JW, Ahn MS, et al. Right versus left radial artery access for coronary procedures: Efficacy is more dependent on an operator proficiency than on the access site selection. J Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;1(3):115–123. Available from: https://e-jci.org/pdf/10.54912/jci.2021.0008
- Toprak K, Inanır M, Memioğlu T, Palice A, Kaplangoray M, Yesilay AB, et al. Effect of Hand Dominance on Radial Artery Spasm and Occlusion: A Prospective Observational Study. Angiology. 2024 Apr 1;75(4):340–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36745059/
- Cazares-Diazleal A, Dorantes-Garcia J, Kiamco-Castillo R, Payro-Ramirez G, Betuel-Ivey J, Lozano-Sabido E, et al. Comparison between left and right radial access for coronary angiography. J Cardiovasc Med Cardiol. 2020 Jul 6;7(3):213–9.
- Li L, Zeng ZY, Zhong JM, Wu XH, Zeng SY, Tang EW, et al. Features and variations of a radial artery approach in southern Chinese populations and their clinical significance in percutaneous coronary intervention. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Mar 20;126(6):1046–52. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23506576/
- Kara A, Soylu K, Yildirim U, Uyanik M, Coksevim M, Avci B. Comparative Analysis of right vs. left radial access in percutaneous coronary intervention: impact on silent cerebral ischemia. Medicina (Lithuania). 2024 Aug 1;60(8). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39202475/
- Xia SL, Zhang XB, Zhou JS, Gao X. Comparative efficacy and safety of the left versus right radial approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: A meta-analysis including 6870 patients. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2015 Aug 1;48(8):743–50. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26108097/
- Shah RM, Patel D, Abbate A, Cowley MJ, Jovin IS. Comparison of transradial coronary procedures via right radial versus left radial artery approach: A meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 1;88(7):1027–33. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27037544/
- Will M, Weiss TW, Weber M, Kwok CS, Borovac JA, Lamm G, et al. Left vs. right radial approach for coronary catheterization: Relation to age and severe aortic stenosis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 30;9. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1022415
- Park JY, Rha SW, Choi BG, Oh DJ, Choi CU, Youn YJ, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between the right and left radial artery approaches from the Korean transradial coronary intervention registry. Yonsei Med J. 2017 May 1;58(3):521–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28332356/
- Thirumurugan E, Gomathi K, Swathy P, Afrin SA. Emerging perspectives of anatomical snuff box in invasive cardiology. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2023;20(3):238–41. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/37091263/